[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)
On 13. 07. 21 5:21, Ethan Furman wrote: On 7/11/21 4:00 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: >> I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were >> integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag. As a result the enum in 3.10 will be the same >> as 3.9 (complete module reversion). > > I see the revert was merged with the "skip news" label. The changelog now mentions the original > change, but not the revert. > > Is it possible to mention this retroactively in the 3.10.0b4 changelog, or is that frozen now? > I think it's important to document this for maintainers of codebases that already adapted their > code to the new behavior with an if Python version >= 3.10 conditional. Thanks for bringing that up, a new news entry has been added. Thank you, Ethan. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/XNXJILZGHGSA3LAZSPP67GRNYDDUTCIZ/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)
On 7/11/21 4:00 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: >> I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were >> integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag. As a result the enum in 3.10 will be the same >> as 3.9 (complete module reversion). > > I see the revert was merged with the "skip news" label. The changelog now mentions the original > change, but not the revert. > > Is it possible to mention this retroactively in the 3.10.0b4 changelog, or is that frozen now? > I think it's important to document this for maintainers of codebases that already adapted their > code to the new behavior with an if Python version >= 3.10 conditional. Thanks for bringing that up, a new news entry has been added. -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/RXFYYX74WVI5ALUNJUL645EANUVFNU6G/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)
On 07. 07. 21 3:58, Ethan Furman wrote: On 6/29/21 9:50 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > the Steering Council strongly suggests that for Python 3.10, the changes in Enum’s > str and repr be reverted back to the Python 3.9 behavior, and that a PEP be written > for Python 3.11. I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag. As a result the enum in 3.10 will be the same as 3.9 (complete module reversion). Hello Ethan. I see the revert was merged with the "skip news" label. The changelog now mentions the original change, but not the revert. Is it possible to mention this retroactively in the 3.10.0b4 changelog, or is that frozen now? I think it's important to document this for maintainers of codebases that already adapted their code to the new behavior with an if Python version >= 3.10 conditional. Thanks for considering, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/3YE5FOVKK5ZEGPARDBE3JOGA3R66HCAD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: From the SC (was Re: Enum -- last call for comments on 3.10 changes)
On 6/29/21 9:50 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > the Steering Council strongly suggests that for Python 3.10, the changes in Enum’s > str and repr be reverted back to the Python 3.9 behavior, and that a PEP be written > for Python 3.11. I was unable to revert just the str and repr changes in the time available as many of them were integral to fixes and improvements made to Flag. As a result the enum in 3.10 will be the same as 3.9 (complete module reversion). A PEP will be forthcoming. My apologies and sympathies to those that contributed to the 3.10 enum module -- look for those changes in 3.11. -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/LSTMFAPSPD3BGZ4D6HQFODXZVB3PLYKF/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
