[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
> Maarten Koopmans wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) > > I have used it extensively under Linux, but > > > > - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen > > - it is *slow* > > > > OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based > > mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and > > has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the > > built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. > > I haven't done any testing myself yet, but if it is so, it's pretty ... > ehm Our company paind 700 USD for /Command, which does not seem to > be up-to-date enough to compete with free implementation? I think that > once DocKimbel releases his free FastCGI protocol, someone else does > ODBC library wrapper and there is no reason anymore for anyone to buy > /Command, as everything else is in View/Pro ... ;-) ... ah I forgot > there is no Core/Pro, so Unix users would still be required to buy > Command, because of that X11 gfx thing > > -pekr- > > > I did an ODBC-wrapper in Command1.0 times and from time to time I am still using it with /View or Command2.0, as it is more flexible than the native implementation. But I think it has a few memory flaws and is not made according Rebol/port conventions. I have a tcp/ip connection to the Cache ODBC&JDBC-server port too. If anyone wants to clean them up... AR -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
This sounds like the most likely solution for me ;-) I guess I will grab the 'Teach Yourself XML in' & give it a go. ;-) Thanks!! Ammon A short time ago, Gavin F. McKenzie, sent an email stating: > I drive a MS SQL Server 2000 box with Core via SQL Server 2000's built-in > HTTP and XML support. > > It's a wonderful thing. You can do everything you want with SQL commands > over HTTP, get result-sets back as XML documents, and you can setup XML > documents on the server side that contain queries, XSLT transforms, etc. > > Gavin. > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Ammon Johnson > Sent: April 14, 2002 10:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] MS SQL connection from Linux > > > Hi, > > I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL Server. > Has this been done? can it be done? I know that it is possible to get > ODBC for Linux, I was just wondering if it was necisary. > > Thanks!! > Ammon -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
Maarten Koopmans wrote: > I know, I know. Mailed it to feedback 6 months ago or so. > > But... Oracle support on Linux was also necessary, so Command > was the right choice. Even better: you can easily replace the mysql > protocol in Command, so... > > Nevertheless, their C mysql implementation has room for improvement ;-) > Another thing: The pure REBOL solution by DocKimbel is faster (!) > than the C implementation on the REBOL layer ;-) > > They are better than they think at RT! Ha! Then those trying to develop Rebol in Java, should try to develop Rebol in Rebol itself ... :-) Anyway - IOS has to be making them real money, as business Rebol users = Command users are being left one year without the single, and as I can see from your post, it really needs an update :-) ... Or just maybe they sold Command just to you and me, so it is not worth to update it? ;-) -pekr- -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
I know, I know. Mailed it to feedback 6 months ago or so. But... Oracle support on Linux was also necessary, so Command was the right choice. Even better: you can easily replace the mysql protocol in Command, so... Nevertheless, their C mysql implementation has room for improvement ;-) Another thing: The pure REBOL solution by DocKimbel is faster (!) than the C implementation on the REBOL layer ;-) They are better than they think at RT! --Maarten Petr Krenzelok wrote: > Maarten Koopmans wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) >> I have used it extensively under Linux, but >> >> - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen >> - it is *slow* >> >> OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based >> mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and >> has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the >> built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. > > > I haven't done any testing myself yet, but if it is so, it's pretty > ... ehm Our company paind 700 USD for /Command, which does not > seem to be up-to-date enough to compete with free implementation? I > think that once DocKimbel releases his free FastCGI protocol, someone > else does ODBC library wrapper and there is no reason anymore for > anyone to buy /Command, as everything else is in View/Pro ... ;-) ... > ah I forgot there is no Core/Pro, so Unix users would still be > required to buy Command, because of that X11 gfx thing > > -pekr- > >> >> >> HTH, >> >> Maarten >> >> Ammon Johnson wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL >>> Server. Has this been done? can it be done? I know that it is >>> possible to get ODBC for Linux, I was just wondering if it was >>> necisary. Thanks!! >>> Ammon >>> >> >> > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
Ah.. I read the subject again. Ms-sql Sorry... --Maarten Maarten Koopmans wrote: > Hi, > > Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) > I have used it extensively under Linux, but > > - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen > - it is *slow* > > OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based > mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and > has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the > built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. > > HTH, > > Maarten > > Ammon Johnson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL >> Server. Has this been done? can it be done? I know that it is >> possible to get ODBC for Linux, I was just wondering if it was >> necisary. >> Thanks!! >> Ammon >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
Maarten Koopmans wrote: > Hi, > > Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) > I have used it extensively under Linux, but > > - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen > - it is *slow* > > OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based > mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and > has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the > built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. I haven't done any testing myself yet, but if it is so, it's pretty ... ehm Our company paind 700 USD for /Command, which does not seem to be up-to-date enough to compete with free implementation? I think that once DocKimbel releases his free FastCGI protocol, someone else does ODBC library wrapper and there is no reason anymore for anyone to buy /Command, as everything else is in View/Pro ... ;-) ... ah I forgot there is no Core/Pro, so Unix users would still be required to buy Command, because of that X11 gfx thing -pekr- > > > HTH, > > Maarten > > Ammon Johnson wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL >> Server. Has this been done? can it be done? I know that it is >> possible to get ODBC for Linux, I was just wondering if it was >> necisary. >> Thanks!! >> Ammon >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
Hi, Command (2.0 and up) have built-in Mysql support ;-) I have used it extensively under Linux, but - strange errors in datatype conversion sometimes happen - it is *slow* OTOH: DocKimbel (Reb/sites/DocKimbel) made a tcp based mysql driver that runs on Core 2.5! It is up to 30 times faster and has *no* problems I know off. You can simple 'do' it to replace the built-in Command implementation, and it has the same way of calling. HTH, Maarten Ammon Johnson wrote: >Hi, > > I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL Server. Has >this been done? can it be done? I know that it is possible to get ODBC for >Linux, I was just wondering if it was necisary. > >Thanks!! >Ammon > -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
[REBOL] Re: MS SQL connection from Linux
I drive a MS SQL Server 2000 box with Core via SQL Server 2000's built-in HTTP and XML support. It's a wonderful thing. You can do everything you want with SQL commands over HTTP, get result-sets back as XML documents, and you can setup XML documents on the server side that contain queries, XSLT transforms, etc. Gavin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ammon Johnson Sent: April 14, 2002 10:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [REBOL] MS SQL connection from Linux Hi, I am running Command on Linux & I need to connect to an M$ SQL Server. Has this been done? can it be done? I know that it is possible to get ODBC for Linux, I was just wondering if it was necisary. Thanks!! Ammon -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes. -- To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" in the subject, without the quotes.
