Re: after using .forward, can use also have copy of the message?

2001-08-09 Thread John Hogan

i can't believe i'm going to say this... you guys are a bad influence :-)

this is covered in-depth in the lwq/faqs, which you obviously haven't read 
- please re-read, comprehend and then re-ask the question

(hint: look for the function of the dot-qmail file)

- hogan

>can .forward remain a copy to original user email maildir?
>what is the difference between
>&[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>in .forward file?




Re: anger management courses

2001-08-03 Thread John Hogan

At 03:41 PM 8/1/2001, Robin S. Socha wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 04:10:13PM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone say 'anger management course'?
>
>Anger mangama... Angre mgnma

anggg munug... annngr mnng... no!

Robin - I too have anger issues... two joke my wife would like me to share 
(mostly she tells them about me):

1) any time an app on her (our?) windows server crashes, she classifies it 
as an 'rtfm ID-10-T' error ('read the feching manual, idiot')

2) abstract, seemingly random software issues are often described as 'lying 
somewhere between the chair and keyboard'... this one often works when 
describing the desire to 'un-send' email

apologies for the useless flame

>`In Germany, they are not referred to as network administrators. They
>prefer to be called "Sons Of The Third Reich".' (Kate: www.katewerk.com)

in the usa, they are treated like goalkeepers in football (soccer, duh?)... 
when the team wins, you shower alone - when the team loses, you shower 
alone *grin*

- hogan




Re: Program Delivery to PHP Script

2001-07-29 Thread John Hogan


> > So for the lynx method, I tried in the .qmail file:
> >
> > |/usr/bin/lynx -post_data "http://..parser.php";

why not use perl for this? faster, more secure and more flexible regex work...

>php > info.html
>

make sure that you delete this file when you're finished... lots of info 
that johnny q public doesn't need to know...

- hogan




Re: Sublist (Was: Virus-infected listmembers)

2001-07-27 Thread John Hogan


>despite the fact that I just finished building a qmail cluster using 3 Sun 
>220R's load balanced behind a pair of F5 Networks Big/IP's, qmail 1.03, 
>vpopmail, courier-imap, sqwebmail, mysql and apache handling 1,000,000 
>users across 5,400 domains, I should be banned from your sublist because I 
>choose to use Outlook Express???

testify, brother... at over 1000 messages/day, my eudora treats me very 
well, indeed

i couldn't agree more... i got over 300 copies of that damned virus, yet 
remain unaffected... why? because 'i'm smarter than the average bear, boo boo!'

>Trust me - the day I can get all the features I feel I need without using 
>any MS apps, I'm there.  But I'm not going to dump MS just to spite MS 
>without having what *I* consider suitable replacements - not you, or the 
>rest of the rabid Anti-MS bridgade.

i use windows because (and only because) i cannot do the interface design 
for end-users of windows without walking in their shoes (and i love photoshop!)

robin: don't you get nosebleeds being so high up on that soapbox of yours?

- hogan




Re: FW: Hanging

2001-07-25 Thread John Hogan

try disabling tcpserver dns lookups with the -H switch - that made a world 
of difference for us

from my /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run file:

exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 200 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -H -v -R 
-l 0 -x \
   /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 \
   smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1

- hogan


At 03:53 AM 7/25/2001, Christian wrote:
>I just managed to get an email to send to a local account
>but it took about 10 minutes to get through !!
>Why is it taking so long ???
>
>Sachin Kundra wrote:
>
>>Are transactions being logged in the qmail log?
>>Sachin
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:12 AM
>>To: qmail
>>Subject: Hanging
>>
>>Hi,
>>I'm a newbie to qmail and have just setup my first qmail server
>>I'm having problems with users sending mail
>>It just hangs .. trys for ages to send &
>>There's no error messages returned
>>Which makes it hard to figure out what's wrong.
>>All the processes are running
>>Port 25 seems to be open .. I can telnet in
>>And I can send message thru qmail-inject
>>qmail-smtpd is running via tcpserver
>>/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R -l 0 -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c 20 -u 510 -g 
>>513 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
>>Can someone please point me in the right
>>direction so I can figure this out.
>>Thanx,
>>
>>
>>
>>.
>
>




flame-qmail-newbies (WAS: How to piss people off easily)

2001-07-23 Thread John Hogan


> > If you are too incompetent to use a
> > search engine, why are you running a mail server?
>
>I am just wondering if hurdling insults at the first opportunity is the
>direction this list is heading towards. What happened to common decency and
>business manners?

that's the way some of the people on this list act... sad but true - a few 
are funny, a few are rude :-(

i used to think that the list name should be 'flame-qmail-newbies' - lurk 
and learn, eh?

- hogan




Re: qmail and analog

2001-07-12 Thread John Hogan

i was just there this pm...

http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#qmailanalog

- hogan

At 11:52 AM 7/12/2001, Miranda Gomez Miguel Angel wrote:
>hi , do you know if there are some HOW TO'S or similar for analog ???, the
>man pages are difficult,
>thanks




Re: how can I unsubscri...

2001-07-11 Thread John Hogan

HA HA!!! sometimes, charles makes me laugh so hard... by far the funniest 
thing i've seen all day!

thanx charles

- hogan

>From: Lukasz Gogolewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: hi,how to unsubcribe?
>Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Sigh. This has become such a FAQ that I'm reposting the detailed
>instructions:
>
>First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit.
>Then follow these directions.






a wee rant (was: 'RE: Autoresponder problem.')

2001-07-03 Thread John Hogan


> Actually you can run frontpage on Unix with Apache. I know, we do 
> it now.
>Works better than the Windows Frontpage servers.

not to be rude, but don't even go there... for our customers who want 
frontpage as their primary web-authoring interface (especially in an 
enterprise environment with document publishing, m$sql access, etc...) i 
always recommend win nt/2000... they're all made for each other and work 
best together...

we have noticed measurable server performance and maintenance issues in a 
linux/apache enviroment - directory creation, backups and permissions are 
the main problems from a systems p o v... cryptic htpasswd/htaccess files 
are another

also, there are still security issues with child webs in linux/apache 
environments - all such security issues can be resolved in an m$ iis 
environment (with application of the current corrections, patches, fixes 
and updates



sorry, vent closed back to work

- hogan




Re: majordomo

2001-07-03 Thread John Hogan


>switch to ezmlm ;-)

ditto...

>installation on qmail systems is quite straightforward
>http://www.ezmlm.org/

the mysql support is awesome - very powerful :-)

- hogan


>/k
>
>balaji adhimoolam([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.07.03 08:10:21 +:
> > hi all,
> > i have a problem with majordomo..






Re: I can't install vmailmgr on my RH 7.1 Professional - Box

2001-06-30 Thread John Hogan

robin makes me laugh...

>1. You are on the wrong list.
>2. You did not consult the archive for the right list.
>3. RH and "Professional" don't belong into the same sentence unless
>there is a "but not" in between.
>4. http://qmail.org/ lists several companies that offer professional
>support. You might also consider looking for The Other Kind(tm) of
>professional help.
>5. Du kannst Dir Deine beschissenen deutschen Fehlermeldungen
>irgendwohin schieben, wo es dunkel ist - das ist eine englischsprachige
>Liste.
>6. While trying to parse your MIME attachment (HTML produced by Word I
>presume), tidy crashed due to memory overcommitment.
>
>In short: DO NOT USE SOFTWARE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

even you german is impeccable - i'm still laughing...

- hogan




Re: headers in failure notice

2001-06-01 Thread John Hogan


>I've never seen anyone else ask for this type of control, and have a difficult
>time imagining why it would be necessary (or even desirable).  Probably no one
>else has written such a patch or add-on; you'd need to do it yourself.  Note
>that this would then require parsing the original message headers -- a job
>tricky to do without introducing bugs.

ick

>Why do you want to control this?

we get quite a number of them daily (sometimes 300-400/day) - some 
customers' sites have email addresses on web pages, robots harvest them 
(you know the ending)

i'd like to at least get rid of the Content-Type, Content-Transfer, 
X-MSMail-Priority, etc... just keep the basics in case i need to flog someone

- hogan


>Charles
>--
>---
>Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
>Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
>---




headers in failure notice

2001-06-01 Thread John Hogan

this is a post-search-the-archive question:

i want control over the headers available in the body of the qmail-send 
bounce notices

is this at all configurable?

- hogan




Re: Urgent Qmail Question (Relaying)

2001-05-09 Thread John Hogan



>[climbing belltower with sniper rifle...]

hehe... i'm being good, charles

- hogan


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: html based email

2001-05-09 Thread John Hogan

i was, in a former life, a sysadmin for a major-league list-hosting outfit...

no way, no how - don't believe them... it's not possible to float two 
'copies' of the message, with reception being dependent on the user's MUA 
(very difficult to detect on MTA 'send') - also, a lot depends on the 
end-user's reader -- that's possible to detect (difficult) and absolutely 
impossible to predict

set up two lists: html-listname and text-listname - have your users state 
their preference when they subscribe

- hogan

At 08:49 AM 5/9/2001, Meuse, Andy wrote:

>Hey All,
>
> Is there a way anyone knows of to send one email in both html and 
> plain text format? This is so the recipient will get the html version if 
> their mua supports it, and the plain text version if it doesn't.
>
> I know of a service that does this, www.roving.com, but don't 
> know of a way to do it myself. Except scripting my mailing list to send 
> only plain text to like AOl and other domains I know don't support html.
>
>Thanks,
>Andy


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: Mail still undeliverable after qmail-getpw reports correctly.

2001-05-09 Thread John Hogan

those sound like old sendmal errors...

- hogan

> > 554 5.0.0 MX list for postboy.net. points back to markus.postkidxp.com
> > 554 5.3.5 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Local configuration error


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: Can MX record be CNAME?

2001-05-04 Thread John Hogan

temper, temper, Henning...

my temper got me into trouble earlier this week... just let them act like children and 
let it go

- hogan

At 03:15 AM 5/4/2001, you wrote:
>On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 08:18:56PM -0500, q question wrote:
>> >Please stop this useless flaming. You aren't posting anything usefull, just
>> >flaming charles. This is a technical discussion list, no smalltalk. Either
>> >provide answers or participate in technical discussions or shut up. 
>> I am not flaming Charles in any way. I have been completely respectful.
>
>Sure. What else.
>
>> I 
>> have requested that he not issue blanket directives that are not necessarily 
>> shared by all.
>
>You are posting tons of useless OFF TOPIC stuff and not a single on-topic
>message so far, please stop this NOW.
>
>-- 
>Henning Brauer | BS Web Services
>Hostmaster BSWS| Roedingsmarkt 14
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 20459 Hamburg
>http://www.bsws.de | Germany
>
>Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
>(Dennis Ritchie) 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




i apologize...

2001-05-02 Thread John Hogan

for my temper yesterday... 

i learn a lot from this list and would miss it terribly... i will read more and 
hopefully, soon, be answering questions (or pointing to the faq link)

- hogan


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: slow smtp connection

2001-05-01 Thread John Hogan


>>> for future reference, what sort of question would qualify for your
>enlightened views? <<
>
>
>Probably NO QUESTION!

you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the list... please don't 
email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing this morning

i would be the first to admit that i'm not the 'guru' that you guys are... i've spent 
the last four full days trying to figure out qmail/tcpserver/qpopper/ezmlm and 
procmail - mostly because i thought that the open-source community was cool and 
helpful - you know TEAMWORK? - i have found that documentation is poorly written and 
poorly organized

since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my questions... i would 
estimate that i have printed/read over 200 pages of documentation on the various 
source packages, patches, add-ons and cetera that i have had to install...

you would think that a few guys who know all there is to know wouldn't mind helping 
out the new guy on the block - boy, was i wrong - seems like the main function of the 
list is to distribute the links to faqs or more documentation

i am sorry to have troubled you all... i would have liked to progress to your level... 
now, i realize that there's nothing to envy

adios

- hogan

>On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:53:01AM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>> i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question
>> would qualify for your enlightened views?
>
>Perhaps one that you couldn't answer yourself with a minimum of effort.
>
>Chris


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: slow smtp connection

2001-05-01 Thread John Hogan

you know, i've had about enough of you guys... on and off the list... please don't 
email me anymore... i will be unsubscribing this morning

i would be the first to admit that i'm not the 'guru' that you guys are... i've spent 
the last four full days trying to figure out qmail/tcpserver/qpopper/ezmlm and 
procmail - mostly because i thought that the open-source community was cool and 
helpful - you know TEAMWORK? - i have found that documentation is poorly written and 
poorly organized

since i joined this list, i have gotten nothing but grief for my questions... i would 
estimate that i have printed/read over 200 pages of documentation on the various 
source packages, patches, add-ons and cetera that i have had to install...

you would think that a few guys who know all there is to know wouldn't mind helping 
out the new guy on the block - boy, was i wrong - seems like the main function of the 
list is to distribute the links to faqs or more documentation

i am sorry to have troubled you all... i would have liked to progress to your level... 
now, i realize that there's nothing to envy

adios

- hogan

>On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 10:53:01AM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>> i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question
>> would qualify for your enlightened views?
>
>Perhaps one that you couldn't answer yourself with a minimum of effort.
>
>Chris


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: slow smtp connection

2001-05-01 Thread John Hogan

man, you guys are tough - i thought it was a simple question... it probably took 
charles more time to type the links than to type the answer

i'm sorry to have trouble you... for future reference, what sort of question would 
qualify for your enlightened views?

- hogan

At 09:31 AM 5/1/2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
>John Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i am having slow smtp connectivity from an internal machine to my qmail 
>smtp/firewall machine... once the message hits the smtp server, all is well
>> 
>> what should i check?
>
>The mailing list archives -- questions about slow network connections to qmail
>services come up every three minutes on this list.  It's so bad, one of the
>regulars has actually added this FAQ and its answer to his .sig.
>
>You can find a link to the archives from www.qmail.org, or from "Life with
>qmail" at www.lifewithqmail.org.
>
>Charles
>-- 
>---
>Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
>Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions.
>--- 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




slow smtp connection

2001-05-01 Thread John Hogan

i am having slow smtp connectivity from an internal machine to my qmail smtp/firewall 
machine... once the message hits the smtp server, all is well

what should i check?

- hogan


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: newbie question

2001-04-26 Thread John Hogan

thanks for the off-list advice...

i thought i'd let everyone know - building a sym-link from /var/spool/mail/username to 
~(username)/Mailbox did the trick... popper must have been looking at the old 
/var/spool i'll have to figure out a way to change popper and release those nasty 
sym-links

thanks again

- hogan

At 02:40 PM 4/26/2001 -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>i was running just regular, old, linux distribution flavored popper... must i switch?
>
>- hogan
>
>At 09:17 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>>On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>>> yep, popper's running...
>>> 
>>> qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
>>
>>What popper? qmail-pop3d only does Maildir.
>>
>>Greetz, Peter. 
>
>
>_
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: newbie question

2001-04-26 Thread John Hogan

i was running just regular, old, linux distribution flavored popper... must i switch?

- hogan

At 09:17 PM 4/26/2001 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:53:50PM -0500, John Hogan wrote:
>> yep, popper's running...
>> 
>> qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt
>
>What popper? qmail-pop3d only does Maildir.
>
>Greetz, Peter. 


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




Re: newbie question

2001-04-26 Thread John Hogan

yep, popper's running...

qmail is configured to ~/Mailbox, tests, performs local delivery and receipt

new messages are received in Pine just fine, but not by a remote UA

- hogan

At 07:42 PM 4/26/2001 +0100, Barry Hill wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>
>Thursday, April 26, 2001, 7:16:38 PM, you wrote:
>
>JH> i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local
>JH> environment... when i send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the
>JH> message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is only
>JH> available at the command line (pine)
>JH> any ideas?
>
>You need a POP server, such as popper (included with most
>Linux distributions) if you're storing your messages in
>/var/spool/mail, or some other POP server if you're using mbox or
>Maildir. 
>
>
>Best regards,
>
> Barrymailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com




newbie question

2001-04-26 Thread John Hogan

i have qmail all configured, tested and working in a local environment... when i send 
a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is not downloaded by a third-party UA and is 
only available at the command line (pine)

any ideas?

- hogan


_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com