Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-08 Thread Poppa Bear
Another difference is that HD is 192 KHZ, but some say that it doesn't make a 
difference when it comes to commercial music. 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:17 AM
  Subject: Re: PT vs PT HD


  Hi Jon,


  Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
signal. Sometimes we call that railroad, that is, when people's harmonies 
lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. Compression, 
in this case, is supremely helpful.


  True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route to 
a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
still rules for certain things, eh?


  Slau


  On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:


Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?




On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:


  Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what 
a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
From: Jon Solitro
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
Subject: PT vs PT HD


What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they 
worthwhile?


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
  To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread CHUCK REICHEL
Hi Jon,
For my self its one word!
LATENCY :)
YMMV


CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
www.SoundPictureRecording.com
954-742-0019
GUFFAWING :)
In GOD I Trust

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:

 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to
handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins?

Can I mix in surround without HD?

Sent from my phone

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

Hi Jon,

Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the
expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that
includes. HD Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the
card provides. That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony cards.
I'm not sure if any other systems out there provide that. I know UA is
probably either already doing that or close to it. You mentioned that
latency isn't exactly an issue for you. With Low latency mode on host-based
systems, of course, one can monitor at close to 0 latency but without
real-time plug-in performance. Things will undoubtedly get there with
Thunderbolt in time. Frankly, I think Avid will eventually drop HD when it
gets to that point. For now, it's tough to swallow thousand-dollar upgrades
with HD. I don't think Avid would survive another such upgrade. We'll see…

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:

What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Poppa Bear
Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
mixed down product will feel like.  Message - 
  From: Jon Solitro 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
  Subject: PT vs PT HD


  What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? 

  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Pro Tools Accessibility group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
compressor right? the audio will still clip?


On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
 inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
 mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
i never thought of tracking  like that with plug in comp.

will try that today slau.
very interesting
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Jon,
 
 Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
 control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
 usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
 signal. Sometimes we call that railroad, that is, when people's harmonies 
 lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
 Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
 
 True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
 recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
 to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
 recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
 still rules for certain things, eh?
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
 
 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
 tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
 plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Ok, so I'm confused. What's the difference between HD and HD Native? I thought 
Native meant it uses the computer's processors just like regular Pro Tools. And 
the benefit to HD was the outboard processing cards.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Jon,
 
 Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
 control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
 usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
 signal. Sometimes we call that railroad, that is, when people's harmonies 
 lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
 Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
 
 True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
 recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
 to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
 recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
 still rules for certain things, eh?
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
 
 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
 tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
 plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
 Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Ricky Prevatte
I cannot wait to try this with my ProTools demo. Since I've had this board I 
have had very little clipping at all. Doing this from my Board is very easy. It 
has built in compression and reverb. I can track with reverb or compression and 
not printed it

Ricky Prevatte LMBT 1154 http://www.rickyprevattemassage.com


On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro jon.soli...@gmail.com wrote:

 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
 with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
 compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
 inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
 mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
That's how some cats were using Pro Tools back in the days before I solved the 
metering problem. Insertion of limiter plug-in and recording to another track. 
Again, there's latency but only a little. On HD systems, it's hardly detectable.

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, byron harden wrote:

 i never thought of tracking  like that with plug in comp.
 
 will try that today slau.
 very interesting
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Jon,
 
 Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
 control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, 
 people usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level 
 of signal. Sometimes we call that railroad, that is, when people's 
 harmonies lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
 Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
 
 True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
 recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
 to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
 recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
 still rules for certain things, eh?
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
 
 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
 tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using 
 a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
You're partly correct. HD Native does use native processing but it still uses a 
card for 0 latency routing. The interfaces still connect to a PCI card. Only 
the plug-in processing is handled by the host CPU while routing is handled by 
the card.

HTH,

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:

 Ok, so I'm confused. What's the difference between HD and HD Native? I 
 thought Native meant it uses the computer's processors just like regular Pro 
 Tools. And the benefit to HD was the outboard processing cards.
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Slau Halatyn slauhala...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hi Jon,
 
 Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
 control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, 
 people usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level 
 of signal. Sometimes we call that railroad, that is, when people's 
 harmonies lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
 Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
 
 True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
 recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
 to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
 recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
 still rules for certain things, eh?
 
 Slau
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
 
 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
 tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using 
 a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, Poppa Bear heavens4r...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 Pro Tools Accessibility group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Pro 
Tools Accessibility group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.