Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-08 Thread Poppa Bear
Another difference is that HD is 192 KHZ, but some say that it doesn't make a 
difference when it comes to commercial music. 
  - Original Message - 
  From: Slau Halatyn 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 11:17 AM
  Subject: Re: PT vs PT HD


  Hi Jon,


  Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's harmonies 
lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. Compression, 
in this case, is supremely helpful.


  True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route to 
a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
still rules for certain things, eh?


  Slau


  On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:


Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?




On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:


  Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what 
a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
From: Jon Solitro
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
Subject: PT vs PT HD


What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they 
worthwhile?


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 



  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
  To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
  To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 




  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-06 Thread Byron Harden
real cool 
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Slau Halatyn wrote:

> That's how some cats were using Pro Tools back in the days before I solved 
> the metering problem. Insertion of limiter plug-in and recording to another 
> track. Again, there's latency but only a little. On HD systems, it's hardly 
> detectable.
> 
> Slau
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, byron harden wrote:
> 
>> i never thought of tracking  like that with plug in comp.
>> 
>> will try that today slau.
>> very interesting
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jon,
>>> 
>>> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
>>> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, 
>>> people usually track each other much better when they hear a more even 
>>> level of signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's 
>>> harmonies lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
>>> Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
>>> 
>>> True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
>>> recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and 
>>> route to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the 
>>> compression recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The 
>>> analog domain still rules for certain things, eh?
>>> 
>>> Slau
>>> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
>>> 
 Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
 tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using 
 a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
 
 
 On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
 
> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
> what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
> From: Jon Solitro
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
> Subject: PT vs PT HD
> 
> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
You're partly correct. HD Native does use native processing but it still uses a 
card for 0 latency routing. The interfaces still connect to a PCI card. Only 
the plug-in processing is handled by the host CPU while routing is handled by 
the card.

HTH,

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:38 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:

> Ok, so I'm confused. What's the difference between HD and HD Native? I 
> thought Native meant it uses the computer's processors just like regular Pro 
> Tools. And the benefit to HD was the outboard processing cards.
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jon,
>> 
>> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
>> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, 
>> people usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level 
>> of signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's 
>> harmonies lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
>> Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
>> 
>> True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
>> recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
>> to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
>> recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
>> still rules for certain things, eh?
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
>> 
>>> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
>>> tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using 
>>> a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
>>> 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
That's how some cats were using Pro Tools back in the days before I solved the 
metering problem. Insertion of limiter plug-in and recording to another track. 
Again, there's latency but only a little. On HD systems, it's hardly detectable.

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:29 PM, byron harden wrote:

> i never thought of tracking  like that with plug in comp.
> 
> will try that today slau.
> very interesting
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jon,
>> 
>> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
>> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, 
>> people usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level 
>> of signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's 
>> harmonies lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
>> Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
>> 
>> True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
>> recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
>> to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
>> recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
>> still rules for certain things, eh?
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
>> 
>>> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
>>> tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using 
>>> a plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
>>> 
 Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
 help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
 what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
 From: Jon Solitro
 To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
 Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
 Subject: PT vs PT HD
 
 What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
  
  
 
 -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
 Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
 To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
 To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
 ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Ricky Prevatte
I cannot wait to try this with my ProTools demo. Since I've had this board I 
have had very little clipping at all. Doing this from my Board is very easy. It 
has built in compression and reverb. I can track with reverb or compression and 
not printed it

Ricky Prevatte LMBT 1154 http://www.rickyprevattemassage.com


On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro  wrote:

> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
> with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
> compressor right? the audio will still clip?
> 
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
> 
>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
>> inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
>> mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
>> From: Jon Solitro
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
>> Subject: PT vs PT HD
>> 
>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Ok, so I'm confused. What's the difference between HD and HD Native? I thought 
Native meant it uses the computer's processors just like regular Pro Tools. And 
the benefit to HD was the outboard processing cards.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:

> Hi Jon,
> 
> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
> usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
> signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's harmonies 
> lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
> Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
> 
> True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
> recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
> to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
> recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
> still rules for certain things, eh?
> 
> Slau
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
> 
>> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
>> tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
>> plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
>>> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
>>> what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
>>> From: Jon Solitro
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
>>> Subject: PT vs PT HD
>>> 
>>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
i never thought of tracking  like that with plug in comp.

will try that today slau.
very interesting
On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:

> Hi Jon,
> 
> Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
> control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
> usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
> signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's harmonies 
> lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. 
> Compression, in this case, is supremely helpful.
> 
> True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original 
> recording. It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route 
> to a bus and then another track. The second track would have the compression 
> recorded. Then, of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain 
> still rules for certain things, eh?
> 
> Slau
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:
> 
>> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is 
>> tracking with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a 
>> plugin compressor right? the audio will still clip?
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
>> 
>>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  
>>> help inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of 
>>> what a mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
>>> From: Jon Solitro
>>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
>>> Subject: PT vs PT HD
>>> 
>>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
Hi Jon,

Tracking with compression, at least in plug-in form, would be helpful to 
control dynamics. Especially when working with more than one vocalist, people 
usually track each other much better when they hear a more even level of 
signal. Sometimes we call that "railroad," that is, when people's harmonies 
lock together like railroad tracks because the blend is so solid. Compression, 
in this case, is supremely helpful.

True, in plug-in form, the compression will not affect the original recording. 
It is possible, however, to apply compressor to a track and route to a bus and 
then another track. The second track would have the compression recorded. Then, 
of course, you're looking at more latency. The analog domain still rules for 
certain things, eh?

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:

> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
> with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
> compressor right? the audio will still clip?
> 
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
> 
>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
>> inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
>> mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
>> From: Jon Solitro
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
>> Subject: PT vs PT HD
>> 
>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread byron harden
hello john

   i've recently got a hd system.

i generally  work projects that have very high track counts, so i need a lot of 
processing power, as well as a lot of voicings.

having access to the dsp thing is great for me.

i also feel it sounds better, that could just be wishful thinking.  lol

to me it is all predicated on what you are doing

awesome
On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Jon Solitro  wrote:

> Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
> with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
> compressor right? the audio will still clip?
> 
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:
> 
>> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
>> inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
>> mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
>> From: Jon Solitro
>> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
>> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
>> Subject: PT vs PT HD
>> 
>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Makes sense. This topic is slowly morphing….another question….how is tracking 
with compression helpful? It's all after the fact if you're using a plugin 
compressor right? the audio will still clip?


On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:38 PM, "Poppa Bear"  wrote:

> Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
> inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
> mixed down product will feel like.  Message -
> From: Jon Solitro
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
> Subject: PT vs PT HD
> 
> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Poppa Bear
Yeh, I myself track with reverb and compression. The reverb does often  help 
inspire the performer and the compression helps me to get an idea of what a 
mixed down product will feel like.  Message - 
  From: Jon Solitro 
  To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 7:14 AM
  Subject: PT vs PT HD


  What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile? 

  -- 
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
   
   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
Well, occasionally, you might want to track with certain reverbs or delays on 
certain tracks. It can sometimes help inspire a performance. Also, for those 
who track with  amp simulation, it's a pretty big consideration. Again, I'm 
sure that'll all change in the very near future.

Not sure about the surround question. For the longest time, surround was only 
for HD. that's not to say you couldn't approximate a surround mix with a host 
system but you could only keep the mix static rather than doing dynamic pans 
between, say, left and right surround channels. That might have changed with 
10, I haven't ever checked. The only surround stuff I've done was in HD.

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 12:25 PM, Jon Solitro wrote:

> Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to 
> handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins?
> 
> Can I mix in surround without HD? 
> 
> Sent from my phone
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jon,
>> 
>> Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the 
>> expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that includes. 
>> HD Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the card 
>> provides. That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony cards. I'm 
>> not sure if any other systems out there provide that. I know UA is probably 
>> either already doing that or close to it. You mentioned that latency isn't 
>> exactly an issue for you. With Low latency mode on host-based systems, of 
>> course, one can monitor at close to 0 latency but without real-time plug-in 
>> performance. Things will undoubtedly get there with Thunderbolt in time. 
>> Frankly, I think Avid will eventually drop HD when it gets to that point. 
>> For now, it's tough to swallow thousand-dollar upgrades with HD. I don't 
>> think Avid would survive another such upgrade. We'll see…
>> 
>> Slau
>> 
>> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:
>> 
>>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>>  
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
Yeah thats what I was thinking. I have a quad core Mac pro which seems to
handle anything. What is the benefit of tracking with plug ins?

Can I mix in surround without HD?

Sent from my phone

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Slau Halatyn  wrote:

Hi Jon,

Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the
expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that
includes. HD Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the
card provides. That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony cards.
I'm not sure if any other systems out there provide that. I know UA is
probably either already doing that or close to it. You mentioned that
latency isn't exactly an issue for you. With Low latency mode on host-based
systems, of course, one can monitor at close to 0 latency but without
real-time plug-in performance. Things will undoubtedly get there with
Thunderbolt in time. Frankly, I think Avid will eventually drop HD when it
gets to that point. For now, it's tough to swallow thousand-dollar upgrades
with HD. I don't think Avid would survive another such upgrade. We'll see…

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:

What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




 --
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Slau Halatyn
Hi Jon,

Aside from 0 latency, HD systems include all of the extra options that the 
expanded toolkits provide. These days, I'm not even sure what that includes. HD 
Native systems also have 0 latency because of the routing the card provides. 
That 0 latency is also possible on Apogee's Symphony cards. I'm not sure if any 
other systems out there provide that. I know UA is probably either already 
doing that or close to it. You mentioned that latency isn't exactly an issue 
for you. With Low latency mode on host-based systems, of course, one can 
monitor at close to 0 latency but without real-time plug-in performance. Things 
will undoubtedly get there with Thunderbolt in time. Frankly, I think Avid will 
eventually drop HD when it gets to that point. For now, it's tough to swallow 
thousand-dollar upgrades with HD. I don't think Avid would survive another such 
upgrade. We'll see…

Slau

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:

> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread Jon Solitro
I don't have any latency issues right now….if I do I adjust the buffer size. 
Would there be the same latency issues with HD Native?


On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:32 AM, CHUCK REICHEL  
wrote:

> Hi Jon,
> For my self its one word!
> LATENCY :)
> YMMV
> 
> 
> CHUCK REICHEL
> soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
> www.SoundPictureRecording.com
> 954-742-0019
> GUFFAWING :)
> In GOD I Trust
> 
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:
> 
>> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ptaccess/HE4W4Z9P0iw/unsubscribe?hl=en.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.




Re: PT vs PT HD

2013-04-05 Thread CHUCK REICHEL
Hi Jon,
For my self its one word!
LATENCY :)
YMMV


CHUCK REICHEL
soundpicturerecord...@gmail.com
www.SoundPictureRecording.com
954-742-0019
GUFFAWING :)
In GOD I Trust

On Apr 5, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Jon Solitro wrote:

> What have people found are the benefits of going HD? Are they worthwhile?
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro 
Tools Accessibility" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.