Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
Antoine Pitrou wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old ConfigParser as _BuggyConfigParser? (that idea is only partially tongue-in-cheek...) Or we can put it in the buggy module which receives all buggy code. The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be so simple! -- Steven ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote: The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be so simple! It's self-describing, and needs no further documentation. :-) -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake at acm.org A storm broke loose in my mind. --Albert Einstein ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
On Dec 14, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Fred Drake wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote: The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be so simple! It's self-describing, and needs no further documentation. :-) And psychologically more effective than deprecation. Anyone writing import buggy probably feels like they have got some explaining to do :-) Raymond___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
On 14/12/2010 17:01, Raymond Hettinger wrote: On Dec 14, 2010, at 3:38 AM, Fred Drake wrote: On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Steven D'Apranost...@pearwood.info wrote: The good thing about that idea is that maintenance of buggy.py will be so simple! It's self-describing, and needs no further documentation. :-) And psychologically more effective than deprecation. Anyone writing import buggy probably feels like they have got some explaining to do :-) They might be intro retro-robotics: http://www.anf.nildram.co.uk/beebcontrol/buggies/bbc_buggy/index.html (For those not in the UK, this was a very popular schools project kit on the back of the famous BBC micro initiative) TJG ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
+1 from me. If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old ConfigParser as _BuggyConfigParser? (that idea is only partially tongue-in-cheek...) Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
Wiadomość napisana przez Nick Coghlan w dniu 2010-12-14, o godz. 01:20: +1 from me. If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old ConfigParser as _BuggyConfigParser? (that idea is only partially tongue-in-cheek...) We may leave the LegacyInterpolation class if someone *really* needs to support that. That way RawConfigParser(interpolation=LegacyInterpolation()) is effectively the old ConfigParser. -- Nondeprecatorily yours, Łukasz Langa tel. +48 791 080 144 WWW http://lukasz.langa.pl/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] configparser 1.1 - one last bug fix needed
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:20:04 +1000 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote: +1 from me. If anyone complains too much, perhaps we can offer to retain the old ConfigParser as _BuggyConfigParser? (that idea is only partially tongue-in-cheek...) Or we can put it in the buggy module which receives all buggy code. Regards Antoine. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
