[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-03 Thread callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com

I wonder how big one of those bomb disposal robots would be in 1:6

On Jan 2, 10:39 pm, Aahz aah...@gmail.com wrote:
 Steve Tyng wrote:
  Aahz wrote:

  So if you went with 1/6 scale and it was under 3' it would be
  classified as something other than a tank? A support vehicle maybe?

  Nope, still classified as a tank.  The rules state that a Tank is Any
  fully tracked vehicle.  The Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1937 is
  definitely a fully tracked vehicle.

     Hm, if sub 3' tanks became a common thing Tankette rules could be fun.

 Aahz.
 (still working on the 1/6 T-35 at the moment though)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-03 Thread OdysseySlipways
 
 
Aahz for a 1:6th scale Goliath couldn't something like them small r/c  battle 
tanks be used to represent one?



 
Chris,
_Odyssey  Slipways_ (http://hometown.aol.com/odysseyslipways/index.html) 
**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-03 Thread callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com

I reckon by the time I make my first tank (which will be sometime
after I make a few support vehicles) i will probably make a tankette.

On Jan 3, 2:13 pm, odysseyslipw...@aol.com wrote:
 Aahz for a 1:6th scale Goliath couldn't something like them small r/c  battle
 tanks be used to represent one?

 Chris,
 _Odyssey  Slipways_ (http://hometown.aol.com/odysseyslipways/index.html)
 **New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making
 headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-03 Thread Paul Hilton

Pay attention to what this man says!  I had to resort to using a .40 caliber 
gun myself in the BT-7.  With a lot of trimming and a fair amount of cussing 
I managed to fit a .68 caliber gun in the turret but had no room for 
ammunition!  Also, stay away from paintballs of mixed colors.  I mean 
several different colors of paintballs in one batch.  I think the mind has a 
hard time recognizing random colors.  For me, a single color that contrasts 
well works much better.

Paul H.
- Original Message - 
From: Pureteenlard pureteenl...@hotmail.com
To: R/C Tank Combat rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:28 AM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank



 Well the smallest proper tank with a turret in the hobby is probably
 the ex-Neil Rochford M22 Locust (T055 - 
 http://www.rctankcombat.com/tanks/T055/
 ) but the diminutive nature of the beast leads to some real problems
 when it comes to fitting a paintball gun. A regular .68 calibre gun
 just won't fit. The smaller calibre guns (.40, .43 and .50) are often
 difficult to get and ammunition can be scarce too. The smaller balls
 are difficult to see in flight so it's difficult to correct your aim
 and when they do hit they are less likely to burst than a full calibre
 ball. If at all possible, I would recommend making a regular sized
 tank (whatever THAT is!) with a nice big turret.

 On Jan 2, 2:35 am, WWIIFanatic wwii1...@hotmail.com wrote:
 i was wondering if anyone could find a smaller tank than the Polish
 TKD armed with something larger than a machine gun. I think smaller
 tanks have the advantage even though they take less hits and carry
 less ammo. I'll never be able to make one but i can always bounce
 ideas around.
 

 



--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Steve Tyng

The Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Model 1937 tank looks pretty small to me and
is a real production tank (turret, tracks, and a cannon).

   http://www.museum-tank.ru/IIwar/tables2A/va.html
   
http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-victor/victor/vickers-light_series/light-tank-m1937/m1937-intro.html
   http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/GreatBritain/GB-LightTankModel1937.jpg
   http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563763772kJhppu

The specs are:

   Issue of 1937
   Weight 4.2 tons
   Engine 6cyl 90hp
   Max. speed of 48 km/h (30mph)
   Armor 7-9mm
   Armament 40mm cannon (British 2pdr)
   Ammunition - 58 shots
   2 person crew.
   Length: 11', 10.75
   Width: 6' 2.25
   Height 6' 2

In 1:6 scale this tank would be just shy of 2' long and be 12.34
wide.  Under our rule set this tank would get a 30 round magazine, 2
hits for a kill, frontal hits will not count.

Here's and interesting pdf on the British light tanks/tankettes

   http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_British_Light_Medium_Tanks.pdf


Steve Tyng


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Crooks, Steven M

Hello Mr Tyng, 
The Carden-Loyd/vickers tankette looks very interesting.
But don't the rule specify 1:6 scale or a minimum of 36' long?
Steven C.


-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tyng
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:40 AM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank


The Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Model 1937 tank looks pretty small to me and
is a real production tank (turret, tracks, and a cannon).

   http://www.museum-tank.ru/IIwar/tables2A/va.html
 
http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-victor/victor/vickers-light_series/light-t
ank-m1937/m1937-intro.html
 
http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/GreatBritain/GB-LightTankModel1937.jp
g
   http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563763772kJhppu

The specs are:

   Issue of 1937
   Weight 4.2 tons
   Engine 6cyl 90hp
   Max. speed of 48 km/h (30mph)
   Armor 7-9mm
   Armament 40mm cannon (British 2pdr)
   Ammunition - 58 shots
   2 person crew.
   Length: 11', 10.75
   Width: 6' 2.25
   Height 6' 2

In 1:6 scale this tank would be just shy of 2' long and be 12.34
wide.  Under our rule set this tank would get a 30 round magazine, 2
hits for a kill, frontal hits will not count.

Here's and interesting pdf on the British light tanks/tankettes

   http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_British_Light_Medium_Tanks.pdf


Steve Tyng









The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are 
confidential, possibly privileged and intended
for the addressee(s) only. Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, retain 
or otherwise use this message. If
received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this 
message without disclosing its contents
to anyone.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Steve Tyng

Steven,

A tank may be built to 1:6 scale OR must be a minimum of 3' IF NOT
built to 1:6 scale.


Steve Tyng


On Jan 2, 12:12 pm, Crooks, Steven M steven.cro...@usoncology.com
wrote:
 Hello Mr Tyng,
 The Carden-Loyd/vickers tankette looks very interesting.
 But don't the rule specify 1:6 scale or a minimum of 36' long?
 Steven C.

 -Original Message-
 From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com

 [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tyng
 Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:40 AM
 To: R/C Tank Combat
 Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank

 The Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Model 1937 tank looks pretty small to me and
 is a real production tank (turret, tracks, and a cannon).

    http://www.museum-tank.ru/IIwar/tables2A/va.html

 http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-victor/victor/vickers-light_series/light-t
 ank-m1937/m1937-intro.html

 http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/GreatBritain/GB-LightTankModel1937.jp
 g
    http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563763772kJhppu

 The specs are:

    Issue of 1937
    Weight 4.2 tons
    Engine 6cyl 90hp
    Max. speed of 48 km/h (30mph)
    Armor 7-9mm
    Armament 40mm cannon (British 2pdr)
    Ammunition - 58 shots
    2 person crew.
    Length: 11', 10.75
    Width: 6' 2.25
    Height 6' 2

 In 1:6 scale this tank would be just shy of 2' long and be 12.34
 wide.  Under our rule set this tank would get a 30 round magazine, 2
 hits for a kill, frontal hits will not count.

 Here's and interesting pdf on the British light tanks/tankettes

    http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_British_Light_Medium_Tanks.pdf

 Steve Tyng

 The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are 
 confidential, possibly privileged and intended
 for the addressee(s) only. Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, 
 retain or otherwise use this message. If
 received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this 
 message without disclosing its contents
 to anyone.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Pureteenlard

That looks like a Vickers Dutchman with a bigger turret.

On Jan 2, 4:40 pm, Steve Tyng steve...@gmail.com wrote:
 The Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Model 1937 tank looks pretty small to me and
 is a real production tank (turret, tracks, and a cannon).

    http://www.museum-tank.ru/IIwar/tables2A/va.html
    http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-victor/victor/vickers-light_series/ligh...
    http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/GreatBritain/GB-LightTankModel1937...
    http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563763772kJhppu

 The specs are:

    Issue of 1937
    Weight 4.2 tons
    Engine 6cyl 90hp
    Max. speed of 48 km/h (30mph)
    Armor 7-9mm
    Armament 40mm cannon (British 2pdr)
    Ammunition - 58 shots
    2 person crew.
    Length: 11', 10.75
    Width: 6' 2.25
    Height 6' 2

 In 1:6 scale this tank would be just shy of 2' long and be 12.34
 wide.  Under our rule set this tank would get a 30 round magazine, 2
 hits for a kill, frontal hits will not count.

 Here's and interesting pdf on the British light tanks/tankettes

    http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_British_Light_Medium_Tanks.pdf

 Steve Tyng
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Aahz

Steve Tyng wrote:
 Steven,

 A tank may be built to 1:6 scale OR must be a minimum of 3' IF NOT
 built to 1:6 scale.
   

So if you went with 1/6 scale and it was under 3' it would be 
classified as something other than a tank? A support vehicle maybe?

Aahz.

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Crooks, Steven M

That's pretty small.
An M50 was larger at 3.82m l x 2.6m w x 2.13m h
( 12'6 L x 8'6 w x 7'h)

(it had 6 x 106 though...)

-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Steve Tyng
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 12:07 PM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank


Steven,

A tank may be built to 1:6 scale OR must be a minimum of 3' IF NOT
built to 1:6 scale.


Steve Tyng


On Jan 2, 12:12 pm, Crooks, Steven M steven.cro...@usoncology.com
wrote:
 Hello Mr Tyng,
 The Carden-Loyd/vickers tankette looks very interesting.
 But don't the rule specify 1:6 scale or a minimum of 36' long?
 Steven C.

 -Original Message-
 From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com

 [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tyng
 Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 10:40 AM
 To: R/C Tank Combat
 Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank

 The Vickers-Carden-Lloyd Model 1937 tank looks pretty small to me and
 is a real production tank (turret, tracks, and a cannon).

    http://www.museum-tank.ru/IIwar/tables2A/va.html

 http://www.jedsite.info/tanks-victor/victor/vickers-light_series/light-t
 ank-m1937/m1937-intro.html

 http://mailer.fsu.edu/~akirk/tanks/GreatBritain/GB-LightTankModel1937.jp
 g
    http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563763772kJhppu

 The specs are:

    Issue of 1937
    Weight 4.2 tons
    Engine 6cyl 90hp
    Max. speed of 48 km/h (30mph)
    Armor 7-9mm
    Armament 40mm cannon (British 2pdr)
    Ammunition - 58 shots
    2 person crew.
    Length: 11', 10.75
    Width: 6' 2.25
    Height 6' 2

 In 1:6 scale this tank would be just shy of 2' long and be 12.34
 wide.  Under our rule set this tank would get a 30 round magazine, 2
 hits for a kill, frontal hits will not count.

 Here's and interesting pdf on the British light tanks/tankettes

    http://the.shadock.free.fr/Surviving_British_Light_Medium_Tanks.pdf

 Steve Tyng

 The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are 
 confidential, possibly privileged and intended
 for the addressee(s) only. Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, 
 retain or otherwise use this message. If
 received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this 
 message without disclosing its contents
 to anyone.




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Steve Tyng

Aahz wrote:

 So if you went with 1/6 scale and it was under 3' it would be
 classified as something other than a tank? A support vehicle maybe?

Nope, still classified as a tank.  The rules state that a Tank is Any
fully tracked vehicle.  The Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1937 is
definitely a fully tracked vehicle.

Steve Tyng
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Crooks, Steven M

That makes a 1:6 scale Goliath pretty small...

-Original Message-
From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
[mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Tyng
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:20 PM
To: R/C Tank Combat
Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank


Aahz wrote:

 So if you went with 1/6 scale and it was under 3' it would be
 classified as something other than a tank? A support vehicle maybe?

Nope, still classified as a tank.  The rules state that a Tank is Any
fully tracked vehicle.  The Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1937 is
definitely a fully tracked vehicle.

Steve Tyng







The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are 
confidential, possibly privileged and intended
for the addressee(s) only. Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, retain 
or otherwise use this message. If
received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this 
message without disclosing its contents
to anyone.


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com

Or go the other way completely and find some drwings of the P1000
ratte (correct me if im wrong). Wouldn't be allowed in the rules
(only ever 1 or 2 planned and was never built) and its a good thing
too, it would of probably 36 metres long making it approximately 6
metres long at 1/6 scale.

 I would recommend making a regular sized
 tank (whatever THAT is!) with a nice big turret.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com

Seems a bit big. Like the P1000 I guess. But then the P1000 has more
guns.

On Jan 2, 7:46 pm, Crooks, Steven M steven.cro...@usoncology.com
wrote:
 The 80cm Dora was built and used operationally.

 http://www.missing-lynx.com/reviews/german/dorareviewdh_1.html

 http://www.aopt91.dsl.pipex.com/railgun/Content/Railwayguns/German/Dora%
 20index.htm

 Steven C.

 -Original Message-
 From: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com

 [mailto:rctankcom...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
 callum.king.underw...@googlemail.com
 Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:44 PM
 To: R/C Tank Combat
 Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank

 Or go the other way completely and find some drwings of the P1000
 ratte (correct me if im wrong). Wouldn't be allowed in the rules
 (only ever 1 or 2 planned and was never built) and its a good thing
 too, it would of probably 36 metres long making it approximately 6
 metres long at 1/6 scale.

  I would recommend making a regular sized
  tank (whatever THAT is!) with a nice big turret.

 The contents of this electronic mail message and any attachments are 
 confidential, possibly privileged and intended
 for the addressee(s) only. Only the addressee(s) may read, disseminate, 
 retain or otherwise use this message. If
 received in error, please immediately inform the sender and then delete this 
 message without disclosing its contents
 to anyone.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-02 Thread Aahz

Steve Tyng wrote:
 Aahz wrote:

   
 So if you went with 1/6 scale and it was under 3' it would be
 classified as something other than a tank? A support vehicle maybe?
 

 Nope, still classified as a tank.  The rules state that a Tank is Any
 fully tracked vehicle.  The Vickers-Carden-Loyd Model 1937 is
 definitely a fully tracked vehicle.
   

Hm, if sub 3' tanks became a common thing Tankette rules could be fun.

Aahz.
(still working on the 1/6 T-35 at the moment though)

--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-01 Thread Chris. b

the polish TKS 20mm mounted a 20mm auto cannon, similar to the pzII.
thats the smalest tank youll find I think

Chris. b

On Jan 2, 12:35 pm, WWIIFanatic wwii1...@hotmail.com wrote:
 i was wondering if anyone could find a smaller tank than the Polish
 TKD armed with something larger  than a machine gun.  I think smaller
 tanks have the advantage even though they take less hits and carry
 less ammo.  I'll never be able to make one but i can always bounce
 ideas around.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---



[TANKS] Re: smallest tank

2009-01-01 Thread Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos

The German captured Vickers Tankette mounted something larger than a machine
gun: a 105 mm gun. A small and fast target with a big gun. That's a 1:6
armed model that fits in a suitcase.
It also has teh advantage that it needs less battery.
http://www.rctankcombat.com/tanks/T056/
MOre videos here:
http://s148.photobucket.com/albums/s30/ChrysKane/TANKETTE%20UPGRADED%202007/

The shape is approximated. I hope you can build a more faithful model.
Use smaller (5 cm wide) tracks and you'll be to scale for Vickers. I should
do that one day.
 I have the CAD plans of the individual plates of teh lower hull, if you
like it.  Only you should build it out of aluminium sheets, 3-4 mms wide, so
you save space inside this little model.

Chrys ( I am battling in 3 hours from now) K.

- Original Message -
From: Chris. b barthelso...@hotmail.com
To: R/C Tank Combat rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 8:07 AM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: smallest tank



 the polish TKS 20mm mounted a 20mm auto cannon, similar to the pzII.
 thats the smalest tank youll find I think

 Chris. b

 On Jan 2, 12:35 pm, WWIIFanatic wwii1...@hotmail.com wrote:
  i was wondering if anyone could find a smaller tank than the Polish
  TKD armed with something larger than a machine gun. I think smaller
  tanks have the advantage even though they take less hits and carry
  less ammo. I'll never be able to make one but i can always bounce
  ideas around.
 



 __ NOD32 3434 (20080911) Information __

 This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
 http://www.eset.com




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You are currently subscribed to the R/C Tank Combat group.
To post a message, send email to rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe, send email to rctankcombat-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---