Re: [Radiant] Reference Assets in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 05/22/2013 10:26 AM, Julian Hurley wrote: > Not having a go, but as feedback I feel the documentation is > really, really patchy. I couldn't agree more; I haven't been very involved lately (getting aclimated at a new job), but I've considered sitting down over a weekend and writing fresh documentation from the ground up. However, this probably needs to wait until we make some progress on a version of Radiant that works on Rails 3 and/or 4. Maybe you'd care to document your setup experience through the eyes of someone who's never used Radiant before? This could potentially be very helpful. —Sam - -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/EC2C9934 https://samwhited.com/contact -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRnPC+AAoJEPs5vPfsLJk0OOAP/iDaCoi5uZcrCaKi842SdU/c qym3Q7XEsDyOuOdsB7fiR3xMOiWVaq8j1dxwUBPKS3bqzxOoH47N9UdUNMclQhCZ YOR9XSD4l9BqXrRPoz2LV3K/qLFfAaZftZ6H9fio29q0KKCfE+NM2esOsnU8Bfyt h/LUxXp3uZN+ub0dvtJ0waPKHqgRIP6SyZXtXaqzG/BdiDByZUFuvq+wsy98Mo8P QwbvFzNT3AyhoG9N/zMLzn+TZHNDFJa870zS0Fg73NR6PjaQXLW610bJeyCmQyyk kGPD1e49GDbTxkSWW8+8Bd2dV5/CjhrPe10NuOVbRUTLC7dZxIqqLIAD/vN7mVzd ogRe11QrU1It/3YD3fCdHON+4JQdKZs0KPrV3ne0Sh4I9lwh3doaKzxCZl+BALiW GJAJRZcglDD5yeNiVvHpPKcjdedHBacnLiBc3wX/2heDQ3N/EYaX3Z9kD1mPBgt9 4/kmpCMGA+nKgK+rIcM44RCW1LQ549eHiAafdU2O+pUly+U/6BO6HN6HpTylE8A3 6AWJzQtRA/GZBOddmTDvP4HYJXvR6FRt4oIS69+0luG8BEdCUYCk+KX+gU2B46oO 8O9HaS+dWkWKAuMvaLjsz6y/hGZLdlsPsFaN3qvOdqJJIFpFcESetBEGkewK4+GB lnZTfx6Hxs4+PZtsHzTf =X9Tw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Radiant CMS" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to radiantcms+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: [Radiant] RFP | Upgrade radiant 0.9.1 --> 1.1.1
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Adam Waterson wrote: > I'd love it if someone from this group wanted to do a few hours of work for > me. I've attached an RFP. Never send doc or docx files. In fact, never send anything that's not a PDF or postscript file if you want people to actually read what you've sent. Best, Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/EC2C9934 https://samwhited.com/contact
Re: [Radiant] Website down
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jim Gay wrote: > We're working on upgrading it to patch the Rails vulnerability. > Ah, I should have known. Thanks! —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/EC2C9934 https://samwhited.com/contact
[Radiant] Website down
In case no one has noticed, the website is currently down (lots of "undefined tag" errors all over the place). —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/EC2C9934 https://samwhited.com/contact
Re: [Radiant] change admin url
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:34 PM, goodluckpaul wrote: > Is it possible to change the URL to the admin interface? > (/admin to /somethingnotsoobvious) > On a semi-offtopic note: Security by obscurity is never a good idea, and won't help at all. Don't bother. Instead, choose a strong passphrase and always use SSL. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/EC2C9934 SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Hard Work - To install a radiant extension!
> Someone knows what is happening? What extension is it? Any error messages? —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Radiant 1.0 installation
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:17 AM, goodluckpaul wrote: > Hello guys, Hi > - Now I'm not sure WHERE to install radiant: in /home/USER/ or > /home/USER/www > either way, it doesn't work for me; but wouldn't it be more secure to NOT > install it in www but just symlink from there?! > No, a soft link won't add any sort of security. The only reason to symlink from a different directory would be for your convenience, and if the symlink points to a different drive some servers (apache2) will refuse to follow it. As for what path to put it in, that's entirely dependent on your server configuration. If you're running apache in a standard way, you can probably dig around in /etc/apache2/ (if you have access) until you find a config file where the path is set. > > - I think I don't know the right settings for the .htaccess and > environment.rb for getting my site running in the browser, how to redirect > the domain, and to which directory, etc > Can you stick those files in a gist or pastebin? > > Please tell me, what I should take care of! > Thanks, Paul What does the error say, what version of rails, ruby, bundler, etc. are you using, any other useful information? -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Rails 3
Sounds great; I've got a few minor patches and features lying around, but I've been waiting to learn more about where development will go from here to push them. I'm certainly looking forward to Rails 3 support, and will be interested to hear the results of the hack day. Best, Sam On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 15:41, Jim Gay wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Radiant development has been quiet, but it's still under development. > > I'm currently on a project using Radiant and planned to do a lot of > development to move it forward. Unfortunately the project I've > inherited had a lot of serious problems that need some major surgery. > This has kept me from pushing code for Radiant. > I've been doing some work to get to a place where we can move to Rails 3 > faster. > Tonight I'll be hacking with others at Arlington Ruby > (http://arlingtonruby.org) and will be working with people interested. > I've shared ideas about CMS with Patrick Peak of BrowserCMS and he'll > be there helping me move things along. > > My current plan is to make a new clean project and pull things into > the engine to eventually feedback to Radiant proper. I'll update the > mailing list with details soon. > > -Jim > > -- > Write intention revealing code #=> http://www.clean-ruby.com > > Jim Gay > Saturn Flyer LLC > 571-403-0338 -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Question on copying an install
Mark: Yah, SCP will work fine. No reason to install or use something else when you've got a perfectly good solution out of the box :) As for having a test environment there are a couple different ways you could go about it: 1. Assuming you're using a newer version of Radiant, you can set the dev address in the settings and setup a new subdomain that points to it (say dev.yoursite.com). You can then view the site at that subdomain to see any hidden pages. You'll want to password protect it or perform some sort of authentication to ensure that the public can't see your drafts, and this requires working on the production system which isn't a great idea. It's also limited to new pages, so it's probably not what you want. 2. If you're just doing work in the database you could just use Ruby's `TEST` and `DEVELOPMENT` environments. 3. Probably the best (and simplest) option is to just make a copy of your site / DB on your personal computer and use that. This way you don't have to touch the production server at all when testing and developing. I can't say I've ever used Heroku, but git is always your friend. I'm a firm believer that if a project has more than 0 maintainers it should be in a DVC system. —Sam On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:42, Mark L. wrote: > Thanks Sam. I have not worked with Linode, but have heard good things. I > hope this project will give me some exposure to their services. Any > suggestions on copying the stuff I need. I guess just SCP? > > Also, do you have any suggestions on a way for me to stage any changes I > make to the clients website so they would have a change to preview them > before I make changes on the actual server? > > I am used to working in a heroku/git environment, so I am fleshing out > exactly the best work to make changes to the clients site. > > > On Sunday, March 18, 2012 2:14:20 PM UTC-4, Sam Whited wrote: >> >> Mark: >> >> Yup, that should work fine. You'll also have to copy over the database >> (unless you're using sqlite or another file based solution). >> >> —Sam >> >> P.S. On a side note, you've gotta love Linode... easily one of the >> best companies I've ever worked with. >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 21:32, Mark L. wrote: >> > Hey folks! I have a client that is asking me to make some changes to >> > there web site which is build in Radiant. The server is running on >> > Linode. Once I get the login information to Linode I am thinking I >> > will want to pull a copy of the app to my local machine and use that >> > as a dev environment. >> > >> > My question is can I just copy the app folder to my local box and do >> > 'bundle install' to have a working copy of the web site? I there any >> > gotcha's I might run into? Any info appreciated. Thanx! >> >> -- >> Sam Whited >> pub 2048R/0DBB515F >> >> SamWhited.com >> s...@samwhited.com >> 404.492.6008 > > > On Sunday, March 18, 2012 2:14:20 PM UTC-4, Sam Whited wrote: >> >> Mark: >> >> Yup, that should work fine. You'll also have to copy over the database >> (unless you're using sqlite or another file based solution). >> >> —Sam >> >> P.S. On a side note, you've gotta love Linode... easily one of the >> best companies I've ever worked with. >> >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 21:32, Mark L. wrote: >> > Hey folks! I have a client that is asking me to make some changes to >> > there web site which is build in Radiant. The server is running on >> > Linode. Once I get the login information to Linode I am thinking I >> > will want to pull a copy of the app to my local machine and use that >> > as a dev environment. >> > >> > My question is can I just copy the app folder to my local box and do >> > 'bundle install' to have a working copy of the web site? I there any >> > gotcha's I might run into? Any info appreciated. Thanx! >> >> -- >> Sam Whited >> pub 2048R/0DBB515F >> >> SamWhited.com >> s...@samwhited.com >> 404.492.6008 -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Question on copying an install
Mark: Yup, that should work fine. You'll also have to copy over the database (unless you're using sqlite or another file based solution). —Sam P.S. On a side note, you've gotta love Linode... easily one of the best companies I've ever worked with. On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 21:32, Mark L. wrote: > Hey folks! I have a client that is asking me to make some changes to > there web site which is build in Radiant. The server is running on > Linode. Once I get the login information to Linode I am thinking I > will want to pull a copy of the app to my local machine and use that > as a dev environment. > > My question is can I just copy the app folder to my local box and do > 'bundle install' to have a working copy of the web site? I there any > gotcha's I might run into? Any info appreciated. Thanx! -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008
[Radiant] Re: Error after updating to 1.0 RC2
Wow. Took me ages to find, but I forgot to remove the old "assets" extension. Nevermind, silly mistake on my part. —Sam On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 20:49, Sam Whited wrote: > After updating to Radiant 1.0 RC2 I've begun having the following error > > "Duplicate config definition for 'assets.additional_thumbnails'. Are > you loading something twice?" > > when running most rake tasks (including migrations for new extensions). > > Has anyone else encountered this? A trace points me at config.rb, but > I assume it's being called from an extension. Logs provided no further > details. I'm assuming it's something to do with paperclipped. > > Best, > Sam > > -- > Sam Whited > pub 2048R/0DBB515F > > SamWhited.com > s...@samwhited.com > 404.492.6008 > > Georgia Institute of Technology > Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate > swhi...@gatech.edu > -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008 Georgia Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate swhi...@gatech.edu
[Radiant] Error after updating to 1.0 RC2
After updating to Radiant 1.0 RC2 I've begun having the following error "Duplicate config definition for 'assets.additional_thumbnails'. Are you loading something twice?" when running most rake tasks (including migrations for new extensions). Has anyone else encountered this? A trace points me at config.rb, but I assume it's being called from an extension. Logs provided no further details. I'm assuming it's something to do with paperclipped. Best, Sam -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008 Georgia Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate swhi...@gatech.edu
Re: [Radiant] admin taskbar
I don't know if this has been brought up in the past before or not, but I'm normally against such things. As convenient as they are for quickly editing pages and what not, I prefer to see the page exactly as the user sees it (without having to hit a preview button, or close the toolbar, etc.) Just my two cents. —Sam On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 14:35, Dave Akins wrote: > I'm really new to using Radiant, so apologize in advance if this has been > asked. > I searched, but didn't find anything... > > Has anyone looked at having a task bar appear at the top of your pages when > logged in as admin? > > I'm thinking along the lines of the one Concrete5 uses. > It has buttons for edit page, add page (add a child page), dashboard, etc. > I can see having buttons dependent on extensions such as add tags. > > Thanks in advance, > Thanks to all who have worked to get Radiant so great. > Looking forward to the 1.0 release. > > -- > God Bless > WizarDave Akins > Webmaster http://jabi.com Just Another Bright Idea > > -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com 404.492.6008 Georgia Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate swhi...@gatech.edu
Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter
Done. See: https://github.com/radiant/radiant/pull/174 Thanks again for your help and for pointing me in the right direction Jim. Best, Sam On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 08:07, Jim Gay wrote: > Sam, > > Can you fork the project on github and send a pull request? > http://help.github.com/forking/ > http://help.github.com/pull-requests/ > > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Sam Whited wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> On 12/6/2010 22:35, Jim Gay wrote: >>>> A well-tested patch would be applied, for sure. Or, if you can't do >>>> that, make an issue for it https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues >> >> How about something like this? >> It appears to be working for me and is not causing any problems (it >> shouldn't, it's a grand total of 3 lines of code). It simply adds the >> 'defaults.snippet.filter' option which works exactly the same as >> 'defaults.page.filter'. >> >> I'll forward this over to radiant-dev once I get a bit of feedback (I've >> never submitted a patch for Radiant before, so I'd like to read up on >> all policies and procedures first and make sure I do the thing properly, >> even for a patch as simple as this one). >> >> Best, >> Sam >> >> - -- >> Sam Whited >> pub 2048R/0DBB515F >> >> SamWhited.com >> s...@samwhited.com >> >> Georgia Institute of Technology >> Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate >> swhi...@gatech.edu >> 404.492.6008 >> > > -- > Jim Gay > Saturn Flyer LLC > http://www.saturnflyer.com > 571-403-0338 > -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com Georgia Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate swhi...@gatech.edu 404.492.6008
Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Darn, that's embarrassing. Here's the file. On 12/7/2010 01:23, Sam Whited wrote: > > On 12/6/2010 22:35, Jim Gay wrote: >>> A well-tested patch would be applied, for sure. Or, if you can't do >>> that, make an issue for it https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues > > How about something like this? > It appears to be working for me and is not causing any problems (it > shouldn't, it's a grand total of 3 lines of code). It simply adds the > 'defaults.snippet.filter' option which works exactly the same as > 'defaults.page.filter'. > > I'll forward this over to radiant-dev once I get a bit of feedback (I've > never submitted a patch for Radiant before, so I'd like to read up on > all policies and procedures first and make sure I do the thing properly, > even for a patch as simple as this one). > > Best, > Sam > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM/dMlAAoJEHjfG+UNu1Ff9lsIAK7SK9u49fV5U58Qlf4ldFtr 1UPs/u8QO/4mNdfzZHftZRDhlg5G62v58asJpSJIPtV8ZcSpyNunxS12jKZwNyXy ml8FK7UDDpCKvCK0p1KY0Ip6ztDEzAS/cMJhuTV+ny+5V9mwiWZtLjp/mY82I8pw Qh0g5d25CHc5oGWt69MlOwwUUJadllbl4MDp5sNs2F4BcDx6ZyeAnvjUrnaLdfk0 x9x7brAr7APuFCRiaKxxqgYasUO5pJt847uO+2RGrjaU6YUrIdqFg/D4ZsINipaB ef6s0Gh6nYf5QU9tR/UQrFiN1nYp/L4jPGkA7fVUBcuHCnioqCePPcZeOcsPjH8= =iB5o -END PGP SIGNATURE- >From 1e5f8099926200467cfbf26c9f636ce214102bd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Samuel Whited Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 01:10:30 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Added a config option 'defaults.snippet.filter' to set the default filter for snippets --- app/models/snippet.rb |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/models/snippet.rb b/app/models/snippet.rb index 4c8d196..2f1df43 100644 --- a/app/models/snippet.rb +++ b/app/models/snippet.rb @@ -16,4 +16,8 @@ class Snippet < ActiveRecord::Base object_id_attr :filter, TextFilter + def after_initialize +self.filter_id ||= Radiant::Config['defaults.snippet.filter'] if new_record? + end + end -- 1.7.0.4 defaults_snippet_filter_config.diff.sig Description: Binary data
Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/6/2010 22:35, Jim Gay wrote: >> A well-tested patch would be applied, for sure. Or, if you can't do >> that, make an issue for it https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues How about something like this? It appears to be working for me and is not causing any problems (it shouldn't, it's a grand total of 3 lines of code). It simply adds the 'defaults.snippet.filter' option which works exactly the same as 'defaults.page.filter'. I'll forward this over to radiant-dev once I get a bit of feedback (I've never submitted a patch for Radiant before, so I'd like to read up on all policies and procedures first and make sure I do the thing properly, even for a patch as simple as this one). Best, Sam - -- Sam Whited pub 2048R/0DBB515F SamWhited.com s...@samwhited.com Georgia Institute of Technology Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate swhi...@gatech.edu 404.492.6008 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM/dLQAAoJEHjfG+UNu1Ff2IUH+wcwkIFEaXWeKvoS9vnZmv9l n/x+jgwclhLq+KfYduSmZ0+4kSZ5NqeMM6OHbTYmm9yVouPIaDDbtRA5rKHk1jHM Rnc4CbVHvjJNpsUFMkgFl4TXYN07oRou44/ishnAaPO5BT2sWoCBof84FJcB9+52 ZuanhHAZLi2M/aTvzCwywWPxozMHHT319trCBdudftJfSo9dZJb4cVxp/uAyT1Xa rz2HBTo3WmZ9rfavnbfft7KmvWhfkAUL1gk4t86RS+JDxBdoBcfHHE2+xBHPuNLj sknt0ZqGJJqpPRHzDgd3KqJtTpEjqMqBZGgSO4bhUUOzPellV4k6bzEzD1u2y2c= =/Dez -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Radiant] Wordpress versus Radiant
The two are designed for different purposes. It all depends what you need. Radiant is a very minimalist CMS, while Wordpress has much more functionality out of the box (most of which can be obtained in Radiant by using plugins). Wordperss is also more of a blogging-platform-turned-CMS. So you'll probably find that Wordpress isn't what you want unless you're running a blog. However, I've seen it used for normal websites as well. What are your specific needs? I'd say that you probably want Wordpress if you need a lot of user interaction and feedback (comments and the like), and Radiant if you want a more static website. Of course, this does not cover the technical differences which are substantial. I don't know if this is something you are interested in, but if so, let us know. Best, Sam On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:02, Mohit Sindhwani wrote: > Any opinions about Wordpress versus Radiant? This issue came up recently in > the office and since I'm not familiar with Wordpress much, I thought it > would be better to ask if anyone here has an opinion. > > Any comments will be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Mohit. > 29/11/2010 | 10:02 PM. > >
[Radiant] Default snippets filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone know if there is an option to set the default filter for
snippets in Radiant 0.9.0?
I've got my default pages filter set ('defaults.page.filter') so I
thought there might be a similar option for snippets
('defaults.snippets.filter' or similar) but nothing I've tried has
worked, and I can find no information about it online.
Thanks,
Sam
- --
Sam Whited
pub 2048R/0DBB515F
SamWhited.com
s...@samwhited.com
Georgia Institute of Technology
Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate
swhi...@gatech.edu
404.492.6008
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJM44OuAAoJEHjfG+UNu1FfPkoH/3LVG+nXcjlfRiL6zGdSNzeV
5t02cnmCOTZ9rJGFX/lxWsY6oS2al+agUP3/pnjIByDb9aK/PeK6lQzKXLH9+qXw
1jkMiacy568sbdyZ6qKIU2h+KUCcNYQjVXxH4rssNoRsacsItwRKMFTOCHubpivo
nfSsJ6MSJu/WrjGMSYHIlWd2Mvo4CBHWopmjMHFpjDaN3mXQZ/t0tSSoYBDzLCdg
qMHLOcBLOb/F92FREZ+qa5VorMzaqHESrF/kln4TWIsY9/Oke+dSe5iz4F8in7XZ
u6wVzNI3z3Hpj1v1FLePASR2uX/I6U6bsAu+e70kMirYS0CIMBMYq2hRNGeNRhY=
=fI0+
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
