Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
Back to the which is best question, I think at this stage it depends on what you are mostly using it for or what you want to use it for. If you mostly or only work with audio I would say pro tools but if you mostly use MIDI and soft synths to make your music, sonar is definatly better at this stage. If you already have a powerfull pc with jaws, I would say go for sonar but if you have a mac get pro tools and if you later need it, you can install windows on your mac and use sonar. Brian Casey wrote: > Hmm, so I did completely miss that whole development. > > Would you mind dropping me a mail off-list if you've experience with it to > elaborate? > > Regards, > Brian. > > -- > From: "Monkey Pusher" > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 8:52 PM > To: > Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar > > > Much like sonar on the PC there is a a reaper plug in to allow it to > > interface better with screen readers. It's called Reaacces and its > > allows reaper to interface with jaws, window eyes, NVDA, and System > > Access. Once you have your screen reader of choice installed, install > > reaper and then install reaaccess and you should be up and running. > > > > On 1/6/12, Brian Casey wrote: > >> > >> Hi Steven, > >> > >> Have I missed something completely, is Reaper now accessible? > >> > >> Or were you simply talking in general terms? > >> > >> Brian. > >> > >> -- > >> From: "Stephen Martin" > >> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:58 AM > >> To: > >> Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar > >> > >>> In my opinion, If you got a powerful enough PC get Sonar or Reaper. In > >>> the end they all do the same things with pretty much the same features, > >>> and are all capble of making professional consumer recordings. It's just > >>> the way of getting there is different.The advantage of Pro Tools is > >>> being > >>> able to walk into just about any studio in the world with a pro tools > >>> session and being able to open it up. Though if you use sonar or reaper, > >>> it's simply a matter of exporting the raw tracks and importing them into > >>> pro tools at the studio. > >>> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:34 PM, J�rgen Skov Nielsen wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello all > >>>> One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, > >>>> Protools for mac or sonar for windows. > >>>> I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question > >>>> best regards jorgen > >>> > >>> > >> > >
Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
Hmm, so I did completely miss that whole development. Would you mind dropping me a mail off-list if you've experience with it to elaborate? Regards, Brian. -- From: "Monkey Pusher" Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 8:52 PM To: Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar Much like sonar on the PC there is a a reaper plug in to allow it to interface better with screen readers. It's called Reaacces and its allows reaper to interface with jaws, window eyes, NVDA, and System Access. Once you have your screen reader of choice installed, install reaper and then install reaaccess and you should be up and running. On 1/6/12, Brian Casey wrote: Hi Steven, Have I missed something completely, is Reaper now accessible? Or were you simply talking in general terms? Brian. -- From: "Stephen Martin" Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:58 AM To: Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar In my opinion, If you got a powerful enough PC get Sonar or Reaper. In the end they all do the same things with pretty much the same features, and are all capble of making professional consumer recordings. It's just the way of getting there is different.The advantage of Pro Tools is being able to walk into just about any studio in the world with a pro tools session and being able to open it up. Though if you use sonar or reaper, it's simply a matter of exporting the raw tracks and importing them into pro tools at the studio. On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen wrote: Hello all One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, Protools for mac or sonar for windows. I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question best regards jorgen
Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
Much like sonar on the PC there is a a reaper plug in to allow it to interface better with screen readers. It's called Reaacces and its allows reaper to interface with jaws, window eyes, NVDA, and System Access. Once you have your screen reader of choice installed, install reaper and then install reaaccess and you should be up and running. On 1/6/12, Brian Casey wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > Have I missed something completely, is Reaper now accessible? > > Or were you simply talking in general terms? > > Brian. > > -- > From: "Stephen Martin" > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:58 AM > To: > Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar > >> In my opinion, If you got a powerful enough PC get Sonar or Reaper. In >> the end they all do the same things with pretty much the same features, >> and are all capble of making professional consumer recordings. It's just >> the way of getting there is different.The advantage of Pro Tools is being >> able to walk into just about any studio in the world with a pro tools >> session and being able to open it up. Though if you use sonar or reaper, >> it's simply a matter of exporting the raw tracks and importing them into >> pro tools at the studio. >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen wrote: >> >>> Hello all >>> One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, >>> Protools for mac or sonar for windows. >>> I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question >>> best regards jorgen >> >> >
Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
Hi Steven, Have I missed something completely, is Reaper now accessible? Or were you simply talking in general terms? Brian. -- From: "Stephen Martin" Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 3:58 AM To: Subject: Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar In my opinion, If you got a powerful enough PC get Sonar or Reaper. In the end they all do the same things with pretty much the same features, and are all capble of making professional consumer recordings. It's just the way of getting there is different.The advantage of Pro Tools is being able to walk into just about any studio in the world with a pro tools session and being able to open it up. Though if you use sonar or reaper, it's simply a matter of exporting the raw tracks and importing them into pro tools at the studio. On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen wrote: Hello all One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, Protools for mac or sonar for windows. I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question best regards jorgen
Re: what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
In my opinion, If you got a powerful enough PC get Sonar or Reaper. In the end they all do the same things with pretty much the same features, and are all capble of making professional consumer recordings. It's just the way of getting there is different.The advantage of Pro Tools is being able to walk into just about any studio in the world with a pro tools session and being able to open it up. Though if you use sonar or reaper, it's simply a matter of exporting the raw tracks and importing them into pro tools at the studio. On Jan 5, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Jørgen Skov Nielsen wrote: > Hello all > One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, > Protools for mac or sonar for windows. > I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question > best regards jorgen
what is best for a blind Protools or sonar
Hello all One of my blind friends have asked me, what is best for a blind user, Protools for mac or sonar for windows. I hope anyone here on this list can answer this question best regards jorgen
