[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-08 Thread Jim M.
On Friday, February 7, 2014 10:24:30 PM UTC-8, bingomck wrote:

 Jim, all Roadeos are .65/.45/.65, or just the smaller sizes? 


My knowledge is limited to having seen the order form Riv sent to the 
builder for the first batch, and they were all the same. They may have 
changed since then. 

It wasn't that unusual back in the day. For example, '80s Merckx Corsas are 
full Columbus SL regardless of size, whereas '80s Paramounts were a mix of 
SL/SP in the larger sizes.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-07 Thread bingomck
Jim, all Roadeos are .65/.45/.65, or just the smaller sizes? 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-04 Thread Chris Lampe 2
I THINK I've seen the tubing thickness for the AHH but I don't remember the 
exact numbers.  I do remember that I was surprised because it was thinner 
tubing than I expected but I do think the AHH stats are out there.  I don't 
recall seeing the Roadeo numbers. 



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:11:38 AM UTC-6, Michael wrote:

 Anyone know the diffs between the tube wall thicknesses and weight of 
 these bikes.?

 I was reading a BQ blog post comment that mentioned the Homer and Roadeo 
 and that BQ was interested in testing the Roadeo because it looked like a 
 light performance designed bike, with a mention of tubes.
 It was an old post from 2011. Wonder if they ever tested it.

 I am guessing they were probably interested in the planeing possibilities, 
 maybe suggesting that thinner tubes make plane-ing possible, or 
 responsiveness possible.

 I am guessing that if there is a diff between the two bikes, it is a mm 
 at whatever thicknesses.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-04 Thread Chris Lampe 2
I did a little searching.  I'm pretty sure I've seen the AHH tubing 
thicknesses in print but I don't remember exactly what they were.  I'm 
thinking .7-.5-.7 or in that ball park.  I found a thread on another forum 
where a poster quotes Grant as specifying the Roadeo having  .65-.45-.65 
tubing.  I found a Riv article stating the Atlantis is .9-.6.-.9.   Riv's 
website states the Sam Hillborne is in between the Atlantis  AHH in tubing 
thickness so if  Atlantis is 9-6-9  Roadeo is 6-4-6, that leaves the 
Hillborne at 8-5-8  the AHH at 7-4-7 or roughly where I was thinking it 
was.  



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:11:38 AM UTC-6, Michael wrote:

 Anyone know the diffs between the tube wall thicknesses and weight of 
 these bikes.?

 I was reading a BQ blog post comment that mentioned the Homer and Roadeo 
 and that BQ was interested in testing the Roadeo because it looked like a 
 light performance designed bike, with a mention of tubes.
 It was an old post from 2011. Wonder if they ever tested it.

 I am guessing they were probably interested in the planeing possibilities, 
 maybe suggesting that thinner tubes make plane-ing possible, or 
 responsiveness possible.

 I am guessing that if there is a diff between the two bikes, it is a mm 
 at whatever thicknesses.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


RE: [RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-04 Thread Allingham II, Thomas J
The AHH tubing specs are listed in a Blug entry, I think a couple of years ago.

From: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Lampe 2
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:12 AM
To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: [RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

I did a little searching.  I'm pretty sure I've seen the AHH tubing thicknesses 
in print but I don't remember exactly what they were.  I'm thinking .7-.5-.7 or 
in that ball park.  I found a thread on another forum where a poster quotes 
Grant as specifying the Roadeo having  .65-.45-.65 tubing.  I found a Riv 
article stating the Atlantis is .9-.6.-.9.   Riv's website states the Sam 
Hillborne is in between the Atlantis  AHH in tubing thickness so if  Atlantis 
is 9-6-9  Roadeo is 6-4-6, that leaves the Hillborne at 8-5-8  the AHH at 
7-4-7 or roughly where I was thinking it was.



On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 9:11:38 AM UTC-6, Michael wrote:
Anyone know the diffs between the tube wall thicknesses and weight of these 
bikes.?

I was reading a BQ blog post comment that mentioned the Homer and Roadeo and 
that BQ was interested in testing the Roadeo because it looked like a light 
performance designed bike, with a mention of tubes.
It was an old post from 2011. Wonder if they ever tested it.

I am guessing they were probably interested in the planeing possibilities, 
maybe suggesting that thinner tubes make plane-ing possible, or responsiveness 
possible.

I am guessing that if there is a diff between the two bikes, it is a mm at 
whatever thicknesses.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.commailto:rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.commailto:rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--


To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you that, 
unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this 
message was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the 
purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code 
or applicable state or local tax law provisions or (ii) promoting, marketing or 
recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.



This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the 
addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, 
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this 
email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. If you receive this 
email in error please immediately notify me at (212) 735-3000 and permanently 
delete the original email (and any copy of any email) and any printout thereof.

Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their 
professional qualifications will be provided upon request.

==

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-04 Thread Mike Schiller
The Hilsens are 8/5/8 OS tubing as are the Roadeos in larger sizes.  The 
smaller Roadeo's are 7/4/7 OS. If I recall correctly.  Much stiffer than 
anything Jan likes.

~mike

On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 7:11:38 AM UTC-8, Michael wrote:

 Anyone know the diffs between the tube wall thicknesses and weight of 
 these bikes.?

 I was reading a BQ blog post comment that mentioned the Homer and Roadeo 
 and that BQ was interested in testing the Roadeo because it looked like a 
 light performance designed bike, with a mention of tubes.
 It was an old post from 2011. Wonder if they ever tested it.

 I am guessing they were probably interested in the planeing possibilities, 
 maybe suggesting that thinner tubes make plane-ing possible, or 
 responsiveness possible.

 I am guessing that if there is a diff between the two bikes, it is a mm 
 at whatever thicknesses.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


[RBW] Re: Roadeo vs. Homer tube thickness and weight

2014-02-04 Thread Jim M.

On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:52:07 AM UTC-8, Mike Schiller wrote:

 The Hilsens are 8/5/8 OS tubing as are the Roadeos in larger sizes.  The 
 smaller Roadeo's are 7/4/7 OS. If I recall correctly.  Much stiffer than 
 anything Jan likes.



Not to split hairs too finely, but the Roadeo's are .65/.45/65.

jim m
wc ca

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.