Re: [recoznet2] Redskins? Blackskins? Niggers?

1999-08-02 Thread Lance Kelly

Ian,
 Noel Pearson was on a similar track: it is no use trying to induce
 Aboriginal Peoples health with an imposed European system. As Noel has
said
 on several occasions '... my people are not useless. They can think and
work
 things out.' During my stay in the Territory I so often saw this and tried
 in my own small way to encourage this attitude. As I was at the time
working
 for a Government Dept. this procedure was often criticised. I was once
 criticised for not spending enough money. This was a time when on the
 outstations I was helping the Peoples to build houses out of bashed down
ant
 hills, bark and saplings. Primitive? Degrading? To us maybe but those
people
 loved them: if someone died in a house it could be deserted or burned; if
 they wished to move on they could; if they were left they did not become a
 ruin they became compost. I was roundly criticised for these houses but
not
 by those that lived in them. When the People begin to live much more
 sedentary lives their needs change as do the homes they live in but they
are
 still idiosyncratic as would be expected.

The power for change cannot come from above Ian. It can only come from
within and with resources to do it with.

 Considering health. My firm belief is that the most constructive way to
 overcome the terrible health statistics is to restore the People's
 connection to the land. Think of the diseases ravaging Aboriginal Peoples:
 diabetes, heart conditions, obesity, and cancer.  The illnesses are all
 induced by some form of addictive behaviour: overeating, alcoholism,
smoking
 and other drug taking of various types. All addictive behaviours are, in
my
 experience, induced by an inability to cope with life. As an alcoholic my
 aim when drinking was to get sober - that is normal. Despite forty years
of
 trying I never did succeed.

Again the lack of governmental health authorities not supplying resources
and training to people who need it...but keeping it in and under academic
control.

 the People. And Lance, a large part of this will be how we use words. We
are
 NOT allowed to use words as we like. If I was to influentially and
publicly
 name Kennett a social misfit he would have me in Court for defamation so
 quick my head would spin. And, is all Parliamentary Privilege used in a
 constructive way? I think not.

Does an aboriginal person or a white person for that matter have the ability
to take one to court for defaming another, no they dont its all scare
tactics really.
I've been threatened and intimidated by someone and yet Im told in no
uncertain terms that unless they hit you or you have a witness to extreme
harrasment and even then it must be physical then you will not have chance.
Im sure Kennet gets catsigated by everyone in society and these things can
be quite defamatory remarks but unless your in power over another it means
absolutely nothing.
Im sorry I see holes everywhere in some of these arguments. Must be that
chip on my shoulder :)
Regards,
Lance.



---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Redskins? Blacksins? Niggers?

1999-08-02 Thread Lance Kelly

Suzanne I'd like you to explain this comment please if you would

if u are not oppositional, then u would rejoyce in 'other' groups also
finding
their voices on predator 'issues' -??

Are you telling me that as males we are all predators ?

 eg. women, children, the land, survival,
pollution, violence, reconciliation, sovereignty etc - concerns of a
community
of peoples - yr focus is on the male form/being rather than it seems on what
individual males do or say


- Original Message -
From: webweave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Redskins? Blacksins? Niggers?


 political correctness - pc - is the platform you yourself are using to
assert
 the male voice in this space

 many have gone before u, who laid the 'floorboards' that u now stand on,
to
 assert yourself or your group identity and rights for legitimated space

 some would call u separatist because u will 'hear' of nothing but
maleness,
 itself non pc on the pc circuit

 if u are not oppositional, then u would rejoyce in 'other' groups also
finding
 their voices on predator 'issues' - eg. women, children, the land,
survival,
 pollution, violence, reconciliation, sovereignty etc - concerns of a
community
 of peoples - yr focus is on the male form/being rather than it seems on
what
 individual males do or say

 to me yr 'group' is just one thread that contributes or not, to the whole
 fabric
 in humanhood
 susanne





 ---
 RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at http://www.mail-archive.com/
 To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
 of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
 This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
 copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
 use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed further without
 permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

 RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Tent Embassy

1999-08-02 Thread Lynn Pollack

When I received the notices re the meetings
Susanne listed, I also received two documents
a Press release "Aboriginal Tent Embassy under attack:
Embassy representatives on a national speaking tour"
and
"Land Rights or else! a brief history of the Aboriginal Tent
Embassy"

The contacts quoted are
Diane Fieldes  02 9328 0020 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isabell Coe 02 9568 5643
Ray Swan (in Canberra) 02 6295 0493
or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Lynn Pollack
9/363 Edgecliff Road,
Edgecliff. NSW. 2027. Australia
Tel/Fax 61293282060
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Redskins? Blackskins? Niggers?

1999-08-02 Thread Ian Henderson

Lance,

Maybe if you retained the goal posts in the same place for a while you and I
may learn something. You have some good ideas as I hope I have but neither
of us can conduct a meaningful discussion if what we are talking about is
fluid, thus continually moving.

Regards,

___
Ian J. Henderson  Murdoch University
24 Harfleur Place  Humanities
Hamilton Hill  Murdoch, 6150.
Western Australia, 6163
Tel and Fax: (08) 94183972
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] language and culture

1999-08-02 Thread Lance Kelly



Yes Tim, 
I and many other have chips on our shoulders asyou 
put its called exclusion,denigration intimidation and denial of basic rights of 
respect and selfworth.
People use words to dominate others plain and 
simple. 
Rather than allow for freedom of expression we are 
told thisis the way we must express 
ourselves.
I take no offence at what you say Tim. 

By politicalcorrectedness I am saying those people 
in dominat positions that dont speak in plain common sense terms that relate 
to everyone and not just the educated few in societywho 
understand them. 
We keep talking aboutculture as thoughitsimportance 
is above evbreything else except thatmost australians don't have any culture at 
all thats the issue. Isculture more importantthan real here and now issues 
suchas what I have previouslyspoken about , third world housing, diabetes, 
men in rural and aborginal communities, families in brokenhomes, 1 in 5 
australians with mentalhealthissues, overcharging privatising beaurocrats, need 
I go on. 
Yes I have chip on my shoulder, you should 
to
regards,Lance. 



Re: [recoznet2] Redskins? Blacksins? Niggers?

1999-08-02 Thread webweave

At 17:16 2/08/99 +1000, you wrote:
Suzanne I'd like you to explain this comment please if you would
if u are not oppositional, then u would rejoyce in 'other' groups also finding
their voices on predator 'issues' -??
Are you telling me that as males we are all predators ?

communication is difficult as everyone is on their circuit, thanks for the
opportunity to explain what i must have poorly written or expressed

i meant - i can relate to yr gendered ie men only space as i respect the women
and children only space of reclaim the night annual march
- both agree so far
 - single gender spaces are to be frequently found in mainstream without
looking too hard, with your group being the most dominant 
- a lot of other people must agree that it is ok for females to organise
amongst themselves and for males to do the same judging by the number of groups
that exclude one or the other that exist right now
- no-one has told me why this is not ok, yet many each year object to the march
because men are not 'in' it 
- from a female point of view - men are in jst about everything else
tho
i walk in other spaces also, not just this single gender space
these are not based on exclusively women's or men's business
but on corroboree business - the 'all of us stuff' like land destruction,
national health, incarceration as social control, language dessimation, trade
manipulation, genocide ... this makes me the saddest/maddest of all and it is
predator behaviour to me - crimes of the body - physical and social and
spiritual

in short - anyone who preys on humanity in ways that with knowledge, diminishes
ANY individual's lived experience, is committing a crime of the body to me -
and is a predator and it must stop - no matter who is doing it - women,
children, men meaning governments, business ... circuits of power that exploit
the women, men and kids of our communities to the max - black or grey or white
or pink or rainbow or ...

eg true story
a medical doctor, health minister and minister for aboriginal affairs -
'leader'
having gained the knowledge of all three 'offices'
-of the relationship between needles and the spread of deadly diseases 
-of the racial composition of his 'target' community
did remove, without notice to the community, 'the' needle exchange from a high
drug traffic area
predator behaviour to me and i am shamed that he is still holding public office
and has not been punished for his crime of genocide

i cannot only protest on behalf of women who suffer genocidal practices, as its
victims are all women and men and children ie the whole mob as well as all mobs

- 'men's business doesn't make much sense to me in this context as we haven't
got our acts together in gendered arenas to say that all women or men are
represented or even visible in our speak 
- otherwise 'we' would have eliminated violence from our lives, in all its
forms, surely :)

i'm tired, so if anything needs further exchange let me know

cheers
susanne











---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



[recoznet2] Tent Embassy exhibition

1999-08-02 Thread Lynn Pollack

There will also be an exhibition of art and artefacts
 associated with the Tent Embassy
Bondi Pavilion 7/8 August



---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Explanation of Predator.

1999-08-02 Thread Lance Kelly

Thankyou so much for your explanation and comment Suzanne I whole heartedly
agree with you.
I think even though we are different genders have similar feelings (if
Imnotmistaken)
Regards, Lance.



---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Males

1999-08-02 Thread Ben Wadham

Lance

Your experience of the critique of masculinity is not uncommon. Many men
feel as if they have no role in society any more and that feminism, amongst
other critiques are to blame. When men complain about how they are worse off
than women, that they have it bad, that they are alway the brunt of unfair
criticism it certainly tells us something. One thing, I believe is that it
is hard to accept change. The men's movement, from my experience remains a
strongly misogynist movement of men who feel this way. Yes, they may be
experiencing grief, but it is a grief of dislocation, of being stuck
somewhere between being the traditional male and the expectations of what it
means to be a man today. It is, from my perspective, ridiculous to think
that men (as a group) are disadvantaged. You blame the system, and whether
you believe it or not, this is a system created in the image of man as an
affirmation of the cultural ideals of masculinity (and women are part of
this - Maggie Thatcher was called the Iron Lady)

To talk about the problems of 'dominant' masculinity is not to be
mistaken for calling all men bastards, but to recognise that there is a set
of social relations (of which men have greater access to) that are
historically and culturally based upon control and domination. I've felt the
competitive, adversarial, controlling hand of masculinity all my life, as a
man, growing up in a western capitalist patriarchal environment. I don't
hate
men, but challenge the gendered nature of our world.

It seems to men that if you want to work for reconciliation then you would
challenge the meanings of white people and whiteness. If you want to
challenge sexism then challenge masculinity (at this point in time). In both
cases neither means hating all whites or hating all men, but recognising
that dominance in our culture has certain histories.

Bring on the new man!

Ben


- Original Message -
From: Lance Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Males


 Ben,
 the finite amount of white men in the corporate world (fro rememberthat
 corporate only makes upa very finiteamount of thepopulatiuon run that
world.
 They are NOT all white men - Im tired of the rhetoric blaming white men
for
 evrything I think its absolute bull shit. Ifthis was so whywould be dying
 earlier (much earlier) why would be committing suicide at a significantly
 higher rate, why are we basically being told we should be testubes.
 No sorry I have just spent three years in Social Science academia and I
 dontagree with what is being espoused what so ever. You only need to look
at
 the statistics to see the reality of the situation.
 Instead of blaming a gender for the inhumanity to man and generalising
what
 about getting back to some reality and doing someting about the problems
in
 society.
 The blame needs to lay fairly and squarely (if anywhere at all) on the
 political system of beliefs that we have developed. Until we have a truly
 socially democratic system nothing will change.

 Regards,Lance
 (Stop blaming males society)

 - Original Message -
 From: Ben Wadham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, August 02, 1999 9:55 AM
 Subject: Re: [recoznet2] Males


  Lance
 
  As a white man it is the culture of masculinity that I live in which
 causes
  me a lot of grief. Certainly, Aboriginal men are highly disadvantaged,
no
  question, but as I've grown up its been the highly competitive,
 aggressive,
  adversarial culture of masculinity that has made me want to work for
 change.
  I think changing men is a very important challenge and one that would
  improve social justice across the globe. White men remain in charge of
the
  western world and its globalising forces, its predominantly white men
and
  other men who run the multinational corporate sector. And women get
caught
  up in this, but it isnt their birthright as it is for most men. Stamp
out
  hegemonic masculinity - that's my motto! To say that males in our
culture
  don't have voice is like saying the colour white has no meaning in our
  culture.
 
  Ben
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Lance Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 11:38 PM
  Subject: [recoznet2] Males
 
 
   Trudy,
   If I was female I would be asking what about the females wheres their
   voice?. Would you see this as a problem too?
   I dont have a problem with asking for males to speak up, because in
the
   field of human endeavours they are few and far between. That doesn't
   discount your gender from commentingmy personal aim however is to
   encourage males to speak up.
   I didn't start the gender wars however I'm a victim of it, ...now I
want
  to
   be a survivorMy aim in life is existing for men thats my language
  thats
   my state of being.  Ive spent quite a of time now looking at the
  statistics
   in this country and males are not doing well at 

Re: [recoznet2] Males

1999-08-02 Thread webweave

re
'If your a heterosexual male in this world you are basically blamed for
evrything and if your not blamed your rights are denied or threatened.
Thats the problem with profeminist male attitude they fail their own
sexuality and their own gender. Why not accept your masculinity and be
proud of it and learn to help other males to do like wise across all
cultures and all ethnic barriers'

lance - this is what i meant when i said - living in the 'form' of maleness
- are u saying above: 

hetero males have blotted their copy books and are now held accountable
profeminist men not masculine - so are they gay and feminine?
proud hetero men wanted to globally convert homo males 

if this is so, yr 'maleness' is reduced to a gaze at an incompetent 'penis'
- unfortunately
if not - please explain - but maybe off list as we are dominating a lot :)
susanne

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] language and culture

1999-08-02 Thread tim dunlop



Lance,

I think Ian got it right when he said that you keep shifting 
the goal-posts of the conversation thus making it almost impossible to get 
anywhere. I'd put it a bit more strongly and say that you're simply not 
making sense. For example, you complain that to want to change the name of 
a stadium called 'nigger' is to be "politically correct". Then you say 
(below) that "People use words to dominate others plain and simple." 
That is exactly why some people want to change the name; because to use words 
like 'nigger' is to exercise a form of power, to create an environment where 
some people are put down and kept down. The people who want to change the 
name of the stadium have recognised exactly what you have noticed - that 
language can be a form of power. That's why some people object to being 
called 'sheila' or 'fat' or 'nigger' - its a form of domination, of keeping 
people down. You demand respect from peoplebut you get upset when 
they demand your respect by not being called'sheila' and simply accuse 
them of beingpolitically correct'. So if someone accuses you (or 
your gender) of something, you accuse them of blaming you for everything. 
But if someone else feels you are putting them down by calling them 'sheila' (or 
whatever), you dismiss them as 'politically correct'. If you can't see the 
contradiction in what you're saying, then you're simply not thinking about the 
issues hard enough.

George Orwell, writing during the second world war, once heard 
someone referring to Germans as Huns. His response what that you 
ultimately do people more harm by calling people Huns (or whatever) than you do 
by dropping bombs on them. I know you don't like people quoting books at 
you, Lance, but it might be worth thinking about what Orwell said. 


As to your suggestion that I get a chip on my own shoulder 
because of my gender - well, it seems to me that you and I have different ideas 
of masculinity. Being strong, being masculine to me is about getting rid 
of the chips on our shoulders (and I've got plenty) not wallowing in them. 
Seems to me, Lance, on the basis of how you've replied to this list, that you're 
not very interested in trying to understand other points of view. You 
might think that constantly asserting your own point of view is being strong - I 
think it's weak.Strong men admit that they might be wrong on 
occasions.

Tim



Lance wrote:

  
  Yes Tim, 
  I and many other have chips on our shoulders asyou put its called 
  exclusion,denigration intimidation and denial of basic rights of respect and 
  selfworth.
  
  People use words to dominate others plain and simple. 
  Rather than allow for freedom of expression we are told 
  thisis the way we must express ourselves.
  I take no offence at what you say Tim. 
  By politicalcorrectedness I am saying those people in dominat positions 
  that dont speak in plain common sense terms that relate to everyone and 
  not just the educated few in societywho understand them. 
  We keep talking aboutculture as thoughitsimportance is above evbreything 
  else except thatmost australians don't have any culture at all thats the 
  issue. Isculture more importantthan real here and now issues suchas what I 
  have previouslyspoken about , third world housing, diabetes, men in 
  rural and aborginal communities, families in brokenhomes, 1 in 5 australians 
  with mentalhealthissues, overcharging privatising beaurocrats, need I go on. 
  
  Yes I have chip on my shoulder, you should to
  regards,Lance. 
  


[recoznet2] Reply (?) from Denis Burke

1999-08-02 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray


I received a reply (actually two identical replies to two different letters)
from the NTTC and the NT Chief Minister, Denis Burke, this morning.
I have no qualms about posting it since it is obviously not a letter but a
standard piece of propaganda.
Australians against mandatory sentencing - and their supporters - will be
widening their campaign to include issuing warnings to the Consuls of various
countries, Ministers for Foreign affairs and Tourism groups.
Further details will be posted as they are decided upon.

Trudy
^
From the NTTC:

Please find below the response from the Chief Ministers office regarding
mandatory sentencing laws.
It has been presented in two different formats to allow for different computer
equipment.



Yours sincerely,

Liz Harkin
Northern Territory Holiday Centre.


In March 1997, the Northern Territory introduced a mandatory minimum sentencing
regime for certain crimes against people’s homes and property.

These laws, which were passed by the Parliament and confirmed by the Territory
people at a general election some months later, have nothing to do with race,
creed or colour.  They have everything to do with guilt and innocence.

These laws do not target the marginalised or disadvantaged community members -
or tourists.  These laws do target those who break the law and are convicted by
the courts.   These laws only affect convicted criminals - particularly those
who offend and re-offend.

If a court finds someone guilty of these offences then they will go to jail -
unless there are exceptional circumstances;
unless they are aged 15 and 16 and this is their first conviction;
unless they are under 15;
- then the offender will not go to jail.

It is a very simple mandatory minimum sentencing regime - do the crime, you’ll
do the time.

Everyone is welcome in the Northern Territory - it is a very multi-cultural
society with an abundance of nature’s wonders.   It is a safe place being made
safer by the tough stance Territorians take on those who break the law.

So don’t be misled by the propaganda and lies of those who are more concerned
about the rights of criminals than the rights of victims.  Don’t be misled by
the propaganda and lies being spread by those who live thousands of kilometres
away from the beauty that is the Northern Territory.

If you want to know about the Northern Territory visit the website at
www.nt.gov.au

If you want to visit us you will be very welcome, but think for a moment about
what you would feel if when you return to your own home you find someone has
broken in and trashed the place, stealing your hard-earned goods and precious
possessions.  What would you like to see happen to the criminals who invaded
your home?






---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/