RE: [qmailtoaster] server overload

2008-02-20 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
Thanks Dan & Eric.
Entries where made exactly as you told me, and I double checked it with what you
sent here.
I did a full stop when I added this, and the server was rebooted for other
reasons a couple of days after.

But on Monday we had an unusual overload, and I though if it might be somehow
related to the change of settings.
I couldnt make sense why or how.

Maybe it was just an unusual overload...

Thanks- Sergio

> -Original Message-
> From: Dan McAllister [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:54 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] server overload
> 
> 
> Just to be sure... the option (which is domain specific) is 
> DELETE (not DROP).
> 
> The file is:
>  /home/vpopmail/domains/YOUR DOMAIN HERE/.qmail-default
> and the entry should read:
>  | /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' delete
> 
> NOTES:
>  1) that's a PIPE symbol as the 1st character (usually 
> already there, but if you're starting from scratch on the 
> file, the | symbol is, on most US keyboards, located with the 
> \ symbol)
>  2) the 's after "vdelivermail" are a pair of single quotes 
> -- that's 2 characters, not a single double-quote character
> 
> My personal experience (hosting more than 20 domains on this 
> server right now, plus more than 40 others on other QMT 
> installations) is that my connection load lowered when I did 
> this -- apparently address harvesters 
> detect when "everything succeeds" and stop trying (knowing 
> it's futile? maybe!).
> 
> A FINAL NOTE: I believe (but am not sure) that the contents 
> of all .qmail-default files are read by qmail-smtp at startup 
> -- so you'll definitely need to shutdown QMT and restart it 
> (NOT just a "qmailctl
> restart"!) once you have made the change. Personally, I have 
> OFTEN found it necessary to manually kill many of the QMail 
> processes (after a "qmailctl stop"). So, if you're not 
> comfortable issuing a BUNCH of ps & kill (or pkill) commands, 
> I might suggest rebooting the entire server. (That being 
> said, if you DO find yourself rebooting the system to 
> accomplish this, you might want to consider some additional 
> "learnin" about your Linux system!)
> 


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
Hi List,
I was wondering if there is a way to limit the size of attachments that my
users/remote senders can send through this box.
 
And how about limiting the number of recipients for each message? 
What is less hard on the server: sending a mail to 50 rcpts or 5 mails to 10
each?
 
Thanks! Sergio
 
PS: This kind of config would be great if we could make it from the new Web UI.
 

Sergio Minini :: NetKey Solutions :: ( 4742.1101 ::  
http://www.netkey.com.ar 
 


Re: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Natalio Gatti
Sergio:

On Feb 20, 2008 11:00 AM, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi List,
> I was wondering if there is a way to limit the size of attachments that my
> users/remote senders can send through this box.

You can limit the size of attachments via
/var/qmail/control/databytes. You can set there the max amount of
bytes you'll accept. Be carefull with this value, becouse it counts
the complete mail. You should increment it in a 50% aprox. from your
max attachment size.

>
> And how about limiting the number of recipients for each message?
> What is less hard on the server: sending a mail to 50 rcpts or 5 mails to 10
> each?

You can control it modifying chkuser settings in tcprules file. There you have:
CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT: max number of recipients accepted
CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT: max number of WRONG recipients accepted

>
> Thanks! Sergio
>
> PS: This kind of config would be great if we could make it from the new Web
> UI.
>
> 
> Sergio Minini :: NetKey Solutions :: ( 4742.1101 :: http://www.netkey.com.ar
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
Thanks Natalio,
Where can I find this tcprules file?


> > And how about limiting the number of recipients for each 
> message? What 
> > is less hard on the server: sending a mail to 50 rcpts or 5 
> mails to 
> > 10 each?
> 
> You can control it modifying chkuser settings in tcprules 
> file. There you have:
> CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT: max number of recipients accepted
> CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT: max number of WRONG recipients accepted
> 


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Updating spamassassin and clamav

2008-02-20 Thread James Ecker

Here there docs available explaining how to update both spamassassin and clamav 
without breaking qmail toaster?
_
Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with star 
power.
http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan

Re: [qmailtoaster] Updating spamassassin and clamav

2008-02-20 Thread Eric "Shubes"
James Ecker wrote:
> Here there docs available explaining how to update both spamassassin and
> clamav without breaking qmail toaster?
> 

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Upgrading

It hasn't been updated to explain the unionfs capabilities in the latest
version, but it's otherwise still applicable. Undoubtedly the safest way to
upgrade, with the least amount of downtime.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Natalio Gatti
On Feb 20, 2008 12:38 PM, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Natalio,
> Where can I find this tcprules file?
in
/etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp

After modifying it, you have to run "service qmail cdb".
You can also control some other paremeters (such as relaying, rbls,
domainkeys, etc.) per IP.


>
>
> > > And how about limiting the number of recipients for each
> > message? What
> > > is less hard on the server: sending a mail to 50 rcpts or 5
> > mails to
> > > 10 each?
> >
> > You can control it modifying chkuser settings in tcprules
> > file. There you have:
> > CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT: max number of recipients accepted
> > CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT: max number of WRONG recipients accepted
> >

Salutti,

Natalio

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
Thanks!


> -Original Message-
> From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:01 PM
> To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions
> 
> 
> On Feb 20, 2008 12:38 PM, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Natalio,
> > Where can I find this tcprules file?
> in
> /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
> 
> After modifying it, you have to run "service qmail cdb".
> You can also control some other paremeters (such as relaying, 
> rbls, domainkeys, etc.) per IP.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions

2008-02-20 Thread Natalio Gatti
For further info:

http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Tcp.smtp

Natalio.


On Feb 20, 2008 2:24 PM, Sergio Minini {NETKEY} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:01 PM
> > To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
> > Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Some basic config questions
> >
> >
> > On Feb 20, 2008 12:38 PM, Sergio Minini {NETKEY}
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Thanks Natalio,
> > > Where can I find this tcprules file?
> > in
> > /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp
> >
> > After modifying it, you have to run "service qmail cdb".
> > You can also control some other paremeters (such as relaying,
> > rbls, domainkeys, etc.) per IP.
>
>
>
> -
>  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Activate imap access for update ip list in relay table

2008-02-20 Thread Dan McAllister

Paolo

I'm afraid I do NOT know of a way to make the QMT IMAP server 
(courierIMAP) do what you want (so you can do an IMAP before SMTP kind 
of thing) however:


IMHO, you should be using authenticated smtp instead of pop-before-smtp 
(that is, make the users provide a username/password before sending -- 
it is already "configured" for that in the QMT, and the 
username/password combo is the same as for the POP or IMAP account). 
Users just have to check an extra box when configuring their email.


Now, to get on my HIGH HORSE... Personally, I think that POP3 & IMAP4 
are two of the most DANGEROUS protocols we (as admins) allow on our 
systems! Why? Because by default, each of these sends the 
username/password information in cleartext over the open Internet. My 
systems do not accept POP3 (port 110) or IMAP4 (port 143) connections 
except from LAN hosts. Instead, I FORCE SSL connections (port 995 for 
POP, 993 for IMAP). The drawback is that you need to have a REAL SSL 
certificate installed, or else your users will get a warning message 
about an invalid certificate every time their Outlook makes an initial 
connection to the server.


REAL SSL Certificates are a small pain (and a small price to pay) for 
the added security -- but I've been happy with RegisterFly's reseller 
price of $10/year (I charge my clients $25 to account for my extra time 
setting them up). NOTE: Last time I checked, RegisterFly.com had some 
REAL customer service problems -- so much so that they lost their ICANN 
certification as a Domain Registrar. That MAY have been resolved (there 
is no longer a warning banner on their website), but I've NEVER had a 
problem with an SSL certificate -- it's all automated, and other than 
having some "proof of identity" issues, I've been VERY happy with 
RegisterFly. (I contemplated moving ALL my domains over there, until I 
read about them loosing their ICANN certification!)


Anyway -- if anyone knows of a cheaper way to get a valid SSL 
Certificate, let me know!


OK... so now I'm getting OFF my HIGH HORSE! :-)

Finally, if you're intimidated with the whole PKI (Public Key 
Infrastructure) and want help getting & installing an SSL Certificate, 
contact me off-list and I'll be happy to help (for a normal consulting fee).


I hope this helps SOMEONE!

Dan

Daniel McAllister, President

IT4SOHO, LLC

Taxxolo wrote:

Hi all,
i'm using pop before smtp with roaming users on a QT mailserver and i 
read that

only the pop3 access updates the ips in relay table of vpopmail database.
Is there a way to enable that imap access makes it too??
I've got another server with plesk and qmail and it does it using 
"couriertcp" process

instead of tcpserver.
 
Thanks for any help!
 
Regards,

Paolo


[qmailtoaster] How to not forward messages marked as spam

2008-02-20 Thread curt . qt
Still no luck on this one - there are apparently 0 options for a "forward" line
in the .qmail file. An account is set up to either forward using &[address], or
to not forward at all.

Is there no way to forward ONLY IF the message meets certain criteria? (i.e.
$subject !~/\*\*\* SPAM \*\*\*/)

This has become a huge issue, particularly for blackberry users.


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] How to not forward messages marked as spam

2008-02-20 Thread Eric "Shubes"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Still no luck on this one - there are apparently 0 options for a "forward" 
> line
> in the .qmail file. An account is set up to either forward using &[address], 
> or
> to not forward at all.
> 
> Is there no way to forward ONLY IF the message meets certain criteria? (i.e.
> $subject !~/\*\*\* SPAM \*\*\*/)
> 
> This has become a huge issue, particularly for blackberry users.
> 

I'd look into customizing the /etc/mail/mailfilter script. It's part of the
maildrop-toaster package, so if you change it, be sure to keep a backup copy
handy because any changes would probably be clobbered by an upgrade of that
package.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Activate imap access for update ip list in relay table

2008-02-20 Thread Eric "Shubes"
Thanks for the words of wisdom, Dan. It is a little disturbing that the
stock toaster is insecure in that regard, and people should be aware of it.
Unfortunately, I don't have a simple solution.

I'd like to point out though that there is an alternative to getting a
commercially signed certificate. Certificates can be self-signed by creating
your own Certificate Authority (CA) and signing your own certificate
requests. The drawback of course is that email clients won't initially
recognize your certificate or your CA, but some client programs (I know that
Thunderbird is one, and I'm not sure about Outlook) allow you to import/save
the CA/certificate so that the user isn't prompted with a warning each time.
This solution would only be practical for self-contained businesses, and not
the public at large.

Another option for signing certificates for free is CaCert.org, which signs
certificates for free. Unfortunately, they are not a recognized CA (yet) by
most clients.

HTH (someone, as you say!)

Dan McAllister wrote:
> Paolo
> 
> I'm afraid I do NOT know of a way to make the QMT IMAP server
> (courierIMAP) do what you want (so you can do an IMAP before SMTP kind
> of thing) however:
> 
> IMHO, you should be using authenticated smtp instead of pop-before-smtp
> (that is, make the users provide a username/password before sending --
> it is already "configured" for that in the QMT, and the
> username/password combo is the same as for the POP or IMAP account).
> Users just have to check an extra box when configuring their email.
> 
> Now, to get on my HIGH HORSE... Personally, I think that POP3 & IMAP4
> are two of the most DANGEROUS protocols we (as admins) allow on our
> systems! Why? Because by default, each of these sends the
> username/password information in cleartext over the open Internet. My
> systems do not accept POP3 (port 110) or IMAP4 (port 143) connections
> except from LAN hosts. Instead, I FORCE SSL connections (port 995 for
> POP, 993 for IMAP). The drawback is that you need to have a REAL SSL
> certificate installed, or else your users will get a warning message
> about an invalid certificate every time their Outlook makes an initial
> connection to the server.
> 
> REAL SSL Certificates are a small pain (and a small price to pay) for
> the added security -- but I've been happy with RegisterFly's reseller
> price of $10/year (I charge my clients $25 to account for my extra time
> setting them up). NOTE: Last time I checked, RegisterFly.com had some
> REAL customer service problems -- so much so that they lost their ICANN
> certification as a Domain Registrar. That MAY have been resolved (there
> is no longer a warning banner on their website), but I've NEVER had a
> problem with an SSL certificate -- it's all automated, and other than
> having some "proof of identity" issues, I've been VERY happy with
> RegisterFly. (I contemplated moving ALL my domains over there, until I
> read about them loosing their ICANN certification!)
> 
> Anyway -- if anyone knows of a cheaper way to get a valid SSL
> Certificate, let me know!
> 
> OK... so now I'm getting OFF my HIGH HORSE! :-)
> 
> Finally, if you're intimidated with the whole PKI (Public Key
> Infrastructure) and want help getting & installing an SSL Certificate,
> contact me off-list and I'll be happy to help (for a normal consulting fee).
> 
> I hope this helps SOMEONE!
> 
> Dan
> 
> Daniel McAllister, President
> 
> IT4SOHO, LLC
> 
> Taxxolo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> i'm using pop before smtp with roaming users on a QT mailserver and i
>> read that
>> only the pop3 access updates the ips in relay table of vpopmail database.
>> Is there a way to enable that imap access makes it too??
>> I've got another server with plesk and qmail and it does it using
>> "couriertcp" process
>> instead of tcpserver.
>>  
>> Thanks for any help!
>>  
>> Regards,
>> Paolo


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] How to not forward messages marked as spam

2008-02-20 Thread curt . qt
I already tried modifying /etc/mail/mailfilter to get it to
dump local spam and TRY to abort the procedure. Here's what I inserted directly
after reading in
$VHOME/Maildir/.mailfilter. If the user's .mailfilter contains the line
SPAMFORWARDDROP=1, the following executes:

if((/^X-Spam-Status: Yes/:h) && ($SPAMFORWARDDROP == 1))
{
log "Message deleted as specified by .mailfilter\n"
exception {
to "/home/vpopmail/domains/[the 
domain]/postmaster/Maildir/.Spam/"
}
log "=== END ===\n"
EXITCODE=1
exit
}

This works perfectly without having to modify the smtp delivery pipe, but the
next line in .qmail which contains the forward (&[address]) still executes.

I've also tried setting EXITCODE=99 - no difference.

=


I'd look into customizing the /etc/mail/mailfilter script. It's part of the
maildrop-toaster package, so if you change it, be sure to keep a backup copy
handy because any changes would probably be clobbered by an upgrade of that
package.

--
-Eric 'shubes'

=

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Still no luck on this one - there are apparently 0 options for a "forward"
> line
> in the .qmail file. An account is set up to either forward using &[address],
> or
> to not forward at all.
>
> Is there no way to forward ONLY IF the message meets certain criteria? (i.e.
> $subject !~/\*\*\* SPAM \*\*\*/)
>
> This has become a huge issue, particularly for blackberry users.
>


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local.

2008-02-20 Thread lordfuknowsyou

Hello list.

I am sorry that this topic has been covered before, I know, but I am 
stuck.. Please bear with me.


Incoming mail works fine. I have a proper MX record.

# dig mx miekungfu.com | grep MX
;miekungfu.com. IN  MX
miekungfu.com.  42532   IN  MX  5 mail.miekungfu.com.

Everything resolves fine.

The problem occurs when I try and send out from the local machine. I 
have a ~/.forwarders file that should forward my logs etc to the account 
specified and that is what alerted me that something isn't right as I 
have not recieved any forwarded logs.


So a simple

#echo "test" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

fails with the message below.
Of note:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <-- why this, I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <--again,this isn't a valid address
And a few other entries untill I get the error as in the title of this mail.

2008-02-20 15:19:34.364917500 new msg 132221
2008-02-20 15:19:34.365387500 info msg 132221: bytes 244 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 4210 uid 0
2008-02-20 15:19:34.374941500 starting delivery 10: msg 132221 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 15:19:34.375407500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.389652500 delivery 10: failure: 
Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_localhost.MIEKUNGFU.COM._(#5.1.2)/

2008-02-20 15:19:34.389657500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.399580500 bounce msg 132221 qp 4212
2008-02-20 15:19:34.399585500 end msg 132221
2008-02-20 15:19:34.400461500 new msg 132228
2008-02-20 15:19:34.400837500 info msg 132228: bytes 844 from <> qp 4212 
uid 7796
2008-02-20 15:19:34.407678500 starting delivery 11: msg 132228 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 15:19:34.408337500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.420533500 delivery 11: failure: 
Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_localhost.MIEKUNGFU.COM._(#5.1.2)/

2008-02-20 15:19:34.420539500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.428153500 bounce msg 132228 qp 4214
2008-02-20 15:19:34.428158500 end msg 132228
2008-02-20 15:19:34.428561500 new msg 132226
2008-02-20 15:19:34.429065500 info msg 132226: bytes 1347 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 
4214 uid 7796
2008-02-20 15:19:34.434523500 starting delivery 12: msg 132226 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 15:19:34.435103500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.459286500 new msg 132228
2008-02-20 15:19:34.459294500 info msg 132228: bytes 1459 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 
4217 uid 7790
2008-02-20 15:19:34.467729500 starting delivery 13: msg 132228 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 15:19:34.467734500 status: local 1/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.467737500 delivery 12: success: did_0+1+0/qp_4217/
2008-02-20 15:19:34.467741500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.467744500 end msg 132226
2008-02-20 15:19:34.482895500 delivery 13: failure: 
Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local._(#5.4.6)/

2008-02-20 15:19:34.482901500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 15:19:34.482904500 triple bounce: discarding bounce/132228
2008-02-20 15:19:34.482908500 end msg 132228

Some more info:
# hostname --fqdn
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM

# cat me
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM

# cat defaultdomain
MIEKUNGFU.COM

# cat plusdomain
MIEKUNGFU.COM

cat locals
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM

cat rcpthosts
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM
miekungfu.com
cerebro.miekungfu.com
theze.miekungfu.com

# cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain


If I left anything out please let me know. Any help is appreciated. I am 
sure that this is a problem I created but honestly I am not too sure where.


mtia
Jeremy






-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local.

2008-02-20 Thread Adam Cantwell

On 2/20/2008 4:29 PM, lordfuknowsyou wrote:

Hello list.

I am sorry that this topic has been covered before, I know, but I am 
stuck.. Please bear with me.


Incoming mail works fine. I have a proper MX record.

# dig mx miekungfu.com | grep MX
;miekungfu.com. IN  MX
miekungfu.com.  42532   IN  MX  5 mail.miekungfu.com.

Everything resolves fine.

The problem occurs when I try and send out from the local machine. I 
have a ~/.forwarders file that should forward my logs etc to the account 
specified and that is what alerted me that something isn't right as I 
have not recieved any forwarded logs.


So a simple

#echo "test" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

fails with the message below.
Of note:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <-- why this, I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <--again,this isn't a valid address
And a few other entries untill I get the error as in the title of this 
mail.



cat locals
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM



Add "localhost" to your locals file.  Or else use "mail.miekungfu.com" 
when sending mail to root.


Adam


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[qmailtoaster] mail not being delivered to all users

2008-02-20 Thread John
   I manage an ezmlm list via qmailtoaster for a non-profit and I'm 
getting reports that not all users are receiving emails from the list. 
I've checked the dns report for the specific domain name and no 
problems. This may be getting off topic but I'm trusting many of you 
have lots of experience with DNS and rDNS: if I lookup the IP address on 
dnstuff.com I get this:


IP address: 65.111.170.76
Reverse DNS:76-170-111-65.serverpronto.com.
Reverse DNS authenticity:   [Could be forged: hostname 
76-170-111-65.serverpronto.com. does not exist]


I use everydns.net for DNS hosting. Should I add this server name to the 
list? Or do I need to coordinate with serverpronto on that? FYI I've 
already checked the common blacklists and this IP isn't listed, although 
Earthlink informed me that they may have been blocking it if my IP 
address was previously used by spammers. On that subject, I thought rbl 
checks were done in real-time?


John



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local.

2008-02-20 Thread lordfuknowsyou

Adam Cantwell wrote:

On 2/20/2008 4:29 PM, lordfuknowsyou wrote:

Hello list.

I am sorry that this topic has been covered before, I know, but I am 
stuck.. Please bear with me.


Incoming mail works fine. I have a proper MX record.

# dig mx miekungfu.com | grep MX
;miekungfu.com. IN  MX
miekungfu.com.  42532   IN  MX  5 mail.miekungfu.com.

Everything resolves fine.

The problem occurs when I try and send out from the local machine. I 
have a ~/.forwarders file that should forward my logs etc to the 
account specified and that is what alerted me that something isn't 
right as I have not recieved any forwarded logs.


So a simple

#echo "test" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

fails with the message below.
Of note:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <-- why this, I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <--again,this isn't a valid address
And a few other entries untill I get the error as in the title of 
this mail.



cat locals
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM



Add "localhost" to your locals file.  Or else use "mail.miekungfu.com" 
when sending mail to root.


Adam


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Thanks for the response.

I did try what you suggested before I posted to the list but here is the 
results with that entry in locals. Using the same mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]


2008-02-20 18:21:56.472472500 new msg 132215
2008-02-20 18:21:56.472946500 info msg 132215: bytes 244 from 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 3518 uid 0
2008-02-20 18:21:56.481795500 starting delivery 1: msg 132215 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 18:21:56.482296500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 18:21:56.529918500 delivery 1: failure: 
Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_localhost.MIEKUNGFU.COM._(#5.1.2)/

2008-02-20 18:21:56.530925500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:56.577947500 bounce msg 132215 qp 3520
2008-02-20 18:21:56.579191500 end msg 132215
2008-02-20 18:21:56.629182500 new msg 132221
2008-02-20 18:21:56.635507500 info msg 132221: bytes 844 from <> qp 3520 
uid 7796
2008-02-20 18:21:56.809570500 starting delivery 2: msg 132221 to remote 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 18:21:56.809946500 status: local 0/10 remote 1/60
2008-02-20 18:21:56.818685500 delivery 2: failure: 
Sorry,_I_couldn't_find_any_host_named_localhost.MIEKUNGFU.COM._(#5.1.2)/

2008-02-20 18:21:56.821004500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.126952500 bounce msg 132221 qp 3522
2008-02-20 18:21:57.126958500 end msg 132221
2008-02-20 18:21:57.127771500 new msg 1716961
2008-02-20 18:21:57.128211500 info msg 1716961: bytes 1347 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
qp 3522 uid 7796
2008-02-20 18:21:57.135073500 starting delivery 3: msg 1716961 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 18:21:57.135417500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.159214500 new msg 132217
2008-02-20 18:21:57.159590500 info msg 132217: bytes 1459 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 
3525 uid 7790
2008-02-20 18:21:57.165591500 starting delivery 4: msg 132217 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 18:21:57.166704500 status: local 2/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.166708500 delivery 3: success: did_0+1+0/qp_3525/
2008-02-20 18:21:57.166712500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.166716500 end msg 1716961
2008-02-20 18:21:57.196635500 new msg 132215
2008-02-20 18:21:57.197154500 info msg 132215: bytes 1562 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 
3528 uid 7790
2008-02-20 18:21:57.200520500 starting delivery 5: msg 132215 to local 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-20 18:21:57.200982500 status: local 2/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.211102500 delivery 4: success: did_0+1+0/qp_3528/
2008-02-20 18:21:57.211107500 status: local 1/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.21500 end msg 132217
2008-02-20 18:21:57.211452500 delivery 5: failure: 
This_message_is_looping:_it_already_has_my_Delivered-To_line._(#5.4.6)/

2008-02-20 18:21:57.212147500 status: local 0/10 remote 0/60
2008-02-20 18:21:57.212702500 triple bounce: discarding bounce/132215
2008-02-20 18:21:57.212706500 end msg 132215

All help is appreciated.

mtia
Jeremy

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Sorry._Although_I'm_listed_as_a_best-preference_MX_or_A_for_that_host,/it_isn't_in_my_control/locals_file,_so_I_don't_treat_it_as_local.

2008-02-20 Thread lordfuknowsyou

Adam Cantwell wrote:

On 2/20/2008 4:29 PM, lordfuknowsyou wrote:

Hello list.

I am sorry that this topic has been covered before, I know, but I am 
stuck.. Please bear with me.


Incoming mail works fine. I have a proper MX record.

# dig mx miekungfu.com | grep MX
;miekungfu.com. IN  MX
miekungfu.com.  42532   IN  MX  5 mail.miekungfu.com.

Everything resolves fine.

The problem occurs when I try and send out from the local machine. I 
have a ~/.forwarders file that should forward my logs etc to the 
account specified and that is what alerted me that something isn't 
right as I have not recieved any forwarded logs.


So a simple

#echo "test" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]

fails with the message below.
Of note:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <-- why this, I sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  <--again,this isn't a valid address
And a few other entries untill I get the error as in the title of 
this mail.



cat locals
MAIL.MIEKUNGFU.COM



Add "localhost" to your locals file.  Or else use "mail.miekungfu.com" 
when sending mail to root.


Adam


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I think I now understand where I am completely off base.
I believe I am encountering this error because of the following reasons.

1. Dot forward files are ignored and I need the dot forward package to 
read them


2. qmail will not send to root

Is this the reason for my weird bounce loops? This is only what I have 
concluded over the last couple hours, please correct me if I am wrong.


mtia
Jeremy


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] mail not being delivered to all users

2008-02-20 Thread Ben Mills
John, You need to have your ISP set your rDNS to emerald.boubion.com . 
Many MTAs won't accept messages from foreign hosts that have unresolvable

rDNS or an rDNS which contains an IP.

Ben


John wrote:
   I manage an ezmlm list via qmailtoaster for a non-profit and I'm 
getting reports that not all users are receiving emails from the list. 
I've checked the dns report for the specific domain name and no 
problems. This may be getting off topic but I'm trusting many of you 
have lots of experience with DNS and rDNS: if I lookup the IP address on 
dnstuff.com I get this:


IP address: 65.111.170.76
Reverse DNS:76-170-111-65.serverpronto.com.
Reverse DNS authenticity:   [Could be forged: hostname 
76-170-111-65.serverpronto.com. does not exist]


I use everydns.net for DNS hosting. Should I add this server name to the 
list? Or do I need to coordinate with serverpronto on that? FYI I've 
already checked the common blacklists and this IP isn't listed, although 
Earthlink informed me that they may have been blocking it if my IP 
address was previously used by spammers. On that subject, I thought rbl 
checks were done in real-time?


John



-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted 
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]