[qmailtoaster] Forward email with domainkeys
Hi List, Some of my users' email are forwarded from regional office (another qmail server). Most emails are fine, except email from google alert. The only error message I can see is something like this: Dec31 14:40:12 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote regionaloffice:unknown:x.x.x.x rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient Dec31 14:40:13 tcpserver: end 24357 status 256 My guess is it's due to domainkeys is being used by Google and when we forward from one server to another, it breaks. Am I correct? If yes, any way to disable domainkeys checking? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill
Re: [qmailtoaster] Forward email with domainkeys
Bill Kwok wrote: Hi List, Some of my users' email are forwarded from regional office (another qmail server). Most emails are fine, except email from google alert. The only error message I can see is something like this: Dec31 14:40:12 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote regionaloffice:unknown:x.x.x.x rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient Dec31 14:40:13 tcpserver: end 24357 status 256 My guess is it's due to domainkeys is being used by Google and when we forward from one server to another, it breaks. Am I correct? If yes, any way to disable domainkeys checking? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill That could be on older toaster versions, which did not log spf nor dk rejections. If your toaster is fairly recent, you would see a rejection message in the log for both of these conditions. If your toaster is a bit old, I suspect that your problem is more likely due to SPF misconfiguration, although domainkeys might also be a problem. Check the list archive for instructions on disabling domainkeys. The wizard at http://www.openspf.org is great helping to determine what should be in the spf record for your domain. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Forward email with domainkeys
Bill Kwok wrote: On Jan 29, 2008 12:07 AM, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Kwok wrote: Hi List, Some of my users' email are forwarded from regional office (another qmail server). Most emails are fine, except email from google alert. The only error message I can see is something like this: Dec31 14:40:12 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:: remote regionaloffice:unknown:x.x.x.x rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient Dec31 14:40:13 tcpserver: end 24357 status 256 My guess is it's due to domainkeys is being used by Google and when we forward from one server to another, it breaks. Am I correct? If yes, any way to disable domainkeys checking? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill That could be on older toaster versions, which did not log spf nor dk rejections. If your toaster is fairly recent, you would see a rejection message in the log for both of these conditions. If your toaster is a bit old, I suspect that your problem is more likely due to SPF misconfiguration, although domainkeys might also be a problem. Check the list archive for instructions on disabling domainkeys. The wizard at http://www.openspf.org http://www.openspf.org/ is great helping to determine what should be in the spf record for your domain. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org http://www.vr.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Eric, It seems my qmt versions are not that outdated: # rpm -qa | grep toaster vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.1-1.3.5 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.7 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.2 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.3 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2 qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.7-1.3.9 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.5 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.4 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.4 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 To be honest, I have no idea about how to setup SPF. I will study it soon and hope can solve my problem soon. Thanks for pointing me to a new direction. IIRC that logging problem was corrected somewhere around version 1.3.9 or 1.3.11 of qmail-toaster. The only changelog that I know of that's up to date is in the rpm spec file, which I don't have handy at the moment. BL, you appear to be current enough to have the change in there. You can try turning off DK checking, but I'm guessing that won't fix your problem. I could be wrong about this though (it's been known to happen!). Since you're not getting a meaningful log message, the best way to really tell what's going on is to turn on recordio during a test. Directions for using recordio are in the archives somewhere. It'd be nice if they were on the wiki, but I don't know that they're there yet. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster on debian etch
Eric Shubes wrote: Lucian Cristian wrote: Hi everyone I installed qmailtoaster from src rpms (after making changes on spec files) on Debian Etch, is someone here who knows how to make a deb package, I would like to make a src deb and use debian specific tools to compile the package and save them as deb files. Thanks, Lucian Cristian I'm not very familiar with deb files (yet), but have been thinking about creating toaster deb files for Ubuntu server (a popular Debian derivative). Perhaps we can work together on this. for now I have only the dependencies and some changes that needs to be done to the sistem, using alien it will rebuild the rpm and install smoothly, like on rehdat sistems - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster on debian etch
Lucian Cristian wrote: Hi everyone I installed qmailtoaster from src rpms (after making changes on spec files) on Debian Etch, is someone here who knows how to make a deb package, I would like to make a src deb and use debian specific tools to compile the package and save them as deb files. Thanks, Lucian Cristian I'm not very familiar with deb files (yet), but have been thinking about creating toaster deb files for Ubuntu server (a popular Debian derivative). Perhaps we can work together on this. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] FRCP Email Retention
I am a longtime qmail and qmailtoaster user. Has anybody handled the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for electronic communications with GPL tools? I understand qmailtap will allow me to make the email copies. I'm more interested in the search, storage, and retrieval. What I am looking for is what solutions you have come up with that satisifys email retention rules, indexable searchable content, ability to provide a portion or all of the emails in an easy end user type of interface. What are you using and does it work well? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Forward email with domainkeys
On Jan 29, 2008 12:07 AM, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Kwok wrote: Hi List, Some of my users' email are forwarded from regional office (another qmail server). Most emails are fine, except email from google alert. The only error message I can see is something like this: Dec31 14:40:12 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :: remote regionaloffice:unknown:x.x.x.x rcpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : found existing recipient Dec31 14:40:13 tcpserver: end 24357 status 256 My guess is it's due to domainkeys is being used by Google and when we forward from one server to another, it breaks. Am I correct? If yes, any way to disable domainkeys checking? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Bill That could be on older toaster versions, which did not log spf nor dk rejections. If your toaster is fairly recent, you would see a rejection message in the log for both of these conditions. If your toaster is a bit old, I suspect that your problem is more likely due to SPF misconfiguration, although domainkeys might also be a problem. Check the list archive for instructions on disabling domainkeys. The wizard at http://www.openspf.org is great helping to determine what should be in the spf record for your domain. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Eric, It seems my qmt versions are not that outdated: # rpm -qa | grep toaster vpopmail-toaster-5.4.13-1.3.3 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.1-1.3.5 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.9a-1.3.5 spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.7 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.2 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.2 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.3 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.2 libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.2 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.2 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.6 send-emails-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.2 qmailtoaster-plus-0.2.7-1.3.9 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.3 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.5 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.2 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.9-1.3.3 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.4 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.90.1-1.3.11 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.2 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.4 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.14 To be honest, I have no idea about how to setup SPF. I will study it soon and hope can solve my problem soon. Thanks for pointing me to a new direction.
Re: [qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster on debian etch
Hi Lucian, I will contact you offlist later tonight. I am definitely interested in an official Debian port if you are interested in being the guy in charge of the port. Thanks, Erik On Jan 28, 2008 10:14 AM, Lucian Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eric Shubes wrote: Lucian Cristian wrote: Hi everyone I installed qmailtoaster from src rpms (after making changes on spec files) on Debian Etch, is someone here who knows how to make a deb package, I would like to make a src deb and use debian specific tools to compile the package and save them as deb files. Thanks, Lucian Cristian I'm not very familiar with deb files (yet), but have been thinking about creating toaster deb files for Ubuntu server (a popular Debian derivative). Perhaps we can work together on this. for now I have only the dependencies and some changes that needs to be done to the sistem, using alien it will rebuild the rpm and install smoothly, like on rehdat sistems - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] qmailtoaster on debian etch
Hi everyone I installed qmailtoaster from src rpms (after making changes on spec files) on Debian Etch, is someone here who knows how to make a deb package, I would like to make a src deb and use debian specific tools to compile the package and save them as deb files. Thanks, Lucian Cristian - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. thank you
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
David Campbell wrote: I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com http://hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. Are they receiving an error about the RBL check? If so, you can either remove spamhaus from the blacklists, connect them to 587 istead of 25, or some other type of workaround.
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
David Campbell wrote: I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com http://hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. thank you Could it be that the 20% are on dynamic IP addresses and are using port 25? They would be blocked by RBLs in that case. If they use the submission port (587) they won't have that problem. Let us know if that's the case or you're experiencing a different problem. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: I'm running qmailtaoster for an ISP mail system, we just switched over from another mail server that was running in windows (hmailserver.com) which uses the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] for username and password, and it worked fine with my outgoing mailserver requires authentication ticked in outlook or equivalent settings in other programs, but I have an issue with about 20% of my customers, with exactly the same settings we transfered the usernames and passwords so they matched on the new server, then switched over the A and MX records, all of a sudden they cannot send email, they can receive fine, just not send, they get an SMTP auth failure, I was wondering if anyone else has experience in using qmailtaoster for an isp and could offer any tips, we resell our connections from a wholesaler so we dont control their IP's thus cannot just allow relaying from a particular ip range, we need authentication. Are they receiving an error about the RBL check? If so, you can either remove spamhaus from the blacklists, connect them to 587 istead of 25, or some other type of workaround. -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? Not unless you use port 587. RBLs are checked the first thing, before any type of authentication is even processed. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
so for example I wanted to skip rbl for 10.10.*.* I would open up /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp and add the entry on a new line so it looked like 10.10.:allow what would be the exact line I would need to put in there, to allow people on that range to skip RBL sorry, I'm a total noob at this :D Also would this require a restart of the server or networking in order to start working? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system You can create your own RBL whitelist if you want - just add that entry before the spamhaus entry. You can also add their IP ranges in your tcp.smtp file to skip the RBL checks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
David Campbell wrote: aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system You can create your own RBL whitelist if you want - just add that entry before the spamhaus entry. You can also add their IP ranges in your tcp.smtp file to skip the RBL checks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
David Campbell wrote: yes, it was an RBL error they got, but I am loving the RBL protection for antispam, is there anyway to allow authenticated users to bypass RBL checking? Not unless you use port 587. RBLs are checked the first thing, before any type of authentication is even processed. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
is spamhaus the only one that rejects dynamic ips or should I remove any others like spamcop ( I checked and the customers ip that had been rejected was not listed at spamcop) but are there others I should remove? currently I have the following in my control/blacklists file -r bl.spamcop.net -r list.dsbl.org -r cbl.abuseat.org are there any others that could be recommended for extra protection, without killing dynamic IP addresses (ie, addresses only blacklisted for sending spam, not just for being a dynamic ip) On 29/01/2008, David Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so for example I wanted to skip rbl for 10.10.*.* I would open up /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp and add the entry on a new line so it looked like 10.10.:allow what would be the exact line I would need to put in there, to allow people on that range to skip RBL sorry, I'm a total noob at this :D Also would this require a restart of the server or networking in order to start working? On 29/01/2008, Jake Vickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: aw, thats a shame, I mean its good and they do a great job...I dont really want to add ANOTHER layer of complication to the setup of our email accounts to home users who can barely figure out how to open outlook :( is it possible to whitelist IP addresses from certain ranges against the blacklist? this would require me to whitelist all of out wholesalers dynamic IP range, but they have a fairly strict anti-spam system You can create your own RBL whitelist if you want - just add that entry before the spamhaus entry. You can also add their IP ranges in your tcp.smtp file to skip the RBL checks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
Re: [qmailtoaster] - Outgoing Authentication for ISP mail
David Campbell wrote: so for example I wanted to skip rbl for 10.10.*.* I would open up /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp and add the entry on a new line so it looked like 10.10.:allow what would be the exact line I would need to put in there, to allow people on that range to skip RBL sorry, I'm a total noob at this :D Also would this require a restart of the server or networking in order to start working? I assume adding entries to tcp.smtp in the manner you outlined would work. You would need to run qmailctl cdb afterwards. No need for a reboot. On 29/01/2008, *Jake Vickers* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] New Toaster SSL problem
Greetings and Salutations to all... I have installed a new toaster (with QMT-Plus) onto a Fedora 8 system. I used the Fedora 6 build scripts and everything seems to work perfectly. EXCEPT (there's always an exception)... imap4-SSL is experienceing a problem with the kerberos library. All of the relevant packages were installed from the devel website (vs. the now-static-since-April main site). Again, after making sure all the relevant support rpms were installed, the install scripts ran cleanly. The problem can be seen from the qmlog imap4-ssl | tail, which appears as: 01-28 20:43:50 /usr/bin/couriertls: error while loading shared libraries: libkrb5support.so.0: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory The system runs with 2.0 GB of ram, and being a good sysadm, the swap space is an equaly spacious 2.0 GB. (In other words, I believe there is a problem in the allocation routine, or in the library itself -- because there is PLENTY of memory (real and virtual) available. If I look from the client end, I get the following from Outlook Express: Configuration: Account: mail.mydomain.com Server: mail.mydomain.com User name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protocol: IMAP Port: 993 Secure(SSL): 1 Code: 800ccc0f (I don't think that helps much... but you never know!) Finally, I have the following krb packages installed: krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-auth-dialog-0.7-5.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-workstation-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 I BELIEVE that I NEED the Kerberos packages for my Samba (as PDC) installation -- but that may be a false assumption. I have even tried backing out the latest kerberos versions (to the FC6 version), but I get the same result. Any ideas??? -- Dan McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS: 224 - 13th Avenue N St. Petersburg, FL 33701 All other contact info remains unchanged: 877-IT4SOHO - Toll Free 727-647-7646 - In Pinellas 727-507-9435 - Fax - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] New Toaster SSL problem
Greetings and Salutations to all... I have installed a new toaster (with QMT-Plus) onto a Fedora 8 system. I used the Fedora 6 build scripts and everything seems to work perfectly. EXCEPT (there's always an exception)... imap4-SSL is experienceing a problem with the kerberos library. All of the relevant packages were installed from the devel website (vs. the now-static-since-April main site). Again, after making sure all the relevant support rpms were installed, the install scripts ran cleanly. The problem can be seen from the qmlog imap4-ssl | tail, which appears as: 01-28 20:43:50 /usr/bin/couriertls: error while loading shared libraries: libkrb5support.so.0: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory The system runs with 2.0 GB of ram, and being a good sysadm, the swap space is an equaly spacious 2.0 GB. (In other words, I believe there is a problem in the allocation routine, or in the library itself -- because there is PLENTY of memory (real and virtual) available. If I look from the client end, I get the following from Outlook Express: Configuration: Account: mail.mydomain.com Server: mail.mydomain.com User name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protocol: IMAP Port: 993 Secure(SSL): 1 Code: 800ccc0f (I don't think that helps much... but you never know!) Finally, I have the following krb packages installed: krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-auth-dialog-0.7-5.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-workstation-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 I BELIEVE that I NEED the Kerberos packages for my Samba (as PDC) installation -- but that may be a false assumption. I have even tried backing out the latest kerberos versions (to the FC6 version), but I get the same result. Any ideas??? -- Dan McAllister, President IT4SOHO, LLC PLEASE NOTE OUR NEW ADDRESS: 224 - 13th Avenue N St. Petersburg, FL 33701 All other contact info remains unchanged: 877-IT4SOHO - Toll Free 727-647-7646 - In Pinellas 727-507-9435 - Fax - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] New Toaster SSL problem
Dan McAllister wrote: Greetings and Salutations to all... I have installed a new toaster (with QMT-Plus) onto a Fedora 8 system. I used the Fedora 6 build scripts and everything seems to work perfectly. EXCEPT (there's always an exception)... imap4-SSL is experienceing a problem with the kerberos library. All of the relevant packages were installed from the devel website (vs. the now-static-since-April main site). Again, after making sure all the relevant support rpms were installed, the install scripts ran cleanly. The problem can be seen from the qmlog imap4-ssl | tail, which appears as: 01-28 20:43:50 /usr/bin/couriertls: error while loading shared libraries: libkrb5support.so.0: failed to map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory The system runs with 2.0 GB of ram, and being a good sysadm, the swap space is an equaly spacious 2.0 GB. (In other words, I believe there is a problem in the allocation routine, or in the library itself -- because there is PLENTY of memory (real and virtual) available. If I look from the client end, I get the following from Outlook Express: Configuration: Account: mail.mydomain.com Server: mail.mydomain.com User name: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Protocol: IMAP Port: 993 Secure(SSL): 1 Code: 800ccc0f (I don't think that helps much... but you never know!) Finally, I have the following krb packages installed: krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-auth-dialog-0.7-5.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-workstation-1.6.2-9.fc8 krb5-devel-1.6.2-9.fc8 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 pam_krb5-2.2.18-1 krb5-libs-1.6.2-9.fc8 I BELIEVE that I NEED the Kerberos packages for my Samba (as PDC) installation -- but that may be a false assumption. I have even tried backing out the latest kerberos versions (to the FC6 version), but I get the same result. Any ideas??? Try increasing the softlimit in the /var/qmail/supervise/imap4-ssl/run file, especially if you have a x86_64 system. I think you'll need to stop then start (not restart) qmail after changing this. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
Always. ;) Glad it's working for you. David Campbell wrote: yes, I have actually added them into that file now, havn;t had any more complaints... I guess thats a good thing :D On 29/01/2008, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?... -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] /var/qmail/control/blacklists
yes, I have actually added them into that file now, havn;t had any more complaints... I guess thats a good thing :D On 29/01/2008, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Campbell wrote: if this file is edited, is it automatically updated, or does something need to be restarted before this will update? thanks This file is pulled into each smtp session when it's started, so nothing needs to be done for these. If it's feasible though, I'd make an effort to try using the solution Jake suggested by disabling RBLs in the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp file (in which case you'd need to 'qmailctl cdb' as Ben mentioned to make the change effective). That way you won't lose the effectiveness of spamhaus entirely. RBLs are a powerful and effective tool against spam, and they use minimal toaster resources because rejected messages aren't even accepted, let alone scanned. -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Campbell E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.bigbighuge.com The information in this E-mail and any attachments is confidential. It is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person responsible for delivering this information to the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended recipient or his/her representative you are not authorised to, and must not read, copy, distribute, use or retain this message or any part of it. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by the sender unless otherwise indicated by an authorised officer independent of this message. ...when was the last time you did a backup?...
[qmailtoaster] Cannot send local email
I'm trying to send from one domain to another on the same machine but keep getting the following; // Delivery error: Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host, it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. (#5.4.6) \\ Yet, I have listed all of the domains in the locals file. What am I missing? Mike - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
