Hi
We are going to be hopefully moving various qgis facilities onto
different servers in the near future so I would prefer to do this
afterwards, though I support the idea of closing aging bugs. The
people I rent the server from auto close issues after 48 hours if
waiting response from the reporter - wouldnt that be
(unreaslistically) nice :-)
Regards
Tim
2008/1/31, Magnus Homann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi all.
I had a look to the bug list, and I think many of them are no longer
valid. I would urge all those who reported a bug to check whether it is
still valid, and if not, to close them.
This is important, both for users (who do not get lost in a swamp of
would-be bugs) and for developers, who can concentrate on the real ones.
Having 200 open bugs is no good for anyone.
Please make a little effort.
I re-state my wish for auto-using bugs where we are waiting for user to
report back for some length of time. I hope Tim can find the time to
implement the server-side logic?
Magnus
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.qgis.org
http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
--
Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Member - Release Manager
Visit http://qgis.org for a great open source GIS
openModeller Desktop Developer
Visit http://openModeller.sf.net for a great open source ecological
niche modelling tool
Home Page: http://tim.linfiniti.com
Skype: timlinux
Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.qgis.org
http://lists.qgis.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
