[issue21197] venv does not create lib64 directory and appropriate symlinks
Vinay Sajip added the comment: Issue #18807 relates to symlinks not being available, or not being wanted by the user creating the environment. The lib64 symlink is (currently) the only case where we symlink to a directory (in the other cases, such as aliases for the interpreter, we can use copies rather than symlinks). I propose to make a change such that if copying rather than symlinking is specified, the lib64 link simply isn't created - a copy would be of no use here. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21197 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18807] Allow venv to create copies, even when symlinks are supported
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset ce1b8b2ddf07 by Vinay Sajip in branch '3.4': Issue #18807: If copying (no symlinks) specified for a venv, then the python interpreter aliases (python, python3) are now created by copying rather than symlinking. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ce1b8b2ddf07 New changeset f2adaccc13ab by Vinay Sajip in branch 'default': Issue #18807: Merged fix from 3.4. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/f2adaccc13ab -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18807 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18807] Allow venv to create copies, even when symlinks are supported
Vinay Sajip added the comment: I've made the change - not exactly the same as your patch, which was missing an os.chmod() and doing an unnecessary os.path.join() - but thanks for submitting a patch :-). However, note that on 64-bit Linux systems (actually any POSIX other than OS X) a symlink lib64 - lib is still created. Perhaps this could be omitted, but I'm not sure if that would cause problems with pip. I've posted a note on the relevant issue - #21197. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18807 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21591] exec(a, b, c) not the same as exec a in b, c in nested functions
New submission from Robert Jordens:
According to the documentation the exec a in b, c is equivalent to exec(a,
b, c). But in the testcase below the tuple form causes a SyntaxError while the
statement form works fine.
diff -r e770d8c4291c Lib/test/test_compile.py
--- a/Lib/test/test_compile.py Tue May 27 03:30:44 2014 -0400
+++ b/Lib/test/test_compile.py Wed May 28 02:45:31 2014 -0600
@@ -90,6 +90,22 @@
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
exec(a = b + 1, g, l) in g, l
+def test_nested_qualified_exec(self):
+# Can use qualified exec in nested functions.
+code = [
+def g():
+def f():
+if True:
+exec in {}, {}
+,
+def g():
+def f():
+if True:
+exec(, {}, {})
+]
+for c in code:
+compile(c, code, exec)
+
def test_exec_with_general_mapping_for_locals(self):
class M:
SyntaxError: unqualified exec is not allowed in function 'f' it is a nested
function (code, line 5)
--
components: Interpreter Core
messages: 219259
nosy: Robert.Jordens
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: exec(a, b, c) not the same as exec a in b, c in nested functions
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21591
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10203] sqlite3.Row doesn't support sequence protocol
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 6e2833ae1718 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #10203: sqlite3.Row now truly supports sequence protocol. In particular http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6e2833ae1718 New changeset 6af865f1a59d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Issue #10203: sqlite3.Row now truly supports sequence protocol. In particulr http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6af865f1a59d New changeset 474c97a5f0c8 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #10203: sqlite3.Row now truly supports sequence protocol. In particulr http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/474c97a5f0c8 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10203 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10203] sqlite3.Row doesn't support sequence protocol
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you Claudiu for your contribution. But please be more careful, your patches contained trailing whitespaces. Thank you Paul for your report. -- resolution: - fixed stage: commit review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10203 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21208] Change default behavior of arguments with type bool when options are specified
Karl Richter added the comment: @paul.j3 That's interesting [1]. Documenting argparse.register seems crucial to me (- reopen or file a new request?). After dealing more with the very sophisticated and complex functionality of argparse I'm sure that this is the only use case where such an unintuitive result may happen, so it's worth adding an explicit negative example in the docs of argparse.add_argument with a hint to the docs about way that argparse handles types. -- [1] (and a very good example for missing capabilities of QA sites with regard to the relation of votes of your much better answer and the one with the highest number of votes) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5950] Make zipimport work with zipfile containing comments
Thomas Heller added the comment: As for progress, the answer is no as the hope is to eventually replace zipimport with something in pure Python thanks to importlib. Does this mean there is no chance to put this into 3.4 and 3.3, do we really have to wait until 3.5 with it's pure-python zipimport? I (together with the py2exe-users) have the same usecase as Ryan Kelly in msg110014: I want to digitally sign a frozen python program with appended zipfile, which involves appending the signature to the EXE. Simple to do if only zipimport would support appended comments. -- nosy: +theller ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5950 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20430] Make argparse.SUPPRESS work as an argument dest
jzwinck added the comment: Yes, I have a practical need for dest=SUPPRESS. One of the reasons is basically what you said: to implement things analogous to --help. In those cases you want to be able to invoke a function (e.g. via type=myfunc) but not store anything. Or you may need to ignore an argument completely for compatibility, but you have logic which expects all the arguments returned by parse_args() to be known and meaningful. In any case, I wrote this ticket because I ran into a concrete need that argparse didn't readily support (which almost never happens!). As for what the usage statement should show: it should behave as if dest=SUPPRESS were not present. If metavar is specified, use that, otherwise use the option name as if dest were not passed in. And we already have the behavior that help=SUPPRESS will hide it from the usage entirely, so that should still work (i.e. dest=SUPPRESS, help=SUPPRESS should hide the option both from --help and the result of parse_args()). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20430 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21592] Make statistics.median run in linear time
New submission from Thomas Dybdahl Ahle: The statistics module currently contains the following comment: FIXME: investigate ways to calculate medians without sorting? Quickselect? This is important, because users expect standard library functions to use state of the art implementations, and median by sorting has never been that. There are many good linear time alternatives, the classical median-of-k algorithm was posted to the mailing list in a nice version by David Eppstein in 2002 [1]. The fastest method in practice is probably Quick Select in the Floyd-Rivest version [2] which is similar to quick sort. These algorithms also have the feature of letting us select any k-th order statistic, not just the median. This seems conceptually a lot simpler than the current median/median_low/median_high split. However, sticking with the current api, a new implementation would have to support calculating a median as the average of n//2 and (n+1)//2'th order statistics. This could be implemented either by calling the select function twice, or by implementing a multi-select algorithm, which is also a well studied problem [3]. I'll be happy to contribute code, or help out in any other way. [1]: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2002-May/132170.html [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floyd%E2%80%93Rivest_algorithm [3]: https://domino.mpi-inf.mpg.de/intranet/ag1/ag1publ.nsf/0/59C74289A2291143C12571C30017DEA8/$file/Mehlhorn_a_2005_o.pdf -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 219265 nosy: Thomas.Dybdahl.Ahle priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Make statistics.median run in linear time type: performance versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21592 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21592] Make statistics.median run in linear time
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +steven.daprano stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21592 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5950] Make zipimport work with zipfile containing comments
Brett Cannon added the comment: I actually stopped development of a pure Python zip importer so it won't be in Python 3.5 either (http://bugs.python.org/issue17630). The motivation simply wasn't there if zipimport is going to be sticking around for bootstrapping reasons. This can still get fixed in 3.5 (3.4 is Larry's call). I have added Thomas Wouters and Greg Smith who have done the most work with zipimport to the nosy list to see if they have interest in taking a look at the patch. -- nosy: +gregory.p.smith, twouters ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5950 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5950] Make zipimport work with zipfile containing comments
Changes by Peter Otten __pete...@web.de: -- nosy: +peter.otten ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5950 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3015] tkinter with wantobjects=False has been broken for some time
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset c69e8ea3bf10 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #3015: _tkinter.create() now creates tkapp object with wantobject=1 by http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c69e8ea3bf10 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3015 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3015] tkinter with wantobjects=False has been broken for some time
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Lita Cho, originally reported issue is fixed. I asked Martin (and Guilherme if he is here). Are you agree to close this issue? See issue21585 about extending testing. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3015 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21579] Python 3.4: tempfile.close attribute does not work
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: OK, O_TMPFILE is not related. But Windows is related. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21579 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21593] Clarify re.search documentation first match
New submission from Joshua Landau: The documentation for re.search does not state that it returns the first match. This should be added, or a clarification added if this is implementation-defined. https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#re.search --- See also http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23906400/is-regular-expression-search-guaranteed-to-return-first-match -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 219270 nosy: Joshua.Landau, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Clarify re.search documentation first match versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21593 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21592] Make statistics.median run in linear time
Thomas Dybdahl Ahle added the comment: I have written some proof of concept code here [1], I would appreciate you commenting on it, before I turn it into a patch, as I haven't contributed code to Python before. I have tried to write it as efficiently as possible, but it is of course possible that the c-implemented `sorted()` code will be faster than even the smartest python-implemented select. [1]: http://pastebin.com/30x0j39a -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21592 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Changes by Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org: -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg219253 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg219255 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Guido van Rossum added the comment: If you don't know enough about the base class you shouldn't be subclassing it. In this particular case you should be overriding __init__, not __new__. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21579] Python 3.4: tempfile.close attribute does not work
Марк Коренберг added the comment: So, maybe API change? like delete=True|False|Maybe ? don't think that this is good decisions. My approach is based on ext4 behaviour about delayed allocation and atomic file replacements. In my case, either old file (with contents) or new file appear. In any case, corrupted data cannot appear. This is required behaviour for my application. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt http://lwn.net/Articles/322823/ === auto_da_alloc(*)Many broken applications don't use fsync() when noauto_da_alloc replacing existing files via patterns such as fd = open(foo.new)/write(fd,..)/close(fd)/ rename(foo.new, foo), or worse yet, fd = open(foo, O_TRUNC)/write(fd,..)/close(fd). If auto_da_alloc is enabled, ext4 will detect the replace-via-rename and replace-via-truncate patterns and force that any delayed allocation blocks are allocated such that at the next journal commit, in the default data=ordered mode, the data blocks of the new file are forced to disk before the rename() operation is committed. This provides roughly the same level of guarantees as ext3, and avoids the zero-length problem that can happen when a system crashes before the delayed allocation blocks are forced to disk. === So, this is essential functionality. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21579 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21579] Python 3.4: tempfile.close attribute does not work
Марк Коренберг added the comment: why not to make tmpfileobj.delete as property that really sets self._closer.delete ? this will fix my problem. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21579 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21493] Add test for ntpath.expanduser
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 5e599b301ebd by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #21493: Added test for ntpath.expanduser(). Original patch by http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5e599b301ebd New changeset a981a088512c by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Issue #21493: Added test for ntpath.expanduser(). Original patch by http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a981a088512c New changeset 5a71a7e60fe6 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #21493: Added test for ntpath.expanduser(). Original patch by http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5a71a7e60fe6 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21493 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: From what I see, you do not need to change either __new__ or __init__, just add __enter__ and __exit__ , and you only need to do that in 2.6. Since Zipfile is written in Python, you could monkey-patch instead of subclassing, if that is easier in your particular case. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19385] dbm.dumb should be consistent when the database is closed
Claudiu.Popa added the comment: Looks good to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19385 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Eric Snow added the comment: If you don't know enough about the base class you shouldn't be subclassing it. That's important when overriding any API in subclass and absolutely always essential when it comes to __new__ and __init__! That's something that isn't very obvious at first. :( In this particular case you should be overriding __init__, not __new__. Jason's code is doing something like OSError.__new__ does now, which returns an instance of a subclass depending on the errno. However, while the language supports it, I see that as a viable hack only when backward-compatibilty is a big concern. Otherwise I find factory classmethods to be a much better solution for discoverability and clarity of implementation. -- nosy: +eric.snow ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21402] tkinter.ttk._val_or_dict assumes tkinter._default_root exists
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 8e5c65719c12 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': Issue #21402: tkinter.ttk now works when default root window is not set. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8e5c65719c12 New changeset 4a0987b8f630 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Issue #21402: tkinter.ttk now works when default root window is not set. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4a0987b8f630 New changeset c112a91ad609 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Issue #21402: tkinter.ttk now works when default root window is not set. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/c112a91ad609 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21402 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21493] Add test for ntpath.expanduser
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thanks Claudiu. -- resolution: - fixed stage: - resolved status: open - closed versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21493 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19385] dbm.dumb should be consistent when the database is closed
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 95207bcd8298 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '3.4': Restore performance of some dumb database methods (regression introduced by #19385). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/95207bcd8298 New changeset 2e59e0b579e5 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': Restore performance of some dumb database methods (regression introduced by #19385). http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2e59e0b579e5 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19385 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21402] tkinter.ttk._val_or_dict assumes tkinter._default_root exists
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - fixed stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21402 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21402] tkinter.ttk._val_or_dict assumes tkinter._default_root exists
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thank you for your report Stephen. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21402 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19385] dbm.dumb should be consistent when the database is closed
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Thanks Claudiu. -- stage: patch review - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19385 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21343] os.path.relpath returns inconsistent types
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: OK. I say the original issue is not a bug. -- resolution: - not a bug stage: - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21343 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21594] asyncio.create_subprocess_exec raises OSError
New submission from Sebastian Kreft: In some cases asyncio.create_subprocess_exec raises an OSError because there are no file descriptors available. I don't know if that is expected, but IMO I think it would be better to just block until the required numbers of fds are available. Otherwise one would need to do this handling, which is not a trivial task. This issue is happening in Debian 7, with a 3.2.0-4-amd64 kernel, and python 3.4.1 compiled from source. -- messages: 219285 nosy: Sebastian.Kreft.Deezer priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: asyncio.create_subprocess_exec raises OSError versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21594 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21594] asyncio.create_subprocess_exec raises OSError
STINNER Victor added the comment: I don't know if that is expected, but IMO I think it would be better to just block until the required numbers of fds are available. Does it mean that it can block forever? It sounds strange to try to make such error silent. Why not retrying in case of such error in your application? asyncio has no idea how to release file descriptors. -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21594 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21580] PhotoImage(data=...) apparently has to be UTF-8 or Base-64 encoded
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
All works to me.
import tkinter
b = tkinter.Button()
with open('Lib/test/imghdrdata/python.gif', 'rb') as f: data = f.read()
...
img = tkinter.PhotoImage(data=data)
b['image'] = img
b.pack()
Could you please provide an example which demonstrates the issue?
--
stage: - test needed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21580
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21595] Creating many subprocess generates lots of internal BlockingIOError
New submission from Sebastian Kreft: Using the asyncio.create_subprocess_exec, generates lost of internal error messages. These messages are: Exception ignored when trying to write to the signal wakeup fd: BlockingIOError: [Errno 11] Resource temporarily unavailable Getting the messages depeneds on how many subprocesses are active at the same time. In my system (Debian 7, kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64, python 3.4.1), with 3 or less processes at the same time I don't see any problem, but with 4 or more I got lot of messages. On the other hand, these error messages seem to be innocuous, as no exception seems to be raised. Attached is a test script that shows the problem. It is run as: bin/python3.4 test_subprocess_error.py MAX_PROCESSES ITERATIONS it requires to have the du command. Let me know if there are any (conceptual) mistakes in the attached code. -- files: test_subprocess_error.py messages: 219288 nosy: Sebastian.Kreft.Deezer priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Creating many subprocess generates lots of internal BlockingIOError versions: Python 3.4 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35385/test_subprocess_error.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21595 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21579] Python 3.4: tempfile.close attribute does not work
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: Yes, it would be easy to restore this behavior on Posix. -- keywords: +easy stage: - needs patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21579 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21596] asyncio.wait fails when futures list is empty
New submission from Sebastian Kreft: Passing an empty list/set of futures to asyncio.wait raises an Exception, which is a little annoying in some use cases. Probably this was the intended behavior as I see there's a test case for that. If such, then I would propose to document that behavior. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation messages: 219290 nosy: Sebastian.Kreft.Deezer, docs@python priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: asyncio.wait fails when futures list is empty versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21596 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20689] socket.AddressFamily is absent in pydoc output
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: We should discuss this suggestion on Python-Dev. It affects the use of enums in other modules. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue20689 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21477] Idle: improve idle_test.htest
Saimadhav Heblikar added the comment: Summary for htest-28052014-34.diff and htest-28052014-27.diff 1. Add htest for GrepDialog,UndoDelegator and configDialog 2. Makes changes to the way the help string is displayed. The label has been replaced by a text widget made to look like a label, and also scrollable. The result is that the htest root dialog stays in the same place and same size throughout.(See the code for more information). 3. Some minor change to spec dict strings and in ObjectBrowser for child dialog placement. With this, it leaves AutoCompleteWindow, TkMessageBoxes, Debugger(from 21477-htest.txt) to be tested. OutputWindow - already being tested from GrepDialog. There is nothing extra to be tested separately. FileList - Is it already being tested through EditorWindow? In case there is a need to test them, please say so. The code is ready. RemoteDebugger and RemoteObjectBrowser - I need some input on how to begin with them. Next: Apart from the above htest, a way to destroy the child when user clicks 'next', for certain modules like ClassBrowser, which don't work by the method of http://bugs.python.org/msg219161 -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35386/htest-28052014-34.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21477 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21477] Idle: improve idle_test.htest
Changes by Saimadhav Heblikar saimadhavhebli...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35387/htest-28052014-27.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21477 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Sorry, I didn't realize why __new__ was being used. But what Jason's code is doing isn't any cleaner than monkey-patching. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18141] tkinter.Image.__del__ can throw an exception if module globals are destroyed in the wrong order
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
My worry about the patch is that is is a bandage covering up a problem
elsewhere.
1. You indicate that you only have a problem with your custom build, but not on
a standard build. This seems odd. Perhaps the problem is with your build.
2. turtledemo.__main__ only calls root.destroy indirectly via
root.wm_protocol(WM_DELETE_WINDOW, self._destroy)
def _destroy(self):
self.root.destroy()
sys.exit()
Let's assume that .destroy is called when the exception happens (verifiable by
adding print('destroy called').)
3. The purpose of Tk.destroy is to cleanly deconstruct the gui before python's
random cleanup. Should it have cleared PhotoImage?
Image and Variable (and subclasses) are the only classes in tkinter.__init__
with __del__ methods. Both have a tcl.call, so Variable potentially has the
same problem as Image. But neither seem to have a problem in routine tkinter
use.
4. Why is there a PhotoImage to be deleted? Idle Find in Files does not find
'PhotoImage' in turtledemo/*.py. I believe it is created as follows.
turtledemo.DemoWindonw.__init__ contains this odd pair of lines that
initializes a turtle.Screen instance with turtle.TurtleScreen.__init__
(TurtleScreen subclasses TurtleScreenBase, not Screen).
self.screen = _s_ = turtle.Screen()
turtle.TurtleScreen.__init__(_s_, _s_._canvas)
The latter call creates a collection of default turtles (_shapes) that includes
'blank', a 1x1 (pixel) blank PhotoImage that gets tkinter._default_root as
(default) master.
I suspect that adding either of these lines to _destroy would prevent the
TclError.
del self.screen # before self.root.destroy()
import tkinter; tkinter._default_root.destroy() # after self.root
5. While it seems like a buglet for turtle to create a hidden PhotoImage, with
an anonymous master, and not clean it up somehow; and while I am puzzled if
this never happens with standard builds; it seems plausible that we could patch
Variable/Image.__delete__ to be sure they do not leak an exception.
Serhiy, what do you think?
--
nosy: -gpolo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18141
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21585] Run Tkinter tests with wantobjects=False
Changes by Lita Cho lita@gmail.com: -- nosy: +Lita.Cho, jesstess ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21585 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18132] buttons in turtledemo disappear on small screens
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: On my widescreen, the buttons are completely gone when I shrink vertically to about 720 pixels. So they must be gone on a 600x800 screen or 720x1280 small widescreen and perhaps on a non-fullscreen window on a 780x10xx screen. I agree with fixing this if possible. The patch applies cleanly to 3.4 and fixes the problem with the buttons. However, it introduces a problem with the vertical canvas scrollbar, on the right. It does not appear when it should and does not scroll the entire canvas when it does appear. Try it with bytedesign, and see if you can fix it with an altered patch. -- stage: - patch review versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21597] Allow turtledemo code pane to get wider.
New submission from Terry J. Reedy: Turtledemo (python -m turtledemo) has a text pane for code and a canvas pane for the actual demo. The code pane is fixed at about 60% of the width needed to display full-width code lines. If the window is expanded horizontally, all the expansion goes to the canvas pane, where it is mostly not needed or used. Almost all the examples are a fixed size on the canvas, independent of the size of the window on the canvas. Having the text pane too narrow makes it harder to read and copy the code than it would be if entire code lines were visible. The default width of the overall window is about 1250 pixels on my big monitor. Many people have more pixels than that. Even on smaller screen, people might like to temporarily allocate more space to the text. So I think the best solution, if possible with tkinter, would be a movable divider. -- messages: 219296 nosy: terry.reedy priority: normal severity: normal stage: needs patch status: open title: Allow turtledemo code pane to get wider. type: behavior versions: Python 2.7, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21597 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1054041] Python doesn't exit with proper resultcode on SIGINT
Changes by Samuel Bronson naes...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +SamB ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1054041 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21596] asyncio.wait fails when futures list is empty
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21596 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1820] Enhance Object/structseq.c to match namedtuple and tuple api
Stefan Krah added the comment: Sunny, is there a definition of visible positional fields? Currently, it seems to me that in os.stat_result we have the opposite problem, namely visible non-positional fields: For example, st_atime_ns is visible but not indexable: os.stat_result(st_mode=33188, st_ino=524840, st_dev=64513, st_nlink=1, st_uid=0, st_gid=0, st_size=2113, st_atime=1401225421, st_mtime=1398786163, st_ctime=1398786163) x[9] 1398786163 x.st_atime_ns 1401225421887116783 x[10] Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module IndexError: tuple index out of range -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1820 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18141] tkinter.Image.__del__ can throw an exception if module globals are destroyed in the wrong order
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment: 1. 3.3 is in security fixes only mode and shutdowning mechanism was changed in 3.4. 2. Looks as some Tk root was not explicitly destroyed and deleted during shutdown stage. 3. Tk.destroy does nothing with images, it destroys only subcomponents and commands. In any case it destroys only Tcl/Tk objects, not Python objects which wrap them. 4. I think we shouldn't use _default_root outside the tkinter package. This is implementation detail. 5. Agree, we could patch Variable/Image.__del__, and proposed patch looks correct (other way is pass TclError as default value for optional parameter: def __del__(self, TclError=TclError), both ways are widely used). But I prefer first try to reproduce this in tests. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21595] Creating many subprocess generates lots of internal BlockingIOError
STINNER Victor added the comment: Exception ignored when trying to write to the signal wakeup fd message comes from the signal handler in Modules/signalmodule.c. The problem is that Python gets a lot of SIGCHLD signals (the test scripts creates +300 processes per second on my computer). The producer (signal handler writing the signal number into the self pipe) is faster than the consumer (BaseSelectorEventLoop._read_from_self callback). Attached patch should reduce the risk of seeing the message Exception ignored when trying to write to the signal wakeup fd. The patch reads all pending of the self pipe, instead of just trying to read a signal byte. The test script doesn't write the error message anymore when the patch is applied (the script creates more than 300 processes per second). The patch doesn't solve completly the issue. Other possible enhancements: * Add a flag in the signal handler to notify that a signal was received, and write a single byte until the flag is reset to False. It would avoid to fill the pipe. It requires to implement a custom signal handler implemented in C, different from signal handlers of the Python module. * Add an higher priority to callbacks of signal handlers. Asyncio doesn't support priority on callbacks right now. * Increaze the size of the pipe. On Linux, it looks like fcntl(fd, F_SETPIPE_SZ, size); can be used. The maximum size is /proc/sys/fs/pipe-max-size (ex: 1 MB of my Fedora 20). -- keywords: +patch nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35388/asyncio_read_from_self.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21595 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Jason R. Coombs added the comment: Maybe I should have focused on a more trivial example to demonstrate the place where my expectation was violated. The use of a real-world example is distracting from my intended point. Consider instead this abstract example: class SomeClass(SomeParentClass): def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs): return super(SomeClass, cls).__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs) def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super(SomeClass, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs) Ignoring for a moment the incongruity of the invocation of __new__ with 'cls' due to __new__ being a staticmethod, the naive programmer expects the above SomeClass to work exactly like SomeParentClass because both overrides are implemented as a trivial pass-through. And indeed that technique will work just fine if the parent class implements both __init__ and __new__, but if the parent class (or one of its parents) does not implement either of those methods, the technique will fail, because the fall through to 'object' class. I believe this incongruity stems from the fact that __new__ and __init__ are special-cased not to be called if they aren't implemented on the class. Therefore, to write SomeClass without knowledge of the SomeParentClass implementation, one could write this instead: class SomeClass(SomeParentClass): def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs): super_new = super(SomeClass, cls).__new__ if super_new is object.__new__: return super_new(cls) return super_new(cls, *args, **kwargs) def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super_init = super(SomeClass, self).__init__ if super_init.__objclass__ is object: return super_init(*args, **kwargs) Now that implementation is somewhat ugly and perhaps a bit brittle (particularly around use of __objclass__). Ignoring that for now, it does have the property that regardless of the class from which it derives, it will work, including: SomeParentClass = datetime.datetime # implements only __new__ SomeParentClass = zipfile.ZipFile # implements only __init__ class SomeParentClass: pass # implements neither __init__ nor __new__ While I would prefer a language construct that didn't require this dance for special casing (or similarly require the programmer to hard-code the dance to a specific implementation of a specific parent class as Guido recommends), at the very least I would suggest that the documentation better reflect this somewhat surprising behavior. Currently, the documentation states [https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__new__] effectively Typical implementations of __new__ invoke the superclass’ __new__() method with appropriate arguments. It's left as an exercise to the reader to ascertain what 'appropriate arguments' are, and doesn't communicate that the introduction or omission of __new__ or __init__ to a class hierarchy affects the process by which a class is constructed/initialized. Greg Smith's blog demonstrates some even more dangerous cases. I don't understand why his concerns weren't addressed, because they seem legitimate, and I agree with his conclusion that the older behavior is more desirable, despite the concerns raised by the OP. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21595] Creating many subprocess generates lots of internal BlockingIOError
STINNER Victor added the comment: BaseProactorEventLoop._loop_self_reading() uses an overlapped read of 4096 bytes. I don't understand how it wakes up the event loop. When the operation is done, _loop_self_reading() is scheduled with call_soon() by the Future object. Is it enough to wake up the event loop? Is BaseProactorEventLoop correct? -- Oh, I forgot to explain this part of asyncio_read_from_self.patch: +data = self._ssock.recv(4096) +if not data: +break This break should never occur. It should only occur if _ssock is no more blocking. But it would be a bug, because this pipe is private and set to non-blocking at its creation. I chose to add the test because it should not hurt to add it just in case (and to avoid an unlimited busy loop). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21595 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue20430] Make argparse.SUPPRESS work as an argument dest
paul j3 added the comment:
In the attached file I tried another approach - a custom Action class. It
gives you the custom behavior now, instead of 2-3 releases in the future.
class Action2(Action):
# custom action
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(Action2, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.default = SUPPRESS
def __call__(self, parser, namespace, values, option_string=None):
print('Action2', argparse._get_action_name(self), values)
'self.default=SUPPRESS' keeps the dest out of the namespace without affecting
help display. And as with '_HelpAction', the __call__ can do its own thing
without modifying the namespace.
One thing that this custom Action class does not do well is let you modify the
handling of the argument after it is created. For example if an argument is
created by an imported parent parser, attributes like 'dest' and 'default' can
be changed after the fact, but the argument class can't.
In http://bugs.python.org/issue14191 I wrestled with the issue of
temporarily disabling subsets of the arguments, first the positionals, and then
the optionals, so I could run 'parse_known_args' separately on the two groups.
For optionals it was enough to ensure that 'required=False'. For positionals I
first used 'nargs=0', and latter enabled a 'nargs=SUPPRESS' option to suppress
them.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35389/issue20430.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20430
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1641] asyncore delayed calls feature
STINNER Victor added the comment: asyncore documentation now starts with this note (which was approved by the asyncore maintainer): This module exists for backwards compatibility only. For new code we recommend using asyncio. Since asyncio is now part of the stdlib, I don't think that it's worth to enhance asyncore. asyncore has design flaws like its poll() function which doesn't scale well with the number of file descriptors. The latest patch for this issue was written 5 years ago, I don't think that many people are waiting for this feature in asyncore. Delayed calls are part of asyncio core, it's well designed and *efficient*. So I'm now closing this issue. Upgrade your code to asyncio! -- nosy: +haypo resolution: - wont fix status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1641 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue777588] asyncore is broken for windows if connection is refused
STINNER Victor added the comment: This issue was opened 11 years ago, when Windows 95, 98, Me, 2000 and XP were used. Python is going to drop support of Windows XP, and most older versions are already no more supported. Does this issue still exist in recent Windows versions? I'm not aware of such bug. Does asyncio have the bug? -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue777588 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21208] Change default behavior of arguments with type bool when options are specified
paul j3 added the comment: In http://bugs.python.org/issue11588#msg212243 I explore the option of using decorators to 'register' custom functions with the parser. There I was adding exclusive/inclusive tests, but the same approach could be used to register custom types and actions. I should start a new issue re. documenting the use of 'register'. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21208 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Jason R. Coombs added the comment: Based on the example above, I've created a blog post to publish my recommendation for overriding these special methods in a way that's safe regardless of the parent implementation, given the status quo: http://blog.jaraco.com/2014/05/how-to-safely-override-init-or-new-in.html -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21119] asyncio create_connection resource warning
STINNER Victor added the comment: Can someone review close-3.patch please? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21119 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue19662] smtpd.py should not decode utf-8
Maciej Szulik added the comment: I'm attaching file issue19662_v1.patch. David please have a look at it and let me know if this is it, if not I'm waiting for your suggestions. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35390/issue19662_v1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue19662 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21252] Lib/asyncio/events.py has tons of docstrings which are just XXX
STINNER Victor added the comment: A first patch to fill remaining XXX docstring of events.py. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35391/asyncio_events_docstring.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21252 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21376] asyncio docs refer to wrong TimeoutError
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 6d90e8df01f4 by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4': Issue #21376: document asyncio.TimeoutError http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/6d90e8df01f4 New changeset 03bb1077b362 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.4) Issue #21376: document asyncio.TimeoutError http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/03bb1077b362 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21376 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21376] asyncio docs refer to wrong TimeoutError
STINNER Victor added the comment: Thanks for the report. In fact, asyncio.TimeoutError was not documented at all. It should now be fixed. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21376 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21443] asyncio logging documentation clarifications
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21443 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21443] asyncio logging documentation clarifications
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Good idea. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21443 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21454] asyncio's loop.connect_read_pipe makes pipes non-blocking contrary to the documentation
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 16f399588b2a by Victor Stinner in branch '3.4': Issue #21454: Fix asyncio.BaseEventLoop.connect_read_pipe doc http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/16f399588b2a New changeset 8391f99208f6 by Victor Stinner in branch 'default': (Merge 3.4) Issue #21454: Fix asyncio.BaseEventLoop.connect_read_pipe doc http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/8391f99208f6 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21454 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21454] asyncio's loop.connect_read_pipe makes pipes non-blocking contrary to the documentation
STINNER Victor added the comment: Yes, the documentation was wrong. It should now be fixed. Thanks for the report. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21454 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15014] smtplib: add support for arbitrary auth methods
Milan Oberkirch added the comment: Done. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35392/smtplib_auth.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13451] sched.py: speedup cancel() method
STINNER Victor added the comment: Serhiy, perhaps it would be useful to see if such optimizations can apply to Tulip's (or asyncio's) event loop, since it will probably be the new standard in 3.4. asyncio was designed differently. Cancelling a task doesn't remove it from a list of pending tasks. Cancelled tasks are just skipped when the event loop executes tasks. If you look more closely, a task can be a Handle, Future or Task object. A Handle object has a _cancelled attribute, its cancel() method just sets this attribute to True. It's almost the same for a Future object. In the context of a Task object, cancel() is very different because it sends a CancelledError exception into the running code. I see no possible optimization here. -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13451 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue15014] smtplib: add support for arbitrary auth methods
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org: -- nosy: +jesstess ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue15014 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21580] PhotoImage(data=...) apparently has to be UTF-8 or Base-64 encoded
Martin Panter added the comment:
Thanks for looking at this. Originally the issue was found by reading the GIF
and PNG images on various web pages, such as
http://www.weatherzone.com.au/vic/north-central/castlemaine. However I was
also able to produce the problem with the other formats of that Python logo:
$ python3 -Wall -bt
Python 3.4.1 (default, May 19 2014, 17:40:19)
[GCC 4.9.0 20140507 (prerelease)] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
import tkinter; tk = tkinter.Tk(); text = tkinter.Text(tk); text.pack()
with open(/lib/python3.4/test/imghdrdata/python.png, rb) as file: data
= file.read()
...
image = tkinter.PhotoImage(format=png, data=data)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File /usr/lib/python3.4/tkinter/__init__.py, line 3384, in __init__
Image.__init__(self, 'photo', name, cnf, master, **kw)
File /usr/lib/python3.4/tkinter/__init__.py, line 3340, in __init__
self.tk.call(('image', 'create', imgtype, name,) + options)
_tkinter.TclError: CRC check failed
u8png = tkinter.PhotoImage(format=png,
data=data.decode(latin-1).encode(utf-8))
text.image_create(tkinter.END, image=u8png)
'pyimage2'
The same problem occurs with the PGM and PPM logos, and the Base-64 encoding
trick does not work with those; only UTF-8 encoding. However as you discovered,
the GIF format logo works no problem when passed unencoded, although it
continues to work if I use my UTF-8 encoding trick, which is a bit strange.
Perhaps the internal UTF-8 decoding step is passing the invalid UTF-8 straight
through?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21580
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17172] Add turtledemo to IDLE menu
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: 0. My general interest is in running external programs and in particular, for this issue, python modules intended to be run as main. Some other scripts I would like to be able to easily launch from Idle include List/test.test_idle.py, Tools/Scripts/patchcheck.py, and a possible 'idle_tour.py' (in progress) that would be a live demo/tutorial of some Idle widgets and functions. I would like the list to be user-configurable for other choices. 1. As with any python script, turtledemo can be run now, without modification, in a separate process, asynchronously, from within idle, by loading the file into an editor window and selecting Run / Run Module or hitting F5. Communication and cleanup issues are already solved. Having output appear in the Shell window obviates the need for a separate console window to receive output, keeps it visible even after the external process quits. One thing that remains impossible is to run two separate modules at the same time. A possible inplementation of 'easy to launch' would be to load turtledemo.py into an editor window and generate a 'run-module' event. This, of course, does more than is needed and has the danger of a user accidentally overwriting the original module code. An alternative would be a stripped down version of ScriptBinding.ScriptBinding._run_module_event. 2. This feature should be implemented as an extension rather than being 'baked' into Idle. Run-module itself is an extension (ScriptBinding.py), as are several other functions (see config-extensions.def). A possible name would be 'external_module.py' An advantage of an extension is that it can be turned off if someone, such as a college course instructor, does not like it present. This change could be made before considering point 1. I would like to have one extension that could handle multiple external modules listed in the config entry. After reading config-bindings.def and some of the extension files, especially RstripExtension.py, I believe this is possible. However, I would expect to add this after there is a patch just for turtledemo. 3. If Run were on the menu of Shell windows, that would be the appropriate place for 'run external module' as opposed 'run editor module'. This would be especially true with multiple entries. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17172 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18141] tkinter.Image.__del__ can throw an exception if module globals are destroyed in the wrong order
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu: -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18141 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21326] asyncio: request clearer error message when event loop closed
STINNER Victor added the comment: I proposed a patch upstream (in Tulip) to solve this issue: http://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=169 -- nosy: +haypo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21326 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1683368] object.__init__ shouldn't allow args/kwds
Guido van Rossum added the comment: Hrm. I've always thought that the key point of cooperative MI was the term *cooperative*. Consider a regular (non-constructor) method. You must have a common base class that defines this method, and *that* method shouldn't be calling the super-method (because there isn't one). All cooperative classes extending this method must derive from that base class. It's the same for __init__ and __new__, except that you may treat each (keyword) argument as a separate method. But you must still have a point in the tree to eat that argument, and that point must not pass it up the super call chain. If in a particular framework you want unrecognized keyword arguments to the constructor to be ignored, you should define a common base class from which all your cooperative subclasses inherit. But given the prevalence of *single* inheritance, 'object' shouldn't be that common base class. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1683368 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21252] Lib/asyncio/events.py has tons of docstrings which are just XXX
STINNER Victor added the comment: Updated patch to address Guido's remarks. FYI I copied the documentation from the Doc repository and Lib/asyncio/unix_events.py (for child watchers), and so I copied typos :-) I tried to fix all copies of the documentation in my new patch. I didn't mention the API of a child watcher because the class is not documented yet... nor get_child_watcher and set_child_watcher functions! (I mean not documented in the Doc/ directory). I suggest to open a new issue to enhance the documentation of this part of the part. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35393/asyncio_events_docstring-2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21252 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21585] Run Tkinter tests with wantobjects=False
Lita Cho added the comment: So I don't know what the best way to do this, but I changed the widget_tests.py in order to set tkinter.wantobjects = 0 if a 'wantobjects' flag was passed through test.support.use_resources. Then I added a new test called test_ttk_guionly_wantobj, where it turns on wantobjects. If we create a new module, then we start off with a clean tkinter object. Before I go this route for all the tests, I wanted to make sure if this was the correct way to go about it. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21585 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21585] Run Tkinter tests with wantobjects=False
Lita Cho added the comment: Patches lived in my Linux machine. I've attached my patch. I will add my module next. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35394/test_wantobj.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21585 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21585] Run Tkinter tests with wantobjects=False
Changes by Lita Cho lita@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35395/test_ttk_guionly_wantobj.py ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21585 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21592] Make statistics.median run in linear time
Steven D'Aprano added the comment: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 02:43:29PM +, Thomas Dybdahl Ahle wrote: I have written some proof of concept code here [1], I would appreciate you commenting on it, before I turn it into a patch, as I haven't contributed code to Python before. Thanks Thomas! I will try to look at this over the weekend (today is Thursday my time). If I haven't responded by Monday your time, please feel free to send me a reminder. I have tried to write it as efficiently as possible, but it is of course possible that the c-implemented `sorted()` code will be faster than even the smartest python-implemented select. My quick-and-dirty tests suggest that you need at least 10 million items in the list before a pure Python median-of-median algorithm is as fast as the median algorithm based on sorting in C. [1]: http://pastebin.com/30x0j39a -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21592 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3991] urllib.request.urlopen does not handle non-ASCII characters
Graham Oliver added the comment: hello I came across this bug when using 'ā' in a url To get around the problem I used the 'URL encoded' version '%C4%81' instead of 'ā' See this page http://www.charbase.com/0101-unicode-latin-small-letter-a-with-macron I tried using the 'puny code' for 'ā' 'xn--yda' but that didn't work -- nosy: +Graham.Oliver ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3991 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21598] Is __getitem__ and __len__ implementations enough to make a user-defined class sliceable?
New submission from Santoso Wijaya: The reference doc for Python data model says that __getslice__ is deprecated [1], and that __getitem__ should be used instead: Deprecated since version 2.0: Support slice objects as parameters to the __getitem__() method. (However, built-in types in CPython currently still implement __getslice__(). Therefore, you have to override it in derived classes when implementing slicing.) But I'm getting the following behavior when I try it myself. Is there something I'm missing? $ python Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56) [GCC 4.8.2] on linux2 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information. class tup(object): ... def __getitem__(self, i): ... if i == 0: return 0 ... if i == 1: return 1 ... KeyboardInterrupt class tup(object): ... def __getitem__(self, i): ... if i in (0, 1): return i ... else: raise IndexError() ... def __len__(self): ... return 2 ... t = tup() len(t) 2 t[0], t[1] (0, 1) t[:2] Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File stdin, line 4, in __getitem__ IndexError t[:1] Traceback (most recent call last): File stdin, line 1, in module File stdin, line 4, in __getitem__ IndexError [1] https://docs.python.org/2/reference/datamodel.html#object.__getslice__ -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 219326 nosy: santa4nt priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Is __getitem__ and __len__ implementations enough to make a user-defined class sliceable? type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21598 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21598] Is __getitem__ and __len__ implementations enough to make a user-defined class sliceable?
Santoso Wijaya added the comment: Hm. The docstring for __getitem__ doesn't mention it can/should be accepting slice object as argument. That's what I'm missing. Doc patch? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21598 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21598] Is __getitem__ and __len__ implementations enough to make a user-defined class sliceable?
Changes by Santoso Wijaya santoso.wij...@gmail.com: -- resolution: - not a bug status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21598 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21599] Argument transport in attach and detach method in Server class in base_events file is not used
New submission from Vajrasky Kok: In Lib/asyncio/base_events.py, we have these lines of code: --- def attach(self, transport): assert self.sockets is not None self.active_count += 1 def detach(self, transport): assert self.active_count 0 self.active_count -= 1 if self.active_count == 0 and self.sockets is None: self._wakeup() The transport is not used. We can remove them. Here is the patch to remove the arguments. If for higher philosophical reason, we need this unused argument, maybe we can comment it. -- components: Library (Lib) files: remove_transport_in_base_events.patch keywords: patch messages: 219328 nosy: haypo, vajrasky priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Argument transport in attach and detach method in Server class in base_events file is not used type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35396/remove_transport_in_base_events.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21599 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21592] Make statistics.median run in linear time
Vajrasky Kok added the comment: Yeah, I remember I tried to improve the performance of the median in the past using median-of-k algorithm. But too bad I could not beat sorted C function efficiency. Maybe you have a better luck! -- nosy: +vajrasky ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21592 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17172] Add turtledemo to IDLE menu
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: I withdraw my suggestion that turtledemo get anything added just for moving code to Idle. What is does need is the ability to widen the code pane so one can more easily read or cut (by normal means). See #21597. One of my concerns about putting turtledemo on the Idle menu is that people will see it as part of Idle. Fine it it works well ;-). Not so fine if it does not. The solution is to fix any important current problems. #18132 (buttons disappear on small screens) has a patch that fixes the problem but creates another. I have not yet looked at the other open turtledemo issues. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17172 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21600] mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict to sys.modules
New submission from fumihiko kakuma:
It seems that stopall doesn't work when do start patch.dict to sys.modules.
I show sample scripts the following.
Using stopall test case seems to always refer the first mock foo object.
But using stop it refers a new mock foo object.
$ cat test_sampmod.py
import foo
def myfunc():
print myfunc foo=%s % foo
return foo
$ cat test_samp.py
import mock
import sys
import unittest
class SampTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.foo_mod = mock.Mock()
self.m = mock.patch.dict('sys.modules', {'foo': self.foo_mod})
self.p = self.m.start()
print foo_mod=%s % self.foo_mod
__import__('test_sampmod')
self.test_sampmod = sys.modules['test_sampmod']
def tearDown(self):
if len(sys.argv) 1:
self.m.stop()
print stop patch
else:
mock.patch.stopall()
print stopall patch
def test_samp1(self):
self.assertEqual(self.foo_mod, self.test_sampmod.myfunc())
def test_samp2(self):
self.assertEqual(self.foo_mod, self.test_sampmod.myfunc())
def test_samp3(self):
self.assertEqual(self.foo_mod, self.test_sampmod.myfunc())
if __name__ == '__main__':
suite = unittest.TestSuite()
suite.addTest(unittest.TestLoader().loadTestsFromTestCase(SampTestCase))
unittest.TextTestRunner(verbosity=2).run(suite)
$ python test_samp.py stop
test_samp1 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='41504336'
myfunc foo=Mock id='41504336'
stop patch
ok
test_samp2 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='41504464'
myfunc foo=Mock id='41504464'
stop patch
ok
test_samp3 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='41504720'
myfunc foo=Mock id='41504720'
stop patch
ok
--
Ran 3 tests in 0.004s
OK
$ python test_samp.py
test_samp1 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='19152464'
myfunc foo=Mock id='19152464'
stopall patch
ok
test_samp2 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='19152592'
myfunc foo=Mock id='19152464'
FAIL
stopall patch
test_samp3 (__main__.SampTestCase) ... foo_mod=Mock id='19182096'
myfunc foo=Mock id='19152464'
FAIL
stopall patch
==
FAIL: test_samp2 (__main__.SampTestCase)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test_samp.py, line 27, in test_samp2
self.assertEqual(self.foo_mod, self.test_sampmod.myfunc())
AssertionError: Mock id='19152592' != Mock id='19152464'
==
FAIL: test_samp3 (__main__.SampTestCase)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File test_samp.py, line 30, in test_samp3
self.assertEqual(self.foo_mod, self.test_sampmod.myfunc())
AssertionError: Mock id='19182096' != Mock id='19152464'
--
Ran 3 tests in 0.003s
FAILED (failures=2)
$
--
components: Tests
messages: 219331
nosy: kakuma
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: mock.patch.stopall doesn't work with patch.dict to sys.modules
type: behavior
versions: Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21600
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9351] argparse set_defaults on subcommands should override top level set_defaults
paul j3 added the comment: This is not getting much attention for several reasons: - there's quite a backlog of argparse patches and issues - 'set_defaults' is not commonly used. Setting default in 'add_argument' seems more common. - defining the same argument for both the parser and subparser can create other difficulties. - in Bethard's example, 'set_default' sets an attribute that has no connection to any argument. It's a cleaver trick that few users will think to use, and probably won't be of much value. The idea proposed here of using a subnamespace for the subparser is interesting. It reminds me of a StackOverflow question about implementing nested namespaces. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18668227 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9351 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21601] Cancel method for Asyncio Task is not documented
New submission from Vajrasky Kok: https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio-task.html#task The cancel method is not documented although it is a part of public API. Here is the patch to fix the doc. -- assignee: docs@python components: Documentation files: fix_doc_asyncio_task.patch keywords: patch messages: 219333 nosy: docs@python, haypo, vajrasky priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Cancel method for Asyncio Task is not documented versions: Python 3.4, Python 3.5 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35397/fix_doc_asyncio_task.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21601 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21602] smtplib.py socket.create_connection() also doesn't handle EINTR properly
New submission from Syou Ei: The smtplib.py also has the same problem. The EINTR cannot be handled properly. 2014-05-21 19:20:15,631 ERROR actions: Notification 'socket_noti' FAILED to send emails to set(['mailt...@tscoss.com']): class 'socket.error' - [Errno 4] Interrupted system calltrace:Traceback (most recent call last): File Utils.py, line 719, in sendEmail server = smtplib.SMTP(host, port, timeout=DEFAULT_SOCKET_TIMEOUT) File /opt/zenoss/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 242, in __init__ (code, msg) = self.connect(host, port) File /opt/zenoss/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 302, in connect self.sock = self._get_socket(host, port, self.timeout) File /opt/zenoss/lib/python2.7/smtplib.py, line 277, in _get_socket return socket.create_connection((port, host), timeout) File /opt/zenoss/lib/python2.7/Write failed: Broken pipecreate_connection -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 219334 nosy: flox, gregory.p.smith, haypo, meishao, neologix, pitrou, tholzer priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: smtplib.py socket.create_connection() also doesn't handle EINTR properly type: behavior versions: Python 2.7 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21602 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21477] Idle: improve idle_test.htest
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 90dab7696e89 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '2.7': Issue #21477: Add htests for GrepDialog, UndoDelegator, and configDialog. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/90dab7696e89 New changeset d90905960803 by Terry Jan Reedy in branch '3.4': Issue #21477: Add htests for GrepDialog, UndoDelegator, and configDialog. http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d90905960803 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21477 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue21477] Idle: improve idle_test.htest
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: Ned, this patch includes a call to macosxSupport. _initializeTkVariantTests(root) in htest.run. Does this work on mac or is something else needed (like doing the same for individual tests that create another root)? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue21477 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
