Re: IA2 branch testing of r1484083 merege with trunk
Hi Stuart, Fortunately, a new build of the ia2 branch was ready. : ) The wiki was updated, and more detail actions were added. Thanks. On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 5:47 AM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > Sorry, horrible typo, make that > > ... it should have all of the work done on Sidebar through r1483767 so > _THERE IS NO_ wasted effort there... > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
Re: New QA Volunteer
Welcome Vanita It is time to AOO 4.0 Full Regression Test You can register an account by yourself in Testlink: http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php . You can tell us (1) your Testlink ID; (2) your interest in areas you want to test; (3) the platform (Win/Linux/Mac) that you run the testing. Then we can assign some test cases for you. AOO 4.0 Full Regression Test focus of this test circle include the following: (1) Basic Function Verification (2) MS Interoperability Test (3) 2nd phase of sidebar testing (4) Defect verification Please refer: . Now we have the latest dev snapshot build here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/ Development+Snapshot+Builds#DevelopmentSnapshotBuilds-AOOSnapshotfullsets And we have the "AOO 4.0 Full Regression Test" test plan created in http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php . And we have test guidance here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/ AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance and here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/ AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance Be free to contact me for any issue. Thanks a lot On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Vanita Washington < vanit...@streamsofwatermm.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to QA. I am available to do QA on the Mac. > > Thanks, > > Vanita > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: Call for volunteers to confirm critical defects
hi, Anil I make QA_Contact to you (anilmotupa...@gmail.com), Assign 39=2+37 bugs to you to confirm , thanks Bug ID 121200 121188 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=AOO_UnConfirm_Crash_Regression_Need_Fix_3.4.1&sharer_id=249289&list_id=60660 Bug ID 66647 120781 120836 120857 120974 121052 121204 121229 121248 121286 121289 121300 121309 121323 121325 121377 121410 121424 121449 121474 121519 121575 121642 121653 121724 121759 121847 121863 121888 121890 121893 121916 121919 121974 122179 122258 122297 On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Anil Kumar wrote: > Hi. Yu Zhen. > I have interest. > Testlink ID - anilmotupa...@gmail.com >
New QA Volunteer
Hi, I am new to QA. I am available to do QA on the Mac. Thanks, Vanita - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Next Plan for AOO 4.0 Testing
Hello, I finished the cases in Calc, could you assign me more cases? Thank you
Re: Next Plan for AOO 4.0 Testing
Hello, I finished the cases in Calc, could you assign me more cases? Thank you On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Yuzhen Fan wrote: > Kay, thanks for the suggestion. I am going to open another mail thread for > Base test cases writing. > > Regards, > Yu Zhen > > > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On May 15, 2013 1:29 AM, "Yuzhen Fan" wrote: > > > > > > Kay, > > > > > > It's confirmed that we don't have Base test cases in place so far, Draw > > is > > > the same case. > > > > > > I agree with Rob that we define structured tests from now to have > > > consistent coverage. We (Liu Ping and I) can initial a test matrix to > > > organize test cases, and then call volunteers to populate the test > matrix > > > by writing test cases in TestLink. It is welcome if you can help on > > writing > > > test cases. Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Yu Zhen > > > > > > > Hi Yu Zhen and thanks for this reply. I would love to help write "test > > cases" for Base at some point, but I don't have any training in QA, so I > > would definitely need some instruction from somewhere on how to go about > > this. > > > > I think the biggest hurdle with base testing is the availability of > "live" > > DBs for connectivity testing. Some of us would readily be able to set > > something up, whereas others not. This would need to be some set of > servers > > I would think that would house an ongoing set of tables for connectivity > > testing for any release. So, how can we make this happen? We probably > need > > an additional thread for that discussion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Kay Schenk > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Rob Weir > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Kay Schenk > > > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Yuzhen Fan > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> (Added dev in this mail thread ..) > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Simon and all, > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Here is the update of the preparation for full regression: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> - All test cases are populated to test plan "AOO 4.0 Full > > Regression > > > > > Test" > > > > > >> in TestLink > > > > > >> - Test guidance for Full Regression Test and Defect Verification > > are > > > > > ready > > > > > >> and have published in wiki > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance > > > > > >> - Defect verification list are generated per different products > > with > > > > > >> multiple queries > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Thanks Liu Ping to make defect queries. > > > > > >> Thanks Simon for guidance and reviewing all preparation work > > above. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > >> Yu Zhen > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought I might like to help with this. I'm interested in > testing > > > > Base > > > > > > portions, but, I don't see any tests that apply to Base. Are > there > > > > any? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Test cases in Testlink are derived from the test cases used for > > > > > Symphony. But Symphony did not include Base. > > > > > > > > > > So if we want structured testing of Base we'll need someone (or > > > > > several people) to write some test cases. Or we could do informal, > > > > > use-based testing like we did with 3.4./3.4.1. But best to get > some > > > > > tests defined so we can have consistent coverage. That will > require > > > > > that someone with expertise as a Base user step up to lead this. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK...this is what I figured after a while. The big problem with > testing > > for > > > > Base is the availability of a "test" DB(s) to test connectivity in > some > > way > > > > -- our indigenous MySQL connector, jdbc etc. Any ideas about that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Yuzhen Fan > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Simon and all, > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Here is the update of the preparation for full regression: > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > - All test cases are populated to test plan "AOO 4.0 Full > > Regression > > > > > >> Test" > > > > > >> > in TestLink > > > > > >> > - Test guidance for the Full Regression Test and Defect > > Verification > > > > > are > > > > > >> > ready and have published in wiki > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:05 PM
Re: Call for volunteers to write test cases for Base
Hi. Yu Zhen. I have interest. Testlink ID - anilmotupa...@gmail.com
Re: Call for volunteers to confirm critical defects
Hi. Yu Zhen. I have interest. Testlink ID - anilmotupa...@gmail.com
Call for volunteers to write test cases for Base
Hi All, Test matrix for Base is ready here(thanks Liu Ping for the contribution in it): http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/Tescase, please review and welcome suggestions or comments. Next actions would be: 1. Yu Zhen put test suites in TestLink, based on the finalized test matrix 2. Volunteers provide their TestLink ID and list of their preferred test suites to Yu Zhen 3. Yu Zhen specifies the test suites' assignment to the individual volunteer 4. Volunteers write test cases in the assigned test suites, in TestLink. For test cases related to connectivity testing, please attach the "live" test DB(s) and provide steps to set up test environment in "Preconditions". It's encouraged test cases' author to test his/her test cases in execution stage. Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Next Plan for AOO 4.0 Testing
Kay, thanks for the suggestion. I am going to open another mail thread for Base test cases writing. Regards, Yu Zhen On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Kay Schenk wrote: > On May 15, 2013 1:29 AM, "Yuzhen Fan" wrote: > > > > Kay, > > > > It's confirmed that we don't have Base test cases in place so far, Draw > is > > the same case. > > > > I agree with Rob that we define structured tests from now to have > > consistent coverage. We (Liu Ping and I) can initial a test matrix to > > organize test cases, and then call volunteers to populate the test matrix > > by writing test cases in TestLink. It is welcome if you can help on > writing > > test cases. Thanks! > > > > Regards, > > Yu Zhen > > > > Hi Yu Zhen and thanks for this reply. I would love to help write "test > cases" for Base at some point, but I don't have any training in QA, so I > would definitely need some instruction from somewhere on how to go about > this. > > I think the biggest hurdle with base testing is the availability of "live" > DBs for connectivity testing. Some of us would readily be able to set > something up, whereas others not. This would need to be some set of servers > I would think that would house an ongoing set of tables for connectivity > testing for any release. So, how can we make this happen? We probably need > an additional thread for that discussion. > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Kay Schenk > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Rob Weir wrote: > > > > > > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Kay Schenk > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Yuzhen Fan > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> (Added dev in this mail thread ..) > > > > >> > > > > >> Simon and all, > > > > >> > > > > >> Here is the update of the preparation for full regression: > > > > >> > > > > >> - All test cases are populated to test plan "AOO 4.0 Full > Regression > > > > Test" > > > > >> in TestLink > > > > >> - Test guidance for Full Regression Test and Defect Verification > are > > > > ready > > > > >> and have published in wiki > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance > > > > >> - Defect verification list are generated per different products > with > > > > >> multiple queries > > > > >> > > > > >> Thanks Liu Ping to make defect queries. > > > > >> Thanks Simon for guidance and reviewing all preparation work > above. > > > > >> > > > > >> Regards, > > > > >> Yu Zhen > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I thought I might like to help with this. I'm interested in testing > > > Base > > > > > portions, but, I don't see any tests that apply to Base. Are there > > > any? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Test cases in Testlink are derived from the test cases used for > > > > Symphony. But Symphony did not include Base. > > > > > > > > So if we want structured testing of Base we'll need someone (or > > > > several people) to write some test cases. Or we could do informal, > > > > use-based testing like we did with 3.4./3.4.1. But best to get some > > > > tests defined so we can have consistent coverage. That will require > > > > that someone with expertise as a Base user step up to lead this. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > -Rob > > > > > > > > > > OK...this is what I figured after a while. The big problem with testing > for > > > Base is the availability of a "test" DB(s) to test connectivity in some > way > > > -- our indigenous MySQL connector, jdbc etc. Any ideas about that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Yuzhen Fan > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > Simon and all, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Here is the update of the preparation for full regression: > > > > >> > > > > > >> > - All test cases are populated to test plan "AOO 4.0 Full > Regression > > > > >> Test" > > > > >> > in TestLink > > > > >> > - Test guidance for the Full Regression Test and Defect > Verification > > > > are > > > > >> > ready and have published in wiki > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Full+Regression+Test+Guidance > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+Defect+Verification+Guidance > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Shenfeng Liu < > liush...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> Hi, all, > > > > >> >> I just want to update on our next plan for AOO 4.0 Testing. > Since > > > > >> >> sidebar > > > > >> >> FVT already finished, we are currently preparing for a full > > > > regression > > > > >> >> which will cover the following areas: > > > > >> >> (1) Basic Function Verification > > > > >> >> (2) MS Interoperability Test > > > > >> >> (3) 2nd phase of sidebar tes
