RE: No Transport Provider Available
hello Mark. Ive been using outlook2000 and so do all my customers.. some use outlook express, but NONE use eudora or netscape. im "happy" to say, that we didnt encounter any problems sending or recieving mail with them, other that the fact it gets sent to damn fast... :-) im sorry for your problems, but it seems interesting that for me it works.. im sure others are also using micro$oft products and its working for them aswell... have you tried telneting to your server and manually enter the commands? if this works, its defenetly something in your outlook config files... try a new account, on a fresh install of outlook... This realy should work... -- Haim -Original Message- From: Mark Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2000 1:26 AM To: Qmail Subject: RE: No Transport Provider Available I love to blame Microsoft for this problem as well. It just seems funny that it is now happening to more than one person in the company. All of a sudden, it's most of the people. This is why I am starting to wonder if it's my QMAIL system not accepting the mail for delivery all the time. What are other people using for EMAil on Win9x systems? Anything else except Netscape? -Original Message- From: Ben Beuchler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, September 22, 2000 6:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: No Transport Provider Available It ain't qmail. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=g nFR=0 On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 05:55:14PM -0300, Mark Walsh wrote: I had someone put in a Linux Firewall with QMail as the Mail server. Lately, I had lost their support and I am at a bit of a loss. The problem that I have is that most of my company is on Microsoft Outlook. Most or all of the employees are experiencing difficulties in sending EMail. They attempt to send email, either locally or remotely and get the message There is No Transport Provider Available. Sometimes I can send mail, sometimes I can't. I had removed The Personal folders and accounts from individual computers and for a time it seemed to repair it. But now everyone is doing it? I starting to wonder if it is actually the QMAil. Where Do I start looking there? Mark Walsh -- Ben Beuchler [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAILER-DAEMON (612) 321-9290 x101 Bitstream Underground www.bitstream.net
RE: Forward on Bounce
hi Dave you mean that if i enter the following: =domain1-user1:...:/popboxes/domain1/user1 =domain1-user2:...:/popboxes/domain1/user2 +domain1:.../popboxes/domain1/user1 this will forward all mail for domain1 that is not for user1 nor user2, to user1 right? will it also bounce the message? Thanks for your response --- Haim Halpern - ? --- -Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 4:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Forward on Bounce çééí äìôøï [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in the virtualdomains file i put the domain, and the prefix for the users of that domain: domain1.com:domain1 domain2.com:domain2 and then u have in the assign file: =domain1-user:blabla =domain2-user:blabla You need "+" entries in the assign file, e.g.: +domain1:blabla +domain2:blabla Which act as wildcards and direct unmatched addresses to a .qmail-default file in the specified directory. -Dave
RE: Forward on Bounce
i tried it. it works perfectly! and so simple too.. (if you know the material, i guess...) thanks a lot Dave!! (for the archive i'll post the contents of .qmail-default) ---SNIPSNIPSNIP-- mailer# cat .qmail-default /popboxes/domain1/user1/Maildir |bouncesaying 'This address no longer accepts mail.' ---SNIPSNIPSNIP-- Haim -Original Message- From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Forward on Bounce çééí äìôøï [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you mean that if i enter the following: =domain1-user1:...:/popboxes/domain1/user1 =domain1-user2:...:/popboxes/domain1/user2 +domain1:.../popboxes/domain1/user1 this will forward all mail for domain1 that is not for user1 nor user2, to user1 right? will it also bounce the message? Let's use complete assign entries, like: =domain1-user1:vpop:99:99:/popboxes/domain1/user1:: =domain1-user2:vpop:99:99:/popboxes/domain1/user2:: +domain1:vpop:99:99:/popboxes/domain1/user1:-: Now, /popboxes/domain1/user1/.qmail-default will catch all other domain1 addresses except user1 and user2. It won't bounce the messages unless the .qmail-default tells it to, e.g., via "bouncesaying". -Dave
RE: qmail: 964126783.245290 delivery 15092: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbo x_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)
have you updated the assign file? -Original Message- From: Ricardo Cerqueira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 2:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: qmail: 964126783.245290 delivery 15092: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbo x_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1) On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 09:53:38AM +1000, Baden Hughes wrote: I've looked elsewhere, there's no info on it in the FAQ: - moved a user home directory from one partition to another, ensuring symlinks are updated etc - confirm user still exists on system - confirm permissions are still set appropriately for all directories - persistent error message : qmail: 964126783.245290 delivery 15092: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1) Has qmail lost it's list of user homedirs ? How do I put a still existing user back into qmail's list of known recipients. Have you tried changing the home in the passwd file? :) (just a thought) RC -- +--- | Ricardo Cerqueira | PGP Key fingerprint - B7 05 13 CE 48 0A BF 1E 87 21 83 DB 28 DE 03 42 | Novis - Engenharia ISP / Rede Técnica | Pç. Duque Saldanha, 1, 7º E / 1050-094 Lisboa / Portugal | Tel: +351 21 3166700 (24h/dia) - Fax: +351 21 3166701
RE: checkpassword
hi you have to use a checkpassword replacement that checks another file, let say /etc/poppasswd... -Original Message- From: Audouy Jérôme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 4:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: checkpassword is it possible to have a password for qmail-pop3d different then the linux password because the current passwords for the current internal server (using window$ $oftware) have only a 2 letter password (i know that it's impossible to have it under linux with kernel 2.2.16) and for a simply way for upgrading server to qmail, i would like to know how i can do P.S : i know that it isn't good to have only two letters for a password, but i have not the choice... thx Dji. -- Audouy Jérôme - 3rd year student in E.S.S.I. (Ecole Supérieure en Sciences Informatiques) e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://djidji.citeweb.net / http://www.essi.fr/~audouy checklocalpwd-1.0.tar.gz
RE: and yet another NEWBIE question
Hello OK, i dont want the users to be system accounts, but how else can i configure this to work? where will i store the usernames and passwords if not in the /etc/passwd? for the pop3 test - what i did is: telnet mailer.domain.com 110 user user pass pass where the actual password for user user is pass it says authorization failed when i try this on the linux box directly to qmail-pop3d with the checkpassword it works please help... im getting very frustrated with this... :-( -Original Message- From: Paul Jarc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 1:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: and yet another NEWBIE question now, i dont want to have /home/dom1-sales/Mailbox and /home/dom2-sales/Mailbox but instead have /mailuser/dom1-sales/Mailbox and /mailuser/dom2-sales/Mailbox is this possible and if so, how? You can make entries for these addresses in /var/qmail/users/assign, and let the homedir field be /mailuser/dom1-sales, etc. Or if these addresses have system accounts (which doesn't necessarily sound like the best way to do it, but it seems that's what you're doing), then you can let /mailuser/dom1-sales be the actual home directory for the dom1-sales user. (How to change an account's home directory depends on the kind of system you have; check your system documentation, we won't necessarily be able to help you.) also, i inserted the command for pop3 as described in life with qmail into the inetd.conf when i test is as instructed on the machine itself it works great but when i telnet to 110 from another machine, the authentication always doesnt accept the password... What exactly did you do to test it? What exactly are you doing when it fails? paul
RE: and yet another NEWBIE question
damn, im realy sorry for bothering you like that.. i fixed the problem with the pop3 thing, it was an error in the inetd.conf file.. i hate when those little errors happen :-))) anyway, now i have to transfer it to work with tcpserver, right? where do you put the script for it? in the /var/qmail/qmail-smtp/run ? -Original Message- From: çééí äìôøï [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 4:36 PM To: Paul Jarc; Qmail Subject: RE: and yet another NEWBIE question Hello OK, i dont want the users to be system accounts, but how else can i configure this to work? where will i store the usernames and passwords if not in the /etc/passwd? for the pop3 test - what i did is: telnet mailer.domain.com 110 user user pass pass where the actual password for user user is pass it says authorization failed when i try this on the linux box directly to qmail-pop3d with the checkpassword it works please help... im getting very frustrated with this... :-( -Original Message- From: Paul Jarc [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 1:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: and yet another NEWBIE question now, i dont want to have /home/dom1-sales/Mailbox and /home/dom2-sales/Mailbox but instead have /mailuser/dom1-sales/Mailbox and /mailuser/dom2-sales/Mailbox is this possible and if so, how? You can make entries for these addresses in /var/qmail/users/assign, and let the homedir field be /mailuser/dom1-sales, etc. Or if these addresses have system accounts (which doesn't necessarily sound like the best way to do it, but it seems that's what you're doing), then you can let /mailuser/dom1-sales be the actual home directory for the dom1-sales user. (How to change an account's home directory depends on the kind of system you have; check your system documentation, we won't necessarily be able to help you.) also, i inserted the command for pop3 as described in life with qmail into the inetd.conf when i test is as instructed on the machine itself it works great but when i telnet to 110 from another machine, the authentication always doesnt accept the password... What exactly did you do to test it? What exactly are you doing when it fails? paul
RE: NEWBIE - im confused now... please enlighten me
well... now im even more confused, here are two new progs for me... im actually looking for a good source or explanation for installing a pop3 daemon safely and easly like qmail... what about the qmail-pop3d? what is it and how do i make it work? -Original Message- From: Esteban Gutierrez-Moguel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 6:07 PM To: çééí äìôøï Cc: Qmail Subject: Re: NEWBIE - im confused now... please enlighten me i understood that there is a way to run qmail "chrooted" with another root dir.. is this recomended?? chroot is an option, but I will suggest you to install the RPMS from http://em.ca/~bruceg/rpms and also vmailmgr from www.vmailmgr.org esteban.
