Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Henning Brauer wrote: >> > My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and >> > spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on >> > its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. > >I'm not sure about the contes of the spamcontrol patch, but qmail-ldap >contains a lot of spam elimination techniques, perhaps this code is already >included. I did notice that, happily. The one thing I'll miss that I didn't see duplicated in the control set provided by qmail-ldap is the 'badmailfrom' feature, which allows regex-based filtering of incoming mail. - -d -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQEVAwUBOxTIs71ZYOtSwT+tAQHojQf/QSCnPSWQMAnVGCnp3doEQbMO0gBkfCpg 0MHn4mzNmTas611afAYXBoc3rf45NYYUS0tFWebh26ScNUwikMU4pTMYlG4r6bO8 9nIphNE1SuPYsQUUtXircDnBu8S/UsUHLL2EskqCzjaJoASifVT+PcD2PwDNGveW iDOk1npMrzg4WgYkSFpmzAIRfkmLf2HcHaex2lCbVVA0ImAK76mHnBVN5b5x33V3 sX8joR7Nrbdo6v9gSCHdBw/L3M0JDutGDUX/hZA1HWW7HIc9VEzVlkdFVDm1yDYo P4CMV9KclFrzmdgwNr/by1gwprUYdnkHG2fe1VKhGmvg5QVWiHcwDA== =0L24 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:22:07PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: > David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and > > spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on > > its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. > > > > Is there a solution? > > Probably both patches touch qmail-smtpd (I don't use either patch). It may be > possible to apply by hand -- it's not tricky. However, if either one changes > functionality that the other depends on, it's more a matter of rewriting one > or both patches. I'm not sure about the contes of the spamcontrol patch, but qmail-ldap contains a lot of spam elimination techniques, perhaps this code is already included. qmail-ldap's qmail-smtpd varies heavyly from stock qmail's one. There are no ldap related functions in it, but TLS support, RBL stuff and so on. Greetings Henning -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
David Talkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and > spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on > its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. > > Is there a solution? Probably both patches touch qmail-smtpd (I don't use either patch). It may be possible to apply by hand -- it's not tricky. However, if either one changes functionality that the other depends on, it's more a matter of rewriting one or both patches. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
