Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Michael Hudson
Louis Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Michael Hudson wrote:
>
>>Well, I think this is a subjective judgement -- a matter of
>>familiarity.  I "play" with Python all the time.  A good start is to
>>enhance your interactive experience somewhat.  Three options spring to
>>mind:
>>
>> 1) Get readline support working.  If you're still using Apple's

[...]

>> 2) Install IPython (http://ipython.scipy.org/).  This is a massive

[...]

>> 3) Install (my) PyRepl package (http://codespeak.net/pyrpl/), which
>>is a different implementation of the same kind of thing.
>>
>>There are less terminal oriented interactive environments too -- I
>>think wxPython includes one and PyObjC has a 'PyInterpreter' example.
>>But to me they don't hold much advantage over the in-Terminal.app
>>solutions.
>>
>
> Well, I can just see Troy sitting at his computer reading the above
> and saying, "I rest my case."  :-)

It's all a bit unixy, yes.  OTOH, it's not exactly hard and you only
have to do it once...

> You did somewhat admit that in (1) above and in the remainder of your
> message so you are honest about the state of affairs.  And I thank you
> for all the information.  Now, where to start?  Where to start?

I don't know.  If I did know, I'd probably have done it.  It would
help if Apple shipped Python with readline support enabled, for
starters.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  I think my standards have lowered enough that now I think ``good
  design'' is when the page doesn't irritate the living fuck out of 
  me.-- http://www.jwz.org/gruntle/design.html
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Michael Hudson
"Chris Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> That would be nice, but I have even less of an idea how to get money
> for hat than I do getting venture capital to start a
> business. However, perhaps this is just what one poster proposed: the
> PSF could fund a good cross-platform IDE.

I don't think the PSF has the resources to do this currently.  Also,
it doesn't intuitively strike me as the sort of thing the PSF is
currently looking to fund.  But I could be wrong!  Gather some people
and make a proposal for the next round of grants, if you want to show
me up.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
   INEFFICIENT CAPITALIST YOUR OPULENT 
TOILET WILL BE YOUR UNDOING -- from Twisted.Quotes
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 15, 2005, at 5:48, Michael Hudson wrote:
Louis Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael Hudson wrote:
Well, I think this is a subjective judgement -- a matter of
familiarity.  I "play" with Python all the time.  A good start is to
enhance your interactive experience somewhat.  Three options spring 
to
mind:

1) Get readline support working.  If you're still using Apple's
[...]
2) Install IPython (http://ipython.scipy.org/).  This is a massive
[...]
3) Install (my) PyRepl package (http://codespeak.net/pyrpl/), which
   is a different implementation of the same kind of thing.
There are less terminal oriented interactive environments too -- I
think wxPython includes one and PyObjC has a 'PyInterpreter' example.
But to me they don't hold much advantage over the in-Terminal.app
solutions.
Well, I can just see Troy sitting at his computer reading the above
and saying, "I rest my case."  :-)
It's all a bit unixy, yes.  OTOH, it's not exactly hard and you only
have to do it once...
You did somewhat admit that in (1) above and in the remainder of your
message so you are honest about the state of affairs.  And I thank you
for all the information.  Now, where to start?  Where to start?
I don't know.  If I did know, I'd probably have done it.  It would
help if Apple shipped Python with readline support enabled, for
starters.
I think it's a licensing issue, Apple is probably trying to save people 
(themselves?) from linking against GPL stuff without realizing the 
implications.  If Python could use BSD libedit instead of GNU readline, 
of if it just included PyRepl, it would not be a problem.

-bob
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Michael Hudson
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Feb 15, 2005, at 5:48, Michael Hudson wrote:
> 
>> I don't know.  If I did know, I'd probably have done it.  It would
>> help if Apple shipped Python with readline support enabled, for
>> starters.
>
> I think it's a licensing issue, Apple is probably trying to save
> people (themselves?) from linking against GPL stuff without realizing
> the implications.

Probably yes.  But they ship bash with readline enabled... oh well,
I'm not masochistic enough to flog that particular horse.

> If Python could use BSD libedit instead of GNU readline,

I *think* there was a patch to do this, back in the mists of time.

> of if it just included PyRepl, it would not be a problem.

If PyRepl was fit for inclusion (sigh) that would indeed be nice :)

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  Just point your web browser at http://www.python.org/search/ and
  look for "program", "doesn't", "work", or "my". Whenever you find
  someone else whose program didn't work, don't do what they
  did. Repeat as needed.-- Tim Peters, on python-help, 16 Jun 1998
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 15, 2005, at 6:00, Michael Hudson wrote:
Bob Ippolito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Feb 15, 2005, at 5:48, Michael Hudson wrote:
I don't know.  If I did know, I'd probably have done it.  It would
help if Apple shipped Python with readline support enabled, for
starters.
I think it's a licensing issue, Apple is probably trying to save
people (themselves?) from linking against GPL stuff without realizing
the implications.
Probably yes.  But they ship bash with readline enabled... oh well,
I'm not masochistic enough to flog that particular horse.
It would be pretty hard to unintentionally violate the GPL by accident 
with a readline-enabled bash executable considering that you can't link 
to an MH_EXECUTABLE -- and even if you could, it's stripped so the 
symbols aren't there anymore anyway.

-bob
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Mac User Python Newbies

2005-02-15 Thread Kevin Dangoor
Bob Ippolito wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:09 PM, has wrote:
My preferred IDE architecture would be built on a completely 
component-oriented architecture. That way it can ship with the 
minimal components required to get started, and users can add, 
upgrade and remove components as and when they need them. For 
example, a new user needs everything visible so they can see what's 
available; an experience one may prefer everything driven by 
memorised keyboard combinations so they can devote screen estate to 
more important things like their code instead of floating palettes, 
on-screen help, etc.

I think Eclipse is intended to be like this -- though I can't say I 
have real experience using it.
Yes indeed. Since I just arrived back on planet python from javaland a 
couple of months back, I used Eclipse quite extensively. Eclipse has a 
tiny core and everything else is a plugin. IBM's WebSphere Application 
Developer package, I've gathered, consists of more than 500 plugins. Of 
course, the drawback to Eclipse is that it's Java. Whenever I would do 
some of my development on my Mac, I always found it to be a bit 
sluggish. I don't know if it's sluggish because of the plugins, or if 
it's sluggish because of the SWT gui toolkit.

Lately, I've been using JEdit (which is also Java, but I haven't found 
it to be sluggish).

Kevin
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


[Pythonmac-SIG] Can I use tktable with MacPython?

2005-02-15 Thread Thomas Green
Hi, can anyone give me advice about how to import and use tktable in Python? 
I've used it successfully in tcl but when I tried "import tktable" in Python I 
got "ImportError: No module named tktable" (and likewise for other combinations 
of upper and lowercase).

A small working example would be ace!

(BTW I'm not really competent enough to start recompiling the source or 
anything like that)

Thanks,
Thomas Green

27 Allerton Park, Leeds LS7 4ND
+44-(0)-113-226-6687
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/greenery/
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Can I use tktable with MacPython?

2005-02-15 Thread Bob Ippolito
On Feb 15, 2005, at 7:35, Thomas Green wrote:
Hi, can anyone give me advice about how to import and use tktable in 
Python? I've used it successfully in tcl but when I tried "import 
tktable" in Python I got "ImportError: No module named tktable" (and 
likewise for other combinations of upper and lowercase).

A small working example would be ace!
(BTW I'm not really competent enough to start recompiling the source 
or anything like that)
Googling for "tktable tkinter" I found this:
http://tkinter.unpythonic.net/wiki/TkTable
Apparently TkTable comes with a Tkinter wrapper.
-bob
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig