[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-19 Thread Patrick in VT
On May 18, 8:23 pm, Rene Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm 5'11. It seems to me that I might have a shorter torso but long arms
 and long legs. However, I've never been able to figure it out... :-)

not sure about the long legs - your saddle height (76.5) seems a touch
low for a leggy 5'11.

I could place the handlebar below the saddle... Oh wait! That's how I rode 
pre-Rivendell and I had the hand, neck and shoulder pain...

there are many variables involved in a good bike fit.   lots and lots
and lots of folks ride with the bars below the saddle with zero
problems.  not meaning to take away from the bars-up approach, but
it's not the only way to be comfortable on a bike.

have you considered a professional bike fitting?  it's not cheap, but
some folks really benefit from that.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread Rene Sterental
I have an 89.5 PBH and the 60 Bombadil feels pretty high up there. As I
try bigger tires on the Bombadil, my concerns grow to the point I'm now
starting to have second thoughts. I ride a 61 AHH and it fits perfectly; I'm
actually considering a 61 Atlantis now... just thinking!

René

  On May 11, 7:59 pm, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
  Im definately going with the 63cm Hilsen, and I just ordered a 60
  Bombadil. Thanks for your input.
  jamison
 


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread jamison brosseau
I actually got my 63cm hilsen, and i have just over an inch of space,
the top tube fits perfectly.  I really think a 61 would have been too
small for me, and would have been close to not being able to get my
bars higher than my saddle.  my saddle height is right at 79, i'm not
too worried about the 60cm bombadil,  most of the time i will have one
foot on the peddle when i stop, and that gives me even more room.
its funny that i was so worried about the size at the time, i remeber
as a kid riding my dads schwinn world tour that was way too big for
me, i rode it off road, on mountain biking trails, and did small dirt
jumps with it . i wasn't even tall enough to sit on the saddle.  had
to stand the whole time.  never hurt myself once, until i tried to
drop in with it on tom jone's half pipe.  any how i wouldn't ride a
bike that big now, but i had fun didn't get hurt.
i guess two extra centimeters doesn't meen too much to me.
if your thinking atlantis, what about the hunquapillar?
jamison

On May 18, 6:40 pm, Rene Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:
 I have an 89.5 PBH and the 60 Bombadil feels pretty high up there. As I
 try bigger tires on the Bombadil, my concerns grow to the point I'm now
 starting to have second thoughts. I ride a 61 AHH and it fits perfectly; I'm
 actually considering a 61 Atlantis now... just thinking!

 René

   On May 11, 7:59 pm, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

   Im definately going with the 63cm Hilsen, and I just ordered a 60
   Bombadil. Thanks for your input.
   jamison

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread Rene Sterental
My saddle height on both bikes is set at 76.5cm; with your saddle height I
do agree that standover with the 60 Bombadil should not be an issue. I
haven't hurt myself, but I always get very conscious of the top tube height
when straddling the bike, especially if wearing sandals... :-)

I don't quite feel atracted to the Hunqa... can't really say why... if I
ended up swapping frames, I think I'd be more comfortable with the Atlantis.
It's a bike that is somehow growing on me after my intial reaction of
rejection during my pre-Riv days... :-)

I do love my Bombadil, in the end, perhaps I'll just keep it and just ride
it with up to 700x50 tires to keep the standover height manageable.

René

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread jamison brosseau
its funny cause the atlantis was the first riv bike i was interested
in.  i plan on getting another next year, but am afraid the 61 would
be too small.  when i was concerned about the 61 vs 63 Keven suggested
i just ride the 63 for a while and see what i thought.  I couldn't be
happier.  Out of curiosity how tall are you.  I am 6 ft even.
thanks jamison

On May 18, 7:40 pm, Rene Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:
 My saddle height on both bikes is set at 76.5cm; with your saddle height I
 do agree that standover with the 60 Bombadil should not be an issue. I
 haven't hurt myself, but I always get very conscious of the top tube height
 when straddling the bike, especially if wearing sandals... :-)

 I don't quite feel atracted to the Hunqa... can't really say why... if I
 ended up swapping frames, I think I'd be more comfortable with the Atlantis.
 It's a bike that is somehow growing on me after my intial reaction of
 rejection during my pre-Riv days... :-)

 I do love my Bombadil, in the end, perhaps I'll just keep it and just ride
 it with up to 700x50 tires to keep the standover height manageable.

 René

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread EricP
This is an interesting conversation.  Every time I think about getting
an even bigger frame, end up thinking more about reach more than
standover.  Based on these statements, I should be trying a 63cm
frame.  Yet about a year and a half ago straddled a 62 orange
Quickbeam.  The reach was so far my arms were fully extended on the
hoods.  Couldn't really even get to the drops.

Maybe that bike had an unusually long stem.  But to get that bike to
work for me, would probably need a 7 or 8cm stem.

Eric Platt
St. Paul, MN

On May 18, 7:10�pm, jamison brosseau jamison.bross...@gmail.com
wrote:
 its funny cause the atlantis was the first riv bike i was interested
 in. �i plan on getting another next year, but am afraid the 61 would
 be too small. �when i was concerned about the 61 vs 63 Keven suggested
 i just ride the 63 for a while and see what i thought. �I couldn't be
 happier. �Out of curiosity how tall are you. �I am 6 ft even.
 thanks jamison

 On May 18, 7:40�pm, Rene Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:





  My saddle height on both bikes is set at 76.5cm; with your saddle height I
  do agree that standover with the 60 Bombadil should not be an issue. I
  haven't hurt myself, but I always get very conscious of the top tube height
  when straddling the bike, especially if wearing sandals... :-)

  I don't quite feel atracted to the Hunqa... can't really say why... if I
  ended up swapping frames, I think I'd be more comfortable with the Atlantis.
  It's a bike that is somehow growing on me after my intial reaction of
  rejection during my pre-Riv days... :-)

  I do love my Bombadil, in the end, perhaps I'll just keep it and just ride
  it with up to 700x50 tires to keep the standover height manageable.

  Ren�

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-18 Thread Rene Sterental
I'm 5'11. It seems to me that I might have a shorter torso but long arms
and long legs. However, I've never been able to figure it out... :-)

When I went for my first fit, they immediately put me on the 61 AHH and also
had me test ride the Atlantis, I believe the 61 as well. I initially thought
the 61 AHH was too big (coming from where I was coming from) so Mark had me
test ride Grant's 58 AHH. After I did that, I realized the 61 was a better
fit and trusted them from then on.

When I decided I also wanted a Bombadil, Keven said the 60. He even had me
try out the 64, but I trusted them again. After I got my 60 frame and built
it up, I was initially concerned with the standover height as I had had to
adpat to the higher standover height on the AHH compared to my previoius
bikes, but had had no issues with the AHH. I even went back and they offered
to take it back, but after test riding the 56, I found it too cramped and
said I was keeping my 60.

That is my story and I'm sticking to it! :-)

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:10 PM, jamison brosseau 
jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

 its funny cause the atlantis was the first riv bike i was interested
 in.  i plan on getting another next year, but am afraid the 61 would
 be too small.  when i was concerned about the 61 vs 63 Keven suggested
 i just ride the 63 for a while and see what i thought.  I couldn't be
 happier.  Out of curiosity how tall are you.  I am 6 ft even.
 thanks jamison

 On May 18, 7:40 pm, Rene Sterental orthie...@gmail.com wrote:
   My saddle height on both bikes is set at 76.5cm; with your saddle
 height I
  do agree that standover with the 60 Bombadil should not be an issue. I
  haven't hurt myself, but I always get very conscious of the top tube
 height
  when straddling the bike, especially if wearing sandals... :-)
 
  I don't quite feel atracted to the Hunqa... can't really say why... if I
  ended up swapping frames, I think I'd be more comfortable with the
 Atlantis.
  It's a bike that is somehow growing on me after my intial reaction of
  rejection during my pre-Riv days... :-)
 
  I do love my Bombadil, in the end, perhaps I'll just keep it and just
 ride
  it with up to 700x50 tires to keep the standover height manageable.
 
  René
 
   --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
  For more options, visit this group athttp://
 groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-16 Thread Blindrobert
I have a 63 for sale, with SS couplers - if you haven't already
ordered the new one!

On May 11, 7:59 pm, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
 Im definately going with the 63cm Hilsen, and I just ordered a 60
 Bombadil. Thanks for your input.
 jamison

 On May 11, 5:34 pm, wile dylanmcner...@yahoo.com wrote:





  Oh yeah - stem is 9cm.

  On May 11, 1:03 pm, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:

   On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, wile dylanmcner...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a PBH of 89 and ride a 63cm AHH.  I was given the exact same
option from Rivendell - either 61 or 63 would work.  However, Rich
advised me that with handlebars set up the same way (shorter stem on
the 63), the 63 would handle better.  I'm very happy with the 63.  I
have a small handful of seatpost showing - 3 or so, and with the stem
sticking 2 out of the headset, both are level.  The top of the seat
and the crook of the stem are both about 6 above the top tube and the
bike looks perfectly proportioned.  I think if I raise the stem up to
the max, it ends up about 2 above the top of the saddle.  I ride 40c
Schwalbe Marathons and ride the bike mostly for commuting.  Keep in
mind that when you stop and put a foot down at lights, etc. you have
even more standover height because one foot is up on the pedal.

   Dylan,
    if you wouldn't mind, just to humor me - measure from the tip of your
   saddle to the middle of the flats on your handlebars.

   I'm curious what that distance is.

   thanks
   -sv

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group 
   athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread happyriding
Hi tucker,

The standover for the 63 Hilsen is listed as 88.8.  Anyone can ride a
frame with a standover equal to their pbh when road riding.
Typically, Rivendell lists a standover measured with the biggest tires
the bike can handle.  The Hilsen geometry chart lists the biggest tire
as 43mm.  If you are going to run 35 mm tires, then the standover will
be 88.0 cm.  In addition, when you wear cycling shoes, you gain about
2 cm in height, so your pbh of 89 cm + 2 cm = 91 cm is 3 cm higher
than the 88 cm standover of the Hilsen equipped with 35mmm tires.
That is more than enough clearance for anyone.

If you want to get the bars up near the saddle height, you should
consider buying the biggest frame you can standover--then you won't
have to use a high rise stem to get the bars up even with the saddle.
Unfortunately, the Hilsen's have really long top tubes.  Grant will
argue that they don't.  But I argue that they really do.  So while the
large size will allow you to use a lower stem height, you might have
to use a short, stubby 6 cm stem length.  The top tube plus stem
length will determine the reach to the bars--although you do have to
make some adjustments when comparing the Hilsen to your current bike
due to the differences in seat tube angle, etc.  On the other hand,
the adjustments can cancel each other out, and in that case a direct
comparison is possible.

A 6cm stem may be right at your maximum reach, which means you would
have no room to adjust shorter.  The only thing you could do is raise
the bars higher to get the handlebars to move closer to you.

Ok, so maybe that will persuade you to get the smaller frame.  The
smaller frame will have a shorter top tube, which means you can use a
little longer stem, say 8cm long, but now you will have to raise the
stem higher to get the bars even with the top of the saddle.  An 8cm
stem will give you some leeway to adjust  for shorter or longer
reach.  You can switch to a 6 cm stem for less reach or to a 10 cm
stem for more reach.  Of course you can always raise and lower an 8 cm
stem to adjust your reach as well.

If the top tube length on the larger Hilsen doesn't scare you, I would
get the larger size.  The standover is a non-issue.  If you want to
test out how the 88 cm standover will feel, put some books under the
tires of your current bike (or a friend's bike) until the middle of
the top tube is 88cm above the ground.  Then put on some cycling shoes
and straddle the top tube.  Also keep in mind that just leaning the
bike slightly to the side will provide even more clearance.








-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread Mike
I have a PBH of 91, SH of 80 and a 63cm Hilsen with a 10cm stem just a
touch below the saddle. It's my favorite fitting bike. I also have a
62 Ram which is a touch small and a 64 QB which is a tad big. Given
these three bikes I feel like it's easy to comment on going small, big
and perfect. well, perfect speaks for itself right. It appears you're
in-between sizes. I say go big! But call Riv and talk to them.

My QB has Panaracer T-Serve 700x35 and a higher BB height but I still
have enough SO height. On my Hilsen I've ridden tires from 32 to 41
and SO has never been a problem.

I can't stress this enough, call the folks at Riv and discuss it with
them. They're sooo nice and helpful.

--mike

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread tucker
Thanks everyone,
I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

On May 11, 1:40 am, amoll68 amol...@comcast.net wrote:
 Hi Tucker,

 It's worth obsessing over. I imagine you're wishing for a 62?

 This 63cm AHH with 35mm Supremes, has a stand over height just under
 87cm (measured just forward of the BB 
 spindle):http://www.flickr.com/photos/39151...@n07/sets/72157622960184871/

 My PBH is around 91, and BB to center of my Brooks B17 is 80cm (I ride
 with sit bones on the higher back end of the saddle.) The stem is 9cm,
 approximately level with the saddle, and H-bars are 48 Nitto Noodles -
 which reminds me that the TT length on the 63 is 1.5cm longer than the
 61. Gotta think about that fit, too. I have a relatively long torso,
 and this setup feels dialed in to me. (I'm 6' 3, if that helps at
 all.) 64cm is a good size for me also, and I even have a porteur style
 bike that's about a 66 - but that has swept back bars.

 Depending on your torso and that TT length, I'd lean toward the bigger
 size myself. Have you called RBW?

 Good luck!

 Alex
 Seattle, WA

 On May 10, 9:21 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:



  I'm 89 PBH, and have two 61cm frames.  If you like your bars to be at saddle
  height with a normal stem, that'll work fine.  If you want them higher and
  don't want to use a Dirt Drop type stem, go with the 63 IMHO.

  That said, if I was getting an AHH, I'd get a 63.

  On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
   Hi all, my PBH is 89 and I'm trying to decide between a 63 or 61 A
   Homer Hilsen.  Someone told me the listed standovers are a bit high.
   I will be running the bike with 35 mm tires, or 23-24 wide rims.
   anyone have any experience with this or the true standover of a 63
   frame, or with sizing up in general.  I know this has been covered a
   bit here, but i can't help obsessing over this purchase.  thanks.

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2Bunsubscrib
e...@googlegroups.com
   .
   For more options, visit this group at
  http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  Cheers,
  David
  Redlands, CA

  Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
  wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
  scientist guy

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread MKahrl
I also have a PBH of 89cm and ride a 61cm AHH with the handlebars
level with the seat.  I had been using a 90mm stem but now I use 120
and it's much better.

On May 11, 9:22 am, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks everyone,
 I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
 On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
 top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
 seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
 nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
 the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

 On May 11, 1:40 am, amoll68 amol...@comcast.net wrote:





  Hi Tucker,

  It's worth obsessing over. I imagine you're wishing for a 62?

  This 63cm AHH with 35mm Supremes, has a stand over height just under
  87cm (measured just forward of the BB 
  spindle):http://www.flickr.com/photos/39151...@n07/sets/72157622960184871/

  My PBH is around 91, and BB to center of my Brooks B17 is 80cm (I ride
  with sit bones on the higher back end of the saddle.) The stem is 9cm,
  approximately level with the saddle, and H-bars are 48 Nitto Noodles -
  which reminds me that the TT length on the 63 is 1.5cm longer than the
  61. Gotta think about that fit, too. I have a relatively long torso,
  and this setup feels dialed in to me. (I'm 6' 3, if that helps at
  all.) 64cm is a good size for me also, and I even have a porteur style
  bike that's about a 66 - but that has swept back bars.

  Depending on your torso and that TT length, I'd lean toward the bigger
  size myself. Have you called RBW?

  Good luck!

  Alex
  Seattle, WA

  On May 10, 9:21 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:

   I'm 89 PBH, and have two 61cm frames.  If you like your bars to be at 
   saddle
   height with a normal stem, that'll work fine.  If you want them higher 
   and
   don't want to use a Dirt Drop type stem, go with the 63 IMHO.

   That said, if I was getting an AHH, I'd get a 63.

   On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com 
   wrote:
Hi all, my PBH is 89 and I'm trying to decide between a 63 or 61 A
Homer Hilsen.  Someone told me the listed standovers are a bit high.
I will be running the bike with 35 mm tires, or 23-24 wide rims.
anyone have any experience with this or the true standover of a 63
frame, or with sizing up in general.  I know this has been covered a
bit here, but i can't help obsessing over this purchase.  thanks.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups
RBW Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2Bunsubscrib
 e...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

   --
   Cheers,
   David
   Redlands, CA

   Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
   wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
   scientist guy

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
   RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
   rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
   For more options, visit this group 
   athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread cyclotourist
I've found that w/ M-bars, you want the stem ~2cm shorter (closer) than you
would w/ drops.

YMMV



On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks everyone,
 I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
 On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
 top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
 seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
 nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
 the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

 On May 11, 1:40 am, amoll68 amol...@comcast.net wrote:
  Hi Tucker,
 
  It's worth obsessing over. I imagine you're wishing for a 62?
 
  This 63cm AHH with 35mm Supremes, has a stand over height just under
  87cm (measured just forward of the BB spindle):
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/39151...@n07/sets/72157622960184871/
 
  My PBH is around 91, and BB to center of my Brooks B17 is 80cm (I ride
  with sit bones on the higher back end of the saddle.) The stem is 9cm,
  approximately level with the saddle, and H-bars are 48 Nitto Noodles -
  which reminds me that the TT length on the 63 is 1.5cm longer than the
  61. Gotta think about that fit, too. I have a relatively long torso,
  and this setup feels dialed in to me. (I'm 6' 3, if that helps at
  all.) 64cm is a good size for me also, and I even have a porteur style
  bike that's about a 66 - but that has swept back bars.
 
  Depending on your torso and that TT length, I'd lean toward the bigger
  size myself. Have you called RBW?
 
  Good luck!
 
  Alex
  Seattle, WA
 
  On May 10, 9:21 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 
 
   I'm 89 PBH, and have two 61cm frames.  If you like your bars to be at
 saddle
   height with a normal stem, that'll work fine.  If you want them
 higher and
   don't want to use a Dirt Drop type stem, go with the 63 IMHO.
 
   That said, if I was getting an AHH, I'd get a 63.
 
   On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com
 wrote:
Hi all, my PBH is 89 and I'm trying to decide between a 63 or 61 A
Homer Hilsen.  Someone told me the listed standovers are a bit high.
I will be running the bike with 35 mm tires, or 23-24 wide rims.
anyone have any experience with this or the true standover of a 63
frame, or with sizing up in general.  I know this has been covered a
bit here, but i can't help obsessing over this purchase.  thanks.
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups
RBW Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2Bunsubscrib
 e...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at
   http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 
   --
   Cheers,
   David
   Redlands, CA
 
   Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is
 something
   wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill
 Nye,
   scientist guy
 
   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups RBW Owners Bunch group.
   To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
 .
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
   For more options, visit this group athttp://
 groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
 
  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
  For more options, visit this group athttp://
 groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.




-- 
Cheers,
David
Redlands, CA

Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
scientist guy

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 

[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread Patrick in VT
On May 11, 9:22 am, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks everyone,
 I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
 On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
 top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
 seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
 nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
 the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

with a saddle height 78.5, you're going to have very little seatpost
showing on a 63, so spend some time thinking about where you want the
bars.  assuming you don't want the bars at/above saddle height, you
might not be able to get the bars *low* enough with dirtdrop/m-bar set
up.

i recall seeing a rockin' AHH recently (maybe jinxed's?) - the
dirtdrop stem is fully inserted and the bars still look up for his
riding style (he rides stuff where it helps to have a bit of bar
drop).

and speaking of riding style ...  standover clearance is a personal
thing.  if you think you don't need it for whatever kind of riding
your doing, that's cool.i'm intimate with the top tubes on some of
my bikes too.  but, if you're going to be rough-riding, and anticipate
needing to put a foot down every now and then, especially in places
where it's not always convenient to put a foot down - standover
helps.  or, if you plan on loading up your hilsen for a tour of sorts
- having more standover helps.   and i can't imagine that you're going
to have much on a 63.  just something to consider.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread tucker
stocking feet pbh is 89, with sneakers on it moves up to 92.5.  I have
big feet (size 13).  The bike will mostly be ridden as a commuter in
NYC.  If the actual standover with 35mm tires is 87 or so, that would
give me 5.5 cm standover, over two inches.  If it follows that the 61
would have 85 standover on 35 mm tires, that would give me three
inches of standover, which seems like alot, for even a country bike.
On a 63 my saddle will be approximately 15.5 cm above the top tube,
that seems like i will get the requisite fistfull of post.  Maybe im
wrong, Im just afraid on the 61 i will have trouble getting the handle
bars a couple cm above the saddle.  thanks for all the input.

On May 11, 11:03 am, Patrick in VT psh...@drm.com wrote:
 On May 11, 9:22 am, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

  Thanks everyone,
  I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
  On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
  top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
  seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
  nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
  the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

 with a saddle height 78.5, you're going to have very little seatpost
 showing on a 63, so spend some time thinking about where you want the
 bars.  assuming you don't want the bars at/above saddle height, you
 might not be able to get the bars *low* enough with dirtdrop/m-bar set
 up.

 i recall seeing a rockin' AHH recently (maybe jinxed's?) - the
 dirtdrop stem is fully inserted and the bars still look up for his
 riding style (he rides stuff where it helps to have a bit of bar
 drop).

 and speaking of riding style ...  standover clearance is a personal
 thing.  if you think you don't need it for whatever kind of riding
 your doing, that's cool.    i'm intimate with the top tubes on some of
 my bikes too.  but, if you're going to be rough-riding, and anticipate
 needing to put a foot down every now and then, especially in places
 where it's not always convenient to put a foot down - standover
 helps.  or, if you plan on loading up your hilsen for a tour of sorts
 - having more standover helps.   and i can't imagine that you're going
 to have much on a 63.  just something to consider.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread wile
I have a PBH of 89 and ride a 63cm AHH.  I was given the exact same
option from Rivendell - either 61 or 63 would work.  However, Rich
advised me that with handlebars set up the same way (shorter stem on
the 63), the 63 would handle better.  I'm very happy with the 63.  I
have a small handful of seatpost showing - 3 or so, and with the stem
sticking 2 out of the headset, both are level.  The top of the seat
and the crook of the stem are both about 6 above the top tube and the
bike looks perfectly proportioned.  I think if I raise the stem up to
the max, it ends up about 2 above the top of the saddle.  I ride 40c
Schwalbe Marathons and ride the bike mostly for commuting.  Keep in
mind that when you stop and put a foot down at lights, etc. you have
even more standover height because one foot is up on the pedal.

Dylan

On May 11, 8:22 am, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
 stocking feet pbh is 89, with sneakers on it moves up to 92.5.  I have
 big feet (size 13).  The bike will mostly be ridden as a commuter in
 NYC.  If the actual standover with 35mm tires is 87 or so, that would
 give me 5.5 cm standover, over two inches.  If it follows that the 61
 would have 85 standover on 35 mm tires, that would give me three
 inches of standover, which seems like alot, for even a country bike.
 On a 63 my saddle will be approximately 15.5 cm above the top tube,
 that seems like i will get the requisite fistfull of post.  Maybe im
 wrong, Im just afraid on the 61 i will have trouble getting the handle
 bars a couple cm above the saddle.  thanks for all the input.

 On May 11, 11:03 am, Patrick in VT psh...@drm.com wrote:





  On May 11, 9:22 am, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

   Thanks everyone,
   I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
   On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
   top tup is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
   seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
   nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
   the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.

  with a saddle height 78.5, you're going to have very little seatpost
  showing on a 63, so spend some time thinking about where you want the
  bars.  assuming you don't want the bars at/above saddle height, you
  might not be able to get the bars *low* enough with dirtdrop/m-bar set
  up.

  i recall seeing a rockin' AHH recently (maybe jinxed's?) - the
  dirtdrop stem is fully inserted and the bars still look up for his
  riding style (he rides stuff where it helps to have a bit of bar
  drop).

  and speaking of riding style ...  standover clearance is a personal
  thing.  if you think you don't need it for whatever kind of riding
  your doing, that's cool.    i'm intimate with the top tubes on some of
  my bikes too.  but, if you're going to be rough-riding, and anticipate
  needing to put a foot down every now and then, especially in places
  where it's not always convenient to put a foot down - standover
  helps.  or, if you plan on loading up your hilsen for a tour of sorts
  - having more standover helps.   and i can't imagine that you're going
  to have much on a 63.  just something to consider.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
  For more options, visit this group 
  athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread Seth Vidal
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, wile dylanmcner...@yahoo.com wrote:
 I have a PBH of 89 and ride a 63cm AHH.  I was given the exact same
 option from Rivendell - either 61 or 63 would work.  However, Rich
 advised me that with handlebars set up the same way (shorter stem on
 the 63), the 63 would handle better.  I'm very happy with the 63.  I
 have a small handful of seatpost showing - 3 or so, and with the stem
 sticking 2 out of the headset, both are level.  The top of the seat
 and the crook of the stem are both about 6 above the top tube and the
 bike looks perfectly proportioned.  I think if I raise the stem up to
 the max, it ends up about 2 above the top of the saddle.  I ride 40c
 Schwalbe Marathons and ride the bike mostly for commuting.  Keep in
 mind that when you stop and put a foot down at lights, etc. you have
 even more standover height because one foot is up on the pedal.


Dylan,
 if you wouldn't mind, just to humor me - measure from the tip of your
saddle to the middle of the flats on your handlebars.

I'm curious what that distance is.

thanks
-sv

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread wile
Ha - no problem.  It's sitting right in front of me - every week is
bike to work week here :)

Exactly 21.75 inches from the very tip of the saddle (B-17 Team
Professional) to the center of the stem clamp.



On May 11, 1:03 pm, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, wile dylanmcner...@yahoo.com wrote:
  I have a PBH of 89 and ride a 63cm AHH.  I was given the exact same
  option from Rivendell - either 61 or 63 would work.  However, Rich
  advised me that with handlebars set up the same way (shorter stem on
  the 63), the 63 would handle better.  I'm very happy with the 63.  I
  have a small handful of seatpost showing - 3 or so, and with the stem
  sticking 2 out of the headset, both are level.  The top of the seat
  and the crook of the stem are both about 6 above the top tube and the
  bike looks perfectly proportioned.  I think if I raise the stem up to
  the max, it ends up about 2 above the top of the saddle.  I ride 40c
  Schwalbe Marathons and ride the bike mostly for commuting.  Keep in
  mind that when you stop and put a foot down at lights, etc. you have
  even more standover height because one foot is up on the pedal.

 Dylan,
  if you wouldn't mind, just to humor me - measure from the tip of your
 saddle to the middle of the flats on your handlebars.

 I'm curious what that distance is.

 thanks
 -sv

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread wile
Oh yeah - stem is 9cm.

On May 11, 1:03 pm, Seth Vidal skvi...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 3:51 PM, wile dylanmcner...@yahoo.com wrote:
  I have a PBH of 89 and ride a 63cm AHH.  I was given the exact same
  option from Rivendell - either 61 or 63 would work.  However, Rich
  advised me that with handlebars set up the same way (shorter stem on
  the 63), the 63 would handle better.  I'm very happy with the 63.  I
  have a small handful of seatpost showing - 3 or so, and with the stem
  sticking 2 out of the headset, both are level.  The top of the seat
  and the crook of the stem are both about 6 above the top tube and the
  bike looks perfectly proportioned.  I think if I raise the stem up to
  the max, it ends up about 2 above the top of the saddle.  I ride 40c
  Schwalbe Marathons and ride the bike mostly for commuting.  Keep in
  mind that when you stop and put a foot down at lights, etc. you have
  even more standover height because one foot is up on the pedal.

 Dylan,
  if you wouldn't mind, just to humor me - measure from the tip of your
 saddle to the middle of the flats on your handlebars.

 I'm curious what that distance is.

 thanks
 -sv

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



Re: [RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-11 Thread Doug Van Cleve
Tucker,

A Dirt Drop stem is pretty tall (altitude) and pretty short (extension).
M-bars want a stem 2-3cm shorter than the same bike with drop bars.  If the
bigger frame most likely requires a short stem for you, you might find it
hard to get m-bars close enough.  Me personally, I would never buy a frame
that would require a stem shorter than 8-9cm extension with drop bars.
There are several tall Nitto stems, Technomic Deluxe, Technomic, Dirt Drop.
I can't imagine that you wouldn't be able to get the bars high enough using
one of them.  RBW designs fit small, due to the low BB, but if you are on a
bike that is the right size (a lot of folks come to RBW having been riding
bikes several sizes too small), I think your RBW fit is going to be good on
a bike that size or maybe 1 size up.

Doug


On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:22 AM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:

 Thanks everyone,
 I did call Rivendell, and they told me i could go with either size.
 On my current bike a custom track frame.  The standover is 84.5, the
 top tube is 59cm and stem a 110 nitto pearl is about 4 cm below my
 seat. My saddle height is right around 78.5.  I am planning on using a
 nitto dirt drop stem with mustache bars.  I guess i am leaning towards
 the larger frame, so i can get higher handle bars easier.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Sizing on a A Homer Hilsen

2010-05-10 Thread amoll68
Hi Tucker,

It's worth obsessing over. I imagine you're wishing for a 62?

This 63cm AHH with 35mm Supremes, has a stand over height just under
87cm (measured just forward of the BB spindle):
http://www.flickr.com/photos/39151...@n07/sets/72157622960184871/

My PBH is around 91, and BB to center of my Brooks B17 is 80cm (I ride
with sit bones on the higher back end of the saddle.) The stem is 9cm,
approximately level with the saddle, and H-bars are 48 Nitto Noodles -
which reminds me that the TT length on the 63 is 1.5cm longer than the
61. Gotta think about that fit, too. I have a relatively long torso,
and this setup feels dialed in to me. (I'm 6' 3, if that helps at
all.) 64cm is a good size for me also, and I even have a porteur style
bike that's about a 66 - but that has swept back bars.

Depending on your torso and that TT length, I'd lean toward the bigger
size myself. Have you called RBW?

Good luck!

Alex
Seattle, WA







On May 10, 9:21 pm, cyclotourist cyclotour...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm 89 PBH, and have two 61cm frames.  If you like your bars to be at saddle
 height with a normal stem, that'll work fine.  If you want them higher and
 don't want to use a Dirt Drop type stem, go with the 63 IMHO.

 That said, if I was getting an AHH, I'd get a 63.





 On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:23 PM, tucker jamison.bross...@gmail.com wrote:
  Hi all, my PBH is 89 and I'm trying to decide between a 63 or 61 A
  Homer Hilsen.  Someone told me the listed standovers are a bit high.
  I will be running the bike with 35 mm tires, or 23-24 wide rims.
  anyone have any experience with this or the true standover of a 63
  frame, or with sizing up in general.  I know this has been covered a
  bit here, but i can't help obsessing over this purchase.  thanks.

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  RBW Owners Bunch group.
  To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comrbw-owners-bunch%2Bunsubscrib 
  e...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

 --
 Cheers,
 David
 Redlands, CA

 Bicycling is a big part of the future. It has to be. There is something
 wrong with a society that drives a car to workout in a gym.  ~Bill Nye,
 scientist guy

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
 rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group 
 athttp://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.