[Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On 01/28/2011 03:21 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Oops, I forgot to list it:) Thanks for catching. This one is still missing in 0.14. Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
2011/2/2 Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com: On 01/28/2011 03:21 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Oops, I forgot to list it:) Thanks for catching. This one is still missing in 0.14. Posted with [PATCH 0.14] tag, so that it won't get missed. http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg53954.html Thanks, Yoshi Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
2011/1/29 Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws: On 01/28/2011 07:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: [] I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a stable branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. No, I'd prefer not to take Kemari before the 0.14 freeze. It gives us a full release cycle for testing plus gives a nice headline feature for 0.15. Sounds reasonable to me. I thought it might be forgotten unless I didn't raise my voice :) I'll keep up the pace to get it in once the development cycle is ready. Thanks, Yoshi http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
2011/1/28 Michael S. Tsirkin m...@redhat.com: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:29:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have been reviewed and applied. Please reply to this message with a subject starting with [PING 0.14] and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or [PULL 0.14] for tree pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start having [PATCH 0.14], too. Myself I have only http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/88490 to ping. :) It is in branch qemu-char-echo of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git as well. Thanks! Paolo Have some pci fixes, should be ready by monday. Also working on a vhost patch that I think we need for 0.14 but only for qemu-kvm. I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. Thanks, Yoshi
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: [] I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a stable branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. Mergeing it to a development branch is entirely another question. /mjt
[Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: [] I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a stable branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
2011/1/28 Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com: On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: [] I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a stable branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. I don't have any intention to destabilize qemu, so I'm happy to follow what people think appropriate. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Oops, I forgot to list it :) Thanks for catching. Yoshi Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On 01/28/2011 07:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 01/28/2011 11:00 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote: 28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: [] I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect any functions including live migration unless one turns it on. Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and optimization. It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new functionality into a stable branch. Having nothing bad against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released before new year... ;) I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges. To be fair to Yoshiaki, the first 17 patches in his 19-patch series have no impact on the operation of QEMU, and even the last two are Kemari-only. I know almost nothing about Kemari so I cannot comment on the technical side of those patches, only that it w^Hshouldn't be destabilizing. I made some comments on a couple of patches, so I'm inclined to say no as well. No, I'd prefer not to take Kemari before the 0.14 freeze. It gives us a full release cycle for testing plus gives a nice headline feature for 0.15. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/91096 should be applied in any case, as it is a regression from 0.12. Thanks. Regards, Anthony Liguori Paolo
[Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:29:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Before creating rc1 we need to make sure that all patches for 0.14 have been reviewed and applied. Please reply to this message with a subject starting with [PING 0.14] and a link to patchwork, gmane, or whatnot; or [PULL 0.14] for tree pulls. Also, I believe all patches meant for stable should also start having [PATCH 0.14], too. Myself I have only http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/88490 to ping. :) It is in branch qemu-char-echo of git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git as well. Thanks! Paolo Have some pci fixes, should be ready by monday. Also working on a vhost patch that I think we need for 0.14 but only for qemu-kvm.
