Re: [Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity

2009-10-21 Thread Greg Landrum
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Evgueni Kolossov ekolos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Sorry Greg,

 Actually I found the problem - in this case to pass structure into the
 viewer I been using MolToMolBlock(*mol, true, -1, false) instead of SDWriter
 function write(*mol) and this is what making the difference - write(*mol)
 doing it OK but MolToMolBlock producing an effect I described to you.
 I have moved into write(*mol) now and everything is OK.
 I can only suggest you take a look at MolToMolBlock function.

MolToMolBlock is fine, in fact it's what the SDWriter is using (look
at line 75 of SDWriter.cpp). The problem that you are having is maybe
the last argument you provide to MolToMolBlock, which tells it that
the molecule should *not* be kekulized on output. The default value
for this (which is what the SDWriter uses) is true.

None of this explains why you are getting double bonds in the output.

Are you *sure* that there are double bonds? The bond type flag in the
output mol blocks is really equal to 2? Could it be that your viewer
is seeing aromatic bonds in the output (bond type 4) and drawing
them as double bonds?

-greg

--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


Re: [Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity

2009-10-21 Thread Greg Landrum
just to close this thread off

-- Forwarded message --
From: Evgueni Kolossov ekolos...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity
To: Greg Landrum greg.land...@gmail.com


Greg,

I think I just described it wrong - it was VISUALIZED as double
bonds... Because everything is Ok now I think that the problem was in
the way I been passing it to the viewer as string - in case of using
MolToMolBlock the argument was wrong and it was unkekulized and in
this way passed to the viewer which was displaying it as a double
bonds.

Regards,
Evgueni

--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


Re: [Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity

2009-10-20 Thread Greg Landrum
Evgueni,

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:56 PM, Evgueni Kolossov ekolos...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just try to copy any aromatic ring the way I described it and at the end do:
 fragMol-updatePropertyCache();
 MolOps::sanitizeMol(fragMol);
 I believe aromaticity suppose to be set in sanitize and I do not need to
 call MolOps::setAromaticity

Here's a test case I just did that copies one molecule atom-for-atom
and bond-for-bond into another:

std::string smi=c1c1;

RWMol *m = SmilesToMol(smi,0,false);
RWMol m2;
for(unsigned int i=0;i6;++i){
  m2.addAtom(m-getAtomWithIdx(i)-copy(),false,true);
}
for(unsigned int i=0;i6;++i){
  Bond *newBond=m-getBondWithIdx(i)-copy();
  newBond-setOwningMol(m2);
  newBond-setBeginAtomIdx(m-getBondWithIdx(i)-getBeginAtomIdx());
  newBond-setEndAtomIdx(m-getBondWithIdx(i)-getEndAtomIdx());
  m2.addBond(newBond,true);
}
m2.updatePropertyCache();
MolOps::sanitizeMol(m2);
for(unsigned int i=0;i6;++i){
  TEST_ASSERT(m2.getAtomWithIdx(i)-getIsAromatic());
  TEST_ASSERT(m2.getBondWithIdx(i)-getIsAromatic());
  TEST_ASSERT(m2.getBondWithIdx(i)-getBondType()==Bond::AROMATIC);
}
delete m;

This runs without problems and does more or less what you seem to be doing.

In order to be able to figure out what the problem is with your
approach (or if it's caused by a bug in the RDKit), I need code that I
can compile and run that shows the problem. Send that along and I'll
take a look at it.

-greg

--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


[Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity

2009-10-19 Thread Evgueni Kolossov
Hi Greg,

I got a small problem with the fragments - aromatic cycles coming with all
bonds as double. If I save it into SDF and open SDF than it all Ok.
I believe I saw somewhere fix for this. Can you please point me to the right
place?

Regards,
Evgueni
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss


Re: [Rdkit-discuss] fragments aromaticity

2009-10-19 Thread Evgueni Kolossov
Yes, it is reproducible every time...
Actually code is quite simple: iterate through the rings, bonds, atoms for
each bond and add atoms and bonds to a new mol like:
Atom *begAtom = mol.getAtomWithIds(begIdx)-copy();
newBegIdx = fragMol-AddAtom(begAtom, false, true);
the same for an endAtom
etc...

Bond *pNewBond = pBond-copy();
pNewBond-setOwningMol(fragMol);
pNewBond -setBeginAtomIdx(newBegIdx);
pNewBond -setEndAtomIdx(newEndIdx);
int nNewBondIdx = fragMol-addBond(pNewBond, true);


Regards,
Evgueni



2009/10/19 Greg Landrum greg.land...@gmail.com

 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Evgueni Kolossov ekolos...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  I got a small problem with the fragments - aromatic cycles coming with
 all
  bonds as double. If I save it into SDF and open SDF than it all Ok.
  I believe I saw somewhere fix for this. Can you please point me to the
 right
  place?

 hmm, that's weird; it's not really sounding familiar. Do you have a
 reproducible example of it happening?

 -greg




-- 
Dr. Evgueni Kolossov (PhD)
ekolos...@gmail.com
Tel.   +44(0)1628 627168
Mob. +44(0)7812070446
--
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference___
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss