Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES
See also https://ropensci.org/blog/2022/01/21/ropensci-news-digest-january-2022/#to-quote-or-not-to-quote-non-existing-words-in-description https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/utils/html/aspell-utils.html On 2023-07-18 3:11 p.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 18/07/2023 12:37 p.m., Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote: Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain ' New submission Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: EP (14:45) NASAPOWER (11:18) OperatSDI (12:9) PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9) SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20) SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12) ScientSDI (9:19) evapotranspitation (13:44) subperiods (15:76) Note 2: Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s user system elapsed ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00 Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80 Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12 Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s user system elapsed ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765 Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898 Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024 Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package PowerSDI is the name of my package's name NASAPOWER is the project's name. Writing R Extensions section 1.1.1 describes some rules for quoting non-English words. I think they imply OperatSDI, ScientSDI and PowerSDI should be in single quotes. I am not sure whether that also applies to your other non-English words. Duncan Murdoch Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it. The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI I really appreciate any help you can provide. Best regards Gabriel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES
On 18/07/2023 12:37 p.m., Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote: Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain ' New submission Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: EP (14:45) NASAPOWER (11:18) OperatSDI (12:9) PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9) SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20) SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12) ScientSDI (9:19) evapotranspitation (13:44) subperiods (15:76) Note 2: Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s user system elapsed ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00 Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80 Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12 Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s user system elapsed ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765 Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898 Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024 Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package PowerSDI is the name of my package's name NASAPOWER is the project's name. Writing R Extensions section 1.1.1 describes some rules for quoting non-English words. I think they imply OperatSDI, ScientSDI and PowerSDI should be in single quotes. I am not sure whether that also applies to your other non-English words. Duncan Murdoch Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it. The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI I really appreciate any help you can provide. Best regards Gabriel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES
On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 16:37:46 + Gabriel Constantino Blain wrote: > Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, This is fine, especially if you add a comment to your package submission. > Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the > time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. > There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it. I'm sorry, but it's a policy of CRAN to require examples that run "for no more than a few seconds each": https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html I know it may be non-trivial, but I hope it's possible to reduce the amount of data processed by your examples until they take around 5 seconds or less on a typical computer. For example, could it be possible to reduce the date range of the ScientSDI example to one year and/or increase(?) the TS parameter? -- Best regards, Ivan __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES
Hello, Gabriel. CRAN policy is to rarely, if ever, allow long-running examples. It would be best if you could give an example of the function which requires as little run time as possible. Perhaps pre-compute some stages? Avi Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 18, 2023, at 9:07 PM, Gabriel Constantino Blain > wrote: > > Dears, > I submitted my R package to CRAN. > However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: > Note 1: > Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 > Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE > Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain ' > New submission >Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: >EP (14:45) >NASAPOWER (11:18) >OperatSDI (12:9) >PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9) >SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20) >SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12) >ScientSDI (9:19) >evapotranspitation (13:44) >subperiods (15:76) > Note 2: > Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64 > Check: examples, Result: NOTE > Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s > user system elapsed > ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00 > Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80 > Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12 > Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc > Check: examples, Result: NOTE > Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s > user system elapsed > ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765 > Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898 > Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024 > > Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, > EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms > OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package > PowerSDI is the name of my package's name > NASAPOWER is the project's name. > > Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run > the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many > calculations that it does take some time to do it. > > The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI > I really appreciate any help you can provide. > Best regards > Gabriel > >[[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] Package PowerSDI NOTES
Dears, I submitted my R package to CRAN. However, it didn't pass the CRAN checks because of 2 notes: Note 1: Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc, r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NOTE Maintainer: 'Gabriel Constantino Blain ' New submission Possibly misspelled words in DESCRIPTION: EP (14:45) NASAPOWER (11:18) OperatSDI (12:9) PowerSDI (7:18, 13:9) SPEI (3:31, 7:50, 10:20) SPI (3:23, 7:42, 10:12) ScientSDI (9:19) evapotranspitation (13:44) subperiods (15:76) Note 2: Flavor: r-devel-windows-x86_64 Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s user system elapsed ScientSDI 82.71 0.75 88.00 Reference 29.75 0.05 29.80 Accuracy 10.02 1.11 11.12 Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc Check: examples, Result: NOTE Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s user system elapsed ScientSDI 52.674 0.176 57.765 Reference 20.749 0.148 20.898 Accuracy 6.001 0.024 6.024 Regarding note 1, not all the words are misspelled, EP, SPI and SPEI are acronyms OperatSDI and ScientSDI are functions of my package PowerSDI is the name of my package's name NASAPOWER is the project's name. Regarding note 2, I don't know what's wrong. Is it related to the time to run the examples (>5s)? If is it so, it is not an error. There are so many calculations that it does take some time to do it. The package is available at https://github.com/gabrielblain/PowerSDI I really appreciate any help you can provide. Best regards Gabriel [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
