qmailanalog report

2000-08-24 Thread Jason Huang




I use qmailanalog recently. But I don't 
understand why the "xdelay" is minus.
Is that right ?   If it is right , what the real 
mean by that.
 
Appreciate any help . 
 
 
 here is my analog 
#


Completed messages: 104Recipients for 
completed messages: 133Total delivery attempts for completed messages: 
195Average delivery attempts per completed message: 1.875Bytes in 
completed messages: 45428841Bytes weighted by success: 45960852Average 
message qtime (s): 1157.42
 
Total delivery attempts: 419  success: 
105  failure: 28  deferral: 286Total ddelay (s): 
61899.111729Average ddelay per success (s): 589.515350Total xdelay (s): 
-28801.783392Average xdelay per delivery attempt (s): -68.739340Time 
span (days): 2.54319Average concurrency: 
-0.131077


Re: qmailanalog report

2000-08-24 Thread Jason Huang




 
 
# Here is my script and the attachment is my 
log file  #
 
#!/bin/sh
 
cd /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin
cat /var/log/maillog | grep -v 
"imaplogin" | awk 
'{$1="";$2="";$3="";$4="";$5="";print}' 
| \
 ./matchup | ./zoverall

 At 11:17 25/8/00 
+0800, you wrote:Follow From this mail that mean u use qmailanalog for 
analyze your log file So can i know  command line that u use i try to 
use so many time But i no have output like you Brgs
I use qmailanalog recently. 
But I don't understand why the "xdelay" is 
minus.Is that right ?   If it is right 
, what the real mean by that.Appreciate any 
help .  here is my analog 
#Completed messages: 
104Recipients for completed messages: 133Total delivery attempts 
for completed messages: 195Average delivery attempts per completed 
message: 1.875Bytes in completed messages: 45428841Bytes 
weighted by success: 45960852Average message qtime (s): 
1157.42Total delivery attempts: 
419  success: 105  failure: 28  deferral: 
286Total ddelay (s): 61899.111729Average ddelay per success (s): 
589.515350Total xdelay (s): -28801.783392Average xdelay per 
delivery attempt (s): -68.739340Time span (days): 2.54319Average 
concurrency: -0.131077=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--= 
PipE System EngineerSamart Infonet Co.ltd99/12 Software 
Park, 30th Floor Chaengwattana Rd., Klong Gluar, Pak-kred Nonthaburi 
11120[EMAIL PROTECTED]icq 
uin # 10831office phone : (662) 502-6388 fax : (662) 
502-6382  =--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--= 
 

 maillog


Re: qmailanalog report

2000-08-24 Thread Jason Huang




I think it's time problem!! Because I change my 
system time .
Now it's ok !
 
Thanks your care , PipE 
.
 

 
# Here is my script and the attachment 
is my log file  #
 
#!/bin/sh
 
cd /usr/local/qmailanalog/bin
cat /var/log/maillog | grep -v 
"imaplogin" | awk 
'{$1="";$2="";$3="";$4="";$5="";print}' 
| \
 ./matchup | 
./zoverall

 At 11:17 25/8/00 
+0800, you wrote:Follow From this mail that mean u use qmailanalog 
for analyze your log file So can i know  command line that u use i 
try to use so many time But i no have output like you Brgs
I use qmailanalog 
recently. But I don't understand why the "xdelay" is 
minus.Is that right ?   If it is 
right , what the real mean by that.Appreciate any help .  here is my analog #Completed messages: 
104Recipients for completed messages: 133Total delivery 
attempts for completed messages: 195Average delivery attempts 
per completed message: 1.875Bytes in completed messages: 
45428841Bytes weighted by success: 45960852Average message 
qtime (s): 1157.42Total delivery 
attempts: 419  success: 105  failure: 28  
deferral: 286Total ddelay (s): 61899.111729Average ddelay 
per success (s): 589.515350Total xdelay (s): 
-28801.783392Average xdelay per delivery attempt (s): 
-68.739340Time span (days): 2.54319Average concurrency: 
-0.131077=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--= 
PipE System EngineerSamart Infonet Co.ltd99/12 
Software Park, 30th Floor Chaengwattana Rd., Klong Gluar, Pak-kred 
Nonthaburi 11120[EMAIL PROTECTED]icq uin # 
10831office phone : (662) 502-6388 fax : (662) 
502-6382  =--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--=--= 
 



How to control message ?

1999-12-17 Thread Jason Huang




Hi  All !
  My boss told me he wanna control outgoing 
and incoming mail.
He want to allow or delete each mail.  It seems terrible ,but ...
 How can I config my qmail 
??
I tried to redirect all mail to someone by forward and 
tcp.smtp file.
But It seems stupid if allowed mail will  be 
sent.
Any other solution ?
   
Thanks !!

 


Re: How to control message ?

1999-12-17 Thread Jason Huang

yes!!

-­ì©l¶l¥ó-
±H¥óªÌ: iv0 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
¦¬¥óªÌ: Jason Huang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
°Æ¥»§Û°e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
¤é´Á: 1999¦~12¤ë18¤é AM 10:38
¥D¦®: Re: How to control message ?


>> Jason Huang wrote:
>>
>> Hi  All !
>>   My boss told me he wanna control outgoing and incoming mail.
>> He want to allow or delete each mail.  It seems terrible ,but
>> ...
>>  How can I config my qmail ??
>> I tried to redirect all mail to someone by forward and tcp.smtp file.
>> But It seems stupid if allowed mail will  be sent.
>> Any other solution ?
>>
>> Thanks !!
>>
>>
>
>When your boss says he wants to allow or delete each mail, does
>this mean someone will review each mail and decide to allow
>it in or out?
>
>Ken Jones
>Inter7
>



run program in .qmail

2000-02-16 Thread Jason Huang




I am trying to run my program in .qmail. 

In my program , it will create a file and chage 
the mode to 755. 
But it doesn't work,the file still be 
700.
 
Could someone tell me why?
  

 


unable to open mutex

2000-03-08 Thread Jason Huang




I moved all qmail files from 'MACHINE_1' to 
'MACHINE_2' (  use 'tar zxfv' command ) .
The two machine are the same OS (Linux) , but different qmail 
uid and gid.
I had changed the start's sript  about uid and gid , but 
I still got the blow message .
(I use tcpserver.)
 
Mar  8 13:00:52 server58 qmail: 
952491652.534995 alert: cannot start: unable to open mutexMar  8 
13:06:20 server58 qmail: 952491980.571310 alert: cannot start: unable to open 
mutex
I found some files in '/var/qmail/queue/intd'. 
They are 16101 , 16102 ,and 16103.
I thinks it is owner's problem.  

 
Appreciate any help.
    



Re: unable to open mutex

2000-03-08 Thread Jason Huang

Thanks,Petr Novotny !!

 I create new qmail users in 'MACHINE_2'  before moving the files.
I check all qmail files.

[root@MACHINE_2 ]# ls -al /var/qmail/queue/lock
-rw---1 qmails  qmail  0 Jan  8 12:32 sendmutex
-rw-r--r--1 qmailr   qmail1024 Jan  9 12:32 tcpto
prw--w--w- 1 qmails  qmail  0 Jan  9 13:01 trigger

Every file is the right mode and owner that it should be.
Is it possible that qmail remeber the uid number  ?

[root@MACHINE_1  ]# id qmaild
uid=519(qmaild) gid=503(nofiles) groups=503(nofiles)
[root@MACHINE_2  ]# id qmaild
uid=506(qmaild) gid=505(nofiles) groups=505(nofiles)


On 8 Mar 00, at 21:55, Petr Novotny wrote:

>On 8 Mar 00, at 21:45, Jason Huang wrote:
>
>> I moved all qmail files from 'MACHINE_1' to 'MACHINE_2' (  use 'tar
>> zxfv' command ) . The two machine are the same OS (Linux) , but
>> different qmail uid and gid.
>
>Don't. It won't ever work. You have to recompile qmail.
>
>> I had changed the start's sript  about
>> uid and gid , but I still got the blow message . (I use tcpserver.)
>> 
>> Mar  8 13:00:52 server58 qmail: 952491652.534995 alert: cannot start:
>> unable to open mutex Mar  8 13:06:20 server58 qmail: 952491980.571310
>> alert: cannot start: unable to open mutex
>
>[>root@saturnin smtp]# ls -l /var/qmail/queue/lock
>total 1
>- -rw---   1 qmails   qmail   0 May 13  1999 sendmutex
>- -rw-r--r--   1 qmailr   qmail1024 Mar  8 14:57 tcpto
>prw--w--w-   1 qmails   qmail   0 Mar  8 14:57 trigger>
>
>However, you need to recompile qmail with changed uids. No 
>exception. qmail-send is running under a uid of qmails; it must be 
>able to open the sendmutex file above...
>




special user

2000-04-10 Thread Jason Huang




 I have a special user 
account as [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
.
The specail user just can receive some designated domain(or 
just localhost ) .
Thought  SENDER environment variable in dot-qmail can do 
it , 
but it still can be faked .
Have a idea ?
 
Thanks any help !!