[widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009
Begin forwarded message: From: ext Marcos Caceres marc...@opera.com Date: November 17, 2009 11:50:04 AM EST To: public-webapps public-webapps@w3.org Subject: [widgets] Interface published Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/4b02d43c.2040...@opera.com Hi all, Widget interface spec ready for publication (Last Call) [1]. Will be out sometime today (if not already published). Thanks Marcos! And test suite files are now online [2]. [[ ++ MWTS WG ]] Enjoy in moderation! Kind regards, Marcos [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/ [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/test-suite/ Note this spec was formally published as the Widgets APIs and Events spec. If you have any comments re this LCWD: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-widgets-apis-20091117/ Please send them to public-webapps@w3.org by 8 December at the latest. -Art Barstow
Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009
Le mardi 17 novembre 2009 à 12:01 -0500, Arthur Barstow a écrit : And test suite files are now online [2]. [[ ++ MWTS WG ]] [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/test-suite/ To be fair, that work only represents Marcos’s efforts so far — I did contribute some test cases, but they haven’t been integrated or reviewed yet. Definitely Marcos++ :) Dom
Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Interface; deadline 8 December 2009
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux d...@w3.org wrote: Le mardi 17 novembre 2009 à 12:01 -0500, Arthur Barstow a écrit : And test suite files are now online [2]. [[ ++ MWTS WG ]] [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-api/test-suite/ To be fair, that work only represents Marcos’s efforts so far — I did contribute some test cases, but they haven’t been integrated or reviewed yet. Definitely Marcos++ :) Dom is correct. Apologies, I should have made it clear as to what constitutes the test suite at present: The test suite has 100% coverage of the English prose that contains the word MUST in a normative sense - the tests served as a way for me to proof read the specification. That is, the intent of the current test cases is to double check that prose could be translated into tests that run on an identified product (in this case, a user agent). The tests do not thoroughly test the WebIDL, which Dom's IDL test case generator will thoroughly tests. I will work with Dom on getting those tests into the test suite over the next week or so. Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
