Re: [ntp:questions] The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized
Pierre, You might have better luck using the normal -O flags and figuring out which math routines are needed, and then seeing if you can find some .s files that will implement them. Also, "configure CCFLAGS='-O whatever'" may be useful. -- Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member! ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized
Replying to message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:32:50 + > From: Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp > Subject: Re: The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized > > Pierre, > > You might have better luck using the normal -O flags and figuring out which > math routines are needed, and then seeing if you can find some .s files that > will implement them. > > Also, "configure CCFLAGS='-O whatever'" may be useful. > Thanks for the advice, Harlan. It's working fine now. For reference, I used the following command: ./configure --disable-all-clocks --disable-debug CFLAGS='-O0' The resulting ntpd was 351897 bytes, which suits me fine. It seems -O0 is needed, at least for building the daemon, on NetBSD-i386 on a 486SX. Case closed for me. -- Pierre Dubuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized
Pierre Dubuc wrote: > It seems -O0 is needed, at least for building the daemon, on NetBSD-i386 > on a 486SX. > > Case closed for me. > did you try the 386 specific flag: -msoft-float uwe ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
Re: [ntp:questions] The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized
Replying to message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 18:08:43 +0100 > From: Uwe Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups: comp.protocols.time.ntp > Subject: Re: The smallest possible ntpd, unoptimized > > Pierre Dubuc wrote: > >> It seems -O0 is needed, at least for building the daemon, on NetBSD-i386 on >> a 486SX. >> >> Case closed for me. >> > did you try the 386 specific flag: > -msoft-float > > uwe > Indeed, this works as well, even with -O2 enabled. Thanks again... -- Pierre Dubuc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ questions mailing list questions@lists.ntp.org https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
