Re: 2 Problems SMTP and Virtual

1999-12-31 Thread awasson

Is the domain you are trying to send to in the locals files?

Tony Wasson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, CDR Inc wrote:

> OK   Trying to re-acquaint myself with linux, so bear with me.. :)
> 
> I just installed QMAIL on Redhat 6.1
> 
> I thought I had the install right.  The POP3 seems to work OK..   And I can
> telnet to the SMTP side and do the test.  But it doesn't receive the test
> SMTP mail, and when I try to send mail from an EMAIL Client (Outlook) I get
> the following error:
> 
> THIS MESSAGE COULD NOT BE SENT BECAUSE ONE OF THE RECEPIENTS WAS REJECTED BY
> THE SERVER
> SERVER RESPONSE: '553: sorry, that domains isn't in my list of allowed
> rcpthosts (#5.7.1) ( Account 'cdrinc.net', SMTP Server: 'cdrinc.net')
> 
> 
> Anyone have any ideas???
> 
> 
> 
> Secondly, I want to set up this one LINUX box to act as different domains.
> As far as email goes, keep everything completely seperate.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> checks mail.dom1.com for his mail..  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  checks mail.dom2.com
> for her mail. etc etc..
> I found one web site that explains how to do this
> (http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.txt)  I
> followed this until it came to the users/assign and it lost me...
> 
> Any assistance on these issues would be most appreciated
> 
> 
>   Michale
>   M I S
> 



new yp.to DNS software

1999-12-31 Thread D. J. Bernstein

Starting later today, all yp.to DNS records will be provided by the same
DNS software that has been handling list.cr.yp.to for the past week.
Send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you encounter any DNS problems
with http://cr.yp.to or with mailing lists at list.cr.yp.to.

Beware that UIC will be disconnected from the network tonight from 0400
GMT to 0800 GMT. This is a PHB problem, not a DNS problem.

---Dan



Re: 2 Problems SMTP and Virtual

1999-12-31 Thread Uwe Ohse

> SERVER RESPONSE: '553: sorry, that domains isn't in my list of allowed
> rcpthosts (#5.7.1) ( Account 'cdrinc.net', SMTP Server: 'cdrinc.net')

"that domain". 
/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts doesn't contain the domain name of the
recipient, and tcp-env or tcp-server (depending on how qmail-smtpd
is started) doesn't set the RELAYCLIENT variable.
I assume you need the later. Do not set it unconditionally, only
for client for which you do want to relay. See FAQ 5.4


> Secondly, I want to set up this one LINUX box to act as different domains.
> As far as email goes, keep everything completely seperate.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> checks mail.dom1.com for his mail..  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  checks mail.dom2.com
> for her mail. etc etc..
> I found one web site that explains how to do this
> (http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.txt)  I
> followed this until it came to the users/assign and it lost me...

yeah, i felt the same the first time i saw it :-)

The solution depends on what you want and need. Easy one:
a) logins throw the normal UNIX services (/etc/passwd, shadow, 
   unmodified checkpassword). For example bob:
   Create ~bob/.qmail-default containing a single line,
./Maildir/
   chown that to bob, 
   and "maildirmake ~bob/Maildir".
   Do the same for the other users (write a script for that).
   Mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" will not work, you need to
   create ~bob/.qmail for that.
b) /var/qmail/control/virtualdomains
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:bob
   If all mails for domain.example are supposed to go to bob
   then use:
domain.example:bob
c) add domain.example to rcpthosts
d) do not add domain.example to locals.

See FAQ 3.2 and 3.3. See the qmail-send manual page for a detailed
description of the virtualdomains file.

Using the users/assign mechnism isn't hard either, but somewhat more
complicated, and scales better. There are some packages available to
handle that for you, see www.qmail.org

Regards, Uwe



Re: bouncing messages.. but still recieving mail

1999-12-31 Thread Claus Färber

Cameron Arnott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote:
> Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu([131.193.178.181]) by
> 21cn.com(JetMail 2.3.2.1)
> with SMTP id /aimcque/jmail.rcv/0/jm1b3860678d; Wed, 22 Dec 1999
> 00:00:34 -
> Received: (qmail 210 invoked by uid 1002); 21 Dec 1999 23:59:56 -
> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

These lines mean that 21.com is malconfigured and forwards messages to  
the address in the To header (which is the list address) instead of  
correctly handling the envelope addresses.

Obviously, a user at 21.com is subscribed to the list, but the broken  
mailer forwards the messages back to the list instead, which detects the  
loop and bounces the message.

Useful for spammers: Just send the messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the  
actual recipients in the To header.

I already informed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and qmail-owner, but 21.com's  
admins did not react.

Did I say I hate those * domain POP3 systems?

Hm, maybe in the future, ezmlm should check for such brokenness and  
refuse to subscribe users of such broken systems.

> also.. i'm getting and reading mail right.. then i'm also getting mail
> saying that qmail couldn't deliver my mail
...
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 203.87.57.227 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Relay access denied
> Giving up on 203.87.57.227.

But this is really strange.
Is it possible that qmail already sends a bounce message if the primary  
MX fails and before it tries to send messages to the secondary.
Anyway, whatever 203.87.57.227 is, it does not accept messages for  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Claus Andre Faerber 
PGP: ID=1024/527CADCD FP=12 20 49 F3 E1 04 9E 9E  25 56 69 A5 C6 A0 C9 DC



Re: daemontools and qmailanalog

1999-12-31 Thread Jos Backus

Here's a quick hack:

#!/usr/local/bin/perl

while (<>) {
  if (my($s,$t,$rest)=/^\@.(\w{15})(\w{8})(.*)/) {
$s = hex($s);
$t = hex($t); $t =~ s/500$//;
$_ = "$s.$t$rest\n";
  }
} continue {
  print;
}

exit 0;

-- 
Jos Backus  _/ _/_/_/  "Reliability means never
   _/ _/   _/   having to say you're sorry."
  _/ _/_/_/ -- D. J. Bernstein
 _/  _/ _/_/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  _/_/  _/_/_/  use Std::Disclaimer;



Re: daemontools and qmailanalog

1999-12-31 Thread Anand Buddhdev

On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 10:37:43AM +0100, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:

No. You have to pass the logs through some type of filter which converts
the hex timestamps into decimal. Strip out the leading "@4" from the
timestamp, then convert the next 15 digits into decimal, and it'll give
you the seconds since 1st Jan 1970, and then the next 8 digits,
converted to decimal, will give you the nanoseconds. You can strip out
the last 3 digits of that figure to give you only the microseconds. The
resulting set of strings is the format daemontools-0.53's accustamp
uses.

> Hi,
> 
> just a quickie: does qmailanalog handle the timestamps from the new
> daemontools package?

-- 
See complete headers for more info



2 Problems SMTP and Virtual

1999-12-31 Thread CDR Inc

OK   Trying to re-acquaint myself with linux, so bear with me.. :)

I just installed QMAIL on Redhat 6.1

I thought I had the install right.  The POP3 seems to work OK..   And I can
telnet to the SMTP side and do the test.  But it doesn't receive the test
SMTP mail, and when I try to send mail from an EMAIL Client (Outlook) I get
the following error:

THIS MESSAGE COULD NOT BE SENT BECAUSE ONE OF THE RECEPIENTS WAS REJECTED BY
THE SERVER
SERVER RESPONSE: '553: sorry, that domains isn't in my list of allowed
rcpthosts (#5.7.1) ( Account 'cdrinc.net', SMTP Server: 'cdrinc.net')


Anyone have any ideas???



Secondly, I want to set up this one LINUX box to act as different domains.
As far as email goes, keep everything completely seperate.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
checks mail.dom1.com for his mail..  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  checks mail.dom2.com
for her mail. etc etc..
I found one web site that explains how to do this
(http://www.tibus.net/pgregg/projects/qmail/single-uid-howto.txt)  I
followed this until it came to the users/assign and it lost me...

Any assistance on these issues would be most appreciated


Michale
M I S



Re: How to configure....?

1999-12-31 Thread Toni Mueller


Hello!

On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 01:55:34PM +0900, Yong Dae Won wrote:
> My problem is that qmail is locking when I try to deliver large file
> (about over 1Mbyte) from my UNIX Mailbox to Windows messenger. So I
> could not see my email. Now my Mailbox size is 13M.. How I can see my
> large mail?? Can the qmail deliver large email to local mail user??

At least it can. I once received a mail sized 35meg, and our customers
regularly send and receive mails over 10megs w/o problems other than
hitting administratively installed size limits on the remote ends, and
using qmail of course.

 Some items to check:
- How much space of that 13meg do you have left on that Unix server?
- Do you have a 1meg limit in your Windows messenger?
- Does your Unix administrator or so limit you in the size of individual
  emails? (Why are you not said administrator?)
- Your email did get delivered on the Unix box into your (POP3?) mailbox,
  to begin with?
- The Unix box has resources left over that could handle delivering such
  a mail (eg. swap space, process limits)?


> My email is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Send me an email to here...

If you ask on a list, be prepared to pick up the answer there.


Regards,

Toni.

NIC: TM2155
Oeko.neT Mueller & Brandt GbR   sales: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
v: +49 2261 979364 f: +49 2261 979366   http://www.oeko.net
Unix, networking, administration, consulting, programming, Internet services



qmail Digest 31 Dec 1999 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 866

1999-12-31 Thread qmail-digest-help


qmail Digest 31 Dec 1999 11:00:01 - Issue 866

Topics (messages 34898 through 34938):

Re: Corel Linux ships with qmail installed, but not running
34898 by: Robert Varga

Re: virtual domains in qmail/ezmlm?
34899 by: Robert Varga
34900 by: Anand Buddhdev
34903 by: Robert Varga

Re: email names with dashes in them
34901 by: bert hubert

maildircmd: passing filename to command's environment
34902 by: Joost van Baal

Re: stopping the inward executable E- mail attachments in Qmail
34904 by: Greg Owen
34927 by: Arumugam Thiruppathi
34928 by: Sam

Re: multilog
34905 by: Russell Nelson
34907 by: Van Liedekerke Franky

problems with upgrade
34906 by: Geir Høgberg

Stopping remote outgoing mail?
34908 by: Michael Boman
34909 by: Petr Novotny

Re: performance and bounce questions
34910 by: Dave Sill
34914 by: Martin Lesser
34916 by: Dave Sill
34921 by: Martin Lesser

this list
34911 by: J.Adams
34913 by: Dave Sill
34924 by: Troy Frericks
34930 by: Russell Nelson
34935 by: David Uzzell

Trying to start qmail.
34912 by: Dean Channing
34915 by: Adam McKenna

Re: Sore it for y2k and then resend it
34917 by: Dustin Miller

Strange failures on QMAIL
34918 by: Eric Davis
34919 by: Paul Farber

Re: Quotas and qmail: file number
34920 by: Jeff Hayward

San Francisco qmail Developers
34922 by: Will Shatford
34925 by: Troy Frericks

error 4.1.2
34923 by: Samuel Dries-Daffner

Re: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Thank you for your comments]
34926 by: Adam McKenna
34931 by: Russell Nelson
34933 by: dirk.power.net
34934 by: Russell Nelson

Re: 1 call get 2
34929 by: abu

How to configure?
34932 by: Yong Dae Won

bouncing messages.. but still recieving  mail
34936 by: Cameron Arnott

UTC vs Local Time timestamps (Linux)
34937 by: Peter Cavender

daemontools and qmailanalog
34938 by: Van Liedekerke Franky

Administrivia:

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To bug my human owner, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To post to the list, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--





On Tue, 28 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> I installed Corel's Linux and there is a function in the xwindows client
> for starting q-mail. It will ask you the name of the server etc and install
> all existing users. It works great and is pretty hard to screw up.
> 
> I am having one problem though. When handing off mail to the server from a
> POP3 client it can take up to a couple of minutes. Retrieving mail is a
> couple of seconds?
> 
> Any ideas?

It is probably the same problem as I experienced. 

I experienced the following:


My machine was connected with dialup to the internet. It had a caching
DNS. If I was not connected to the internet all requests to the POP3 port
worked the following way: a long wait before the POP3 server greeted the
client. Afterward it worked normally. 

It was due to the long time to resolve a DNS query, since there was no
connection to the internet and the hint zones were in the DNS config, so
it tried to ask them. It of course took a long time to timeout all
connections to the unreachable hint servers.

The solution was to took out hints from the DNS if not connected to the
internet.

Robert Varga







> local part which ezmlm expects to see. It will contain "domain1" in your
> case. You have to change that to "forwarder-domain1-domain1". The
> alternative is to patch ezmlm with ezmlm-idx, which doesn't need you to
> fiddle with any files like this.
> 


It does need. I have ezmlm-idx from the potato package. It still needs
modifying the file inlocal.

Robert Varga





On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 12:46:18PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote:

> > local part which ezmlm expects to see. It will contain "domain1" in your
> > case. You have to change that to "forwarder-domain1-domain1". The
> > alternative is to patch ezmlm with ezmlm-idx, which doesn't need you to
> > fiddle with any files like this.
> 
> It does need. I have ezmlm-idx from the potato package. It still needs
> modifying the file inlocal.

Oops. I should have mentioned that ezmlm-idx doesn't need you to make
these changes ONLY if you use qmail >= 1.02. If you have qmail 1.01,
then you still need these changes.

-- 
See complete headers for more info






On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, Anand Buddhdev wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 12:46:18PM +0100, Robert Varga wrote:
> 
> > > local part which ezmlm expects to see. It will contain "domain1" in your
> > > case. You have to change that to "forwarder-domain1-domain1". The
> > > alternative is to patch ezmlm with ezmlm-idx, which doesn't nee

daemontools and qmailanalog

1999-12-31 Thread Van Liedekerke Franky

Hi,

just a quickie: does qmailanalog handle the timestamps from the new
daemontools package?

Franky