[Proto-Scripty] [OT] Rails 3.1 - Prototype = WTF?

2011-03-14 Thread Walter Lee Davis
Sorry for the rant, but I came to Prototype by way of early  
exploration with Rails. I found Prototype approachable and learn-able  
in a way that I didn't (and don't) find jQuery to be.


I've invested years in learning Prototype and it has trained and  
patterned my JavaScript brain. I'm quite cheesed about the notion of  
having to learn another way to look at JavaScript.


At the same time, I can't help but notice the crickets around here  
lately. When I joined this list (back in the rails-spinoff days) there  
were dozens of posts per day, now we're lucky to get there in a week.


What the heck is going on here?

Walter

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Prototype 
 script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



Re: [Proto-Scripty] [OT] Rails 3.1 - Prototype = WTF?

2011-03-14 Thread Jane Hunter
I can tell you my experience, perhaps others have had a similar ones. I
tried jquery and found that I liked its ability to chain a lot. It toggles
more powerfully than prototype. I also like the fact that I only need one
reference for plenty of effects -- as many as I'll ever care about.Jquery
does have some really aggravating aspects. In a couple of instances I have
been able to find an element with plain old javascript that defied jquery
and I'm still figuring out how to manage its events.

Beyond a nice scrollbar, which is only a couple of hundred bytes, I haven't
explored JQuery's plugins, because I like to make my own stuff.

Additionally, because I plan to do freelance asp.net and javascript work
when I retire (soon), I decided that because JQuery is so much more
prevalent and  because Microsoft is beginning to facilitate using it, that's
what I should spend time learning.

Jane

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Walter Lee Davis wa...@wdstudio.comwrote:

 Sorry for the rant, but I came to Prototype by way of early exploration
 with Rails. I found Prototype approachable and learn-able in a way that I
 didn't (and don't) find jQuery to be.

 I've invested years in learning Prototype and it has trained and patterned
 my JavaScript brain. I'm quite cheesed about the notion of having to learn
 another way to look at JavaScript.

 At the same time, I can't help but notice the crickets around here
 lately. When I joined this list (back in the rails-spinoff days) there were
 dozens of posts per day, now we're lucky to get there in a week.

 What the heck is going on here?

 Walter

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
 To post to this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Prototype  script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
prototype-scriptaculous+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-scriptaculous?hl=en.