On 22.1.2016 1.22, Barry Ard wrote:
> We have recently migrated our RADIUS wireless infrastructure to use our
> F5 load balancers. We have effectively moved from 2 big iron radius
> servers with many radiator processes to 15 VMs and 2 redundant F5s doing
> the proxying. It has been working very well since Christmas. What I
> haven't figured out is how to include our Eduroam configs. Do we have to
> get away from our NATed f5 config and go to routed?
>
> Any direction would be greatly appreciated.
I thought I'd check if you have received any answers on this. I don't
have any specific advice, but maybe you could describe what/how the
eduroam config is problematic with the NATed configuration. Are the
eduroam root servers expecting to see Radiator server addresses directly
instead of F5 IPs?
Thanks,
Heikki
--
Heikki Vatiainen
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. SQL, proxy, DBM, files, LDAP, NIS+, password, NT, Emerald,
Platypus, Freeside, TACACS+, PAM, external, Active Directory, EAP, TLS,
TTLS, PEAP, TNC, WiMAX, RSA, Vasco, Yubikey, MOTP, HOTP, TOTP,
DIAMETER etc. Full source on Unix, Windows, MacOSX, Solaris, VMS,
NetWare etc.
___
radiator mailing list
radiator@open.com.au
http://www.open.com.au/mailman/listinfo/radiator
