Re: [QGIS-Developer] icons for temporal controller

2020-05-11 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
Hi Alexandre,

I agree with your words, but this media-model does not fully map to the
timemanager model OR it kind of does and then the icons fit:

'>|' now IS go to next video/chapter (in anology of a time step to a
song/chapter'.

If you want  |< and >| as "go to start or full end",
you only have << and >> as "do one time step", so this does in my view
not fit the 'fast forward/backward' analogy from media.

That is why I think Samweli's proposal to add a pipe-symbol ('|') to the
fastforward to end and start: '<<' and '>>' as a best fitting proposal:
'|<<' and '>>|'.

Regards,

Richard



On 5/11/20 8:54 PM, Alexandre Neto wrote:
> Hi Richard et al.
> 
> I am also used to see the |< and >| as go to start or go to end (next
> video or chapter), I would take << and >> as rewind and fast forwards
> 
> Alexandre Neto
> 
> A segunda, 11/05/2020, 19:21, Richard Duivenvoorde  > escreveu:
> 
> On 5/8/20 2:41 PM, Samweli wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Yes we definitely need to have commonly used  icons in this scenario.
> >
> > The way we thought about this is |< and >| icons would mean
> "rewind one step
> > then pause and play forward one step then pause, respectively".
> >
> > I think the improvement should be on the << and >> icons changed
> to |<< and
> >>> | meaning "rewind to start then pause and skip to end then pause,
> > respectively".
> >
> > Some little explanation
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_control_symbols
> 
> Hi Samweli,
> 
> Sorry for my late reply. So after seeing your wikipedia page it looks
> correct what we have now... So maybe leave it as is.. I have to
> reconnect some wires in my head I think :-)
> 
> I like your refinement though. I think adding the | tot the go to
> start/end would help (me at least)
> 
> Thanks & Regards,
> 
> Richard
> 
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org 
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Any interested funders for enhancing HTML labels for 3.14?

2020-05-11 Thread Nyall Dawson
Hi all,

Thanks to some funding from geoProRegio AG (www.geoproregio.ch), I've
recently had the opportunity to add support to QGIS labeling for
formatting label contents using HTML color, underline, strikethrough
and overline tags. See https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/36283 for
some pretty demo pictures of this in action!)

Partly, this work was intended to be a research project to determine
what further changes would be required to support a greater subset of
HTML tags (e.g. bold, italic, font size and family, super/subscript).
(These particular tags were initially selected because they do not
modify the shape or size of characters, which simplifies the text
layout calculations greatly!)

I'm now wondering if any organisation is interested in funding some of
these additional formatting tags, such as bold and italic. If you're
interested (and would like to see these supported in 3.14), please get
in contact with me ASAP. Feature freeze hits this week, so we'd need
to move quickly...

Cheers,
Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Iterate over layer features in a model - get_feature_by_id

2020-05-11 Thread Pedro Venâncio
Hi Nyall,

Thank you very much for the clarification! It seems a must have for the
next crowdfunding round!

I believe that the issue is the same or similar with the Iterate over the
layer, right?

Thanks again Nyall!

Best regards,
Pedro


Nyall Dawson  escreveu no dia terça, 12/05/2020
à(s) 02:21:

> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 11:08, Pedro Venâncio 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> >
> > However, I was trying to give a more generic use to the model, and so I
> added the 'Add geometry attributes' algorithm to it. With this, I cannot
> get the coordinates anymore with the expression:
> >
> > concat(attributes( get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT,
> 0))['xcoord'], ',', attributes(
> get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT, 0))['ycoord'])
> >
>
> > This can be due to the fact that the intermediate result of 'Add
> geometry attributes' is a memory layer? Is there any possibility of doing
> this in another way?
>
> No -- it's a limitation in models, that expressions CANNOT access
> layers which have been created during the model execution. Only layers
> present in the project at the start of the model execution can
> (currently) be utilised by expressions in a model.
>
> The fix is not trivial -- e.g. for myself I'd budget about 3 days to fix
> this.
>
> Nyall
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Isochrones ORS Tools

2020-05-11 Thread Miguel Ángel Vecina García
To whom It may concerns,

Hello, I'm having my End of Degree Project at the Politechnical University
of Valencia and I wanted to solve some doubts about the Isochrones that are
in ORS Tools. I want to calculate the isochrones for ambulances in Valencia
so I need to know the next questions:

1. When are the isochrones calculated by ORS Tools, what does it take into
account? The road traffic? The maximum speed (limit speed) on the road?
What things?

2. Depending on the time you calculate the isochrones, will it give you a
different result, or is it not in real time?

3. I've seen that exists one tool on qgis called iso4app that calculates
the isochrones too, but it calculates them in another way. What's the
difference within this two tools? What's better for my case (ambulances)?

My QGIS version is 3.10.5.

Thank you so much in advance.

Best regards,

Miguel Ángel
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Iterate over layer features in a model - get_feature_by_id

2020-05-11 Thread Nyall Dawson
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 11:08, Pedro Venâncio  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>

>
> However, I was trying to give a more generic use to the model, and so I added 
> the 'Add geometry attributes' algorithm to it. With this, I cannot get the 
> coordinates anymore with the expression:
>
> concat(attributes( get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT, 
> 0))['xcoord'], ',', attributes( 
> get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT, 0))['ycoord'])
>

> This can be due to the fact that the intermediate result of 'Add geometry 
> attributes' is a memory layer? Is there any possibility of doing this in 
> another way?

No -- it's a limitation in models, that expressions CANNOT access
layers which have been created during the model execution. Only layers
present in the project at the start of the model execution can
(currently) be utilised by expressions in a model.

The fix is not trivial -- e.g. for myself I'd budget about 3 days to fix this.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Iterate over layer features in a model - get_feature_by_id

2020-05-11 Thread Pedro Venâncio
Hi all,

I'm creating a Model to use with r.viewshed from GRASS, just to avoid the
manual introduction of the coordinates parameter.

https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/r.viewshed.html

So, to get the coordinates from a points layer with just one point
(viewpoint), I can get the coordinates with this expression (input layer
has already etrs89_x and etrs89_y as coordinates fields):

concat(attributes( get_feature_by_id(@viewpoints, 0))['etrs89_x'], ',',
attributes( get_feature_by_id(@viewpoints, 0))['etrs89_y'])

This works good:
r.viewshed input=rast_5eb9d9fb8f9a633 *coordinates=88260.003,118942.526*
observer_elevation=1.6 target_elevation=10 max_distance=5000
refraction_coeff=0.14286 memory=1000 -c -r -b
output=output8e7ee6e47dcb4d4fb287eb65c9698cad --overwrite


However, I was trying to give a more generic use to the model, and so I
added the 'Add geometry attributes' algorithm to it. With this, I cannot
get the coordinates anymore with the expression:

concat(attributes( get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT,
0))['xcoord'], ',', attributes(
get_feature_by_id(@Add_geometry_attributes_OUTPUT, 0))['ycoord'])

r.viewshed input=rast_5eb9dac74eca034 *coordinates=0.0,0.0*
observer_elevation=1.6 target_elevation=10 max_distance=5000
refraction_coeff=0.14286 memory=1000 -c -r -b
output=outputfb2e779533a541c4bbcf2bd6f7773eb1 --overwrite

They always pass as 0.0,0.0.

This can be due to the fact that the intermediate result of 'Add geometry
attributes' is a memory layer? Is there any possibility of doing this in
another way?


Another issue is when I have a points layer with several points
(viewpoints). In this case, I tried to use the 'Iterate over this layer'
option, but it always get 0.0,0.0 as coordinates. Of course I need some
incremental operator get_feature_by_id (I also do not know how yet), but it
should work at least to feature id 0, but it does not work. Running it
without the Iterate option, it work for the feature id 0.

Any hints about this?

Here is some sample dataset and the models (the one that is working and the
other that has the 'Add geometry attributes' algorithm and doest not work):

https://cld.pt/dl/download/a2a1a9e0-97d1-4e4d-a0e7-717d5cfcc120/sample_dataset.zip

https://cld.pt/dl/download/5ba46ec3-3084-45d7-8c3b-6cfe6bac6598/models.zip

Thank you very much!

Best regards,
Pedro Venâncio
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] RES: QGIS / FreeCAD interoperability...

2020-05-11 Thread Jorge Almerio
Hi all,

 

It would be wonderful!!!

 

Excited Waiting!

 

Jorge Almerio

 

De: QGIS-Developer [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] Em nome de 
Régis Haubourg
Enviada em: Monday, May 11, 2020 5:00 AM
Para: Luigi Pirelli 
Cc: qgis-developer 
Assunto: Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS / FreeCAD interoperability...

 

Hi Joel, 

 

Just a note on the QGIS-CAD-BIM "converging" roadmap everyone dreams about. 

What we see here is that many organisation up to now where using CAD software 
to manage city maps and assets management, where GIS - as a true database 
system - is far more accurate. 

We even see public entity allowing public grant only if data are transmitted in 
GIS exchange format in the end. So we see many CAD users switching to GIS - 
wether they like it or not. 

 

As a consequence, and thanks to funders who understand that free software 
allows to be active contributors, QGIS as a project is influenced a lot by CAD 
needs, at least for 2D editing.

We have some construction tools allowing to play with angles, parallels, build 
some inference temporary lines, and a lot of new shape editing tools. 

We still miss a lot of what user require, such as interactive snapping for 
instance or advanced 3D computation libraries. We also reach a point where 
geospatial standards draw a line with CAD world, for instance handling spline 
curves is at the limits. 

 

Concerning 3D and BIM buzz, we have a lot of questions from users, and 
sometimes even from national mapping agencies. And up to now, 3D plans for QGIS 
are focused on viewing datasets mainly.

We miss a lot 3D editing capabilities and FreeCAD is in my opinion the best 
candidate to provide an open source solution for this. 

 

The first bridge would be to ensure that FreeCAD deals with the main 
interchange standards to be able to edit BIM data. That would probably be 
cityGML and all the standards supported by the OGC, plus the main de facto 
standards like STL. I think we already have a challenge here to deals with 
those large datasets in reading and editing.  

 

FreeCad being able to edit those, we could already answer to the 100% open 
source BIM use case. Then an interoperability at API level between FreeCad and 
QGIS to easily open a dataset or a specific feature in QGIS<>Freecad would rock!

I would love as a user be able to view my city in 2D or 3D with QGIS, click on 
a building, open it in FreeCAD, update it, go back to QGIS, refresh, done.

 

Hope it helps

 

Best regards

 

 

 

 

Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 23:24, Luigi Pirelli mailto:lui...@gmail.com> > a écrit :

Hi Joel

 

Since years ago a lot of new features can support a better integration. I did a 
rough investigation about integration and stopped due to the fact that data 
model were (or is) too different to imagine an integration.
BTW probably now is more simple (at least from the qgis point of view) thanks 
to the possibility to bridge different data models using a python data provider 
[1] [2].

I would give a try/look.

 

cheers


 

Luigi Pirelli

[1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/122

[2] https://www.itopen.it/qgis-vector-data-provider-python/

**
* LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
* Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
* GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
* Book: Mastering QGIS3 - 3rd Edition 

 

* Hire a team: http://www.qcooperative.net
**

 

 

On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 05:26, Joel Graff mailto:monograf...@gmail.com> > wrote:

I've been a part of the FreeCAD project for the last three years or so, 
focusing on developing Civil Engineering-related functions (specifically, 
transportation engineering).  On occasion, discussions emerge regarding GIS 
integration into FreeCAD, QGIS being the natural go-to.

Recently, the GIS thread on the FreeCAD forum pointed to a github issue on the 
QGIS repo about FreeCAD integration.  It was closed in late April, citing the 
developer's mailing list as the place to continue the discussion.

I cite the URL below as it contains links to relevant threads on the FreeCAD 
forum:


https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/21623

 

The issue was five years old and not much discussion has happened.  Admittedly, 
I think it's one of those "seems like a good idea, but what can we really do 
with it?" kind of things.

I'm not really posting here to start a discussion on any particular topic or 
advocate for any sort of development effort.  I'm merely bringing it to the 
developer mailing list to give it the proper exposure.

That said, I should also mention that I and one other transportation 
engineering professional are actively working on developing transporta

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [2058] Layer Tree Icons approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Layer Tree Icons approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2058] Layer Tree Icons 1.0.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/layertreeicons/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1523] Map Corners Coordinates approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Map Corners Coordinates approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1523] Map Corners Coordinates 2.0.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/map-coords-plugin/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1879] Indian WAtershed Management support System approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Indian WAtershed Management support System approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1879] Indian WAtershed Management support System 0.3 
Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/iwams/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] icons for temporal controller

2020-05-11 Thread Alexandre Neto
Hi Richard et al.

I am also used to see the |< and >| as go to start or go to end (next video
or chapter), I would take << and >> as rewind and fast forwards

Alexandre Neto

A segunda, 11/05/2020, 19:21, Richard Duivenvoorde 
escreveu:

> On 5/8/20 2:41 PM, Samweli wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > Yes we definitely need to have commonly used  icons in this scenario.
> >
> > The way we thought about this is |< and >| icons would mean "rewind one
> step
> > then pause and play forward one step then pause, respectively".
> >
> > I think the improvement should be on the << and >> icons changed to |<<
> and
> >>> | meaning "rewind to start then pause and skip to end then pause,
> > respectively".
> >
> > Some little explanation
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_control_symbols
>
> Hi Samweli,
>
> Sorry for my late reply. So after seeing your wikipedia page it looks
> correct what we have now... So maybe leave it as is.. I have to
> reconnect some wires in my head I think :-)
>
> I like your refinement though. I think adding the | tot the go to
> start/end would help (me at least)
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Richard
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] icons for temporal controller

2020-05-11 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
On 5/8/20 2:41 PM, Samweli wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> 
> Yes we definitely need to have commonly used  icons in this scenario.
> 
> The way we thought about this is |< and >| icons would mean "rewind one step
> then pause and play forward one step then pause, respectively".
> 
> I think the improvement should be on the << and >> icons changed to |<< and
>>> | meaning "rewind to start then pause and skip to end then pause,
> respectively".
> 
> Some little explanation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_control_symbols

Hi Samweli,

Sorry for my late reply. So after seeing your wikipedia page it looks
correct what we have now... So maybe leave it as is.. I have to
reconnect some wires in my head I think :-)

I like your refinement though. I think adding the | tot the go to
start/end would help (me at least)

Thanks & Regards,

Richard

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS / FreeCAD interoperability...

2020-05-11 Thread Joel Graff
Regis,

This is probably one of the more common use cases that comes up on the
FreeCAD side when GIS integrations are discussed.  There has been some
effort in the past in this regard.  One forum member, microelly, is very
much interested in this topic and has made efforts to build geospatial
support into FreeCAD.  His work has been merged into our "geomatics"
workbench more recently.

As for BIM support, one of our lead developers, yorik, is an architect by
trade and has worked on BIM support at least at the architectural level.
That, I'm sure, provides a suitable beginning point for a larger scale
application of BIM.

Much of this is beyond my scope of work, but I'm always interested in
seeing something happen.  Perhaps if we can establish a use case or propose
a basic, functional integration, it may make it easier to get something
done.

In all honesty, I don't use FreeCAD in the way that it's typically
intended. :)  I'm not the most experienced at seeing the issues in the
integration, so I can't easily predict the complications...

*Joel Graff, P.E.*

*LinkedIn:* https://www.linkedin.com/in/joelcgraff



On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:00 AM Régis Haubourg 
wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> Just a note on the QGIS-CAD-BIM "converging" roadmap everyone dreams
> about.
> What we see here is that many organisation up to now where using CAD
> software to manage city maps and assets management, where GIS - as a true
> database system - is far more accurate.
> We even see public entity allowing public grant only if data are
> transmitted in GIS exchange format in the end. So we see many CAD users
> switching to GIS - wether they like it or not.
>
> As a consequence, and thanks to funders who understand that free software
> allows to be active contributors, QGIS as a project is influenced a lot by
> CAD needs, at least for 2D editing.
> We have some construction tools allowing to play with angles, parallels,
> build some inference temporary lines, and a lot of new shape editing tools.
> We still miss a lot of what user require, such as interactive snapping for
> instance or advanced 3D computation libraries. We also reach a point where
> geospatial standards draw a line with CAD world, for instance handling
> spline curves is at the limits.
>
> Concerning 3D and BIM buzz, we have a lot of questions from users, and
> sometimes even from national mapping agencies. And up to now, 3D plans for
> QGIS are focused on viewing datasets mainly.
> We miss a lot 3D editing capabilities and FreeCAD is in my opinion the
> best candidate to provide an open source solution for this.
>
> The first bridge would be to ensure that FreeCAD deals with the main
> interchange standards to be able to edit BIM data. That would probably be
> cityGML and all the standards supported by the OGC, plus the main de facto
> standards like STL. I think we already have a challenge here to deals with
> those large datasets in reading and editing.
>
> FreeCad being able to edit those, we could already answer to the 100% open
> source BIM use case. Then an interoperability at API level between FreeCad
> and QGIS to easily open a dataset or a specific feature in QGIS<>Freecad
> would rock!
> I would love as a user be able to view my city in 2D or 3D with QGIS,
> click on a building, open it in FreeCAD, update it, go back to QGIS,
> refresh, done.
>
> Hope it helps
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
>
> Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 23:24, Luigi Pirelli  a écrit :
>
>> Hi Joel
>>
>> Since years ago a lot of new features can support a better integration. I
>> did a rough investigation about integration and stopped due to the fact
>> that data model were (or is) too different to imagine an integration.
>> BTW probably now is more simple (at least from the qgis point of view)
>> thanks to the possibility to bridge different data models using a python
>> data provider [1] [2].
>> I would give a try/look.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Luigi Pirelli
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/122
>> [2] https://www.itopen.it/qgis-vector-data-provider-python/
>>
>>
>> **
>> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
>> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
>> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
>> * Book: Mastering QGIS3 - 3rd Edition
>> 
>> * Hire a team: http://www.qcooperative.net
>>
>> **
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 05:26, Joel Graff  wrote:
>>
>>> I've been a part of the FreeCAD project for the last three years or so,
>>> focusing on developing Civil Engineering-related functions (specifically,
>>> transportation engineering).  On occasion, discussions emerge regarding GIS
>>> integration into FreeCAD, QGIS being the natural go-to.
>

[QGIS-Developer] The curious case of GeoPackage on exFAT

2020-05-11 Thread Bo Victor Thomsen

Hi all -

I have a strange problem. I'm have 3 different disk on my windows based 
system on Mac hardware


1. My system drive. Formatted to NTFS.
2. A flash-drive. Formatted to FAT32.
3. A data drive. Formatted to exFAT. The last is my primary data drive
   and is shared between my Windows partition and my Mac partition on
   my MacBook Pro. Hence the use of exFAT.

I have a QGIS plugin, which copies a template of a GeoPackage file to 
"where-ever the user wants it placed" and afterward make some content 
changes in the copy using the PyQT QSQL module with the QSPATIALITE driver


This work if the Geopackage  file is copied to either disk no 1 (NTFS) 
or disk no 2 (FAT32). However, it doesn't work if the file is copied to 
disk no 3 (exFAT). The process leaves the WAL files even after the 
database is closed properly.


And even more strange: If I reformat the flash-drive to exFAT and repeat 
the experiment using the reformatted drive it too works without a hitch.


The normal "divide et impera" method tells me that my exFat data disk is 
bork'ed. However this error *only* occurs with the QGIS/GeoPackage 
creation/modification scenario. Everything else is working OK.


The disk is not shared on the network. Has anyone experienced the same 
type of problems ? And have a solution ?? Just asking before I begin to 
clean up / reformat my 100 GB data disk


System setup: MacBook Pro 2014 / Windows 8.1 OS /QGIS 3.10.5 (the same 
problem occurs with 3.10.0 , 3.10.2 ...3.12.2)



--

Med venlig hilsen / Kind regards

Bo Victor Thomsen

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] annoying frequent github action mail about milestone

2020-05-11 Thread Denis Rouzaud
let's see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/36342

Le ven. 8 mai 2020 à 15:00, Sandro Santilli  a écrit :

> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 12:22:12PM +0200, Werner Macho wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > From what I remember you have to disable Actions from the Settings of
> this
> > repository.
> > Topmenu "Settings" -> Left Menu "Actions" - disable actions.
> > Hope this helps
>
> Thanks, it seems to have helped.
> Could the upstream action be configured NOT to even try to run
> on a fork ?
>
> --strk;
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS / FreeCAD interoperability...

2020-05-11 Thread Régis Haubourg
Hi Joel,

Just a note on the QGIS-CAD-BIM "converging" roadmap everyone dreams about.
What we see here is that many organisation up to now where using CAD
software to manage city maps and assets management, where GIS - as a true
database system - is far more accurate.
We even see public entity allowing public grant only if data are
transmitted in GIS exchange format in the end. So we see many CAD users
switching to GIS - wether they like it or not.

As a consequence, and thanks to funders who understand that free software
allows to be active contributors, QGIS as a project is influenced a lot by
CAD needs, at least for 2D editing.
We have some construction tools allowing to play with angles, parallels,
build some inference temporary lines, and a lot of new shape editing tools.
We still miss a lot of what user require, such as interactive snapping for
instance or advanced 3D computation libraries. We also reach a point where
geospatial standards draw a line with CAD world, for instance handling
spline curves is at the limits.

Concerning 3D and BIM buzz, we have a lot of questions from users, and
sometimes even from national mapping agencies. And up to now, 3D plans for
QGIS are focused on viewing datasets mainly.
We miss a lot 3D editing capabilities and FreeCAD is in my opinion the best
candidate to provide an open source solution for this.

The first bridge would be to ensure that FreeCAD deals with the main
interchange standards to be able to edit BIM data. That would probably be
cityGML and all the standards supported by the OGC, plus the main de facto
standards like STL. I think we already have a challenge here to deals with
those large datasets in reading and editing.

FreeCad being able to edit those, we could already answer to the 100% open
source BIM use case. Then an interoperability at API level between FreeCad
and QGIS to easily open a dataset or a specific feature in QGIS<>Freecad
would rock!
I would love as a user be able to view my city in 2D or 3D with QGIS, click
on a building, open it in FreeCAD, update it, go back to QGIS, refresh,
done.

Hope it helps

Best regards




Le dim. 10 mai 2020 à 23:24, Luigi Pirelli  a écrit :

> Hi Joel
>
> Since years ago a lot of new features can support a better integration. I
> did a rough investigation about integration and stopped due to the fact
> that data model were (or is) too different to imagine an integration.
> BTW probably now is more simple (at least from the qgis point of view)
> thanks to the possibility to bridge different data models using a python
> data provider [1] [2].
> I would give a try/look.
>
> cheers
>
> Luigi Pirelli
>
> [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/122
> [2] https://www.itopen.it/qgis-vector-data-provider-python/
>
>
> **
> * LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/luigipirelli
> * Stackexchange: http://gis.stackexchange.com/users/19667/luigi-pirelli
> * GitHub: https://github.com/luipir
> * Book: Mastering QGIS3 - 3rd Edition
> 
> * Hire a team: http://www.qcooperative.net
>
> **
>
>
> On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 05:26, Joel Graff  wrote:
>
>> I've been a part of the FreeCAD project for the last three years or so,
>> focusing on developing Civil Engineering-related functions (specifically,
>> transportation engineering).  On occasion, discussions emerge regarding GIS
>> integration into FreeCAD, QGIS being the natural go-to.
>>
>> Recently, the GIS thread on the FreeCAD forum pointed to a github issue
>> on the QGIS repo about FreeCAD integration.  It was closed in late April,
>> citing the developer's mailing list as the place to continue the discussion.
>>
>> I cite the URL below as it contains links to relevant threads on the
>> FreeCAD forum:
>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/21623
>>
>> The issue was five years old and not much discussion has happened.
>> Admittedly, I think it's one of those "seems like a good idea, but what can
>> we really do with it?" kind of things.
>>
>> I'm not really posting here to start a discussion on any particular topic
>> or advocate for any sort of development effort.  I'm merely bringing it to
>> the developer mailing list to give it the proper exposure.
>>
>> That said, I should also mention that I and one other transportation
>> engineering professional are actively working on developing transportation
>> engineering tools for FreeCAD, specifically geomatic (survey) and highway
>> alignment design tools at the moment.
>>
>> *Joel Graff, P.E.*
>>
>> *LinkedIn:* https://www.linkedin.com/in/joelcgraff
>>
>> ___
>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailma

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1313] AGT - Archaeological Geophysics Toolbox approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin AGT - Archaeological Geophysics Toolbox approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1313] AGT - Archaeological Geophysics Toolbox 3.0" is now 
approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/AGT/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1963] Mappia Publisher approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Mappia Publisher approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1963] Mappia Publisher 2.2.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/mappia_publisher/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [629] Networks approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Networks approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[629] Networks 2.4.3" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/networks/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [2046] Rectanglify approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Rectanglify approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2046] Rectanglify 1.0.3" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/rectanglify/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [2052] Qveg approval notification.

2020-05-11 Thread noreply

Plugin Qveg approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2052] Qveg 3.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/qveg/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer