Re: [Qgis-user] ubuntugis-nightly: No providers for GRASS and SAGA in Processing?

2017-10-10 Thread Patrick Dunford

GRASS7 is listed as a provider in my 17.04 VM running master build 655f121.

Are you using the ubuntugis version of master, the suggestion was based 
on the known issue with ubuntugis libraries not being updated at the 
same time as a new release of 2.18 comes out. If anything this is 
probably even more of an issue with nightly builds of master.


The solution is simply based on being able (potentially) to eliminate 
the need to use the ubuntugis repository whatsoever. If you can then use 
the non-ubuntugis version of master.



On 11/10/17 07:35, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:

Hi Patrick,
set up a VM with zesty and QGIS 2.99 from the debian-nightly 
repository WITHOUT ubuntugis.

And ... tada ... no GRASS nor SAGA algos in processing again.
So in which way is this a solution?

Cheers
Bernd

Am 28.09.2017, 10:39 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford 
:


It's simply that you can eliminate the ubuntugis dependency as a 
later release of Ubuntu does not require it. Running Qgis in a Vm is 
also a viable option if you can't change the OS on your computer. I 
run Qgis now in VMs because I can doe 100% of the things that I could 
do natively and I have drawn hundreds of kilometres of production 
maps with the development masters running in Virtualbox desktop VMs.



On 28/09/17 20:19, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote

Hi Pattrick,
sorry, but I do not understand what you are talking about.
I'm running the nightlies of the development version and have the 
ubuntugis-unstable ppa activated.
GRASS and SAGA are present in the ppa and are running individually 
without a problem. They are just not available through QGIS processing.
As the nightlies are built frequently, any changes on ubuntugis 
should be adopted to within a short time. But there are still no 
providers for GRASS and SAGA.
What does this have to do with the version of my OS? All necessary 
sources derive directly from qgis.org or ubuntugis-unstable, as far 
as I can see.


Cheers
Bernd


Am 27.09.2017, 23:12 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford 
:


you can run masters up to 313ec55 (January 2017) without ubuntugis 
on xenial, I use this one all the time as it is stable and reliable 
while I am waiting for some bugs to be fixed in latest masters.


I can see your problem if you want to use the latest master though. 
Mostly I take that option to avoid having to convert my project 
files back to 2.18 having been doing my real life projects on 2.99 
since it first came out.



On 28/09/17 09:57, Patrick Dunford wrote:
Another thread we just talked about this, it's an issue with the 
units not being available in ubuntugis yet


Only xenial and older require ubuntugis for the latest versions, 
if you are running 16.10 or later, or a later debian, these issues 
don't occur.



On 28/09/17 04:14, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:

Hi,
just installed the development version on Ubuntu xenial from 
ubuntugis-nightly repository.
In processing, there are only the qgis algos, but no grass nor 
saga. In the settings, there is nothing shown about them.

Do I miss sth, or are the other providers not included yet?

Cheers
Bernd





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] ubuntugis-nightly: No providers for GRASS and SAGA in Processing?

2017-10-10 Thread Patrick Dunford
That isn't the experience I have had. The only variant of Ubuntu that 
wouldn't load GRASS I have seen was 16.04 with 2.18.13



On 11/10/17 07:35, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:

Hi Patrick,
set up a VM with zesty and QGIS 2.99 from the debian-nightly 
repository WITHOUT ubuntugis.

And ... tada ... no GRASS nor SAGA algos in processing again.
So in which way is this a solution?

Cheers
Bernd

Am 28.09.2017, 10:39 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford 
:


It's simply that you can eliminate the ubuntugis dependency as a 
later release of Ubuntu does not require it. Running Qgis in a Vm is 
also a viable option if you can't change the OS on your computer. I 
run Qgis now in VMs because I can doe 100% of the things that I could 
do natively and I have drawn hundreds of kilometres of production 
maps with the development masters running in Virtualbox desktop VMs.



On 28/09/17 20:19, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote

Hi Pattrick,
sorry, but I do not understand what you are talking about.
I'm running the nightlies of the development version and have the 
ubuntugis-unstable ppa activated.
GRASS and SAGA are present in the ppa and are running individually 
without a problem. They are just not available through QGIS processing.
As the nightlies are built frequently, any changes on ubuntugis 
should be adopted to within a short time. But there are still no 
providers for GRASS and SAGA.
What does this have to do with the version of my OS? All necessary 
sources derive directly from qgis.org or ubuntugis-unstable, as far 
as I can see.


Cheers
Bernd


Am 27.09.2017, 23:12 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford 
:


you can run masters up to 313ec55 (January 2017) without ubuntugis 
on xenial, I use this one all the time as it is stable and reliable 
while I am waiting for some bugs to be fixed in latest masters.


I can see your problem if you want to use the latest master though. 
Mostly I take that option to avoid having to convert my project 
files back to 2.18 having been doing my real life projects on 2.99 
since it first came out.



On 28/09/17 09:57, Patrick Dunford wrote:
Another thread we just talked about this, it's an issue with the 
units not being available in ubuntugis yet


Only xenial and older require ubuntugis for the latest versions, 
if you are running 16.10 or later, or a later debian, these issues 
don't occur.



On 28/09/17 04:14, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:

Hi,
just installed the development version on Ubuntu xenial from 
ubuntugis-nightly repository.
In processing, there are only the qgis algos, but no grass nor 
saga. In the settings, there is nothing shown about them.

Do I miss sth, or are the other providers not included yet?

Cheers
Bernd





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] Broken Module. No module named 'numexpr'

2017-10-10 Thread Peter Kaliniecki
Plugin DEM Tools won't install on  2.18.13 with the error message "No
module named 'numexpr' ".
How do I get this plugin underway?
Cheers,
Peter
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] ubuntugis-nightly: No providers for GRASS and SAGA in Processing?

2017-10-10 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Bernd,

On Wed, 27. Sep 2017 at 17:14:22 +0200, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:
> just installed the development version on Ubuntu xenial from
> ubuntugis-nightly repository.
> In processing, there are only the qgis algos, but no grass nor saga. In the
> settings, there is nothing shown about them.
> Do I miss sth, or are the other providers not included yet?

Not a packaging issue.  saga and grass7 are currently disabled processing
providers (see
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/blob/master/python/plugins/processing/core/Processing.py#L57
).


Jürgen

-- 
Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer   D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de
QGIS release manager (PSC)  GermanyIRC: jef on FreeNode


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] ubuntugis-nightly: No providers for GRASS and SAGA in Processing?

2017-10-10 Thread Bernd Vogelgesang

Hi Patrick,
set up a VM with zesty and QGIS 2.99 from the debian-nightly repository  
WITHOUT ubuntugis.

And ... tada ... no GRASS nor SAGA algos in processing again.
So in which way is this a solution?

Cheers
Bernd

Am 28.09.2017, 10:39 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford  
:


It's simply that you can eliminate the ubuntugis dependency as a later  
release of Ubuntu does not require it. Running Qgis in a Vm is also a  
viable option if you can't change the OS on your computer. I run Qgis  
now in VMs because I can doe 100% of the things that I could do natively  
and I have drawn hundreds of kilometres of production maps with the  
development masters running in Virtualbox desktop VMs.



On 28/09/17 20:19, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote

Hi Pattrick,
sorry, but I do not understand what you are talking about.
I'm running the nightlies of the development version and have the  
ubuntugis-unstable ppa activated.
GRASS and SAGA are present in the ppa and are running individually  
without a problem. They are just not available through QGIS processing.
As the nightlies are built frequently, any changes on ubuntugis should  
be adopted to within a short time. But there are still no providers for  
GRASS and SAGA.
What does this have to do with the version of my OS? All necessary  
sources derive directly from qgis.org or ubuntugis-unstable, as far as  
I can see.


Cheers
Bernd


Am 27.09.2017, 23:12 Uhr, schrieb Patrick Dunford  
:


you can run masters up to 313ec55 (January 2017) without ubuntugis on  
xenial, I use this one all the time as it is stable and reliable while  
I am waiting for some bugs to be fixed in latest masters.


I can see your problem if you want to use the latest master though.  
Mostly I take that option to avoid having to convert my project files  
back to 2.18 having been doing my real life projects on 2.99 since it  
first came out.



On 28/09/17 09:57, Patrick Dunford wrote:
Another thread we just talked about this, it's an issue with the  
units not being available in ubuntugis yet


Only xenial and older require ubuntugis for the latest versions, if  
you are running 16.10 or later, or a later debian, these issues don't  
occur.



On 28/09/17 04:14, Bernd Vogelgesang wrote:

Hi,
just installed the development version on Ubuntu xenial from  
ubuntugis-nightly repository.
In processing, there are only the qgis algos, but no grass nor saga.  
In the settings, there is nothing shown about them.

Do I miss sth, or are the other providers not included yet?

Cheers
Bernd





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user





___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



--
Bernd Vogelgesang
Siedlerstraße 2
91083 Baiersdorf/Igelsdorf
Tel: 09133-825374
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] Field-dependent feature style or label

2017-10-10 Thread knussear
Under the properties for the layer choose "style". In the drop down at the
top choose "rule based". Add rules using the + sign at the bottom of the
white box. When you chose filter edit using ... and a field calculation
dialogue will pop up, build a formula using fields and values, select your
field "Check" , and create the expression "Check" = 1 (or whatever your
value is), create a second rule with different symbology for nulls using
"Check" IS NULL.




--
Sent from: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/QGIS-User-f4125267.html
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] Field-dependent feature style or label

2017-10-10 Thread Mark Polczynski
I have a layer with 1000+ point features.  I am going back to check the
field values for each feature.  I have a field named "Check" that I change
the value of after I check the feature.  I want to change either the symbol
style or the label color of a feature based on whether or not I have
checked the feature.  In other words, I want to make the symbol style
and/or the label color of a particular feature dependent on the value of a
particular field.  For example, if my “Check” field for a feature is blank
(I haven't checked the feature yet), then the symbol for that feature is a
red circle, but if the ”Check” field is “OK”, then the symbol changes to a
green star.  Or, if the field is blank, then the label is red, but if the
filed is “OK", the label changes to green.


By the way, I'm pretty new at QGIS, so would need some pretty detailed
instructions on how to do this.  Thanks for any help on this!
-- 
Mark Polczynski
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] Setting path to an icon

2017-10-10 Thread Pat Hin

Hello,

 

i know i have already posted this to the list but maybe somebody

could help me now with my issue below :)

i have successfully linked my self written script for the processing toolbox as a button
to the main menu.
Now i would like to link a an own image/icon to this button. Under general options for
the processing toolbox there is a field for "icon" so i suppose in this field i could
set sth. for this.

So my questions :
a.. is this right?
b.. what exactly do i have to enter in this field?
c.. what are the restrictions for an own icon? pixel, size etc?

many thanks
pat
 

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user