Re: [OT] [useless thread] Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 05:10:32PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > > > You have shown us no proof. That you are unable to for external > > reasons is too bad, but I suggest that you do not claim the above > > until you can show us proof. > > I don't believe you. Why I should believe you, when A. Brown > has presented arrogant behavior to me? Please, please, everyone, let's not let this guy waste another week of the list members' time and energy! Doesn't anyone remember what happened when people tried rational arguments on this guy last time? AFAICT, he's simply a troll -- ignore him... -- Greg White Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -- John F. Kennedy
Re: [OT] [useless thread] Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
Can you guys please stop feeding this troll? --Adam
Re: [OT] [useless thread] Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > You have shown us no proof. That you are unable to for external > reasons is too bad, but I suggest that you do not claim the above > until you can show us proof. I don't believe you. Why I should believe you, when A. Brown has presented arrogant behavior to me? > So people *pay* you to do silly things like block all of .nl? Post from .nl can be received thus secondaries MX - this works, test no. > It indeed effectively blocks .nl hosts. The orbs-tester, however, is > not an .nl host. It was back in december, as you clearly demonstrate, > but it isn't now. If I have it find - I make block and send protest to Netherlands Embassy in Warsaw. I will say you again, the all activities, which you will perform on my server on port 25, which are not provided to send a post to any user on them is inappropriate using of this port and will be not permitted be me as server administrator. This depends all like ORBS systems, whose owners are participants of this list Piotr --- Piotr Kasztelowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [http://www.am.torun.pl/~pekasz]
[OT] [useless thread] Re: ORBS, and RFC-ignorant blacklists
On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 01:29:59PM +0200, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > Now it is not possible, because the ORBS is closed > The host is sun.lodz.ptkardio.pl [212.51.193.152] > > > relays that stay open that long probably will never get fixed. > > Since September 2000 relay open has been fixed by me on > Dane Bernstein software - qmail, tcpserver. A. Brown will > not remove me from list. This is clear, that ORBS uses > others, that objectives criteria. You have shown us no proof. That you are unable to for external reasons is too bad, but I suggest that you do not claim the above until you can show us proof. > NZ Court, as we have heard don't let him do to. > I'm the Vicepresident of Polish Medical Internet Society > and this same work at security and quality of Polish medical > servers. I work as consultant. My statement So people *pay* you to do silly things like block all of .nl? [snip] > > The ORBS tester does not have a reverse that ends in .nl. > > Dec 4 23:39:09 sun smtp: tcpserver: deny 29386 :212.51.193.152:25 > relaytest.orbs.vuurwerk.nl:194.178.232.55::2991 > > As you can see netblock is effective. It indeed effectively blocks .nl hosts. The orbs-tester, however, is not an .nl host. It was back in december, as you clearly demonstrate, but it isn't now. Greetz, Peter.
