[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2014-03-06 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 064ee489982e by R David Murray in branch 'default':
whatsnew: improve PyZipFile filterfuc entry, and its docs (#19274).
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/064ee489982e

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2014-03-05 Thread R. David Murray

R. David Murray added the comment:

For future reference, the update Christian refers to in the previous message is 
4f1121ae1cb5.

--
nosy: +r.david.murray

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment:

Hi Chris, your commit is a bit hard to review due to all the unrelated spacing 
changes.  I assume this is done automatically by your editor?  It's probably 
best to switch off that feature for CPython development :)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment:

While reviewing: is it intended that the filter is only called for directories 
and not for individual files?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 2d39b3555951 by Georg Brandl in branch 'default':
#19274: use captured_stdout() in the test suite; add NEWS entry.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2d39b3555951

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

ah, I just see that.
The problem was that the checkin drove me nuts. It forced me to
run reindent to normalize the code. I did that with my WindIde
editor, but this did not help.
The point was: Actually an end-of-line was missing at the end of
the files.
Sorry, I did not see that at all, because the indentation changes
are at the end. I usually avoid this strictly. It was just the check-in
rejection...

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

@georg:
 While reviewing: is it intended that the filter is only called for 
 directories and not for individual files?

Not really. I will add this, later. Just wanted to see if this makes
sense and it's worth the effort to extend it.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-21 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

added that with tests.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-20 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 34fb83421119 by Christian Tismer in branch 'default':
add a filterfunc to zip file.PyZipFile.writepy, issue 19274
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/34fb83421119

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-20 Thread Christian Tismer

Changes by Christian Tismer tis...@stackless.com:


--
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

Hi Georg,
So do you think it is ok this way?
I was not sure if extending the function with an optional
arg is ok, or if a method to configure PyZipFile would be better.
At the moment I just needed the simple functionality.
Should it maybe get a regex like compileall.py ?

And a general question:
What is the right constraint for a filter function?
As I wrote it, returning nothing would simply be treated as False.
Maybe it is better to enforce a return value which explicitly forbids
to be just None, which often just means I forgot the return value ?

About feature or fix: Well, I need this for python2.7, because without
it, the whole purpose of PyZipFile is pretty questionable. I might argue
it a fix, because it crashes on the standard library ;-)

Anyway, tell me and I'l add test, docs and put it into dev.

cheers - chris

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-18 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

I don't think this is needed. You can walk a tree and call writepy() for files 
and directories which you want.

--
nosy: +serhiy.storchaka

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

@serhiy.storchaka

 I don't think this is needed. You can walk a tree and call writepy()
 for files and directories which you want.

What exactly do mean by this and needed?
I cannot see the connection of my initial post and your reply.

Running PyZipFile on a package dir of the standard lib _does_ traverse
the tree, and there is no way to stop it from doing that.
That was the whole point of the issue.
Please correct me if I'm missing something.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-18 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:

this is a filter function. Not needed means that you can got what you want 
without adding a filter function to zipfile.PyZipFile. Just don't call 
writepy() on directories which contains files which shouldn't be zipped.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-18 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

Ah, I understand:

The case that does not compile comes from the toplevel test folder,
which I could have excluded explicitly.

But it is not a complete solution:
If I want to add every package from the standard lib, then I necessarily
encounter enclosed test folders, for instance:

Lib/unittest

contains

Lib/unittest/test

Your hint to just not call writepy() on directories which contain files
which shouldn't be zipped means that I cannot use writepy at all,
because many library packages contain tests.
But that is the only purpose of class PyZipFile, therefore the patch.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-17 Thread Georg Brandl

Georg Brandl added the comment:

Looks fine but -- as a new feature -- is 3.4 only, and needs docs and tests.

--
nosy: +georg.brandl
stage:  - patch review
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-16 Thread Christian Tismer

New submission from Christian Tismer:

zipfile.PyZipFile needs a filter function.

Reason:
When creating an archive of the python lib, we don't want the tests.
Especially the test file badsyntax_future3.py does not compile.

Use case:

With this little addition, it becomes very easy to create a zip file
of the whole python library. See the attached use case.

--
components: Library (Lib)
files: zipfile.diff
keywords: patch
messages: 200088
nosy: Christian.Tismer
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable
type: enhancement
versions: Python 2.7
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32150/zipfile.diff

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue19274] make zipfile.PyZipFile more usable

2013-10-16 Thread Christian Tismer

Christian Tismer added the comment:

Here is my use case as an example.
With this patch above, I can easily create a .zip file of the standard lib.

This was no longer possible at all, after revision 17558,
from 2001-04-18:

This is a test
from __future__ import nested_scopes
from __future__ import rested_snopes

def f(x):
def g(y):
return x + y
return g

print f(2)(4)

--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file32151/make_libzip.py

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19274
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com