Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. 2014-03-25 17:08 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: +1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing bugs among QGIS ones 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com: As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal categories. This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects of the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they are still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). Hence they each have their own category. The challenge here is Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own categories/sub-categories. Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not right then we can talk about how to move tickets. Thanks, Alex On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Great, thanks Alex. I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will probably open tickets in the main tracker with the general category Processing/Sextante and won't be able to specify which is the affected backend (the Processing bug tracker has a subcategory for each backend: SAGA GIS, GRASS GIS etc). A possible workaround would be to replace the category Processing/Sextante with Processing/SAGA GIS, Processing/R, Processing GRASS GIS etc. Thanks Regards On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. 2014-03-25 17:08 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: +1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing bugs among QGIS ones 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com: As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal categories. This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects of the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they are still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). Hence they each have their own category. The challenge here is Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own categories/sub-categories. Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not right then we can talk about how to move tickets. Thanks, Alex On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Category in main QGIS tracker should be removed and all tickets moved into Processing subproject. 2014-03-26 11:46 GMT+02:00 Filipe Dias filipesd...@gmail.com: Great, thanks Alex. I see a minor issue: users who are not aware of the Processing tracker will probably open tickets in the main tracker with the general category Processing/Sextante and won't be able to specify which is the affected backend (the Processing bug tracker has a subcategory for each backend: SAGA GIS, GRASS GIS etc). A possible workaround would be to replace the category Processing/Sextante with Processing/SAGA GIS, Processing/R, Processing GRASS GIS etc. Thanks Regards On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. 2014-03-25 17:08 GMT+02:00 Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: +1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing bugs among QGIS ones 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com: As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal categories. This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects of the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they are still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). Hence they each have their own category. The challenge here is Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own categories/sub-categories. Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not right then we can talk about how to move tickets. Thanks, Alex On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Am 26.03.2014, 10:31 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. One small issue: Sextante bug tracker/subproject is not listed on http://hub.qgis.org/projects/qgis For those who have trouble finding it: http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/issues Best wishes, Anita -- anitagraser.com ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Maybe someone with admin rights can fix this? 2014-03-26 12:27 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at: Am 26.03.2014, 10:31 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. One small issue: Sextante bug tracker/subproject is not listed on http://hub.qgis.org/projects/qgis For those who have trouble finding it: http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/issues Best wishes, Anita -- anitagraser.com -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
That's because it's a subproject of QGIS-Application I don't think it can be in 2 places at once, so not sure on the solution here. Thanks, Alex On 03/26/2014 03:31 AM, Alexander Bruy wrote: Maybe someone with admin rights can fix this? 2014-03-26 12:27 GMT+02:00 Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at: Am 26.03.2014, 10:31 Uhr, schrieb Alexander Bruy alexander.b...@gmail.com: Hi all, thanks to Alex, now Processing/SEXTANTE bugtracker is a subproject of QGIS. All Processing tickets should be visible inside main QGIS tracker, but for submitting issue one should use Processing tracker. Please test. If this solution will not work fine for us we can always restore previous state. One small issue: Sextante bug tracker/subproject is not listed on http://hub.qgis.org/projects/qgis For those who have trouble finding it: http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/issues Best wishes, Anita -- anitagraser.com ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
+1 from me to make Processing/SEXTANTE subproject if this keep all tickets categories and allow to see Processing bugs among QGIS ones 2014-03-24 21:32 GMT+02:00 Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.com: As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal categories. This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects of the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they are still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). Hence they each have their own category. The challenge here is Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own categories/sub-categories. Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not right then we can talk about how to move tickets. Thanks, Alex On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Hi, I raised this issue twice some time ago, see [0, 1]. Also if I'm not wrong same issue was raised by Paolo too. [0] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-August/027973.html [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-September/028585.html 2014-03-24 14:10 GMT+02:00 Filipe Dias filipesd...@gmail.com: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alexander Bruy ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Qgis-Processing (former Sextante) has two bug trackers
As a sub-project, it would show up in queries of the main QGIS ticket system, but at the same time be able to have it's own internal categories. This to me seems the best compromise. It's really a big plugin with a myriad of backends. That complexity is what makes it a little different from the others mentioned. The others mentioned could be sub-projects of the main QGIS too. In reality all of them are core plugins, but they are still plugins. None of them are required to make QGIS work (boot). Hence they each have their own category. The challenge here is Processing/Sextante(I always call it by both since I do the the possibility of Processing stuff that isn't sextante) needs it's own categories/sub-categories. Also it's really easy for use to try moving it to be a subproject and then reassess (Takes about 30 seconds to move it). If it's still not right then we can talk about how to move tickets. Thanks, Alex On 03/24/2014 12:05 PM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi I think Processing tickets should be in the main bug tracker, since GDAL tools, fTools and Grass plugin tickets are also there. Also, Qgis-Processing is a really big (and great) feature, that interests a lot of users, so it makes sense to keep its tickets in the main tracker. Regards F. On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 05:10 AM, Filipe Dias wrote: Hi QGIS-Processing (former Sextante) has open tickets on two bugtrackers: - the plugin bug tracker, built when it was a plugin, but with a lot of active tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/sextante/activity - the main bug tracker with a few open tickets - http://hub.qgis.org/projects/quantum-gis/issues I understand those two can't be merged in one go, because the plugin-bugtracker has categories (QGIS-Processing SAGA GIS, QGIS-Processing GRASS GIS etc) that don't fit in the main bug tracker. But this should be solved ASAP, because the current situation is quite confusing Regards F. I'm of the opinion that the tracker should continue to be the Plugin tracker, not the main QGIS tracker. So I'd propse moving any Sextante/Processing tickets from the main or linking them into the Plugin tracker. To me it's still a plugin, just a core plugin but big enough that it's really a subproject. If we wanted to move the Plugin tracker as a sub-project of QGIS that would also make sense. Also Processing bugs aside from Processing not loading aren't showstoppers for release. Thanks, Alex ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
