[recoznet2] Fw: [FN] THE CONTINUING SAGA OF THE ECO-RACISTS

1999-08-30 Thread Liam



From: Mike Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]


From AREAN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  THE CONTINUING SAGA OF THE ECO-RACISTS

  When I first confronted Sea Shepherd and its supporting organizations,
over the issue of how they were handling their confrontation with the
Makahs, I thought I was just dealing with people who were just
opportunists who were using a tactic to win their issue. It seemed that
they felt that they already had the support of most environmentalists and
animal rights people and that none of these  people would ever dare
question anything they did. So they set out to increase their support
base by joining with those who would be against anything that any
Native people did. This was not the first time I had seen such people use
what ever they felt they could use, including racism, to win their "issue".
For that is an old "American" tradition. Winning a "issue" is more
important than how you win. But the more I found out about these
people, the more I find myself realizing there is much more to all this
than I ever realized.
  Sea Shepherd and its supporting organizations represent a growing
rightwing turn in parts of the environmental movement. It was in 1997
that Sea Shepherd recruited the extremist rightwing anti-tribal activist
Jack Metcalf in the campaign against the Makah people. Metcalf had a
long history of not only being anti-tribal, but also a racist organizer for
the "Wise Use" movement who was out to work in the interests of the
corporations and white property owners. His goal was to open up public
and tribal land to the interests he represented. Thus, he saw working
with Sea Shepherd against the Makah people as a good opportunity to
expand his campaign against the treaties between the First Nations and
the U.S. Government. Sea Shepherd gave him what he wanted by also
threatening those treaties.
  Then Sea Shepherd, and its supporting organizations, set out to
arouse a racist backlash, not only against the Makahs, but also against
Native people in general. The reason they went after Native people in
general was that they hoped to force other Native people to side against
the Makahs by making them suffer for the actions of the Makahs. Paul
Watson made this very clear when he stated that "if the Makahs take a
whale then all Indian people would suffer."  Watson even went so far as
to use Americian "patriotism" to advance his campaign in the same way
it is used to arouse the Americian people against so-called foreign
enemies. The idea was to create the image of the American people vs
the enemy being the Makahs and Native people in general.
  The result in all this was a racist backlash that was carried on in the
newspapers, radio and tv. Later it included many death threats, a bomb
threat to a Native school, the harassment of Makah children, the
harassment of Native people throughout the state of Washington and so
on.
  Now I read in Sea Shepherd's web site that Sea Shepherd, Sea
Defense Alliance and other such organizations have been showing up at
recent campaign rallies of Sen. Slade Gorton and at one in Friday
Harbor presented him with awards. Sen. Slade Gorton is another long
time anti-tribal activist who many environmentalists know for his work in
the interests of the timber and mining companies. In a letter posted by
Sea Shepherd from Sen. Gorton he says; "I am more convinced today
than ever before that we must bring common sense back to the
relationship between this country, our laws and Native American tribes.
All Americans should be subject to the same laws." If you do not
understand what he is really saying let me explain it. He is using terms
that have been used by not only by anti-tribal people but also by people
against such things as civil rights which says that anything society does
to correct any of the wrongs done to any group of people is some how
taking rights away from white Americans. In this case it means
eliminating the treaties between the First Nations and the U.S.
Government.
  Sen. Gorton is a supporter of the Bush presidential campaign. And I
find it rather interesting that Bush's father, the warmongering former
president and former head of the CIA, on June 22 named Paul Watson a
"Daily Point Of Light".  In issuing this award Bush states "Your acts of
generosity and community action exemplity the spirit of service and set
a standard of excellence to which people of all ages can aspire." Given
the service to the corporate community of Bush as the head of the CIA,
as Reagan's Vice-President and then as President, we all know the type
of service Watson was awarded for.
  Then yesterday I was sent a poem (see below) that was sent to a
member of the Puyallup Nation by the Sea Defense Alliance
"commander" Athena McIntyre that shows just how far the racism and
hate has gone by some of the so-called environmentalists.
  I do not view all environmentalists as racist, even though this is how
some have seen my words. I view myself as an environmentalist and I
view the actions 

Re: [recoznet2] SMH - Moving from words to action

1999-08-30 Thread Laurie Forde

Talk about hitting the nail on the headWell said Trudy---Should be on
the  front page of all tomorrow's dailies.:)

Laurie.

Laurie and Desley Forde   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Trudy and Rod Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 30, 1999 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [recoznet2] SMH - Moving from words to action


I think it is because Aden Ridgeway and Lowitja O'Donahue are better people
than Howard is and they
therefore tend to believe he is sincere - at least in part. He can be very
convincing and his words often
seem very reasonable. I believe it is something he has learnt to use to get
what he wants.
Sociopaths often dupe the same people over and over again because they are
so good at it. They betray no
doubt in what they say because they have no conscience and therefore are
very convincing.

Trudy

tim dunlop wrote:

 I think you're right, Trudy, and I agree with Robert Manne - as per the
 other article you posted - that we've been tricked.  Howard is the most
 cunning and deceitful politician I know of and ANYTHING that has his
 approval is by definition tainted and probably the opposite of what is
 needed.  The upsetting thing is that the likes of Aden Ridgeway and
Lowitja
 O'Donahue (esp the latter) are willing to go along with it.

 Tim

 Trudy wrote:

 I have marked ### the paragraph that makes wonder about the value of the
 'regret' and question what exactly it is that Aboriginal peoples have
 received from the 'compromise' - are they just pawns in
 "blindsiding the Labor Party" and Howard's political games?
  --- Trudy
 =

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the
body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed
further without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/


---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Fw: [FN] THE CONTINUING SAGA OF THE ECO-RACISTS

1999-08-30 Thread Liam

Trudy, have you read any editorials from around the Washington state area?
Have you read the letters to the editor of sections of newspapers? Have you
noticed that Indian people don't have a voice in the area? Did you realize
that it will be ANOTHER treaty that the US has broken if they say the Makah
cannot hunt whales? (not that this makes much of an impression on the US
populace, every treaty has been broken) Does the poem suggest anything about
the supporters of Sea Shepherd? (it was posted on the "Seattle Insider
whaling forum" and was removed recently,) There are more buffalo being
killed by whites in Yellowstone, than what there are Whales being killed by
Makah. Do you think that the Dalai Lama knows what Sea Shepherd are up to?
Who would make a fake Makah site, twisting words to make the Makah look like
murderous pigs? (no offense to pigs intended :) Kill an Indian save a Whale
has been a popular expression.

If you want to follow up on who wrote the message, send an e-mail to the
latter person... bayou@... I believe Arthur j miller wrote the piece...I
will track him down if you can't.

There are ways and means of saving whales. I have read too many articles and
personnel accounts of Sea Shepherd et al to believe that they are doing good
(regardless of their intents)

If you give your permission, I'll send your response to the mailing list I
got this from.

What did Watson do at the Knee?

I've seen just as many "smears" of the Makah, than what I have of
Watson...in fact, if I wasn't on so many Indigenous lists, I probably would
only see "smearing" of the Makah...newspapers, TV, radio haven't touched on
the lies Sea Shepherd has purported.

"Later it included many death threats, a bomb threat to a Native school, the
harassment of Makah children, the harassment of Native people throughout the
state of Washington and so on." I can put you in contact with some of these
people.

peace

p.s. for what it's worth, I haven't made my mind up on how I feel about this
issue. I do know the it has improved and renewed pride in the Makah people,
as much as Sea Shepherd et al has tried to suppress it.

pps I know there are generalisations here... don't attack them...they aren't
meant as anything else


Liam,
Who exactly from the below wrote the smear piece? It is a very dishonest
thing to do to associate the things
George Bush did and stood for and because he praised Paul Watson, insinuate
that Watson holds the same views
and is guilty (by association) of what Bush did.

To wit:
A message from the Dalai Lama

 The natural environment sustains the life of all beings in the world.
 However, nearly everywhere these days it is undergoing extensive
 degeneration. Therefore, it is more important than ever that each of us
 makes whatever effort we can according to our capacity to ensure the
 protection, restoration and replenishment of our environment and its
 inhabitants.

 When the environment becomes damaged and polluted, there are
 many negative consequences. Oceans and lakes lose their cool and
 soothing qualities and the creatures depending on them are disturbed.
 The decline of vegetation and forest cover causes great harm not only
 around its immediate surroundings but even in far away and unrelated
 areas. Rain no longer falls when required, the soil dries and erodes,
 forest fires rage and unprecedented storms and floods arise. We all
 suffer the consequences.

 I am happy to lend my support to those who, like the
 volunteers of the Sea Shepherd Conservation
 Society, seek to protect our oceans and our fellow
 creatures like the whales who live in them.

 And it is my hope that through understanding the
 interdependence of the world and all the beings that live in it, people
 will adapt their behaviour in such ways that the potential of our
 bounteous natural realm will be nurtured and preserved.

 His Holiness The Dalai Lama
 29 September 1998

I guess the Dalai Lama will now be painted with the racist brush  because
he too believes in saving whales.

It seems to me that people who write stuff like you posted are desperate to
excuse what they are doing by
attacking others with a different viewpoint. If the Makah want to kill
whales then they should feel secure
enough in that they don't need to turn everyone who doesn't agree with them
into racists. Disagreement is
not racism. I think that Paul Watson, who braved the bullets at Wounded
Knee is being smeared with racism
very unjustly. It smacks of insecurity on the part of the Makah about what
they are doing. Turning Paul
Watson into a racist is not going to make them feel any better.

Liam wrote:

 From: Mike Wicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 From AREAN; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   THE CONTINUING SAGA OF THE ECO-RACISTS
 
   When I first confronted Sea Shepherd and its supporting organizations,
 over the issue of how they were handling their confrontation with the
 Makahs, I thought I was just dealing with people who were just
 opportunists who were using a tactic to win 

[recoznet2] Y12 seeks opinions on the draft reconciliation document

1999-08-30 Thread webweave

passing this on - please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have answered the questions, but if you want to respond also, just cut and
paste the questions 
cheers susanne
__
Year 12 Aboriginal Studies PAS Major Research Assignment 
My name is Marco Ranauro and as part of the successful completion of my year 12
PAS Aboriginal Studies course I'm required to complete a Major Research
Assignment.  My Assignment is focusing on the draft document for reconciliation
between Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals which was created by the Council of
Aboriginal Reconciliation.  This survey is a part of my assignment so the
completion of it is much appreciated.

1.  What do you know about the Draft Document for Reconciliation?  If you
know nothing why do you think this is so?

I know about the document because i am connected to the internet and subscribe
to lists that circulate this sort of information - without email, i would be
less informed - i know people who are uninformed yet they read newspapers,
watch tv etc - If people don't know about the document which has turned into a
movement, then the government is remiss in its unbiased public ed programmes

2.  What is your understanding of the word Reconciliation?

reconciliation my definition: (check the dictionary for the differences if a
hyphen is added)
re-conciliation is a federally funded assimilationist platform, hopefully
subverted by locally devised and enacted policy and process, involving an
exchange of human understanding, resulting in mutual and individual healing, in
preparation for a mutually thriving co-existence
reconciliation is a healing process between citizens, not a political process
for governments to subvert into national documents that attempts to bind
indigenous peoples to 'british' law and custom, instead of the choice of their
own sovereign laws and traditions

3.  Why do we need a document for Reconciliation?

we don't - politicians are desperate to appear 'reconciled' with our indigenous
citizens because very soon there will be global eyes on Oz - also the
government wants to appease CERD which is complaining about the government's
ongoing genocidal practices - the colonial war is still going
we need a sovereignty movement - where all peoples, young and old are sovereign
selves who determine their own lives through choice - this document represents
late 90's assimilationist practices by individuals who are predators upon
theignorance, trust or powerlessness of many australian people

4.  Do you believe Australia needs a National Reconciliation document to
help aid reconciliation?  Why/Why not.

No - because the document is not about healing or co-existence - it is about
assimilation and more of this we don't need - it has already cost indigenous
peoples and migrants their language, culture and customs - not to mention their
lives for 7 generations so far

5.  Please circle what sources have given you information about the draft
document?
TV/film Newspaper radio news/Current affairs other

internet and some tv but manily protest meetings and speeches at rallies etc

6.  Explain what relevance this document has for:
a)  yourself

none, other than to hopefully alert 'our' citizens to the genocidal practices
that many of 'our' population practice - but i fear that it will influence
uncritical ozians as it is the only platform funded 

b)  An Aboriginal person

you cannot reduce indigenous australia to one group - there are 66 countries in
NSW alone - homogeneity has been debunked now for decades and its failings are
well documented - everyone is different so no group usually speaks for all of
its members as consensus is a rare commodity indeed - only seen it once myself
with a group of 300 - this goes for political parties, groups, families,
schools, classes etc 
compare aden ridgway and isabell coe - both indigenous - but one is a
recognised and paid politician and one is not
- why is this so - both are doing the same thing - isabell comes from the
aboriginal tent embassy and aden from the democrats - but isabell is not given
the credibility that aden enjoys - the reason is the crux of the problem - one
system is privileged - the coloniser's system
- the debate could almost be reduced to the arguments of these two people with
additions to cover some other points not yet raised

c)  The Australian Society

it is clear that those citizens who support assimilation are publicly backing
the document
however it is equally clear that many indigenous australians and many non
indigenous australians do not support reconciliation as a political process and
certainly not as something that needs to be 'signed by anyone' - in fact,
tomorrow 1/9/99 an historic federal court case will be heard in sydney - the
'issue' - whether genocide is admissable under 'our' common law - in this
situation isabell and aden become opponents because the government will not
admit to genocidal 

[recoznet2] SMH - Letters to the editor

1999-08-30 Thread Trudy and Rod Bray



http://www.smh.com.au/news/9908/31/text/letters.html

Some thought provoking letters to the editor today.

Trudy

---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/



Re: [recoznet2] Letters to the editor

1999-08-30 Thread irene

irene watson 
the programme whiteys like us, a good historical document glad someone
thought of filming the process, i hope it goes some way in explaining to
white people about how onerous the role of educating them about their own
racism is and even furhter in finding ways of doing it well without further
traumatising us nungas into the overall process

--
 From: Trudy and Rod Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: RecOzNet2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [recoznet2] Letters to the editor
 Date: Saturday, August 28, 1999 9:01 AM
 
 
 
 The Motion of Regret has unleashed a flurry of letters to the editor.
 Unfortunately, it seems to have flushed a lot of racists out of the
woodwork.
 Read them at:
 http://www.smh.com.au/news/9908/28/text/letters.html
 
 Trudy
 
 PS Does anyone who watched 'Whiteys like Us' last night have any
comments?
 
 ---
 RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived
at http://www.mail-archive.com/
 To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in
the body
 of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
 This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without
permission from the
 copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and
research under the "fair
 use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be
distributed further without
 permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."
 
 RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/
---
RecOzNet2 has a page @ http://www.green.net.au/recoznet2 and is archived at 
http://www.mail-archive.com/
To unsubscribe from this list, mail [EMAIL PROTECTED], and in the body
of the message, include the words:unsubscribe announce or click here
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20announce
This posting is provided to the individual members of this group without permission 
from the
copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment, scholarship and research under 
the "fair
use" provisions of the Federal copyright laws and it may not be distributed further 
without
permission of the copyright owner, except for "fair use."

RecOzNet2 is archived for members @ http://www.mail-archive.com/