[Quantum Owners] Re: Obsolete parts
My local car parts/accessory shop still stocks a lot of parts for the XR2 CVH engine, much better than Halfords, one guy helped build a 2+2, 15 years ago, the other runs an Escort RST, always helpful know what they are talking about. Also EBay can be very good, as the XR2 is fading away there is a surplus supply of parts so can be quite cheap, ( Recon steering rack £11 delivered), I'll bet in 10 years time XR2 parts will go the same way as Escort Mk1 2 parts. John On Jul 12, 10:58 pm, Dave English dave.hil...@virgin.net wrote: Hi Chris Got my last air filter from Exhausts Unlimited if you've got them nearby, got the brake shoes there as well. However, don't ignore E-bay, I seem to be getting more of my spares from E-bay shops these days. Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Scary but fun
that must have been a mad change! I was driving my xtreme for about 4hrs on sat, -- (not enough sunscreen, but that is another story!) then got in the Astra and struggled to adjust! cornering is somewhat different :) Chris Y -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Mail from michaelhughe...@aol.com an apolgy
Many thanks Jim. Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Track Control Arms on 2+2
Thanks, but I think the coupe uses Escort track control arms, not fiesta ones, so it's quite different. The escort ones are cast and have an integral ball joint, whereas the Fiesta ones are pressed in a u section, and have bolt on balljoints. The fouling is on the lip of the arch itself, so I don't think the rack is the problem. I had the wheels off at the weekend, and there didn't seem to be any evidence of rubbing on the inner wing. I read on one of the Ford forums that the XR2 has the same steering gearing as the other fiestas, but less movement, which would tend to confirm your observation. I've checked the balljoints on my car, and they are the same as some XR2 ones I had hanging around. There are some Mk1 balljoints on Ebay, and they do look slightly different. As the Haynes manual gives different angles for the XR2 to the other Mk2s, I wonder if that is the difference. They are attached to the track control arms with 2 bolts, so, if the holes were positioned differently, that could change the camber. Anyway, I'll need to try to get hold of some to measure. On closer inspection, although I'd like to get the negative camber down a bit, my real problem is with the size of the wheels. There really isn't much space under there. The wheels have 2 or 3mm spacers to get the offset right, and without them they would foul the strut. As they are 7 wide, I can't reduce the tyre section much below 195, and, although 45 section would reduce the rolling diameter, I suspect it would still be marginal. My Series 1 (in bits) has 14 x 6J Compomotive wheels with 185/55R 14 tyres, and, when I get them painted, I'll fit them to the 2+2 and see if they look more sensible. Would be interested to know what your lockstops on the rack looked like, though, as I have a Locost with an Escort quickrack that could do with the movement limiting slightly. MoT tester commented that the cycle wings hit the headlights on full lock, so it would be nice to make up some stops to prevent that happening - but it's not something I've ever looked at. Thanks anyway, and If you have any details of the lockstops, I'd be interested to see them. All the best, Dave. On 11 July, 09:07, crash test paul.morr...@jawdans.co.uk wrote: I don't know if this helps or hinders as I have a coupe but the track control arms are (as best I can measure) 280mm centre of fixing to centre of balljoint fixing. One question I have is where are your tyres rubbing, is it the outer arch in a straight line or when on full lock either way. The reason I ask is that if it is full lock and rubbing on the inner wheel well then maybe you have the wrong steering rack. Somewhere else on this chat area it has been suggested that the Fiesta steering rack has more turns from lock to lock than the XR2 rack and this was due to the larger wheels of the XR2. I have just bought what was supposedly and XR2 rack but am not sure as it has three and a quarter turns from lock to lock and that maybe a quarter too much, one way to overcome the issue is to insert stop locks to reduce the amount of steering rack movement. This is something I have had to do on a different kitcar to pass the SVA a year or so ago. My coupe has 194 45 15 tyres on the front to stop the tyre rubbing on the arch on full bounce but it was severly lowered by use of coil overs which was most of its problem, that and the fact that it was too stiff for everyday use, I am now reverting back to ordinary springs and will then get a set of lowered springs when I know what the ordinary ride hieght is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Dutch registered Saloon for sale
Currently a Dutch registered RHD 1987 Quantum Saloon is up for sale. http://fordworld.nl/nl/aanbod/particulieren/default.asp?itemID=5797 The seller asks 4995 euro's (which is a lot of money imho .. for a car of nearly 25 years) It was registered with a dutch license in 2006 Just posted this, to let you know.. regards Jur -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: H4 Front Tyres rubbing on Wheel Arches
I'm not the H4 expert (Haven't even driven one) but own a (dutch) Fiesta mk3. As the H4 is 'based' on the mk3 fiesta. The mk3 fiesta runs on 195/45R15 tyres.. That's a fair bit smaller then the 195/60R15 or 195/55R15 mentioned.The speedo will not show the correct, but a fair bit to slow, speed (some 10%) (making some rides very expensive) 195/50R15 might fit but still show 5% to slow on the standard fiesta mk3 speedo. (but are a fair bit cheaper tyres compared to the 195/45R15 Try the tyre calculator. http://205gti.com/techtyrecalc.htm Standard mk3 XR2i/FRST tyres are: 185/60R13 on (obviously) 13 wheels or 185/55R14 on 14 wheels.. Regards Jur p.s. English is not my native language, so sorry if some english might seem crookked -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Track Control Arms on 2+2
6.5 wide wheels are normally considered the max on the 2+2. It does depend on the offset. All the parts on the Mk2 Fiesta front suspension are the same on all models including the XR2 except the springs and shocks. I checked on Fords Microcat. Jim On 13/07/2010 00:30, Dave the Subbie wrote: Thanks, but I think the coupe uses Escort track control arms, not fiesta ones, so it's quite different. The escort ones are cast and have an integral ball joint, whereas the Fiesta ones are pressed in a u section, and have bolt on balljoints. The fouling is on the lip of the arch itself, so I don't think the rack is the problem. I had the wheels off at the weekend, and there didn't seem to be any evidence of rubbing on the inner wing. I read on one of the Ford forums that the XR2 has the same steering gearing as the other fiestas, but less movement, which would tend to confirm your observation. I've checked the balljoints on my car, and they are the same as some XR2 ones I had hanging around. There are some Mk1 balljoints on Ebay, and they do look slightly different. As the Haynes manual gives different angles for the XR2 to the other Mk2s, I wonder if that is the difference. They are attached to the track control arms with 2 bolts, so, if the holes were positioned differently, that could change the camber. Anyway, I'll need to try to get hold of some to measure. On closer inspection, although I'd like to get the negative camber down a bit, my real problem is with the size of the wheels. There really isn't much space under there. The wheels have 2 or 3mm spacers to get the offset right, and without them they would foul the strut. As they are 7 wide, I can't reduce the tyre section much below 195, and, although 45 section would reduce the rolling diameter, I suspect it would still be marginal. My Series 1 (in bits) has 14 x 6J Compomotive wheels with 185/55R 14 tyres, and, when I get them painted, I'll fit them to the 2+2 and see if they look more sensible. Would be interested to know what your lockstops on the rack looked like, though, as I have a Locost with an Escort quickrack that could do with the movement limiting slightly. MoT tester commented that the cycle wings hit the headlights on full lock, so it would be nice to make up some stops to prevent that happening - but it's not something I've ever looked at. Thanks anyway, and If you have any details of the lockstops, I'd be interested to see them. All the best, Dave. On 11 July, 09:07, crash testpaul.morr...@jawdans.co.uk wrote: I don't know if this helps or hinders as I have a coupe but the track control arms are (as best I can measure) 280mm centre of fixing to centre of balljoint fixing. One question I have is where are your tyres rubbing, is it the outer arch in a straight line or when on full lock either way. The reason I ask is that if it is full lock and rubbing on the inner wheel well then maybe you have the wrong steering rack. Somewhere else on this chat area it has been suggested that the Fiesta steering rack has more turns from lock to lock than the XR2 rack and this was due to the larger wheels of the XR2. I have just bought what was supposedly and XR2 rack but am not sure as it has three and a quarter turns from lock to lock and that maybe a quarter too much, one way to overcome the issue is to insert stop locks to reduce the amount of steering rack movement. This is something I have had to do on a different kitcar to pass the SVA a year or so ago. My coupe has 194 45 15 tyres on the front to stop the tyre rubbing on the arch on full bounce but it was severly lowered by use of coil overs which was most of its problem, that and the fact that it was too stiff for everyday use, I am now reverting back to ordinary springs and will then get a set of lowered springs when I know what the ordinary ride hieght is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Last Call ref QM68
Jan, did you get my mail with the links to the write-up? Neil On 12 July, 23:53, Jan janhaine...@btinternet.com wrote: Hi to you all This is the last call for any articles wishing to go in this QM68 magazine. If anyone wishes to promote there business through the mag please to get there details to me and forward there payment through to the Treasure Paul Fennings, Q's for sale, so far I only have one to go in the mag, any more please forward details even parts wanted. Many thanks Jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Track Control Arms on 2+2
Well back in 2007 it was stated that the XR2 rack had 3 turns lock to lock and the ordinary Fiestas had 3.5 turns lock to lock. The one I eventually got has 3.25 turns lock to lock and its a genuine Ford item. It's fitted now so if I get issues with rubbing on lock when used on the road then I will just fit some stop locks. I take it then that the XR2 springs and dampers make for a stiffer ride. On 13 July, 09:17, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: 6.5 wide wheels are normally considered the max on the 2+2. It does depend on the offset. All the parts on the Mk2 Fiesta front suspension are the same on all models including the XR2 except the springs and shocks. I checked on Fords Microcat. Jim On 13/07/2010 00:30, Dave the Subbie wrote: Thanks, but I think the coupe uses Escort track control arms, not fiesta ones, so it's quite different. The escort ones are cast and have an integral ball joint, whereas the Fiesta ones are pressed in a u section, and have bolt on balljoints. The fouling is on the lip of the arch itself, so I don't think the rack is the problem. I had the wheels off at the weekend, and there didn't seem to be any evidence of rubbing on the inner wing. I read on one of the Ford forums that the XR2 has the same steering gearing as the other fiestas, but less movement, which would tend to confirm your observation. I've checked the balljoints on my car, and they are the same as some XR2 ones I had hanging around. There are some Mk1 balljoints on Ebay, and they do look slightly different. As the Haynes manual gives different angles for the XR2 to the other Mk2s, I wonder if that is the difference. They are attached to the track control arms with 2 bolts, so, if the holes were positioned differently, that could change the camber. Anyway, I'll need to try to get hold of some to measure. On closer inspection, although I'd like to get the negative camber down a bit, my real problem is with the size of the wheels. There really isn't much space under there. The wheels have 2 or 3mm spacers to get the offset right, and without them they would foul the strut. As they are 7 wide, I can't reduce the tyre section much below 195, and, although 45 section would reduce the rolling diameter, I suspect it would still be marginal. My Series 1 (in bits) has 14 x 6J Compomotive wheels with 185/55R 14 tyres, and, when I get them painted, I'll fit them to the 2+2 and see if they look more sensible. Would be interested to know what your lockstops on the rack looked like, though, as I have a Locost with an Escort quickrack that could do with the movement limiting slightly. MoT tester commented that the cycle wings hit the headlights on full lock, so it would be nice to make up some stops to prevent that happening - but it's not something I've ever looked at. Thanks anyway, and If you have any details of the lockstops, I'd be interested to see them. All the best, Dave. On 11 July, 09:07, crash testpaul.morr...@jawdans.co.uk wrote: I don't know if this helps or hinders as I have a coupe but the track control arms are (as best I can measure) 280mm centre of fixing to centre of balljoint fixing. One question I have is where are your tyres rubbing, is it the outer arch in a straight line or when on full lock either way. The reason I ask is that if it is full lock and rubbing on the inner wheel well then maybe you have the wrong steering rack. Somewhere else on this chat area it has been suggested that the Fiesta steering rack has more turns from lock to lock than the XR2 rack and this was due to the larger wheels of the XR2. I have just bought what was supposedly and XR2 rack but am not sure as it has three and a quarter turns from lock to lock and that maybe a quarter too much, one way to overcome the issue is to insert stop locks to reduce the amount of steering rack movement. This is something I have had to do on a different kitcar to pass the SVA a year or so ago. My coupe has 194 45 15 tyres on the front to stop the tyre rubbing on the arch on full bounce but it was severly lowered by use of coil overs which was most of its problem, that and the fact that it was too stiff for everyday use, I am now reverting back to ordinary springs and will then get a set of lowered springs when I know what the ordinary ride hieght is.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor
Re: [Quantum Owners] Struts and stuff, Fiat engine conversion
The earlier smaller engined Mk2 Fiestas had 22 splines on the outer driveshaft joint and the bigger engined had 23 splines. The hub and the bearings are different sizes for this as well but the hub carrier is the same. I think the Mk2 balljoints should be bent, i can't remember now for sure though, need to look under a Quantum. The others could be Mk1 All Mk3 fiestas i remember have 3 bolt fixing (or usually rivets) on the balljoint. Jim On 13/07/2010 10:49, barnacle wrote: While changing the bearings and CV joints it became apparent that while the engine is definitely XR2, the hubs aren't... Joe's suppliers are investigating the CV joint and from the spline count (24 on the outer and 23 on the inner) it's apparent that it's not a Fiesta hub. The fact that it locked the XR2 bearings up is a good indicator there, too. The ball joints originally supplied were larger than those fitted, and were straight: | while those we removed were bent: \ - again according to the supplier, the first type were XR2 and the second XR2i (so Fiesta MK3). It also seems that the brake disks - represented as XR2 but not guaranteed - have a different offset from those fitted. So it looks as if we may have something from an Escort in there... The plan is to replace the existing 13 wheels with something with room for larger brakes, and to better match the size of the tyres to the Coupe's (the 13s are 10% smaller rolling radius). Any hints as to what hubs these might be, or with which hubs we might replace them to accommodate the larger brakes, would be gratefully accepted. Ta, Neil p.s. Joe has started scouring eBay for a Quantum to convert for himself, he enjoyed it so much! p.p.s I'm investigating the spring rate of the existing springs; they'll need uprating to get the ride height back where it should be. Might need new shocks, too; we'll see what the bounce period is. Anyone know what the compression for the 2+2 'special' front springs is in lbs/in? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Dutch registered Saloon for sale
I saw it too. and jip to expensive I am looking for a saloon next to my 2+2. Will convert it to LHD as I dit with my 2+2. The only one I found so far was http://carandclassic.com/car/C153700/# but no relpy on may email nor phone message so far. Does anybody know this car/owner? or any saloon for sale? Hans Dutch white 2+2 - Original Message - From: Jur jurri...@gmail.com To: Quantum Owners Group quantumowners@googlegroups.com Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:51 AM Subject: [Quantum Owners] Dutch registered Saloon for sale Currently a Dutch registered RHD 1987 Quantum Saloon is up for sale. http://fordworld.nl/nl/aanbod/particulieren/default.asp?itemID=5797 The seller asks 4995 euro's (which is a lot of money imho .. for a car of nearly 25 years) It was registered with a dutch license in 2006 Just posted this, to let you know.. regards Jur -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Struts and stuff, Fiat engine conversion
So as I have 24 splines, it's definitely not a Fiesta. Wonder what it might be? On 13 July, 11:02, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: The earlier smaller engined Mk2 Fiestas had 22 splines on the outer driveshaft joint and the bigger engined had 23 splines. The hub and the bearings are different sizes for this as well but the hub carrier is the same. I think the Mk2 balljoints should be bent, i can't remember now for sure though, need to look under a Quantum. The others could be Mk1 All Mk3 fiestas i remember have 3 bolt fixing (or usually rivets) on the balljoint. Jim On 13/07/2010 10:49, barnacle wrote: While changing the bearings and CV joints it became apparent that while the engine is definitely XR2, the hubs aren't... Joe's suppliers are investigating the CV joint and from the spline count (24 on the outer and 23 on the inner) it's apparent that it's not a Fiesta hub. The fact that it locked the XR2 bearings up is a good indicator there, too. The ball joints originally supplied were larger than those fitted, and were straight: | while those we removed were bent: \ - again according to the supplier, the first type were XR2 and the second XR2i (so Fiesta MK3). It also seems that the brake disks - represented as XR2 but not guaranteed - have a different offset from those fitted. So it looks as if we may have something from an Escort in there... The plan is to replace the existing 13 wheels with something with room for larger brakes, and to better match the size of the tyres to the Coupe's (the 13s are 10% smaller rolling radius). Any hints as to what hubs these might be, or with which hubs we might replace them to accommodate the larger brakes, would be gratefully accepted. Ta, Neil p.s. Joe has started scouring eBay for a Quantum to convert for himself, he enjoyed it so much! p.p.s I'm investigating the spring rate of the existing springs; they'll need uprating to get the ride height back where it should be. Might need new shocks, too; we'll see what the bounce period is. Anyone know what the compression for the 2+2 'special' front springs is in lbs/in? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Struts and stuff, Fiat engine conversion
I didn't think anything else fitted in the Fiesta hub carrier. Is there a part number on the hub casting ? Unfortunately Microcat doesn't list the splines for Escort parts. Jim On 13/07/2010 15:30, barnacle wrote: So as I have 24 splines, it's definitely not a Fiesta. Wonder what it might be? On 13 July, 11:02, Jim Hearnej...@quantums.info wrote: The earlier smaller engined Mk2 Fiestas had 22 splines on the outer driveshaft joint and the bigger engined had 23 splines. The hub and the bearings are different sizes for this as well but the hub carrier is the same. I think the Mk2 balljoints should be bent, i can't remember now for sure though, need to look under a Quantum. The others could be Mk1 All Mk3 fiestas i remember have 3 bolt fixing (or usually rivets) on the balljoint. Jim On 13/07/2010 10:49, barnacle wrote: While changing the bearings and CV joints it became apparent that while the engine is definitely XR2, the hubs aren't... Joe's suppliers are investigating the CV joint and from the spline count (24 on the outer and 23 on the inner) it's apparent that it's not a Fiesta hub. The fact that it locked the XR2 bearings up is a good indicator there, too. The ball joints originally supplied were larger than those fitted, and were straight: | while those we removed were bent: \ - again according to the supplier, the first type were XR2 and the second XR2i (so Fiesta MK3). It also seems that the brake disks - represented as XR2 but not guaranteed - have a different offset from those fitted. So it looks as if we may have something from an Escort in there... The plan is to replace the existing 13 wheels with something with room for larger brakes, and to better match the size of the tyres to the Coupe's (the 13s are 10% smaller rolling radius). Any hints as to what hubs these might be, or with which hubs we might replace them to accommodate the larger brakes, would be gratefully accepted. Ta, Neil p.s. Joe has started scouring eBay for a Quantum to convert for himself, he enjoyed it so much! p.p.s I'm investigating the spring rate of the existing springs; they'll need uprating to get the ride height back where it should be. Might need new shocks, too; we'll see what the bounce period is. Anyone know what the compression for the 2+2 'special' front springs is in lbs/in? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: H4 Front Tyres rubbing on Wheel Arches
There is also an excel tyre calc I wrote in the files section of this group, where you can input up to 4 different sizes for comparison. Matthew On 13 Jul 2010, at 09:01, Jur jurri...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not the H4 expert (Haven't even driven one) but own a (dutch) Fiesta mk3. As the H4 is 'based' on the mk3 fiesta. The mk3 fiesta runs on 195/45R15 tyres.. That's a fair bit smaller then the 195/60R15 or 195/55R15 mentioned.The speedo will not show the correct, but a fair bit to slow, speed (some 10%) (making some rides very expensive) 195/50R15 might fit but still show 5% to slow on the standard fiesta mk3 speedo. (but are a fair bit cheaper tyres compared to the 195/45R15 Try the tyre calculator. http://205gti.com/techtyrecalc.htm Standard mk3 XR2i/FRST tyres are: 185/60R13 on (obviously) 13 wheels or 185/55R14 on 14 wheels.. Regards Jur p.s. English is not my native language, so sorry if some english might seem crookked -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Door Lock / Bonnet Catch Query (s)
Hiya folks Got a funny on Q2-002 which is a bit strange. When I open the drivers door, the key unlocks the lock with no problem. If I open the door, shut it, then try to lock it, there is mechanical resistance, and I cannot lock the door. If I unlock the door, then try to re-lock with opening the door, it functions correctly. At the moment I have to hold the external door latch up, press the internal button, then shut the door to lock the car. It has only just started to do this. The other funny is a similar situation on the bonnet catch - the bonnet does not always click in place to close, and there is hard resistance to the bonnet being pushed down on the mechanism. Occasionally the bonnet works first time though... Unfortunately both these problems are only happening when the bodywork is in the way, so I cannot see the reasons why there is mechanical resistance. Both locks have been drowned in WD40 / light oil to see if it is just something sticky. Has anyone got any suggestions, or do I need to purchase new mechanisms for both, and particularly on the door - which bit? Many thanks James T Q2-002 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
RE: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem
I've tried 99 Octane fuel, but made no difference. Going back to basics can anyone confirm the part numbers to work with a 2.0l DESK Mondeo ECU on a 2.0l Silver Top Zetec, Fiesta Alloy Inlet manifold and Brown Injectors. MAF Throttle Body Throttle Position Sensor Any other 2.0 Mondeo specific sensors or parts? Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Wastell Sent: 30 June 2010 22:41 To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem Hi Chris, How about filling up with some Tesco 99 octane? This is what I originally (stupidly) tuned mine to which caused pinking on any other fuel. Might be worth a go to at least see if it is likely fuel related. I'd say at least to try a new tank of fuel, I've heard anecdotal of pinking on same octane different brand fuel. I've some octane boost lying about I bought for the Ireland trip as there was no super available over there, however it didn't seem to help for me. if you happen to be passing you are welcome to it. Although I doubt it will prove anything. Good luck Matthew On 30 Jun 2010, at 22:06, Chris Fairlie chris.fair...@btconnect.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. Definitely sounds like Pinking rather than a knock. It happened all last week during the Haggis Hunt II with a mixture of different brands of petrol (Esso, Jet, BP, Murco etc. ) only one tank of Asda fuel. I checked the plug gaps this evening and they were about 2.5mm. I reduced this to the 1.3mm stated in the Haynes manual. Then drove it from cold in cooled air. It still pinks. Any more ideas? Regards Chris -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Hearne Sent: 28 June 2010 09:12 To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem Are you using Tescos petrol ? I've noticed my 2.0 Mondeo pinking the last few weeks. It's now back to a standard engine spec so shouldn't be due to that. Jim On 27/06/2010 21:56, Chris Fairlie wrote: I have a 2 litre silver top with Ford DESK ecu in a 2+2. It runs well ms of the time, but whenever I try to accelerate hard it makes a rattling noise like pre ignition. Any ideas what might be causing this? Regards Chris Fairlie -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of barnacle Sent: 24 June 2010 18:44 To: Quantum Owners Group Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Fuel injection question for Jim Hearn Thanks for that Jim. I've ordered the Hadrian injection Mk2 Fiesta tank, which appears to have the outlet in the same place as yours (I assume OEM from the lack of filter?). A filter was definitely on the plan. Should be room for a small one... good tip on the half-inch bend, thanks! So, tank 12mm - bend 12mm - filter 12mm - pump -8mm - fuel rail. Ta! On 24 June, 14:15, Jim Hearnej...@quantums.info wrote: The Ford tank has a filter in the tank so you don't need a pre pump one. A pattern one probably doesn't so one would be a very good idea. But you need a low pressure filter not a high pressure one. Jim On 24/06/2010 13:04, barnacle wrote: Jim, on this photohttp://www.quantums.info/pictures/rst_in_2plus2/Fuel%20pump%20in%20fr.. . you show the fuel pump... do you recall the part number, and perhaps more critically, the output size of the tank? It *looks* like 8mm, but I need to order filter and pump urgently and would hate to then find it's 12mm. I won't be getting the tank till Saturday so I can't measure it! Thanks, Neil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en
[Quantum Owners] LeMans Classic
Hi All, anybody else on here attend the Classic this year. Only seen one other Quantum there, a yellow xtreme, like mine, on the Saturday night near the Dunlop bridge. Bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
[Quantum Owners] Re: Track Control Arms on 2+2
I suppose the different angles in the Haynes manual must be due to the at rest spring length then? Are the springs shorter on an XR2, or just stiffer? However, it still doesn't explain the amount of negative on my car. Maybe it isn't unusual after all. Will have to have a closer look next time I see another one. Thanks again for all the information. Dave. On Jul 13, 9:17 am, Jim Hearne j...@quantums.info wrote: 6.5 wide wheels are normally considered the max on the 2+2. It does depend on the offset. All the parts on the Mk2 Fiesta front suspension are the same on all models including the XR2 except the springs and shocks. I checked on Fords Microcat. Jim On 13/07/2010 00:30, Dave the Subbie wrote: Thanks, but I think the coupe uses Escort track control arms, not fiesta ones, so it's quite different. The escort ones are cast and have an integral ball joint, whereas the Fiesta ones are pressed in a u section, and have bolt on balljoints. The fouling is on the lip of the arch itself, so I don't think the rack is the problem. I had the wheels off at the weekend, and there didn't seem to be any evidence of rubbing on the inner wing. I read on one of the Ford forums that the XR2 has the same steering gearing as the other fiestas, but less movement, which would tend to confirm your observation. I've checked the balljoints on my car, and they are the same as some XR2 ones I had hanging around. There are some Mk1 balljoints on Ebay, and they do look slightly different. As the Haynes manual gives different angles for the XR2 to the other Mk2s, I wonder if that is the difference. They are attached to the track control arms with 2 bolts, so, if the holes were positioned differently, that could change the camber. Anyway, I'll need to try to get hold of some to measure. On closer inspection, although I'd like to get the negative camber down a bit, my real problem is with the size of the wheels. There really isn't much space under there. The wheels have 2 or 3mm spacers to get the offset right, and without them they would foul the strut. As they are 7 wide, I can't reduce the tyre section much below 195, and, although 45 section would reduce the rolling diameter, I suspect it would still be marginal. My Series 1 (in bits) has 14 x 6J Compomotive wheels with 185/55R 14 tyres, and, when I get them painted, I'll fit them to the 2+2 and see if they look more sensible. Would be interested to know what your lockstops on the rack looked like, though, as I have a Locost with an Escort quickrack that could do with the movement limiting slightly. MoT tester commented that the cycle wings hit the headlights on full lock, so it would be nice to make up some stops to prevent that happening - but it's not something I've ever looked at. Thanks anyway, and If you have any details of the lockstops, I'd be interested to see them. All the best, Dave. On 11 July, 09:07, crash testpaul.morr...@jawdans.co.uk wrote: I don't know if this helps or hinders as I have a coupe but the track control arms are (as best I can measure) 280mm centre of fixing to centre of balljoint fixing. One question I have is where are your tyres rubbing, is it the outer arch in a straight line or when on full lock either way. The reason I ask is that if it is full lock and rubbing on the inner wheel well then maybe you have the wrong steering rack. Somewhere else on this chat area it has been suggested that the Fiesta steering rack has more turns from lock to lock than the XR2 rack and this was due to the larger wheels of the XR2. I have just bought what was supposedly and XR2 rack but am not sure as it has three and a quarter turns from lock to lock and that maybe a quarter too much, one way to overcome the issue is to insert stop locks to reduce the amount of steering rack movement. This is something I have had to do on a different kitcar to pass the SVA a year or so ago. My coupe has 194 45 15 tyres on the front to stop the tyre rubbing on the arch on full bounce but it was severly lowered by use of coil overs which was most of its problem, that and the fact that it was too stiff for everyday use, I am now reverting back to ordinary springs and will then get a set of lowered springs when I know what the ordinary ride hieght is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of
Re: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem
The MAF is the only other part that has to be matched to the ecu. Tell me the part number on yours and i'll look it up on Microcat. Jim On 13/07/2010 20:37, Chris Fairlie wrote: I've tried 99 Octane fuel, but made no difference. Going back to basics can anyone confirm the part numbers to work with a 2.0l DESK Mondeo ECU on a 2.0l Silver Top Zetec, Fiesta Alloy Inlet manifold and Brown Injectors. MAF Throttle Body Throttle Position Sensor Any other 2.0 Mondeo specific sensors or parts? Thanks Chris -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matthew Wastell Sent: 30 June 2010 22:41 To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem Hi Chris, How about filling up with some Tesco 99 octane? This is what I originally (stupidly) tuned mine to which caused pinking on any other fuel. Might be worth a go to at least see if it is likely fuel related. I'd say at least to try a new tank of fuel, I've heard anecdotal of pinking on same octane different brand fuel. I've some octane boost lying about I bought for the Ireland trip as there was no super available over there, however it didn't seem to help for me. if you happen to be passing you are welcome to it. Although I doubt it will prove anything. Good luck Matthew On 30 Jun 2010, at 22:06, Chris Fairliechris.fair...@btconnect.com wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. Definitely sounds like Pinking rather than a knock. It happened all last week during the Haggis Hunt II with a mixture of different brands of petrol (Esso, Jet, BP, Murco etc. ) only one tank of Asda fuel. I checked the plug gaps this evening and they were about 2.5mm. I reduced this to the 1.3mm stated in the Haynes manual. Then drove it from cold in cooled air. It still pinks. Any more ideas? Regards Chris -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jim Hearne Sent: 28 June 2010 09:12 To: quantumowners@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [Quantum Owners] Zetec acceleration problem Are you using Tescos petrol ? I've noticed my 2.0 Mondeo pinking the last few weeks. It's now back to a standard engine spec so shouldn't be due to that. Jim On 27/06/2010 21:56, Chris Fairlie wrote: I have a 2 litre silver top with Ford DESK ecu in a 2+2. It runs well ms of the time, but whenever I try to accelerate hard it makes a rattling noise like pre ignition. Any ideas what might be causing this? Regards Chris Fairlie -Original Message- From: quantumowners@googlegroups.com [mailto:quantumown...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of barnacle Sent: 24 June 2010 18:44 To: Quantum Owners Group Subject: [Quantum Owners] Re: Fuel injection question for Jim Hearn Thanks for that Jim. I've ordered the Hadrian injection Mk2 Fiesta tank, which appears to have the outlet in the same place as yours (I assume OEM from the lack of filter?). A filter was definitely on the plan. Should be room for a small one... good tip on the half-inch bend, thanks! So, tank 12mm - bend 12mm - filter 12mm - pump -8mm - fuel rail. Ta! On 24 June, 14:15, Jim Hearnej...@quantums.info wrote: The Ford tank has a filter in the tank so you don't need a pre pump one. A pattern one probably doesn't so one would be a very good idea. But you need a low pressure filter not a high pressure one. Jim On 24/06/2010 13:04, barnacle wrote: Jim, on this photohttp://www.quantums.info/pictures/rst_in_2plus2/Fuel%20pump%20in%20fr.. . you show the fuel pump... do you recall the part number, and perhaps more critically, the output size of the tank? It *looks* like 8mm, but I need to order filter and pump urgently and would hate to then find it's 12mm. I won't be getting the tank till Saturday so I can't measure it! Thanks, Neil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Re: [Quantum Owners] Re: Track Control Arms on 2+2
Spring rate, spring height and the spring seat position on the shock. Jim On 13/07/2010 21:18, Dave the Subbie wrote: I suppose the different angles in the Haynes manual must be due to the at rest spring length then? Are the springs shorter on an XR2, or just stiffer? However, it still doesn't explain the amount of negative on my car. Maybe it isn't unusual after all. Will have to have a closer look next time I see another one. Thanks again for all the information. Dave. On Jul 13, 9:17 am, Jim Hearnej...@quantums.info wrote: 6.5 wide wheels are normally considered the max on the 2+2. It does depend on the offset. All the parts on the Mk2 Fiesta front suspension are the same on all models including the XR2 except the springs and shocks. I checked on Fords Microcat. Jim On 13/07/2010 00:30, Dave the Subbie wrote: Thanks, but I think the coupe uses Escort track control arms, not fiesta ones, so it's quite different. The escort ones are cast and have an integral ball joint, whereas the Fiesta ones are pressed in a u section, and have bolt on balljoints. The fouling is on the lip of the arch itself, so I don't think the rack is the problem. I had the wheels off at the weekend, and there didn't seem to be any evidence of rubbing on the inner wing. I read on one of the Ford forums that the XR2 has the same steering gearing as the other fiestas, but less movement, which would tend to confirm your observation. I've checked the balljoints on my car, and they are the same as some XR2 ones I had hanging around. There are some Mk1 balljoints on Ebay, and they do look slightly different. As the Haynes manual gives different angles for the XR2 to the other Mk2s, I wonder if that is the difference. They are attached to the track control arms with 2 bolts, so, if the holes were positioned differently, that could change the camber. Anyway, I'll need to try to get hold of some to measure. On closer inspection, although I'd like to get the negative camber down a bit, my real problem is with the size of the wheels. There really isn't much space under there. The wheels have 2 or 3mm spacers to get the offset right, and without them they would foul the strut. As they are 7 wide, I can't reduce the tyre section much below 195, and, although 45 section would reduce the rolling diameter, I suspect it would still be marginal. My Series 1 (in bits) has 14 x 6J Compomotive wheels with 185/55R 14 tyres, and, when I get them painted, I'll fit them to the 2+2 and see if they look more sensible. Would be interested to know what your lockstops on the rack looked like, though, as I have a Locost with an Escort quickrack that could do with the movement limiting slightly. MoT tester commented that the cycle wings hit the headlights on full lock, so it would be nice to make up some stops to prevent that happening - but it's not something I've ever looked at. Thanks anyway, and If you have any details of the lockstops, I'd be interested to see them. All the best, Dave. On 11 July, 09:07, crash testpaul.morr...@jawdans.co.ukwrote: I don't know if this helps or hinders as I have a coupe but the track control arms are (as best I can measure) 280mm centre of fixing to centre of balljoint fixing. One question I have is where are your tyres rubbing, is it the outer arch in a straight line or when on full lock either way. The reason I ask is that if it is full lock and rubbing on the inner wheel well then maybe you have the wrong steering rack. Somewhere else on this chat area it has been suggested that the Fiesta steering rack has more turns from lock to lock than the XR2 rack and this was due to the larger wheels of the XR2. I have just bought what was supposedly and XR2 rack but am not sure as it has three and a quarter turns from lock to lock and that maybe a quarter too much, one way to overcome the issue is to insert stop locks to reduce the amount of steering rack movement. This is something I have had to do on a different kitcar to pass the SVA a year or so ago. My coupe has 194 45 15 tyres on the front to stop the tyre rubbing on the arch on full bounce but it was severly lowered by use of coil overs which was most of its problem, that and the fact that it was too stiff for everyday use, I am now reverting back to ordinary springs and will then get a set of lowered springs when I know what the ordinary ride hieght is. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Quantum Owners Group group. To post to this group, send email to quantumowners@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to quantumowners-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an As Is basis,
