[issue44294] 3.9.5 Windows 64-bit installer says v3.8.10 in startup window.

2021-06-03 Thread Sunny Jamshedji 


Sunny Jamshedji  added the comment:

Screenshot 4

Yes, I would agree, since it stopped happening on the 3rd and 4th try like 
someone noticed something on the server end; maybe a little guy running around 
inside the server, IDK?!

I'd close this myself, but it was certainly quite bizarre.

--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50090/4. Python 3.8.10 Installer.png

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44294>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue44294] 3.9.5 Windows 64-bit installer says v3.8.10 in startup window.

2021-06-03 Thread Sunny Jamshedji 


Sunny Jamshedji  added the comment:

Screenshot 3

--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50089/3. Use Show in Folder Opens 
Downloads.png

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44294>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue44294] 3.9.5 Windows 64-bit installer says v3.8.10 in startup window.

2021-06-03 Thread Sunny Jamshedji 


Sunny Jamshedji  added the comment:

Screenshot 2.

--
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50088/2. Used Save Link As.png

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44294>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue44294] 3.9.5 Windows 64-bit installer says v3.8.10 in startup window.

2021-06-02 Thread Sunny Jamshedji 


New submission from Sunny Jamshedji :

Downloaded Windows 64 bit installer from:

https://www.python.org/downloads/windows/

Link said:

https://www.python.org/ftp/python/3.9.5/python-3.9.5-amd64.exe

It downloaded what appears to be 3.8.10 installer. I launched it and I got the 
attached screenshot with 3.8.10 installer.

Tested it out 4 times. First 2 times it did the same thing. While testing the 
third time, acquiring screenshots so it took longer, it gave me the correct 
file! IDK what happened, unless you guys fixed it in between!

--
components: Installation
files: 1. Python for Windows Download Page.png
messages: 394951
nosy: sunnyjamshedji
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: 3.9.5 Windows 64-bit installer says v3.8.10 in startup window.
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.9
Added file: https://bugs.python.org/file50085/1. Python for Windows Download 
Page.png

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44294>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue42804] Unable to compile the cpython code x86 windows

2021-02-05 Thread Sunny 


Sunny  added the comment:

Got it fixed with following the below steps 
a. Delete external folder 
b. Run the below build command 

build.bat -k -E -p x64

-k killed the existing python build process
-E skipped the external libraries fetching 
-p mentioned the platform

closing the ticket as it worked

--
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42804>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue42804] Unable to compile the cpython code x86 windows

2021-01-01 Thread Sunny 


Sunny  added the comment:

I am running using admin rights but still getting the error

--

___
Python tracker 
<https://bugs.python.org/issue42804>
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1820] Enhance Object/structseq.c to match namedtuple and tuple api

2014-05-30 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

Hi Stefan,

There is a comment at the top in structseq.c

/* Fields with this name have only a field index, not a field name.
   They are only allowed for indices  n_visible_fields. */
char *PyStructSequence_UnnamedField = unnamed field;

This is the definition of os.stat_result in posixmodule.c:

static PyStructSequence_Field stat_result_fields[] = {
{st_mode,protection bits},
{st_ino, inode},
{st_dev, device},
{st_nlink,   number of hard links},
{st_uid, user ID of owner},
{st_gid, group ID of owner},
{st_size,total size, in bytes},
/* The NULL is replaced with PyStructSequence_UnnamedField later. */
{NULL,   integer time of last access},
{NULL,   integer time of last modification},
{NULL,   integer time of last change},
{st_atime,   time of last access},
{st_mtime,   time of last modification},
{st_ctime,   time of last change},
{st_atime_ns,   time of last access in nanoseconds},
{st_mtime_ns,   time of last modification in nanoseconds},
{st_ctime_ns,   time of last change in nanoseconds},
  ...


By visible i mean the values present in the repr of the object and by-extension 
accessible by position.

I talked about my problems with os.stat_result in points 3 and 4 of msg202333 
i.e repr of os.stat_result takes the first three keys from the attribute-access 
only fields (the invisible part) and uses them for the last three values in the 
displayed structseq.

With my current patch, _fields for os.stat_result only has 7 values:

 x = os.stat('.')
 x._fields
('st_mode', 'st_ino', 'st_dev', 'st_nlink', 'st_uid', 'st_gid', 'st_size')


Is this what you expect?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1820
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1185124] pydoc doesn't find all module doc strings

2014-05-30 Thread Sunny K 

Changes by Sunny K sunfin...@gmail.com:


Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file31844/myfirst.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1185124] pydoc doesn't find all module doc strings

2014-05-30 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

Hi Victor, can you give this another look?

--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1820] Enhance Object/structseq.c to match namedtuple and tuple api

2014-05-26 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

Hi Stefan,

I've added a new patch which only adds _fields, combining parts from my earlier 
patch and Andrew's (his patch does not account for visible unnamed fields).

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35367/structseq_fields.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1820
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue21555] gcmodule.c could use pytime.h

2014-05-22 Thread Sunny K 

Changes by Sunny K sunfin...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +sunfinite

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21555
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1820] Enhance Object/structseq.c to match namedtuple and tuple api

2013-11-07 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

New patch for 3.4 adds the following:

1. _fields
2. _replace()
3. _asdict()
4. eval(repr(s)) == s

Now the issues:

1. _asdict() returns a normal dictionary. I don't know if this is what
   is required.

2. Both _asdict() and _replace() assume that unnamed visible fields are
   at the end of the visible sequence.  A comment at the beginning says
   they are allowed for indices  n_visible_fields.
   
   Is there another way to map members to values? Because tp-members
   is (visible named fields + invisible named fields) whereas values
   array is (visible named fields + visible unnamed fields + invisible
   named fields)

3. The mismatch mentioned above is present in the current
   implementation of repr:

   In os.stat_result, the last three visible fields are unnamed
   (i.e integer a_time, m_time and c_time). However they are present 
   in the repr output with keys which are the first three keys from the
   invisible part(float a_time, m_time and c_time).
   Was this intentional?

   Also, the above logic causes duplicate keys when invisible fields 
   are included in the repr output as per issue11629.
  
   In my patch for that issue, i put invisible fields under the 'dict'
   keyword argument. This output format utilises code already present 
   in structseq_new and makes eval work as expected when invisible 
   fields are present in repr. Also, it sidesteps the question of
   duplicated keys because they are present inside a dict.

4. Raymond stated that _fields should contain only the visible 
   positional fields. So _fields of os.stat_result contains only 7
   fields because of the three unnamed fields. Is this the expected 
   implementation?

5. Is there a way to declare a member function in C that accepts only 
   keyword arguments(like _replace())? I could not find one.

This is my first real C patch. So some of the issues might just be a
lack of understanding. Apologies.

--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +sunfinite
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32525/structseq_1.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1820
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue11698] Improve repr for structseq objects to show named, but unindexed fields

2013-11-07 Thread Sunny K 

Changes by Sunny K sunfin...@gmail.com:


Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file32265/structseq.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11698
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue11698] Improve repr for structseq objects to show named, but unindexed fields

2013-11-07 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

The previous patch had a wrong mapping between keys and values. The 
current implementation of repr means that duplicated keys will be
present when invisible fields are included. See points 2 and 3 in
http://bugs.python.org/issue1820#msg202330 for more explanation.

I have sidestepped that issue by placing invisible fields under the dict 
argument. This also plays well with the current code in 
structseq_new and eval(repr(obj)) works.

The output with the patch is:

$./python -c import os; print(os.stat('LICENSE'))
os.stat_result(st_mode=33188, st_ino=577299, st_dev=64512, st_nlink=1, 
st_uid=33616, st_gid=600, st_size=12749, st_atime=1382696747, 
st_mtime=1382361968, st_ctime=1382361968,
dict={'st_atime':1382696747.0, 'st_mtime':1382361968.0,
'st_ctime':1382361968.0, 'st_atime_ns':13826967470, 
'st_mtime_ns':13823619680, 'st_ctime_ns':13823619680, 
'st_blksize':4096, 'st_blocks':32, 'st_rdev':0})

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32527/structseq_2.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11698
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1820] Enhance Object/structseq.c to match namedtuple and tuple api

2013-11-07 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

Oops, the correct issue for improving the repr is issue11698.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1820
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue19340] test_sysconfig.test_srcdir fails when sys.base_prefix=/

2013-10-23 Thread Sunny K 

Changes by Sunny K sunfin...@gmail.com:


--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32314/test_sysconfig.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19340
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue19340] test_sysconfig.test_srcdir fails when sys.base_prefix=/

2013-10-23 Thread Sunny K 

Changes by Sunny K sunfin...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +tarek

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19340
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue7757] sys.path is incorrect when prefix is

2013-10-22 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

I took a shot at this. Build is successful and imports happen. Tests are ok 
except test_sysconfig, and that is because of sys.prefix being set to '/'. I've 
raised issue19340 for that.

About the patch, i'm not sure how to completely test for false 
positives(joinpath now returns SEPsuffix if prefix is null). I could not 
think of any issues from the current calls to joinpath.

--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +sunfinite
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32293/getpath.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue7757
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue19340] test_sysconfig.test_srcdir fails when sys.base_prefix=/

2013-10-21 Thread Sunny K 

New submission from Sunny K:

While working on issue7757, i noticed that test_srcdir fails when python is 
built with prefix .

This is because in Lib/sysconfig.py, _safe_realpath() is called on srcdir which 
normalises //lib to /lib. In the test case, it is compared directly to the 
output of get_makefile_filename().


==
FAIL: test_srcdir (__main__.TestSysConfig)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /lib/python3.4/test/test_sysconfig.py, line 356, in test_srcdir
srcdir)
AssertionError: '//lib/python3.4/config-3.4dm' != '/lib/python3.4/config-3.4dm'
- //lib/python3.4/config-3.4dm
? -
+ /lib/python3.4/config-3.4dm

~/cpython$ python3.4
Python 3.4.0a3+ (default:dad1debba93c+, Oct 22 2013, 02:32:50)
[GCC 4.4.3] on linux
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
 import sys
 sys.prefix
'/'
 sys.base_prefix
'/'


--
components: Tests
messages: 200849
nosy: sunfinite
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: test_sysconfig.test_srcdir fails when sys.base_prefix=/
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.4

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19340
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue14680] pydoc with -w option does not work for a lot of help topics

2013-10-20 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

This issue is present in 3.4 too.

Added patch for 3.4.

--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +sunfinite
versions: +Python 3.4
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32258/pydoc.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue14680
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue11698] Improve repr for structseq objects to show named, but unindexed fields

2013-10-20 Thread Sunny K 

Sunny K added the comment:

Added patch for 3.4.

The patch demarcates the output by adding a {...} around the dictionary 
portion. Please let me know if this is the right format or if not required at 
all. It is a simple change.

--
nosy: +sunfinite
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32265/structseq.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11698
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1185124] pydoc doesn't find all module doc strings

2013-09-26 Thread Sunny 

Sunny added the comment:

Added patch for 2.7. Please review.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31877/pydoc_2.7.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1185124] pydoc doesn't find all module doc strings

2013-09-25 Thread Sunny 

Sunny added the comment:

I've updated my patch with the review changes and tests.

tokenize.detect_encoding throws a TypeError if the file object passed to it is 
in text mode. However, i've realized catching this is not necessary as i now 
check for TextIOBase instead of just StringIO before.

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31864/myfirst_2.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1185124] pydoc doesn't find all module doc strings

2013-09-22 Thread Sunny 

Sunny added the comment:

I've rewritten the source_synopsis function to use the tokenize module. 

It should now work with triple single quotes and hopefully all the other cases 
where __doc__ returns a string.

Since tokenize.tokenize needs a file object that is opened in binary mode, in 
the case of a StringIO object, i am reading the whole  object and converting it 
to a BytesIO object. I don't know if that is the right way. Also, the only 
instance i could find where source_synopsis is called with a StringIO object is 
in the ModuleScanner.run method. Maybe we could tweak this call to pass a 
byte-stream object to avoid the overhead of re-conversion?

All the current tests pass.

--
keywords: +patch
nosy: +sunfinite
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file31844/myfirst.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1185124
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com