Re: [Qt-creator] error compiling qt-creator rc in fedora
As Andre said, you should get the recent Qt 4.6 (e.g. Qt 4.6's rc). Everybody's beta compiled fine. But some changes have been made, so that only fresh Qt 4.6 is needed. 2009/11/18 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br I am using qt 4.6 the qt-creator 1.3 beta compiled fine. On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote: On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 07:36:24PM -0200, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: any help ? You need a recent Qt. Andre' ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator -- Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] own editor plugin and mimetypes
Hi Prashanth, This trick worked for us. Hope this helps. Thanks for your hint. That did the trick for me as well =) Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Markus Liebe Robert Bosch GmbH Automotive Electronics, RtP2/TEF72 Postfach 13 42 72703 Reutlingen GERMANY www.bosch.com Tel. 07121 35-35246 markus.li...@de.bosch.com Sitz: Stuttgart, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 14000; Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Hermann Scholl; Geschäftsführung: Franz Fehrenbach, Siegfried Dais; Bernd Bohr, Rudolf Colm, Volkmar Denner, Gerhard Kümmel, Wolfgang Malchow, Peter Marks, Peter Tyroller; Uwe Raschke ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] error compiling qt-creator rc in fedora
I have tested with qt 4.6 rc and worked fine. On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alex T. diox...@gmail.com wrote: As Andre said, you should get the recent Qt 4.6 (e.g. Qt 4.6's rc). Everybody's beta compiled fine. But some changes have been made, so that only fresh Qt 4.6 is needed. Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Is this solved on Qt Creator 1.3.0 ?
Hi Jordi, we didn't know that project-level encoding was broken in Qt Creator, but I can now confirm that it is and that the bug still is present in Qt 1.3. I'll see whether we get this fixed. Thanks for the report! Matthias On Wednesday 18 November 2009 11:27:48 ext Jordi Pujol wrote: Hi all, I'm using Windows Qt Creator 1.2.1. in two platforms ( XP VC++ 2008 / Ubuntu 9.10 - 64bits g++ 4.4.1 ) Some time ago I reported an annoying bug ( only in Windows ) that makes me reload EVERY file I open in the editor, because Qt Creator is unable to load it in UTF-8 as configured in project ( see attached screen shots ) Every time I forget to reload the file ( Edit-Select Encoding-UTF-8 press reload with encoding ) if I compile Execute I obtain strain symbols in place of accentuated characters, like in the editor. So SAVES in UTF-8, but not LOADS. I've a big problem here... It happens only on Windows machines ( perhaps because system is the default on my Linux box and I've no changes if I select UTF-8 ). Has anybody the same problem ? Is this annoying problem solved on Qt Creator 1.3.0 ? Kind regards, Jordi. ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Linux SDK containing Qt Creator doesn'tbuild projects out of the box
Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote in message news:20091114173314.gb3...@tu-chemnitz.de... The real problem with the Qt SDK package is that what you download from the Nokia website is not integrated into your distribution's packaging system, so you have to intall the dependencies manually. One line to copy paste - big deal... ... You either wait for the distributions to pick up your package, or provide packages native to your distribution (i.e. .deb for Ubuntu, .rpm for RedHat) yourself, or provide instructions how to install your package manually. For Qt Creator the latter method was chosen (instructions being install the packages x, y, and z, and run the QtSDK installer) Does Qt really tell the one line that installs the necessary dependencies on various Linux distros? I could not find it. The closest I could find is the blog http://blog.dixo.net/2009/03/14/using-qt-creator-with-ubuntu-810/ which advises sudo apt-get install libfreetype6-dev libfontconfig-dev libxrender-dev libsm-dev libglib2.0-dev Unless this is common knowledge for anyone but the newbies, I think Qt should provide such info themselves. Thanks, David ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Linux SDK containing Qt Creator doe sn'tbuild projects out of the box
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 17:48:15 ext David Ching wrote: Andre Poenitz andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de wrote in message news:20091114173314.gb3...@tu-chemnitz.de... The real problem with the Qt SDK package is that what you download from the Nokia website is not integrated into your distribution's packaging system, so you have to intall the dependencies manually. One line to copy paste - big deal... ... You either wait for the distributions to pick up your package, or provide packages native to your distribution (i.e. .deb for Ubuntu, .rpm for RedHat) yourself, or provide instructions how to install your package manually. For Qt Creator the latter method was chosen (instructions being install the packages x, y, and z, and run the QtSDK installer) Does Qt really tell the one line that installs the necessary dependencies on various Linux distros? I could not find it. The closest I could find is the blog http://blog.dixo.net/2009/03/14/using-qt-creator-with-ubuntu-810/ which advises sudo apt-get install libfreetype6-dev libfontconfig-dev libxrender-dev libsm-dev libglib2.0-dev Unless this is common knowledge for anyone but the newbies, I think Qt should provide such info themselves. See http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/pages/FrequentlyAskedQuestions: What development packages from the distribution are needed on Ubuntu/Debian? Andre' ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Linux SDK containing Qt Creator doesn'tbuild projects out of the box
André Pönitz andre.poen...@nokia.com wrote in message news:200911181803.17809.andre.poen...@nokia.com... See http://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/pages/FrequentlyAskedQuestions: What development packages from the distribution are needed on Ubuntu/Debian? Thanks André . ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] [Qt-embedded-interest] How to make the .dll files smaller?
Why not recommended ??? I hear first time about it. Yes, there are some differences in static linking, for example with plugins. You have to static link Qt plugins too (add plugins += to .pro file and init plugins in code). Other bad thing is that you'll be unable to reuse Qt libs: for example you have two Qt based applications, In case with shared linking you'll got that Qt libs will be loaded in memory only once. It's nevermind how much applications use shared library (Qt libs in our case), this lib will load only once. But with static linking you'll got another appearance. Every Application will load it's own Qt libs. This case got overhead. But If in linux there exists software repositories , and system can guaranty to you that there are exists Qt libs. In windows and windows mobile there no such way. In any case you have to provide Qt libs with your application during deploy. That's why static linking is better chois for deploying on Windows Mobile, I think. In other cases there are no differences. As for qconfig and -config flag to use custom configuration is other way, but using this way you need to clear understand what to leave and what to exclude from Qt. During Static linking all this things made for you by compiler (excluded all unused code during final linking ). Yes I made this before, and didn't find any problems. Also you'll got faster loading speed, using static linking. Hi Rudenko Eugene, I heared of creating static link is not recommended. Do you have done it before? Thanks, David 2009/11/16 Rudenko Eugene erule@gmail.com You can link with Qt libraries using static linking, As I now MS compiler have better optimization for static linking then gcc. I think you'll got result size under 10Mb at all, with static linking. You can try. Also you can find Arora browser as example for building browser using Qt. Rudenko Eugene. Hi all, I wanna create a browser for Windows Mobile based on Qt4.5. Is there any method can be used to make the .dll files smaller? For example: QtGui4 is 6.82M; QtCore4 is 2.02M; QtWebKit4 is 9.96M. -- Thanks! David ___ Qt-embedded-interest mailing list qt-embedded-inter...@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-embedded-interest ___ Qt-embedded-interest mailing list qt-embedded-inter...@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-embedded-interest ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
[Qt-creator] (no subject)
Hello all. I have some enhancement suggestion. Firs of all, I'ts good to set svn authentification for every project separately, because different repos can have different accounts. Second suggestion is about diff tool. Now diff show as command line diff, is there any plans to make visual diff (like kdiff for example) or(and) make possibility to execute external diff tool instead of internal? At all, is there are any roadmap for Qt-creator ? Rudenko, Eugene. ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] General Usage Question
Qt Creator is a great code editor first, a good debugger second, and its role as an actual IDE comes after that. You're not missing anything. It just hasn't been done yet. qmake's file format is easy to do this kind of thing by hand in, so I would imagine that such a feature simply hasn't been a great priority. Think of it this way: how often do you actually go and do mass reorganization of your project? If the answer to this is anything more than not very often something's wrong with your workflow. ;) On the other hand, how often do you edit a source file? How often do you check out or check in code with your source code management tools? How often do you compile, test, and debug your application? There's plenty of other stuff that needs to work before renaming files is really a concern. /s/ Adam On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Sean Hignett s...@intelligent-design.ca wrote: Hello all, I just recently discovered Qt, and Qt Creator. Was always aware of it, but never paid it the attention it clearly deserves. Working through the C++ GUI book to get up to speed. Qt Creator has some really impressive features... but... it also has some strange omissions compared to all the IDEs I have used in the past (VS, Eclipse, etc). I'll avoid the apparently standard noob whining about no file rename, no folder creation, etc... Smart guys these Qt developers, so I assume there must be some thinking behind this... it is so bizarre it must be intended :) Can anyone offer an example of how they use the IDE such that basic integrated file management is not a requirement? I assume it is just a case of using the OS file management tools (eg. terminal) and manually updating the .pro files... but am I missing something? It would seem refactoring would be somewhat cumbersome without the ability to re-organize files in concert. I could get used to using terminal/finder/etc, but I can't imagine ever not wanting the ability to do it directly in the IDE... is this crazy? Has anyone written a better FileSystem view as a plugin? (i.e. one that isn't just read-only) Tips or advice is greatly appreciated! Thanks, Sean ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
Re: [Qt-creator] Feature Request
On Thursday 19 November 2009 08:37:56 Robert Caldecott wrote: I'll log this on the cool new Qt tracking system but before I do I wanted to know if it's possible... How cool would it be to add a new method declaration to a C++ header file and have Qt Creator add the method definition to the .cpp file automatically? Taking this a step further, you could edit an existing method declaration and the definition would be changed automatically. It would be a big time saver IMHO. Is this worth logging? This is a pretty standard feature in other IDEs, and a huge timestaver. So yes, please do log it. Would be very nice to see these kinds of features in Creator. -- Christopher ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
