Re: [PyMOL] Vacuum Electrostatics error

2023-11-28 Thread Jarrett Johnson
Hi Joel,

This is unfortunately an oversight on my part. This fix unfortunately never
made its way to a patched version. I will make sure it does for the next
patch. In the meantime, if you ever do come across this issue, the
workaround is to disable undo from the Edit menu.

Best,
Jarrett J

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 3:50 PM Joel Tyndall 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I tried to help Anna with her issue around the colour bar  (which seemed
> unusual) only to find that I cannot generate the electrostatic maps at all
> on 2 different PCs running windows (10 I believe).
>
>
>
> The error is Pop-error: invalid source selection name ‘assign_tmp1’
>
>
>
> Running 2.5.1
>
>
>
> Joel
>
>
>
>
>
> Joel Tyndall | BSc(Hons) PhD
>
> Professor in Medicinal Chemistry
> School of Pharmacy | He Rau Kawakawa
> University of Otago | Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo
>
> PO Box 56 9054
>
> Dunedin | Ōtepoti
>
> New Zealand | Aotearoa
>
> Website | pharmacy.otago.ac.nz
>
>
>
>
> ___
> PyMOL-users mailing list
> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Unsubscribe:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe
>


-- 

*Jarrett Johnson* | Senior Developer, PyMOL
___
PyMOL-users mailing list
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe

[PyMOL] Vacuum Electrostatics error

2023-11-28 Thread Joel Tyndall
Hi all,

I tried to help Anna with her issue around the colour bar  (which seemed 
unusual) only to find that I cannot generate the electrostatic maps at all on 2 
different PCs running windows (10 I believe).

The error is Pop-error: invalid source selection name ‘assign_tmp1’

Running 2.5.1

Joel


Joel Tyndall | BSc(Hons) PhD

Professor in Medicinal Chemistry
School of Pharmacy | He Rau Kawakawa
University of Otago | Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo
PO Box 56 9054
Dunedin | Ōtepoti
New Zealand | Aotearoa
Website | pharmacy.otago.ac.nz


___
PyMOL-users mailing list
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Unsubscribe: 
https://sourceforge.net/projects/pymol/lists/pymol-users/unsubscribe

Re: [PyMOL] Vacuum Electrostatics

2009-07-27 Thread Ian Berke
Problem solved... next time I'll do a completely clean install.  Sorry for
the needless email.

Ian

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Ian Berke ian.be...@yale.edu wrote:

 Hi,

 I'm getting this error still using a self-compiled version from the latest
 SVN and python 2.6.2.  The error is:

  Alter-Error: Aborting on error. Assignment may be incomplete.
  File string, line 1
  formal_charge=0;flags=flags0x-8388609

 In a previous post it was reported to be fixed.  Is anyone still having
 this issue?

 Thanks,
 Ian

 Mark,
 
 Should be fixed now (in rev 3720).
 
 Cheers,
 Wawrren


  -Original Message-
  From: Mark Wehner [mailto:mark.weh...@ru...]
  Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 12:11 PM
  To: pymol-us...@li...
  Subject: [PyMOL] Vacuum electrostatics
 
  Hi everyone,
 
  in the newer version of pymol I realized it is not possible to
 generate
  vacuum
  electrostatics, there's an error while assigning the formal charges.
 The
  error
  message is:
 
  Alter-Error: Aborting on error. Assignment may be incomplete.
  File string, line 1
  formal_charge=0;flags=flags0x-8388609
 
  I build the source code (rev 3719) using Python 2.6.2. Is anyone
  experiencing
  similar problems at the moment?
 
  Mark
 
 
 
 --
  
  The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
 Your
  production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but
 thanks to
  Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW
 KODAK
  i700
  Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
  processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
  ___
  PyMOL-users mailing list
  pymol-us...@li...
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
 
--
___
PyMOL-users mailing list (PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net)
Info Page: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net

[PyMOL] vacuum electrostatics

2009-05-18 Thread Chaix Denis
Dear users

I'm trying to compare the electrostatic charge surface of my protein 
with and without ligand, by using the command generate vacuum 
electrostatics.
that's works fine for the protein without ATP but that doesn't work with 
the ligand.The surface obtaine doesn't take account the ligand

thanks

-- 
CHAIX Denis

Centre de Biochimie Structurale 
INSERM U554/CNRS 5048 
29 rue de Navacelles 
F-34090 Montpellier, France 
Tel: 33 4 67 41 77 21
Fax: 33 4 67 41 79 13 
e-mail:denis.ch...@cbs.cnrs.fr
http://www.cbs.cnrs.fr 


--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables 
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine 
for externally facing server and web deployment. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
PyMOL-users mailing list
PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users


Re: [PyMOL] vacuum electrostatics

2009-05-18 Thread Warren DeLano
Denis,

Sorry, PyMOL only has protein charges coded at present.  Perhaps the
APBS project's pdb2pqr utility might be able to assign charges to
canonoical ligands (such as ATP)?

http://apbs.sourceforge.net

Cheers,
Warren

 -Original Message-
 From: Chaix Denis [mailto:denis.ch...@cbs.cnrs.fr]
 Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 9:10 AM
 To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: [PyMOL] vacuum electrostatics
 
 Dear users
 
 I'm trying to compare the electrostatic charge surface of my protein
 with and without ligand, by using the command generate vacuum
 electrostatics.
 that's works fine for the protein without ATP but that doesn't work
with
 the ligand.The surface obtaine doesn't take account the ligand
 
 thanks
 
 --
 CHAIX Denis
 
 Centre de Biochimie Structurale
 INSERM U554/CNRS 5048
 29 rue de Navacelles
 F-34090 Montpellier, France
 Tel: 33 4 67 41 77 21
 Fax: 33 4 67 41 79 13
 e-mail:denis.ch...@cbs.cnrs.fr
 http://www.cbs.cnrs.fr
 
 


--
 
 Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
 Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables
 unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine
 for externally facing server and web deployment.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
 ___
 PyMOL-users mailing list
 PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
 
 
 



--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables 
unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine 
for externally facing server and web deployment. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
___
PyMOL-users mailing list
PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users


[PyMOL] Vacuum electrostatics

2009-05-11 Thread Mark Wehner
Hi everyone,

in the newer version of pymol I realized it is not possible to generate vacuum 
electrostatics, there's an error while assigning the formal charges. The error 
message is:

Alter-Error: Aborting on error. Assignment may be incomplete.
  File string, line 1
formal_charge=0;flags=flags0x-8388609

I build the source code (rev 3719) using Python 2.6.2. Is anyone experiencing 
similar problems at the moment?

Mark

--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
___
PyMOL-users mailing list
PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users


Re: [PyMOL] Vacuum electrostatics

2009-05-11 Thread Warren DeLano
Mark,

Should be fixed now (in rev 3720).

Cheers,
Wawrren


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Wehner [mailto:mark.weh...@rub.de]
 Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 12:11 PM
 To: pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 Subject: [PyMOL] Vacuum electrostatics
 
 Hi everyone,
 
 in the newer version of pymol I realized it is not possible to
generate
 vacuum
 electrostatics, there's an error while assigning the formal charges.
The
 error
 message is:
 
 Alter-Error: Aborting on error. Assignment may be incomplete.
   File string, line 1
 formal_charge=0;flags=flags0x-8388609
 
 I build the source code (rev 3719) using Python 2.6.2. Is anyone
 experiencing
 similar problems at the moment?
 
 Mark
 


--
 
 The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances!
Your
 production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but
thanks to
 Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW
KODAK
 i700
 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
 processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
 ___
 PyMOL-users mailing list
 PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users
 
 
 



--
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
___
PyMOL-users mailing list
PyMOL-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pymol-users


[PyMOL] Vacuum electrostatics

2006-11-17 Thread Robin Owen

Hi all,

I had a problem calculating electrostatic surfaces for my pdb - 
identical to the problem detailed

below:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=36854260

In short, an electrostatic surface with green/blue/red patches that 
changes according to the
colour of the underlying structure (and doesn't seem to bear an obvious 
relation to the 'correct'

electrostatic surface generated as below).

The get around/fix was to shorten the file name of the pdb -ie remove 
the refmac/coot additions

to the original file name. Giving the input pdb an alias works equally well.

I didn't see a reply to the above post, so hopefully this helps/narrows 
down the problem.


Cheers,
Robin



[PyMOL] vacuum electrostatics

2005-04-11 Thread Scott Classen

Hi Shawn,

As you can see when you select the generate electrostatic surface 
within PyMol - Warren has stated that it is unvalidated experimental 
code and the results should be viewed with skepticism. If you want 
publishable electrostatics calculated using more realistic estimates of 
dielectric constants then you should use eithe APBS, GRASp, or some 
other Poisson Boltzman solver. Personally I wouldn't put figures 
generated from PyMols internal electrostatics calculations any any 
publication.


Scott



On Apr 10, 2005, at 9:29 AM, Shawn Milano wrote:


Hi,

I want to show an electrostatic surface of my protein for publication. 
 In
Pymol, I believe I can use generate-vacuum electrostatics.  However, I 
am not

quite sure what the difference is between absolute and relative protein
surface potential.  Could you help me with this?  Second, I have a 
question
about the slider that appears after the surface is calculated.  What 
do the
numbers represent, and what is changing as you slide to the left and 
right.
I want to use the figure for publication and make sure I understand 
how to

explain it properly.

Thanks,

Shawn-





[PyMOL] vacuum electrostatics

2005-04-10 Thread Shawn Milano
Hi,

I want to show an electrostatic surface of my protein for publication.  In
Pymol, I believe I can use generate-vacuum electrostatics.  However, I am not
quite sure what the difference is between absolute and relative protein
surface potential.  Could you help me with this?  Second, I have a question
about the slider that appears after the surface is calculated.  What do the
numbers represent, and what is changing as you slide to the left and right. 
I want to use the figure for publication and make sure I understand how to
explain it properly. 

Thanks,

Shawn-