[pygtk] Bugs in GnomeMDIGenericChild
Hi, I've noticed some bugs in gnomeuimodule.c, line 966 and following: there are a series of calls to gnome functions with GNOME_MDI_GENERIC_CHILD(mdi) as argument, instead of GNOME_MDI_GENERIC_CHILD(PyGtk_Get (mdi)). Frédéric To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] Re: Small bug in GnomeIconSelection
Hi,
after adding the missing return statement in GnomeIconSelection.get_icon (line
1045 in ui.py) the method works correctly if an icon has been selected.
However, if nothing is selected it gives a segmentation fault.
Cheers
Juergen
from gtk import *
from gnome.ui import *
def get_icon(button, iconSel):
print iconSel.get_icon()
win = GtkWindow()
win.connect("destroy", mainquit)
vbox = GtkVBox()
iconSel = GnomeIconSelection()
iconSel.add_directory('/usr/share/pixmaps')
iconSel.show_icons()
vbox.pack_start(iconSel, expand=TRUE)
button = GtkButton("OK")
button.connect("clicked", get_icon, iconSel)
vbox.pack_start(button)
win.add(vbox)
win.show_all()
mainloop()
--
_
/ __ / / / Jürgen Ehrensberger
/ / / / / Laboratoire de Télécommunications
/ / / / Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
/ / / /1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
_/ _/ _/ _/ Tel: +41 21 693 46 94, Fax: +41 21 693 26 83
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] Bug in GtkRet_FromPyObject
I'm continuing my investigations on MDI ;-) In gtkmodule.c, line 3041, isn't there a break missing ? Frédéric PS : I've write access to the Gnome CVS. Is it ok to fix these kind of bugs without warning ? To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] How to use UIINFO_TOGGLEITEM
Hi all,
in a GnomeApp I created menus including a UIINFO_TOGGLEITEM. However, the
connected callback cannot determine the value of the toggle item, since it
receives a GtkObject of type GtkCheckMenuItem instead of the GtkCheckMenuItem
itself. Therefore the method call __getattr__("active") does not work. Is it
possible to access the GtkCheckMenuItem inside the GtkObject ? For GtkMenus
everything works just fine.
Cheers
Juergen
from gtk import *
from gnome.ui import *
def toggled(checkMenuItem):
print checkMenuItem
print checkMenuItem.__getattr__("active")
win = GnomeApp()
win.connect("destroy", mainquit)
# Gnome Menu
toggle_menu = [UIINFO_TOGGLEITEM("Toggle", cb=toggled)]
main_menu = [UIINFO_SUBTREE('GnomeMenu', toggle_menu)]
win.create_menus(main_menu)
# GtkMenu
vbox = GtkVBox()
gtkMenuBar = GtkMenuBar()
gtkMenuItem = GtkMenuItem("GtkMenu")
gtkSubMenu = GtkMenu()
gtkCheck = GtkCheckMenuItem("Toggle")
gtkCheck.connect("toggled", toggled)
gtkSubMenu.append(gtkCheck)
gtkMenuItem.set_submenu(gtkSubMenu)
gtkMenuBar.append(gtkMenuItem)
vbox.pack_start(gtkMenuBar, expand=TRUE)
win.set_contents(vbox)
win.set_usize(100,100)
win.show_all()
mainloop()
--
_
/ __ / / / Jürgen Ehrensberger
/ / / / / Laboratoire de Télécommunications
/ / / / Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
/ / / /1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
_/ _/ _/ _/ Tel: +41 21 693 46 94, Fax: +41 21 693 26 83
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] A last one on MDI
Invoking a menu callback causes an Illegal instruction failure, or at least
in the code attached to this mail. Am I doing something wrong ?
Frédéric
from gnome.ui import *
from gtk import *
mdi = GnomeMDI ('test', 'test')
mdi.connect ('destroy', mainquit)
mdi.set_menubar_template ([
UIINFO_SUBTREE ("File", []),
UIINFO_SUBTREE ("Documents", [])
])
mdi.set_child_menu_path ("File")
mdi.set_child_list_path ("Documents/")
child = GnomeMDIGenericChild ('child')
def create_view (* arg):
return GtkLabel ("Hi !")
def callback (*arg):
print arg
child.set_view_creator (create_view)
child.set_menu_template ([UIINFO_SUBTREE ("Test",
[UIINFO_ITEM ("gronf", None, callback)])])
mdi.add_child (child)
mdi.add_view (child)
mainloop ()
[pygtk] Sure looks like a bug in gnome.config
Looks like _gnome.gnome_config_private_list_section was changed to _gnome.gnome_config_private_section_contents, but gnome/config.py wasn't updated to match. Context diff included. Randolph Fritz Eugene, Oregon, USA *** /home/randolph/Install/gnome-python-1.0.51/pygnome/gnome/config.py Wed Jan 26 07:05:26 2000 --- /usr/lib/python1.5/site-packages/gnome/config.pyMon Feb 21 10:26:46 2000 *** *** 64,69 def private_has_section(path): return _gnome.gnome_config_private_has_section(path) ! def private_list_section(path): ! return _gnome.gnome_config_private_list_section(path) def private_enum_sections(path): return _gnome.gnome_config_private_enum_sections(path) --- 64,69 def private_has_section(path): return _gnome.gnome_config_private_has_section(path) ! def private_section_contents(path): ! return _gnome.gnome_config_private_section_contents(path) def private_enum_sections(path): return _gnome.gnome_config_private_enum_sections(path) To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] Archives not being updated?
It looks like the email archives for the pygtk list stopped being updated on 2000/02/10. http://www.mail-archive.com/pygtk@daa.com.au/maillist.html To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] ignore - Archives not being updated
Michael McLay writes: It looks like the email archives for the pygtk list stopped being updated on 2000/02/10. Looks like it is a problem with the http://www.mail-archive.com/ service. They had a system crash and they are running in degradation mode. To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[pygtk] Bindings for GtkExtra
I'm currently writing Python bindings for the GtkExtra widget set which is available at http://magnet.fsu.edu/~feiguin/gtk/. Most of the work is done but I have two questions. 1. The C header file is called gtkextra.h therefore I called the Python module gtkextra.py. On non-posix systems this name may conlict with GtkExtra.py. Should I use gtkextra.py or should I use libgtkextra.py? 2. Like gtk_clist_get_selection_info(w, x, y) the function gtk_sheet_get_pixel_info(w, x, y) returns None if the user clicked outside of the cells. On the other hand the functions gtk_sheet_get_active_cell(w) and gtk_color_combo_find_color(w, color) return (-1, -1) as row and column if no cell is active or the specified colour could not be found. The C prototypes of the functions mentioned are: void gint gtk_sheet_get_pixel_info(GtkSheet *, gint x, gint y, gint *row, gint *col); void gtk_sheet_get_active_cell(GtkSheet *, gint *row, gint *col); void gtk_color_combo_find_color(GtkColorCombo *, GdkColor *, gint *row, gint *col); I'm wondering if it wasn't better to return None instead of (-1, -1) in order to be consistent with gtk_clist_get_selection_info(). What do you think? To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
