Re: [Vote] renaming the project to creadur
+1 non binding I like that name very much On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Hugo Hirsch wrote: > Hi, > > as pointed out before let's start voting to rename the project to > 'creadur'. > > +1 > Hugo > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
Re: Top Level Project Name
Apache Creadur is an excellent name, I loved it immediately. It has reminded me a bit on the Harry Potter Character "Kreacher": http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Kreacher Guess, Apache Creadur could have an house elf logo too - at least it is working for free and is very loyal! Cheers Christian On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > Completing the suitable name search seems to be the major obstacle to > graduation. I suspect that "Rat" will prove not unique enough to be a > suitable top level project name. > > "Creadur" means creature or animal in Welsh, a language which has some > sentimental significance to me and which hasn't been mined out for > software names. If "Apache Rat" turns out to be unsuitable, how about > "Apache Creadur" as the top level project name? (with Rat, Tentacles, > Whiskers and so on, of course) > > Robert > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: Graduation TODO?
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On 08/30/11 11:43, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What needs doing? >>>> >>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html >>> >>> :-) >>> >>> Working through that list... >>> >>> The status file [1] looks ok to me (modulo the broken source link which >>> I'll >>> fix). Can anyone else find any issues with it? >>> >> >> One of the best cared status files I daresay. >> >> What is with this one: >> "Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and >> check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already >> trademarked for an existing software product." >> >> My assumption is this already has happened, there just no sign off at the >> item > > Probably. Not sure whether the wording correlates with the new trademark and > branding policy. Work on a website meeting these guidelines is needed, so > I'll pick this up as part of that exercise. Actually I think you made a good point. The status page of the incubator podling should reflect a new item with "Are the ASF branding requirements fulfilled" or something like that. I will bring that up on the incubator list.
Re: Graduation TODO?
>>> What needs doing? >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html > > :-) > > Working through that list... > > The status file [1] looks ok to me (modulo the broken source link which I'll > fix). Can anyone else find any issues with it? > One of the best cared status files I daresay. What is with this one: "Make sure that the requested project name does not already exist and check www.nameprotect.com to be sure that the name is not already trademarked for an existing software product." My assumption is this already has happened, there just no sign off at the item
Re: Graduation TODO?
Hi On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > What needs doing? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html Cheers
Re: Future For Rat...?
> Stefan Bodewig: > To me it sounds as if you are looking for a home for "a bunch of scripts > we use around the release process". Something we don't really have, so > a new TLP seems more appropriate - if we have and keep the momentum. > This new TLP would likely be more focussed on users that are expected to > use trunk versions of the scripts than to have releases - no realy end > users at all, this is quite similar to Gump. Hm sounds good. Recently I wrote a small bash script together with Simone Tripodi for checking release sigs and md5 hashes. We discussed a few minutes if we could store it somewhere at the ASF but could not find a place. Now everybody of us has its own copy. If there would be a "release" top level project collecting rat and scripts like this, i think it would be interesting. I guess there are many tools around like this.
Re: Future For Rat...?
> I agree that the current code base is too small for a TLP but it's been > hard to find anywhere suitable. Maybe we need to think now about > creating a suitable TLP for this code base and other similar stuff. You don't think Commons would fit? Just curious :-)
Re: Custom license
I am a Maven User :-) Cool service, thanks :-) On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Give me a few days and nag me, if you don't here from me. Which one do > you need first: Ant, Maven, or CLI? > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> What you said all makes sense. This is a killer feature >> >>> Are you interested to give this a try? >> >> Yes, but I have no cycles left to code this myself at the moment :-((( >> >> Thanks and thanks for the @since email too! >> Cheers >> Christian >> >> >>> >>> >>> Jochen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier >>> wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> is RAT already able to check for a custom license? >>>> >>>> The license of my customer is a text block in at java doc class level >>>> (first lines). >>>> >>>> I would love to use RAT for this - is it supported? >>>> >>>> Also @since tags are necessary. Is it better to use checkstyle for this? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Christian >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.grobmeier.de >> > > > > -- > I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) > -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Re: Custom license
What you said all makes sense. This is a killer feature > Are you interested to give this a try? Yes, but I have no cycles left to code this myself at the moment :-((( Thanks and thanks for the @since email too! Cheers Christian > > > Jochen > > > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> is RAT already able to check for a custom license? >> >> The license of my customer is a text block in at java doc class level >> (first lines). >> >> I would love to use RAT for this - is it supported? >> >> Also @since tags are necessary. Is it better to use checkstyle for this? >> >> Cheers, >> Christian >> > > > > -- > I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) > -- http://www.grobmeier.de
Custom license
Hello, is RAT already able to check for a custom license? The license of my customer is a text block in at java doc class level (first lines). I would love to use RAT for this - is it supported? Also @since tags are necessary. Is it better to use checkstyle for this? Cheers, Christian
