Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Glassfish custom provider and 'file does not exist'

[Sans]

Hi Gavin,

I know it's almost a 2 yrs. old thread but I'm still getting the very same 
"*Could 
not find a suitable provider for domain*" error. Did you able to solve the 
this prob at all in the end?

Best!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/ae1ca1c2-36ca-4248-9a16-634eb364c4d3%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Glassfish custom provider and 'file does not exist'

[Sans]

Hi Gavin,

I know it's almost a 2 yrs. old thread but I'm still getting the very same 
"*Could 
not find a suitable provider for domain*" error. Did you able to solve the 
this prob at all in the end?

Best!


On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 9:36:33 PM UTC+1, Gavin Williams wrote:
>
> Stefan 
>
> Cheers for the feedback. 
>
> Understood on the exists element. 
>
> Yes, what I'm trying to achieve is a working provider without asadmin 
> being in the path. That's what I've worked towards by using a full path to 
> the relevant asadmin file, as it's possible a given node could have one or 
> more versions of glassfish installed. 
>
> Currently, the asadmin path gets calculated using several parameter 
> values, which allows a user calling the class to override any given 
> parameter. 
>
> The actual command execution appears to work as expected currently, though 
> will take another look at the execute command. 
>
> Cheers 
> Gavin 
> On Oct 24, 2012 6:15 PM, "Stefan Schulte"  > wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 03:38:20AM -0700, Gavin Williams wrote:
>> > Ok, I've gone about it a slightly different way now, and have stripped 
>> the
>> > 'commands' argument from the domain function provider, and am trying to
>> > validate the presence of asadmin at the main asadmin.rb level.
>> >
>> > I've created an 'exists?' definition, but it doesn't appear to be 
>> getting
>> > called. Any ideas how I can force it to be called prior to attempting to
>> > execute asadmin?
>> >
>> > Latest code commit has been pushed to github, available here:
>> > 
>> https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/429f9e8e1d08e99c69d8ffdcb3043648af5fa18a
>> >
>> > Any comments welcome.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Gavin
>>
>> Your exists? method in puppet/provider/domain/el.rb overwrites the
>> exists? method in puppet/provider/asadmin.rb. I don't know if you get
>> problems when you have an el.rb file but you define an asadmin provider
>> here. This may create classname clashes with the asadmin provider defined 
>> in
>> provider/asadmin.rb
>>
>> The exists? method in asadmin.rb is not going to work because `commands`
>> is a class method while `exists` is an instance method. It does make no
>> sense to call `commands` inside an instance method.
>>
>> What exactly are you trying to archive anyhow? If the excutable is not in
>> PATH how should your provider work? The best approach in my opinion
>> is to always specify the full path to the executable. If you want your
>> provider considered suitable even if commands are missing, you can use
>>
>>   optional_commands :asadmin => 'binary_that_may_be_absent'
>>
>> If you want the user to supply the path to the binary via a resource
>> parameter then you cannot realize this at a class level but at an
>> instance level. That beeing said, you cannot define your executables
>> with use the `commands` method.
>>
>> To execute something you can use the execute method. You then have to
>> do something like.
>>
>>   output = execute([resource[:asadmin_binary], "arg1", "arg2"])
>>
>> -Stefan
>>
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:01:47 UTC+1, Gavin Williams wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi there,
>> > >
>> > > I'm trying to setup Glassfish config management using puppet.
>> > > I've found larstobi's module here
>> > > which I've cloned and 
>> am
>> > > starting to tweak, as it would appear that the mentioned module is 
>> based on
>> > > Solaris, therefore I'm starting to add support for EL. My code tree is
>> > > here .
>> > >
>> > > The challenge I'm hitting currently is that upon executing, it's 
>> failing
>> > > with
>> > >
>> > >> *err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain*
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > When running at debug level, I can see the following:
>> > >
>> > >> *debug: Puppet::Type::Domain::ProviderAsadmin: file asadmin does not
>> > >> exist
>> > >> debug: Class[Glassfish::Domain]: The container Stage[main] will 
>> propagate
>> > >> my refresh event
>> > >> err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain
>> > >> *
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I've verified that the asadmin file exists, as follows:
>> > >
>> > >> *notice: /Stage[main]/Glassfish::Domain/Notify[gfdomain]/message:
>> > >> defined 'message' as 'Creating Glassfish domain cms using portbase 
>> 9000.
>> > >>  Asadmin file is: /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin.'*
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > *# file /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin
>> > >> /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin: POSIX shell script text 
>> executable
>> > >> *
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > > So the file definitely exists, and is a valid 'asadmin' file.
>> > >
>> > > Any ideas?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers
>> > > Gavin
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
>> > To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_pJvxmzaEmUJ.
>> > To post to this group, send 

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Glassfish custom provider and 'file does not exist'

[fatmcgav]

Stefan

Cheers for the feedback.

Understood on the exists element.

Yes, what I'm trying to achieve is a working provider without asadmin being
in the path. That's what I've worked towards by using a full path to the
relevant asadmin file, as it's possible a given node could have one or more
versions of glassfish installed.

Currently, the asadmin path gets calculated using several parameter values,
which allows a user calling the class to override any given parameter.

The actual command execution appears to work as expected currently, though
will take another look at the execute command.

Cheers
Gavin
On Oct 24, 2012 6:15 PM, "Stefan Schulte" 
wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 03:38:20AM -0700, Gavin Williams wrote:
> > Ok, I've gone about it a slightly different way now, and have stripped
> the
> > 'commands' argument from the domain function provider, and am trying to
> > validate the presence of asadmin at the main asadmin.rb level.
> >
> > I've created an 'exists?' definition, but it doesn't appear to be getting
> > called. Any ideas how I can force it to be called prior to attempting to
> > execute asadmin?
> >
> > Latest code commit has been pushed to github, available here:
> >
> https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/429f9e8e1d08e99c69d8ffdcb3043648af5fa18a
> >
> > Any comments welcome.
> >
> > Regards
> > Gavin
>
> Your exists? method in puppet/provider/domain/el.rb overwrites the
> exists? method in puppet/provider/asadmin.rb. I don't know if you get
> problems when you have an el.rb file but you define an asadmin provider
> here. This may create classname clashes with the asadmin provider defined
> in
> provider/asadmin.rb
>
> The exists? method in asadmin.rb is not going to work because `commands`
> is a class method while `exists` is an instance method. It does make no
> sense to call `commands` inside an instance method.
>
> What exactly are you trying to archive anyhow? If the excutable is not in
> PATH how should your provider work? The best approach in my opinion
> is to always specify the full path to the executable. If you want your
> provider considered suitable even if commands are missing, you can use
>
>   optional_commands :asadmin => 'binary_that_may_be_absent'
>
> If you want the user to supply the path to the binary via a resource
> parameter then you cannot realize this at a class level but at an
> instance level. That beeing said, you cannot define your executables
> with use the `commands` method.
>
> To execute something you can use the execute method. You then have to
> do something like.
>
>   output = execute([resource[:asadmin_binary], "arg1", "arg2"])
>
> -Stefan
>
> >
> > On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:01:47 UTC+1, Gavin Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to setup Glassfish config management using puppet.
> > > I've found larstobi's module here
> > > which I've cloned and
> am
> > > starting to tweak, as it would appear that the mentioned module is
> based on
> > > Solaris, therefore I'm starting to add support for EL. My code tree is
> > > here .
> > >
> > > The challenge I'm hitting currently is that upon executing, it's
> failing
> > > with
> > >
> > >> *err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain*
> > >>
> > >
> > > When running at debug level, I can see the following:
> > >
> > >> *debug: Puppet::Type::Domain::ProviderAsadmin: file asadmin does not
> > >> exist
> > >> debug: Class[Glassfish::Domain]: The container Stage[main] will
> propagate
> > >> my refresh event
> > >> err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain
> > >> *
> > >
> > >
> > > I've verified that the asadmin file exists, as follows:
> > >
> > >> *notice: /Stage[main]/Glassfish::Domain/Notify[gfdomain]/message:
> > >> defined 'message' as 'Creating Glassfish domain cms using portbase
> 9000.
> > >>  Asadmin file is: /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin.'*
> > >>
> > >
> > > *# file /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin
> > >> /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin: POSIX shell script text
> executable
> > >> *
> > >>
> > >
> > > So the file definitely exists, and is a valid 'asadmin' file.
> > >
> > > Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > > Gavin
> > >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Puppet Users" group.
> > To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_pJvxmzaEmUJ.
> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>

Re: [Puppet Users] Re: Glassfish custom provider and 'file does not exist'

[Stefan Schulte]

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 03:38:20AM -0700, Gavin Williams wrote:
> Ok, I've gone about it a slightly different way now, and have stripped the 
> 'commands' argument from the domain function provider, and am trying to 
> validate the presence of asadmin at the main asadmin.rb level. 
> 
> I've created an 'exists?' definition, but it doesn't appear to be getting 
> called. Any ideas how I can force it to be called prior to attempting to 
> execute asadmin? 
> 
> Latest code commit has been pushed to github, available here: 
> https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/429f9e8e1d08e99c69d8ffdcb3043648af5fa18a
> 
> Any comments welcome. 
> 
> Regards
> Gavin 

Your exists? method in puppet/provider/domain/el.rb overwrites the
exists? method in puppet/provider/asadmin.rb. I don't know if you get
problems when you have an el.rb file but you define an asadmin provider
here. This may create classname clashes with the asadmin provider defined in
provider/asadmin.rb

The exists? method in asadmin.rb is not going to work because `commands`
is a class method while `exists` is an instance method. It does make no
sense to call `commands` inside an instance method.

What exactly are you trying to archive anyhow? If the excutable is not in
PATH how should your provider work? The best approach in my opinion
is to always specify the full path to the executable. If you want your
provider considered suitable even if commands are missing, you can use

  optional_commands :asadmin => 'binary_that_may_be_absent'

If you want the user to supply the path to the binary via a resource
parameter then you cannot realize this at a class level but at an
instance level. That beeing said, you cannot define your executables
with use the `commands` method.

To execute something you can use the execute method. You then have to
do something like.

  output = execute([resource[:asadmin_binary], "arg1", "arg2"])

-Stefan

> 
> On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:01:47 UTC+1, Gavin Williams wrote:
> >
> > Hi there, 
> >
> > I'm trying to setup Glassfish config management using puppet. 
> > I've found larstobi's module here 
> > which I've cloned and am 
> > starting to tweak, as it would appear that the mentioned module is based on 
> > Solaris, therefore I'm starting to add support for EL. My code tree is 
> > here .
> >
> > The challenge I'm hitting currently is that upon executing, it's failing 
> > with 
> >
> >> *err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain*
> >>
> >
> > When running at debug level, I can see the following:
> >
> >> *debug: Puppet::Type::Domain::ProviderAsadmin: file asadmin does not 
> >> exist
> >> debug: Class[Glassfish::Domain]: The container Stage[main] will propagate 
> >> my refresh event
> >> err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain
> >> *
> >
> >
> > I've verified that the asadmin file exists, as follows:
> >
> >> *notice: /Stage[main]/Glassfish::Domain/Notify[gfdomain]/message: 
> >> defined 'message' as 'Creating Glassfish domain cms using portbase 9000.
> >>  Asadmin file is: /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin.'*
> >>
> >
> > *# file /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin
> >> /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin: POSIX shell script text executable
> >> *
> >>
> >
> > So the file definitely exists, and is a valid 'asadmin' file. 
> >
> > Any ideas? 
> >
> > Cheers
> > Gavin 
> >
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_pJvxmzaEmUJ.
> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

[Puppet Users] Re: Glassfish custom provider and 'file does not exist'

[Gavin Williams]

Ok, I've gone about it a slightly different way now, and have stripped the 
'commands' argument from the domain function provider, and am trying to 
validate the presence of asadmin at the main asadmin.rb level. 

I've created an 'exists?' definition, but it doesn't appear to be getting 
called. Any ideas how I can force it to be called prior to attempting to 
execute asadmin? 

Latest code commit has been pushed to github, available here: 
https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/429f9e8e1d08e99c69d8ffdcb3043648af5fa18a

Any comments welcome. 

Regards
Gavin 

On Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:01:47 UTC+1, Gavin Williams wrote:
>
> Hi there, 
>
> I'm trying to setup Glassfish config management using puppet. 
> I've found larstobi's module here 
> which I've cloned and am 
> starting to tweak, as it would appear that the mentioned module is based on 
> Solaris, therefore I'm starting to add support for EL. My code tree is 
> here .
>
> The challenge I'm hitting currently is that upon executing, it's failing 
> with 
>
>> *err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain*
>>
>
> When running at debug level, I can see the following:
>
>> *debug: Puppet::Type::Domain::ProviderAsadmin: file asadmin does not 
>> exist
>> debug: Class[Glassfish::Domain]: The container Stage[main] will propagate 
>> my refresh event
>> err: Could not find a suitable provider for domain
>> *
>
>
> I've verified that the asadmin file exists, as follows:
>
>> *notice: /Stage[main]/Glassfish::Domain/Notify[gfdomain]/message: 
>> defined 'message' as 'Creating Glassfish domain cms using portbase 9000.
>>  Asadmin file is: /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin.'*
>>
>
> *# file /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin
>> /usr/local/glassfish-3.1.2/bin/asadmin: POSIX shell script text executable
>> *
>>
>
> So the file definitely exists, and is a valid 'asadmin' file. 
>
> Any ideas? 
>
> Cheers
> Gavin 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/_pJvxmzaEmUJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.