Re: [qmailtoaster] ****SPAM****
Eric Shubert wrote: Kisakye ALex wrote: Hello, Am getting alot of spam mail these days into my toaster am running spamdyke at the front and yes spam assassin is on. Funny that a couple of weeks ago spam had tremendously gone down when I implemented spamdyke. On some of the messages that are tagged spam, the actual email is blank?? is spam assassin wiping out the content?? Any help is welcome... thanks ALex Kinda hard to tell much from what you've said so far. What distro/toaster versions ? Contents of: /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf ? /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? /var/qmail/control/simcontrol ? Sample of spam log ? Anything else you'd like to share which might provide a hint, like the contents of the headers of one of the blank spams? Thanks Eric, sorry for the shallow info Am running CentOS 4 toaster version is -- #rpm -qa | grep toaster libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3 qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.3 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18 qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.0-1.4.4 -- spamdyke.conf -- #check-dnsrbl=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net #check-dnsrbl=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net #check-dnsrbl=bogons.cymru.com check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist graylist-max-secs=2678400 graylist-min-secs=180 greeting-delay-secs=5 idle-timeout-secs=60 ip-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_ip ip-in-rdns-keyword-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords ip-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts log-level=2 log-target=0 max-recipients=5 #policy-url=http://my.policy.explanation.url/ rdns-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_rdns rdns-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns recipient-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx reject-unresolvable-rdns sender-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_senders tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem contents of /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 -- contents of /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif --- And this is a header from one of the emails From: - Tue Jun 10 13:53:15 2008 X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: 1213094543.26404.abram.domain.com,S=1345 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26402 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2008 10:42:23 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 26302, pid: 26343, t: 60.5942s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93 /m: 46/d:7046 spam: 3.2.4 X-Spam-Flag:YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on abram.domain.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.0 required=5.0 tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,RDNS_NONE, TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header * 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header * 2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header and body * 1.6 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * 2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO * 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header * 0.6 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no * Subject: text * 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS Received: from unknown (HELO ole.kenic.or.ke) (198.32.67.19) by abram.domain.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 10:41:22 - Received-SPF: none (abram.domain.com: domain at my.co.ke does not designate permitted sender hosts) Subject:***SPAM*** X-Spam-Prev-Subject:(nonexistent) thanks ALex - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] customize the Look of SquirrelMail
Yes. That is the script to allow you to customize your squirrelmail. -Original Message- From: Jim Shupert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 June, 2008 7:16 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: [qmailtoaster] customize the Look of SquirrelMail friends, I see that there is a perl file at usr/share/squirrlemail/config/conf.pl I am wondering if this is a means of customizing the look of my instance of squirrelMail such as this - a different logo ( although- i love the squirrel , of course) and a diffrent organization name - instead of SquirrelMail Login something like myOrg login I see where -- in that conf.pl -- there are things like new-org-logo=STDIN does that mean if I run conf.pl I get menus and can enter new stuff like myOrg and if this is a perl Q or Squirrel mail Q and - therefore - I should take my Qs elsewhere that is fine. I was just wondering if it was possible to customize the look of Squirrel mail thanks! jim - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] I have the following query in the webmail
I do not know if you can, but when entering the webmail and I see the list of folders, so I appear INBOX --- Enviados Borradores Basura what they wanted to know whether it was possible to change something in the configuration to INBOX appears as Article? thus: ENTRADA --- Enviados Borradores Basura
Re: [qmailtoaster] ****SPAM****
Kisakye ALex wrote: Eric Shubert wrote: Kisakye ALex wrote: Hello, Am getting alot of spam mail these days into my toaster am running spamdyke at the front and yes spam assassin is on. Funny that a couple of weeks ago spam had tremendously gone down when I implemented spamdyke. On some of the messages that are tagged spam, the actual email is blank?? is spam assassin wiping out the content?? Any help is welcome... thanks ALex Kinda hard to tell much from what you've said so far. What distro/toaster versions ? Contents of: /etc/spamdyke/spamdyke.conf ? /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ? /var/qmail/control/simcontrol ? Sample of spam log ? Anything else you'd like to share which might provide a hint, like the contents of the headers of one of the blank spams? Thanks Eric, sorry for the shallow info Am running CentOS 4 toaster version is -- #rpm -qa | grep toaster libdomainkeys-toaster-0.68-1.3.3 courier-authlib-toaster-0.59.2-1.3.6 ezmlm-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-2.0.3-1.3.5 squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.13-1.3.9 simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6 daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3 vpopmail-toaster-5.4.17-1.3.4 libsrs2-toaster-1.0.18-1.3.3 qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1.3.7 control-panel-toaster-0.5-1.3.4 ezmlm-cgi-toaster-0.53.324-1.3.3 qmailmrtg-toaster-4.2-1.3.3 maildrop-toaster-devel-2.0.3-1.3.5 vqadmin-toaster-2.3.4-1.3.3 spamassassin-toaster-3.2.4-1.3.13 ripmime-toaster-1.4.0.6-1.3.3 qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1 ucspi-tcp-toaster-0.88-1.3.5 qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.15 autorespond-toaster-2.0.4-1.3.3 qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.11-1.3.4 isoqlog-toaster-2.1-1.3.4 clamav-toaster-0.93-1.3.18 qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.0-1.4.4 -- spamdyke.conf -- #check-dnsrbl=zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net #check-dnsrbl=dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net #check-dnsrbl=bogons.cymru.com check-dnsrbl=zen.spamhaus.org check-dnsrbl=bl.spamcop.net check-dnsrbl=list.dsbl.org graylist-dir=/var/spamdyke/graylist graylist-max-secs=2678400 graylist-min-secs=180 greeting-delay-secs=5 idle-timeout-secs=60 ip-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_ip ip-in-rdns-keyword-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_keywords ip-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts log-level=2 log-target=0 max-recipients=5 #policy-url=http://my.policy.explanation.url/ rdns-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_rdns rdns-whitelist-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist_rdns recipient-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients reject-empty-rdns #reject-ip-in-cc-rdns reject-missing-sender-mx reject-unresolvable-rdns sender-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/blacklist_senders tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem contents of /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ok_locales all skip_rbl_checks 1 required_score 5 report_safe 0 rewrite_header Subject ***SPAM*** use_pyzor 1 use_auto_whitelist 1 use_bayes 1 use_bayes_rules 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 -- contents of /var/qmail/control/simcontrol :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif --- And this is a header from one of the emails From: - Tue Jun 10 13:53:15 2008 X-Account-Key: account2 X-UIDL: 1213094543.26404.abram.domain.com,S=1345 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26402 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2008 10:42:23 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 26302, pid: 26343, t: 60.5942s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93 /m: 46/d:7046 spam: 3.2.4 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on abram.domain.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=9.0 required=5.0 tests=EMPTY_MESSAGE,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT,RDNS_NONE, TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=no version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header * 0.0 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header * 2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP Missing blank line between message header and body * 1.6 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * 2.9 TVD_SPACE_RATIO BODY: TVD_SPACE_RATIO * 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header * 0.6 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no * Subject: text * 0.1 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS Received: from unknown (HELO ole.kenic.or.ke) (198.32.67.19) by abram.domain.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2008 10:41:22 - Received-SPF: none (abram.domain.com: domain at my.co.ke does not designate permitted sender hosts) Subject: ***SPAM*** X-Spam-Prev-Subject: (nonexistent) thanks ALex ALex, I don't see any glaring problem. In local.cf I'd use skip_rbl_checks 0 but that's not a big thing. Can you find and post the smtp log messages that correspond to this message? If the smtp log for this
[qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
Thanks for the recommendations. I just downloaded CentOS 5.1 DVD (as well as CDs, for some older servers which do not have DVD ROM). It looks like both Fedora and CentOS latest editions have equally large software bundle .. Is CentOS equally well supported as compare to Fedora ? -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 2:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
Thanks for the recommendations. I just downloaded CentOS 5.1 DVD (as well as CDs, for some older servers which do not have DVD ROM). It looks like both Fedora and CentOS latest editions have equally large software bundle .. Is CentOS equally well supported as compare to Fedora ? CentOS is a RHEL clone (RedHat Enterprise Linux) without the logos and stuff. (more or less is what Oracle in Unbreakable Linux does) They just recompile the packages of the RHEL with the same options. They do that because RHEL is a commercial distro, and you must pay if you want to use it. More information: Please read this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS Fedora in essence is the testing or unstable (they say community) version of RedHat Distro and have a 6 months timeframe between releases and tends to discontinue support in a year. The centos project is as supported as RHEL (AFAIK, 7 years at least), so the short answer is: NO, CentOS is waay more supported than Fedora. And if you really want/need professional support is very easy to migrate between CentOS, RHEL and Oracle Unbreakable Linux. -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 2:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
For servers, stick with CentOS (unless you're delving into Xen or perhaps clustering). Fedora is better for bleeding edge technologies and latest hardware, so is better suited for workstations (desktops laptops). CentOS (as RHEL) is more stable though. For a QMT, there's no purpose in using FC unless you're installing it on a host that's running additional software which requires it. NGS wrote: Thanks for the recommendations. I just downloaded CentOS 5.1 DVD (as well as CDs, for some older servers which do not have DVD ROM). It looks like both Fedora and CentOS latest editions have equally large software bundle .. Is CentOS equally well supported as compare to Fedora ? -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 2:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
I forgot to document what i've said Fedora's support: See this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_(operating_system)#Version_history The oldest supported version is FC7 released on 2007-05-31, and it will be soon desupported (no updates, etc)... As Eric says, Fedora Core is for bleeding edge (and bleeding is a nice adjective in this case :-P). I was bitten once, not anymore :-P Thanks for the recommendations. I just downloaded CentOS 5.1 DVD (as well as CDs, for some older servers which do not have DVD ROM). It looks like both Fedora and CentOS latest editions have equally large software bundle .. Is CentOS equally well supported as compare to Fedora ? CentOS is a RHEL clone (RedHat Enterprise Linux) without the logos and stuff. (more or less is what Oracle in Unbreakable Linux does) They just recompile the packages of the RHEL with the same options. They do that because RHEL is a commercial distro, and you must pay if you want to use it. More information: Please read this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS Fedora in essence is the testing or unstable (they say community) version of RedHat Distro and have a 6 months timeframe between releases and tends to discontinue support in a year. The centos project is as supported as RHEL (AFAIK, 7 years at least), so the short answer is: NO, CentOS is waay more supported than Fedora. And if you really want/need professional support is very easy to migrate between CentOS, RHEL and Oracle Unbreakable Linux. -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 2:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster
Thanks for all the recommendations and explanation. All these come just in time as I will be replacing at least 2 or more servers currently running on older version of fedora. Now I know which I should go with! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 3:20 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster I forgot to document what i've said Fedora's support: See this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fedora_(operating_system)#Version_history The oldest supported version is FC7 released on 2007-05-31, and it will be soon desupported (no updates, etc)... As Eric says, Fedora Core is for bleeding edge (and bleeding is a nice adjective in this case :-P). I was bitten once, not anymore :-P Thanks for the recommendations. I just downloaded CentOS 5.1 DVD (as well as CDs, for some older servers which do not have DVD ROM). It looks like both Fedora and CentOS latest editions have equally large software bundle .. Is CentOS equally well supported as compare to Fedora ? CentOS is a RHEL clone (RedHat Enterprise Linux) without the logos and stuff. (more or less is what Oracle in Unbreakable Linux does) They just recompile the packages of the RHEL with the same options. They do that because RHEL is a commercial distro, and you must pay if you want to use it. More information: Please read this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS Fedora in essence is the testing or unstable (they say community) version of RedHat Distro and have a 6 months timeframe between releases and tends to discontinue support in a year. The centos project is as supported as RHEL (AFAIK, 7 years at least), so the short answer is: NO, CentOS is waay more supported than Fedora. And if you really want/need professional support is very easy to migrate between CentOS, RHEL and Oracle Unbreakable Linux. -Original Message- From: António Pedro Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 12 June, 2008 2:19 AM To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster Centos! I used Fedora for some time... Moved to Centos and... Headaches are gone! -Mensagem original- De: Eric Shubert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada: quarta-feira, 11 de Junho de 2008 18:46 Para: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com Assunto: Re: [qmailtoaster] Fedora or CentOS for the qmToaster NGS wrote: I wonder which one is best for setting up a qmail server based on Qmail Toaster. What are the main different? CentOS. You'll have fewer updates (and headaches). -- -Eric 'shubes' - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] Problem after running qtp-newmodel - Messages blank
Hi everyone, I seem to have run into a problem with a mail server I Iook after. I updated the qmail toaster plus software yesterday using qtp-newmodel. Now, since the update, messages being delivered are coming from Unknown Sender with the message body stripped away. Viewing a message header shows: Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster Received: (qmail 7183 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jun 2008 20:49:32 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7172, pid: 7178, t: 0.0348s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: m: spam: Again, the message body is blank. I've checked over all the log files I can think of, and cannot pinpoint exactly what's wrong. Any light that can be shed on this would be very much appreciated. Thanks. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[qmailtoaster] qmail send receive not working without restart
Good morning everybody I have a strange problem in my qmail server. First let me brief about my qmail setup i am using debian 3.1 OS and qmail+spamassassin+clamav . So far the server was doing it pretty good. The problem started after my vacation holls. my colleague was telling he didnt add/modify anything this mail server other than one cronjob (cronjob is restarting the qmail server every 5 minutes.) Now the problem is if the qmail server is not getting restarted, the mails are not getting delivered to internal/external users had a look at qmail-send/run, nothing seems modified. can anyone helpme out here kavitha
[qmailtoaster] Queue stuck (external domain only)
Hi, since my QTM upgrade last week, my mail server queue is growing up (currently +10K) and mails sent to remote domains stuck in the queue and users received error message (after 1 - 2 days) Connected to ip_address but connection died. (#4.4.2). Message sent to local domains are delivered. I tried to disable ClamAV and SpamAssassin, remove blacklists, repair the queue, force queue processing, backup delete completely the queue... when starting with an empty queue, new message still stuck and are not sended. I also tried to route outgoing smtp traffic trough my second WAN link ISP smtp server for sending message and still don't work. This is not a provider issue, I tried to send an email with my dev server and it worked. Any idea would be appreciated. Thanks you. - QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
