Re: [pygtk] New snapshot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Henstridge) wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Deirdre Saoirse wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Aaron Optimizer Digulla wrote: > > > > > I, for example, cannot use gnome but I use pygtk. Therefore, > > > I depend on an independend pygtk package (a .tar.gz to be precise). > > > The reason for this is: I'm developing in a tight/secure environment > > > and I must restrict myself to the smallest set of tools possible. > > > > Many of us are not enamored with the way gnome has been headed, so I also > > prefer a gnome-less gtk option. > > > > There will always be a gtk only pygtk. What I was wondering about was > whether it would be a good idea to stop including pygtk inside > gnome-python as well. > > James. > > > -- > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ > > > > ___ > pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Ok I think I already gave my answer. Yes, gnome-python should include pygtk. I, for example, am writing an app that uses both. I'd prefer to write all in gnomelibs, but they still don't have all the widgets I need. Desperatly waiting for full bonobo and their bindings. It's already pretty boring to ask users to have gnome-libs, gtk+. Adding pygtk and pygnome would be bad IMHO. I also forgot I use gtkextra, and their bindings, gtkhtml which means one needs to rebuild gnome-python at least the pygnome part. Well to sum it all up. The less number of packages there are out there, the happier I will be. Of course, this means pygtk, gnome-python(=pygtk, pygnome) and any type of bindings you can muster. While at it, would it be possible for a user to easily build bindings for something like gtkextra if they use the new extension class pygtk/pygnome. And I already know those have bindings, I am really talking generic gtk/gnome-based libraries. ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Re: [pygtk] New snapshot
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Deirdre Saoirse wrote: > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Aaron Optimizer Digulla wrote: > > > I, for example, cannot use gnome but I use pygtk. Therefore, > > I depend on an independend pygtk package (a .tar.gz to be precise). > > The reason for this is: I'm developing in a tight/secure environment > > and I must restrict myself to the smallest set of tools possible. > > Many of us are not enamored with the way gnome has been headed, so I also > prefer a gnome-less gtk option. > There will always be a gtk only pygtk. What I was wondering about was whether it would be a good idea to stop including pygtk inside gnome-python as well. James. -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.daa.com.au/~james/ ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Re: [pygtk] New snapshot
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Aaron Optimizer Digulla wrote: > I, for example, cannot use gnome but I use pygtk. Therefore, > I depend on an independend pygtk package (a .tar.gz to be precise). > The reason for this is: I'm developing in a tight/secure environment > and I must restrict myself to the smallest set of tools possible. Many of us are not enamored with the way gnome has been headed, so I also prefer a gnome-less gtk option. -- _Deirdre * http://www.sfknit.org * http://www.deirdre.net "Linux means never having to delete your love mail." -- Don Marti ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
[pygtk] GtkOptionMenu : ( How to get the text of the selected option )
Hi, Is there any way allowing one to get the text displayed by an option menu ? Thanks all _ LaBoufarikoise ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
[pygtk] Compiling pygtk on WinNT
Anyone who succeeded at this ? When I try, I get lots of unresolved symbols in Python 1.6a2 (for example PyExc_TypeError) while others (for example, PyErr_SetString) work. Any ideas ? I'm using Python 1.6a2, pygtk 0.6.6 (with the patches from Hans Breuer) and Visual Studio 6.0. Also, how do I test these things ? Doubleclicking/running python.exe gives me an interpreter, pythonw.exe gives me nothing at all and Dblclicking on a .py-file gives a small window which pops open and the vanishes again :-( How do I test python on Windows *without* installing it first ? -- == Sowatec AG, CH-8330 Pfäffikon (ZH) Witzbergstr. 7, http://www.sowatec.com Tel: +41-(0)1-952 55 55 Fax: +41-(0)1-952 55 66 -- Aaron "Optimizer" Digulla, [EMAIL PROTECTED] == - This mail sent through IMP: www.hepe.com ___ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
