Re: FYI: Windows is better
Ok, who changed the qmail list to an advocacy discussion without
notifying the subscribers?
On 04 Jul 2001 14:36:54 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Subject: Windows vs Unix
>From:Charles Booher
>h-64-105-140-243.lnoclli.covad.net
>Tue Jul 3 12:25:05
>
>My second computer was a VA Linux box. I tried to run
>SCO Unix on my first computer but that did not work out
>for a number of reasons.
>
Stephen Berg
//-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-//
//- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//-Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
RE: Peter from the Dike and Security
Maybe we could borrow the Seti@home or distributed.net engines to decrypt that message. Could be something really useful in there. On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Hank Wethington wrote: > Damn I wish I understood that! > > Hank Wethington > > > Information Logistics > www.GoInfoLogistics.com > mailto:info.at.GoInfoLogistics.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Brett Randall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: None > To: Frank Tegtmeyer > Cc: Qmail List > Subject: Re: Peter from the Dike and Security > > > Qhqr, trg n yvsr! Frevbhfyl! Yrg lbhe 13 lrne byq onyyf qebc naq tb > rng na nccyr!
RE: Case in email address
I always thought that qmail converted the user part of an incoming email to lowercase and then handled it appropriately. On Thu, 10 May 2001, Matt Simonsen wrote: > For additional information, I have read the man page for addresses. *SLAP* I > should have done this first, sorry. > > It says that case does matter in Qmail (as most of you know probably), yet > when I pipe mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] both get > delivered to my real account, [EMAIL PROTECTED] What am I missing? By > default is case sensitivity disabled for interoperability? I get the > impression that case does matter, yet I can't get it to fail.
Re: EMail to all my users
Your email was unreadable. Try resending with plain text in the body of the message. On Thu, 3 May 2001 19:10:48 +0200, Fares Gianluca wrote: Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //-Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: hai just try it
This is pretty tacky trying to put money in your pocket from our participation with this company. Doing it on this list where it has no topical value is even worse. On Sat, 24 Mar 2001 05:53:45 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I found a great new Internet company - CashFiesta.com that >has created a product that everyone can benefit from. They >pay you while you work or play on your computer. They even >pay you when your friends are using their computers. It's >free to join and your privacy is completely protected. > >Their proprietary software - the FiestaBar - displays ads >at the bottom or top of your computer screen. Since advertisers >want you to view these ads, they pay CashFiesta to reach you >via The FiestaBar and then CashFiesta shares its advertising >revenues with you. Members who use the FiestaBar are paid >for their own Web browsing and for referrals. > >All you have to do is sign up and start making money. It only >takes a minute. You can refer your friends, family and co-workers >and you will receive a percentage of their earnings in addition >to your own. > >So here is the link, enjoy and happy money making to all of you. > >http://www.cashfiesta.com/php/join.php?ref=jayputra > >Check it out! > >jayputra unta > Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //-Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: Bogus Popularity claims (sendmail.org's reply)
nhancements over version 3, released last march, are in the areas of Webmail and scalability. "We've been able to achieve better scalability through integration with SQL server databases," Davies said, "and also by adding in some code to support clustering. We designed it so you can start with two nodes, and you should be able to take it up to four, eight, or ten machines. You can host a single domain over multiple MailSite machines." The user directory can be run on one machine, using a centralized SQL Server 7 database. The message store can run on another machine, optimized for high volumes of file reads and writes. Then multiple machines can be run as MailSite application nodes. This architecture, Davies said, has already scaled up to half a million users, and can probably go to a million users. The architecture gets around some of the high-volume filing problems of the Windows NT filing system by using a Network Appliance Inc. file server for the message store function. In that way, he said he can get the reliability and scalability of Unix at NT prices. Looking for Non-Unix ISPs "We're targeting high-end service providers. We're competing with Unix solutions, and with other NT solutions. And we think we have some advantages on both," Davies said. Large and established ISPs still prefer Unix, but if they're starting small and want to scale along with traffic, or if they want Webmail along with POP3 client access, Davies said they might find MailSite attractive. If they plan on getting to a million users in no time, they'll probably use a Unix solution. But only a handful are that ambitious about their own growth, and only a few dozen have ever gotten that big. Application Service Providers (ASPs), however, seem more receptive to Windows NT, he said, because they usually set up their clients one per machine, and NT has a lower cost for that type of configuration. Also, he said the ASPs find it easier to pick from the array of applications available for NT, and then to integrate them into the server for a customer. What Davies said he hopes also will attract ASPs and ISPs is the simplicity of the new MailSite Express Webmail interface, which is both easy to customize and feature-rich, given its avoidance of Java, JavaScript, and ActiveX controls. The Webmail interface looks and feels like Hotmail, but it also supports folders, address books, forwarding, changing passwords, and updating your own directory entry. It uses the IMAP protocol to talk to MailSite, so all messages remain stored on the server. That way, a user can switch from Webmail to an Outlook client without missing any messages. If they read them on a borrowed Webmail connection and don't delete them, they can read them again using Outlook, saving a copy locally. Webmail-to-Outlook Contact Synch The MailSite Express online address book can import and export contacts from an Outlook client, so users can travel with their name and number lists stored in their Webmail interface, reachable through any Web browser. Davies said Rockliffe wrote an Outlook service provider that adds a new button to the Outlook toolbar. When the button is pressed, the utility displays lists of the MailSite Express and Outlook contacts. Users can synchronize them in either direction. Customizing the interface to suit an ISP's look and feel is a process of editing three files, Davies said. Pricing will be around $1 per user. 2000 Messaging Online, Inc. Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //-Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: qmailanalog compiling problem
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:47:40 -0400, Peter Green wrote:
>If you installed kernel-headers before kernel-source (which makes sense,
>since kernel-headers is a prereq for kernel-source), you broke the symlinks.
>Do a ``rpm -Uhv --force kernel-headers-2.2.16-3.i386.rpm'' and the symlinks
>magically reappear.
Way cool, that did the trick. Thanks much. Problem solved.
>This is a (RedHat) bug, not a feature.
I was always told a feature was a bug with seniority. :-)
Stephen Berg
//-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-//
//- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: qmailanalog compiling problem
Ok, take a look here and see if I'm missing something. I'm pretty
sure I got all the packages necessary to do this sort of thing.
[root@black qmailanalog-0.70]# rpm -qa | grep -i kernel
kernel-utils-2.2.14-5.0
kernelcfg-0.5-5
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.14-5.0
kernel-ibcs-2.2.16-3
kernel-2.2.16-3
kernel-2.2.14-5.0
kernel-pcmcia-cs-2.2.16-3
kernel-headers-2.2.16-3
kernel-source-2.2.16-3
I'm running RedHat 6.2.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 18:30:14 -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
>I believe errno.h is part of the kernel source tree. I'm going to guess
>that you are using RedHat and did not install the kernel-devel package,
>which includes all the kernel header files...
>
>Do that and you should be good to go.
Stephen Berg
//-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-//
//- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
qmailanalog compiling problem
Ok, I thought I'd take a gander at the qmailanalog utility from DJB's website. Downloaded it and de-tar'd/gunzip'd it. Read the README and INSTALL files. Ran "make" and get the following error message. ---Error Message start--- [root@black qmailanalog-0.70]# make ./compile error.c In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36, from error.c:1: /usr/include/bits/errno.h:25: linux/errno.h: No such file or directory make: *** [error.o] Error 1 ---Error Message stop--- I beleive I've got all the development stuff installed but this looks like a missing library or some such type file. I have "/usr/include/errno.h" and "/usr/include/error.h" files on the system. I've looked through the files in the package and checked the mailing list archive but can't seem to locate any advice on this one on my own. Anyone know what will fix this? I've looked around and don't Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: For Qmail List Owner
Personally I don't like those prefixes to subject lines. I'd rather
not see them.
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:20:55 +0530 (IST), System Administrator wrote:
>Hi
>
>can we have a prefix set for our list. for example :
>
>Subject line of each mail on the list has something as follows :
>
>Subject : [Qmail]
>
>the dots signify the actual subject.
Stephen Berg
//-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-//
//- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -//
//- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
restarting qmail
I just added a new virtual domain to a qmail server and am curious as to the best/easiest way to restart qmail so it will see the changes in the rcpthosts and virtualdomains file under /var/qmail/control. So far a kill -ALRM does not seem to get qmail-send to reread the virtualdomains file. Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
Re: Need to get copies of 1 user's outgoing mail.
On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 23:50:08 GMT, Sam wrote: >You will have to write the code to examine each incoming connection's IP >address, and for the ones coming from your local IP address space do >whatever is necessary to identify, in real time, the account that's >relaying the mail. Once you have pegged the account, you can do things >like setting RELAYCLIENT to "@foobar", then set up control/virtualdomains >to forward all mail to foobar to some shell script that forwards the mail >to the original message envelope recipient, BCCing the separate account. Might also want to set up a .qmail file so incoming mail is routed to the kid being monitored and his parents so they can also see what he's receiving. Stephen Berg //-USAF Instructor -/- Reluctant NT User -/- Web Designer-// //- Home = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- Work = [EMAIL PROTECTED] -// //- http://iceberg.3c0x1.com/ -/- http://www.3c0x1.com -//
