[R-pkg-devel] Macros in Rd files.
I tried to define a macro to produce today's date (like unto the
"\today" command in LaTeX):
\newcommand{\today}{format(Sys.date(),"%d/%m/%Y")}
I put this into my *.Rd file just before invoking it. (Something like
"I don't think I will do any more work today (i.e. \today).")
When I did
R CMD build ldEst
to my package I got the warning:
Warning: /tmp/RtmpL6sNnQ/Rbuild7f3036693218/ldEst/man/sampleCiLength.Rd:95:
unexpected END_OF_INPUT '\keyword{ datagen }
Clearly I'm stuffing something up. Can some kind soul please provide me
with guidance as to what I *should* be doing?
Ta.
cheers,
Rolf Turner
--
Technical Editor ANZJS
Department of Statistics
University of Auckland
Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"
Great, thank you so much! On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 5:21 PM Uwe Ligges wrote: > > > On 08.11.2017 14:25, Fabian Bachl wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which > itself > > is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed on the winbuilder machine but > > the version is 0.0-1440400394 and extremely outdated (older than a year, > I > > think) and some essential functions that I use are not available. I tried > > to adjust my DESCRIPTION file by stating "depends: INLA (>= 17.06.20)" > but > > winbuilder reports the error "Package required and > > available but unsuitable version: 'INLA'". What's the best way to > approach > > this problem? > > Tell the CRAN team. For winbuilder: Tell me. ;-) > I will update shortly. > > Best, > Uwe Ligges > > > > > Kind regards, > > Fabian Bachl > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > __ > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] issues with SOfun - package upload
And even this cannot work for strong dependencies, as sztrong deendencies must be available from mainstream repositoreis. Best, Uwe Ligges On 08.11.2017 17:59, Brian G. Peterson wrote: I think you should be using: Additional_repositories: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun since that is the actual repository. Regards, Brian On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 17:01 +0100, LUCA BELMONTE wrote: Good evening, I am trying to upload my package, called PdPDB 2.0. When building and checking the package with R-studio with --as-cran option selected, everything looks ok but, once I tried to upload the package to CRAN I had the following reply: *"Strong dependencies not in mainstream repositories:* * SOfun* ** checking package namespace information ... OK* ** checking package dependencies ... ERROR* *Package required but not available: 'SOfun'"* I understand the issue it with SOfun that is a package I downloaded and installed from this github url: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun I came back to CARN policies and I have read: *"Packages on which a CRAN package depends should be available from a mainstream repository: if any mentioned in ‘Suggests’ or ‘Enhances’ fields are not from such a repository, where to obtain them at a repository should be specified in an ‘Additional_repositories’ field of the DESCRIPTION file (as a comma-separated list of repository URLs) or for other means of access, described in the ‘Description’ field."* So, I updated the DESCRIPTION file as follows: Additional_repositories: http://news.mrdwab.com/install_github.R Before to proceed to submission, I would like to know if this is the right way to proceed or I misinterpreted the submission procedure. Thank you for reading this email, Best, __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"
Now insalled, please resub,it the package now. Best, Uwe Ligges On 08.11.2017 17:21, Uwe Ligges wrote: On 08.11.2017 14:25, Fabian Bachl wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which itself is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed on the winbuilder machine but the version is 0.0-1440400394 and extremely outdated (older than a year, I think) and some essential functions that I use are not available. I tried to adjust my DESCRIPTION file by stating "depends: INLA (>= 17.06.20)" but winbuilder reports the error "Package required and available but unsuitable version: 'INLA'". What's the best way to approach this problem? Tell the CRAN team. For winbuilder: Tell me. ;-) I will update shortly. Best, Uwe Ligges Kind regards, Fabian Bachl [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] issues with SOfun - package upload
I think you should be using: Additional_repositories: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun since that is the actual repository. Regards, Brian On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 17:01 +0100, LUCA BELMONTE wrote: > Good evening, > > I am trying to upload my package, called PdPDB 2.0. > When building and checking the package with R-studio with --as-cran > option > selected, everything looks ok but, once I tried to upload the package > to > CRAN I had the following reply: > > *"Strong dependencies not in mainstream repositories:* > * SOfun* > ** checking package namespace information ... OK* > ** checking package dependencies ... ERROR* > *Package required but not available: 'SOfun'"* > > I understand the issue it with SOfun that is a package I downloaded > and > installed from this github url: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun > > I came back to CARN policies and I have read: > > > *"Packages on which a CRAN package depends should be available from a > mainstream repository: if any mentioned in ‘Suggests’ or ‘Enhances’ > fields > are not from such a repository, where to obtain them at a repository > should > be specified in an ‘Additional_repositories’ field of the DESCRIPTION > file > (as a comma-separated list of repository URLs) or for other means of > access, described in the ‘Description’ field."* > > So, I updated the DESCRIPTION file as follows: > Additional_repositories: http://news.mrdwab.com/install_github.R > > Before to proceed to submission, I would like to know if this is the > right > way to proceed or I misinterpreted the submission procedure. > > Thank you for reading this email, > Best, > __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] issues with SOfun - package upload
Good evening, I am trying to upload my package, called PdPDB 2.0. When building and checking the package with R-studio with --as-cran option selected, everything looks ok but, once I tried to upload the package to CRAN I had the following reply: *"Strong dependencies not in mainstream repositories:* * SOfun* ** checking package namespace information ... OK* ** checking package dependencies ... ERROR* *Package required but not available: 'SOfun'"* I understand the issue it with SOfun that is a package I downloaded and installed from this github url: https://github.com/mrdwab/SOfun I came back to CARN policies and I have read: *"Packages on which a CRAN package depends should be available from a mainstream repository: if any mentioned in ‘Suggests’ or ‘Enhances’ fields are not from such a repository, where to obtain them at a repository should be specified in an ‘Additional_repositories’ field of the DESCRIPTION file (as a comma-separated list of repository URLs) or for other means of access, described in the ‘Description’ field."* So, I updated the DESCRIPTION file as follows: Additional_repositories: http://news.mrdwab.com/install_github.R Before to proceed to submission, I would like to know if this is the right way to proceed or I misinterpreted the submission procedure. Thank you for reading this email, Best, -- Luca Belmonte, PhD Dept. Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Mobile: +39 328 45 81 762 [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"
On 08.11.2017 14:25, Fabian Bachl wrote: Hi everyone, I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which itself is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed on the winbuilder machine but the version is 0.0-1440400394 and extremely outdated (older than a year, I think) and some essential functions that I use are not available. I tried to adjust my DESCRIPTION file by stating "depends: INLA (>= 17.06.20)" but winbuilder reports the error "Package required and available but unsuitable version: 'INLA'". What's the best way to approach this problem? Tell the CRAN team. For winbuilder: Tell me. ;-) I will update shortly. Best, Uwe Ligges Kind regards, Fabian Bachl [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] Outdated Winbuilder package "INLA"
Hi everyone, I am trying to submit a package to CRAN that depends on INLA, which itself is not on CRAN. However, INLA is installed on the winbuilder machine but the version is 0.0-1440400394 and extremely outdated (older than a year, I think) and some essential functions that I use are not available. I tried to adjust my DESCRIPTION file by stating "depends: INLA (>= 17.06.20)" but winbuilder reports the error "Package required and available but unsuitable version: 'INLA'". What's the best way to approach this problem? Kind regards, Fabian Bachl [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
