[Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Marcin Komorowski
Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the  
new Intel Macs?

I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my  
attempts to run it on the new platform have failed.

Should I be trying to be digging deeper into what I might be doing  
wrong, or is the port not complete?

Thank You,
Marcin
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Daniel Lord

On May 14, 2006, at 5:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote:

> Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the
> new Intel Macs?
>
> I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my
> attempts to run it on the new platform have failed.
>
> Should I be trying to be digging deeper into what I might be doing
> wrong, or is the port not complete?

I have been able to my small projects on my Intel-based MacBook Pro  
without incident.
So while that doesn't mean the port is perfect, it is fairly complete  
and solid.
There are a few endian issue in a few dark corners of the port which  
are being found and fixed.

A bit more specificity on the problems you are encountering on the  
Intel platform you didn't with the power-pc platform would be helpful.
It is hard to address a general complaint/query without specifics.  
Further, remember, no port is perfect--there are always bugs which  
decline in number and the frequency with which they are encountered  
but some are always there they are just the more obscure ones.

Daniel Lord
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
"You will never regret getting up too early,
and you'll always regret getting up too late,
but sometimes you may regret giving up too late."
   -- Mountaineer's Adage




___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Ronald Oussoren

On 14-mei-2006, at 14:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote:

> Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the
> new Intel Macs?
>
> I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my
> attempts to run it on the new platform have failed.
>
> Should I be trying to be digging deeper into what I might be doing
> wrong, or is the port not complete?

The current version in subversion should work correctly, PyObjC's  
unittests also run the unittests for libffi and all except two of  
those pass. The tests that fail have to do with very small structures  
(1 or 2 bytes in size) and those aren't used in Cocoa APIs.

If you do find something that doesn't work as expected in PyObjC or  
py2app I'm definitely interested to here about it. A small program  
that demonstrates the problem would make it easier to reproduce any  
problems, and hence increase the likelyhood of timely fixes.

Ronald
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig


Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Bob Ippolito

On May 14, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:

>
> On 14-mei-2006, at 14:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the
>> new Intel Macs?
>>
>> I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my
>> attempts to run it on the new platform have failed.
>>
>> Should I be trying to be digging deeper into what I might be doing
>> wrong, or is the port not complete?
>
> The current version in subversion should work correctly, PyObjC's
> unittests also run the unittests for libffi and all except two of
> those pass. The tests that fail have to do with very small structures
> (1 or 2 bytes in size) and those aren't used in Cocoa APIs.
>
> If you do find something that doesn't work as expected in PyObjC or
> py2app I'm definitely interested to here about it. A small program
> that demonstrates the problem would make it easier to reproduce any
> problems, and hence increase the likelyhood of timely fixes.

The binary package at http://pythonmac.org/packages/py24-fat/ is  
recent too, I updated it a day or two ago.

-bob

___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist  -  Pythonmac-SIG@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig