[ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Good day, Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of a bugfix that affects some of our systems. The "old" build of ntpstat does not work with latest stable ntpd, I assume because of some sort of data structure change. Can someone point me to the authoritative location for ntpstat source code? Search engines have not served me well in this regard, to much confusion with the "ntpstats" directory. Thank you, -Bryan If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify the sender and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any attachments were sent free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and other forms of malicious code. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. The recipient opens any attachments at the recipient's own risk, and in so doing, the recipient accepts full responsibility for such actions and agrees to take protective and remedial action relating to any malicious code. Travelport is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message or its attachments. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On 2011-02-03, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: > Can someone point me to the authoritative location for ntpstat source > code? Search engines have not served me well in this regard, to much > confusion with the "ntpstats" directory. http://people.redhat.com/rkeech/#ntpstat I'm adding this to http://support.ntp.org/links -- Steve Kostecke NTP Public Services Project - http://support.ntp.org/ ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On 2/2/2011 7:07 PM, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: Good day, Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of a bugfix that affects some of our systems. The "old" build of ntpstat does not work with latest stable ntpd, I assume because of some sort of data structure change. Can someone point me to the authoritative location for ntpstat source code? Search engines have not served me well in this regard, to much confusion with the "ntpstats" directory. See: http://www.ntp.org/ for links to source code, documentation, etc. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 05:07:19PM -0700, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: > Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in > sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but > in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of > a bugfix that affects some of our systems. The "old" build of ntpstat > does not work with latest stable ntpd, I assume because of some sort of > data structure change. The ntpstat code needs update, because some variables reported by ntpd were renamed. Apply ntpstat-0.2-sysvars.patch from here http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ntp.git;a=tree the other ntpstat-* patches might be useful too. -- Miroslav Lichvar ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Thank you gentlemen. Patches and the new link on ntp.org are exactly what I needed. -Bryan If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify the sender and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any attachments were sent free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and other forms of malicious code. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. The recipient opens any attachments at the recipient's own risk, and in so doing, the recipient accepts full responsibility for such actions and agrees to take protective and remedial action relating to any malicious code. Travelport is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message or its attachments. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Schmidt, Bryan wrote: Good day, Normally my team uses the "ntpstat" utility to check that systems are in sync and so on. Usually we use the one provided by our OS vendor, but in a particular case we require the latest stable ntpd build because of a bugfix that affects some of our systems. The "old" build of ntpstat does not work with latest stable ntpd, I assume because of some sort of data structure change. Can someone point me to the authoritative location for ntpstat source code? Search engines have not served me well in this regard, to much confusion with the "ntpstats" directory. The ntpd distribution has a scripts directory with one of the files being 'ntp-status' 1042 bytes dated Oct 9 2001. It doesn't run on my system due to unsuitable paths. David ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On 2011-02-03, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: > Thank you gentlemen. Patches and the new link on ntp.org are exactly > what I needed. > > -Bryan Could you please remover the following stuff from your postings on the net? It is totally inappropriate ( or do you really waht the 500 people who do not want to read your post to email you and notify you, and do you really want the newgroup repostories to erase your copies immediately?) > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify > the sender > and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any > attachments > were sent free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and other forms of malicious > code. > This message and its attachments could have been infected during > transmission. The > recipient opens any attachments at the recipient's own risk, and in so doing, > the > recipient accepts full responsibility for such actions and agrees to take > protective > and remedial action relating to any malicious code. Travelport is not liable > for any > loss or damage arising from this message or its attachments. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to "stick". What if I were wrong? OK just in case I'm wrong,,, Be reading this email you agree to the following: The reader shall on the second Tuesday of each month run naked through a city park and scream loudly "Zombies are attacking! Zombies are attacking!" Gosh it would be fun it email footers were binding on readers. >> If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify >> the sender >> and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any >> attachments >> were sent free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and other forms of >> malicious code. >> This message and its attachments could have been infected during >> transmission. The >> recipient opens any attachments at the recipient's own risk, and in so >> doing, the >> recipient accepts full responsibility for such actions and agrees to take >> protective >> and remedial action relating to any malicious code. Travelport is not liable >> for any >> loss or damage arising from this message or its attachments. Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
unruh wrote: On 2011-02-03, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: Thank you gentlemen. Patches and the new link on ntp.org are exactly what I needed. -Bryan Could you please remover the following stuff from your postings on the Referring to bogus confidentiality notices. Unfortunately, many professional bodies tell their members that it is legally unsafe to do otherwise than include these notices. If I posted from my office, I would have one. There is no point in asking IT to suppress it, as the directive comes from the MD, an accountant, who is acting on the advice of a professional accountancy organisation. I try to post from home, and if not, I disclaim the confidentiality part of the disclaimer. In practice recipients ignore them, rather than reporting the breach, however I would certainly argue that their inappropriate use devalues their proper use, as they are only useful where the recipient has some reasonable doubt about the confidentiality, and their use in public forums means they are used when the material isn't confidential, so someone in a borderline case will reasonably assume that that was one of those inappropriate use cases. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Chris Albertson wrote: Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to "stick". What if I were wrong? OK just in case I'm wrong,,, Be reading this email you agree to the following: The reader shall on the second Tuesday of each month run naked through a city park and scream loudly "Zombies are attacking! Zombies are attacking!" Gosh it would be fun it email footers were binding on readers. Don't look at though! http://www.lyricsbox.com/ray-stevens-lyrics-the-streak-nsktj67.html ;-) usually due to some overbearing and undereducated legal department. you would invert the Earth magnetic field with less hassle than changing their minds. uwe ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Chris Albertson wrote: > Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of > it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they > are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to > "stick". In certain limited contexts these things actually do serve a purpose. If a lawyer on one side of a legal dispute accidently emails a confidential document to a lawyer on the other side the presence of such a disclaimer can prevent the document from being used in court. Lawyers evidently figure that the things can do no harm in contexts where they don't apply, not realizing how irritating they are to normal people. At least this one requests that you delete the message rather than purporting to order you to do so. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Sorry to have offended some of you, corp email system appends that whether I like it or not. Next time I'll ask my question from a different email account. Try not to get so worked up unruh / Chris! -Original Message- From: questions-bounces+bryan.schmidt=travelport@lists.ntp.org [mailto:questions-bounces+bryan.schmidt=travelport@lists.ntp.org] On Behalf Of John Hasler Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 7:16 AM To: questions@lists.ntp.org Subject: Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location? Chris Albertson wrote: > Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of > it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they > are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to > "stick". In certain limited contexts these things actually do serve a purpose. If a lawyer on one side of a legal dispute accidently emails a confidential document to a lawyer on the other side the presence of such a disclaimer can prevent the document from being used in court. Lawyers evidently figure that the things can do no harm in contexts where they don't apply, not realizing how irritating they are to normal people. At least this one requests that you delete the message rather than purporting to order you to do so. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, please notify the sender and delete all copies immediately. The sender believes this message and any attachments were sent free of any virus, worm, Trojan horse, and other forms of malicious code. This message and its attachments could have been infected during transmission. The recipient opens any attachments at the recipient's own risk, and in so doing, the recipient accepts full responsibility for such actions and agrees to take protective and remedial action relating to any malicious code. Travelport is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message or its attachments. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
> > Unfortunately, many professional bodies tell their members that it is > legally unsafe to do otherwise than include these notices. If I posted from > my office, I would have one. There is no point in asking IT to suppress it, We can ask that people don't post from email accounts that append such nonsense to outgoing messages. It is very easy and free to get a gmail or yahoo mail account. One can also add an excerpt of the annoying text to one's spam filters and never see email from that sender again. -- = Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Chris Albertson wrote: nonsense to outgoing messages. It is very easy and free to get a gmail or yahoo mail account. At least in the past, they were blocked from the office, as inbound mail through them would bypass the email virus checker. As it probably wasn't made clear. These are not about forming a contract, but about denying people a defence that they didn't know the message was confidential. Of course, misusing it, gives them that defence back. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
David Woolley writes: > As it probably wasn't made clear. These are not about forming a > contract, but about denying people a defence that they didn't know the > message was confidential. But if they are unrelated third parties they need no defense (at least in the USA). In circumstances such as these we can simply ignore the silly things. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On 2011-02-04, Schmidt, Bryan wrote: > Sorry to have offended some of you, corp email system appends that > whether I like it or not. Next time I'll ask my question from a > different email account. > > Try not to get so worked up unruh / Chris! Not worked up, just astonished and disgusted. And I have discovered that one of the rules of the world is that if you do not complain things do not change. It takes work to reduce entropy. > > > > -Original Message- > From: questions-bounces+bryan.schmidt=travelport@lists.ntp.org > [mailto:questions-bounces+bryan.schmidt=travelport@lists.ntp.org] On > Behalf Of John Hasler > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 7:16 AM > To: questions@lists.ntp.org > Subject: Re: ntpstat source code master location? > > Chris Albertson wrote: >> Not only is it inappropriate is it complete bull+++t. The short of >> it is that contracts are only valid if both parties agree that they >> are valid so you can't put one on the end of emails and expect it to >> "stick". > > In certain limited contexts these things actually do serve a purpose. > If a lawyer on one side of a legal dispute accidently emails a > confidential document to a lawyer on the other side the presence of such > a disclaimer can prevent the document from being used in court. Lawyers > evidently figure that the things can do no harm in contexts where they > don't apply, not realizing how irritating they are to normal people. > > At least this one requests that you delete the message rather than > purporting to order you to do so. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
On 2011-02-04, John Hasler wrote: > David Woolley writes: >> As it probably wasn't made clear. These are not about forming a >> contract, but about denying people a defence that they didn't know the >> message was confidential. > > But if they are unrelated third parties they need no defense (at least > in the USA). In circumstances such as these we can simply ignore the > silly things. Yes, but in case an email actually IS sent to someone and is supposed to be confidential, the recipient can point to the posting with that message on netnews, and show that that notice is actually meaningless since it is attached to stuff which is clearly not confidential, and thus by misuse they have negated the whole purpose of the message. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] ntpstat source code master location?
Sigh. ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/questions
