Re: RedDot Management Client

2011-01-14 Thread RustyLogic
Hi Casey,

Not sure there is a market for it. Most of the serious developers of
RedDot are using one (free) wrapper or another to get away from RQL in
the first place. It would seem to be a retrograde step to go back to
the 'bad old days' of chopping RQL around.

Just my 2p :-)

John

On Jan 13, 3:17 pm, Casey Williams caseyswilli...@gmail.com wrote:
 I respectfully disagree. The market is not developers, but
 administrators with limited development ability. A developer would
 likely just write a simple program to fulfill their needs themselves.
 Companies that don't have developers capable of something like this
 hire OpenText professional services at 200/hr to do things that this
 software could accomplish for significantly less. Though there may not
 be a benefit for the website end user, there is a benefit for the
 administrators and in an environment with more than a few content
 authors and/or a large number of pages this benefit is substantial. It
 is my experience that companies will spend money on tools that make
 life easier for their employees even more readily than they will on
 something that improves the experience of their end users. Companies
 like infragistics make money doing nothing but selling controls to
 make developer's lives easier. The developers aren't shelling out 1500
 bucks for a silverlight graph control, but the company they work for
 will. I do appreciate your feedback, and it is not my intent to be
 argumentative, but I think exposure to open source communities has
 left you, like many developers, with the impression that software is
 not worth money. My interest was more in receiving questions/comments/
 suggestions about the features of the software than the marketing of
 it. Feel free to check out the screenshot slideshow, and I will upload
 a video walkthrough shortly.

 Casey

 On Jan 12, 5:06 pm, markus giesen markus.gie...@gmail.com wrote:

  I doubt that anyone is going to pay for it, mostly because the
  audience you are looking at is basically developers which don't have a
  budget for it.
  The next thing is that there is no benefit for the website end-user,
  thus no one will invest in something they don't see a monetary value
  in.

  Don't get me wrong, your solutions sounds great and I'd love to see
  and test it but judging by my experience with thehttp://reddotcmsblog.com
  it's a lot taking, little giving. All work on the blog is free, there
  is a donation button I've tried in the past, it has been used once.

  I suggest to publish it, get your name out, earn kudos and get lots of
  good karma.
  You will get more in return that way by getting your reputation up.
  Other than that, I doubt that anyone will pay for it, although I
  understand where you're coming from.

  - Markus

  On Jan 13, 6:59 am, emily stange esta...@gmail.com wrote:

   Casey,

   That sounds like an interesting extension.

   I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free 
   and
   not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
   group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
   centralized location where people go to look for them. Instead of 
   providing
   download instructions, you can provide your contact information for
   prospective buyers to Find Out More (for 
   examplehttp://www.solutionexchange.info/Enthink-Taxonomy-Manager.htm).

   -Emily

   On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Casey Williams 
   caseyswilli...@gmail.comwrote:

So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
program followed naturally.

Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
I'd ask you guys if it sounds 

Re: RedDot Management Client

2011-01-13 Thread Casey Williams
I respectfully disagree. The market is not developers, but
administrators with limited development ability. A developer would
likely just write a simple program to fulfill their needs themselves.
Companies that don't have developers capable of something like this
hire OpenText professional services at 200/hr to do things that this
software could accomplish for significantly less. Though there may not
be a benefit for the website end user, there is a benefit for the
administrators and in an environment with more than a few content
authors and/or a large number of pages this benefit is substantial. It
is my experience that companies will spend money on tools that make
life easier for their employees even more readily than they will on
something that improves the experience of their end users. Companies
like infragistics make money doing nothing but selling controls to
make developer's lives easier. The developers aren't shelling out 1500
bucks for a silverlight graph control, but the company they work for
will. I do appreciate your feedback, and it is not my intent to be
argumentative, but I think exposure to open source communities has
left you, like many developers, with the impression that software is
not worth money. My interest was more in receiving questions/comments/
suggestions about the features of the software than the marketing of
it. Feel free to check out the screenshot slideshow, and I will upload
a video walkthrough shortly.

Casey


On Jan 12, 5:06 pm, markus giesen markus.gie...@gmail.com wrote:
 I doubt that anyone is going to pay for it, mostly because the
 audience you are looking at is basically developers which don't have a
 budget for it.
 The next thing is that there is no benefit for the website end-user,
 thus no one will invest in something they don't see a monetary value
 in.

 Don't get me wrong, your solutions sounds great and I'd love to see
 and test it but judging by my experience with thehttp://reddotcmsblog.com
 it's a lot taking, little giving. All work on the blog is free, there
 is a donation button I've tried in the past, it has been used once.

 I suggest to publish it, get your name out, earn kudos and get lots of
 good karma.
 You will get more in return that way by getting your reputation up.
 Other than that, I doubt that anyone will pay for it, although I
 understand where you're coming from.

 - Markus

 On Jan 13, 6:59 am, emily stange esta...@gmail.com wrote:



  Casey,

  That sounds like an interesting extension.

  I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free and
  not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
  group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
  centralized location where people go to look for them. Instead of providing
  download instructions, you can provide your contact information for
  prospective buyers to Find Out More (for 
  examplehttp://www.solutionexchange.info/Enthink-Taxonomy-Manager.htm).

  -Emily

  On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Casey Williams 
  caseyswilli...@gmail.comwrote:

   So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
   found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
   just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
   draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
   RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
   various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
   more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

   Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
   clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
   RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
   window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
   RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
   the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
   could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
   automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
   program followed naturally.

   Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
   So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
   functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
   this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
   exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
   I'd ask you guys if it sounds like something you would find useful. I
   can post screenshots and/or video walkthroughs if this idea intrigues
   anyone. Let me know!

   --
   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
   RedDot CMS Users group.
   To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-users@googlegroups.com.
   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
   

RedDot Management Client

2011-01-12 Thread Casey Williams
So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
program followed naturally.

Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
I'd ask you guys if it sounds like something you would find useful. I
can post screenshots and/or video walkthroughs if this idea intrigues
anyone. Let me know!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
RedDot CMS Users group.
To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.



Re: RedDot Management Client

2011-01-12 Thread emily stange
Casey,

That sounds like an interesting extension.

I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free and
not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
centralized location where people go to look for them. Instead of providing
download instructions, you can provide your contact information for
prospective buyers to Find Out More (for example
http://www.solutionexchange.info/Enthink-Taxonomy-Manager.htm).

-Emily


On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Casey Williams caseyswilli...@gmail.comwrote:

 So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
 found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
 just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
 draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
 RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
 various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
 more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

 Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
 clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
 RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
 window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
 RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
 the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
 could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
 automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
 program followed naturally.

 Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
 So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
 functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
 this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
 exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
 I'd ask you guys if it sounds like something you would find useful. I
 can post screenshots and/or video walkthroughs if this idea intrigues
 anyone. Let me know!

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RedDot CMS Users group.
 To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreddot-cms-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 .
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
RedDot CMS Users group.
To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.



Re: RedDot Management Client

2011-01-12 Thread Casey Williams
Thanks Emily!

Here are a few screenshots to give you guys a little better idea what
I was talking about.

http://s915.photobucket.com/albums/ac356/ghgknives/RedDot%20Management/?albumview=slideshow

Casey

On Jan 12, 2:59 pm, emily stange esta...@gmail.com wrote:
 Casey,

 That sounds like an interesting extension.

 I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free and
 not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
 group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
 centralized location where people go to look for them. Instead of providing
 download instructions, you can provide your contact information for
 prospective buyers to Find Out More (for 
 examplehttp://www.solutionexchange.info/Enthink-Taxonomy-Manager.htm).

 -Emily

 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Casey Williams 
 caseyswilli...@gmail.comwrote:



  So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
  found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
  just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
  draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
  RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
  various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
  more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

  Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
  clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
  RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
  window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
  RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
  the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
  could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
  automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
  program followed naturally.

  Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
  So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
  functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
  this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
  exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
  I'd ask you guys if it sounds like something you would find useful. I
  can post screenshots and/or video walkthroughs if this idea intrigues
  anyone. Let me know!

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  RedDot CMS Users group.
  To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreddot-cms-users%2bunsubscrib...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
RedDot CMS Users group.
To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.



Re: RedDot Management Client

2011-01-12 Thread markus giesen
I doubt that anyone is going to pay for it, mostly because the
audience you are looking at is basically developers which don't have a
budget for it.
The next thing is that there is no benefit for the website end-user,
thus no one will invest in something they don't see a monetary value
in.

Don't get me wrong, your solutions sounds great and I'd love to see
and test it but judging by my experience with the http://reddotcmsblog.com
it's a lot taking, little giving. All work on the blog is free, there
is a donation button I've tried in the past, it has been used once.

I suggest to publish it, get your name out, earn kudos and get lots of
good karma.
You will get more in return that way by getting your reputation up.
Other than that, I doubt that anyone will pay for it, although I
understand where you're coming from.

- Markus

On Jan 13, 6:59 am, emily stange esta...@gmail.com wrote:
 Casey,

 That sounds like an interesting extension.

 I just wanted to let you know that Solution Exchange (SolEx) is for free and
 not free solutions. Whether or not you get positive feedback here in the
 group, SolEx can be a place where you can market your solution in a
 centralized location where people go to look for them. Instead of providing
 download instructions, you can provide your contact information for
 prospective buyers to Find Out More (for 
 examplehttp://www.solutionexchange.info/Enthink-Taxonomy-Manager.htm).

 -Emily

 On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Casey Williams 
 caseyswilli...@gmail.comwrote:

  So, in working with RedDot 10.1 for the last 4 months or so I have
  found that there are some things that I would like it to do that it
  just doesn't (like releasing pages that other users have saved as
  draft for example), or doesn't do well. I discovered the wonders of
  RQL and started writing a simple .net application that would perform
  various functions that I found I commonly wanted, and just kept adding
  more buttons every time I wanted to do something new.

  Then I decided to make it a little more extensible. I added a
  clipboard that functions much like the one in Management Server, an
  RQL console window, an RQL log window, and a navigation structure
  window complete with drag and drop. I gave myself the ability to save
  RQL commands, and the console the ability to replace placeholders (of
  the form [!lguid_login!]) with data from the clipboard such that I
  could just copy and paste RQL from the documentation and it would work
  automagically. Allowing myself to create new buttons from within the
  program followed naturally.

  Before I knew it, I had not used the web interface at all in weeks.
  So, I was thinking to myself that other users might want this
  functionality as well. Given the large amount of work I've put into
  this it doesn't seem like something I should give away on solutions
  exchange or whatever, but before I started trying to sell it I thought
  I'd ask you guys if it sounds like something you would find useful. I
  can post screenshots and/or video walkthroughs if this idea intrigues
  anyone. Let me know!

  --
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
  RedDot CMS Users group.
  To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
  reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.comreddot-cms-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com
  .
  For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
RedDot CMS Users group.
To post to this group, send email to reddot-cms-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reddot-cms-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reddot-cms-users?hl=en.