upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
All, I just upgraded my ssh using the 3.7.1 source tarball (I couldn't find an rpm for it). Now when I try to login I get a connection refused. As I am unable to get a connection to the machine, I am not able to provide much debugging information. Can anybody give me any pointers as to what to look for to sort out the problem? I do have a go between who has access to the console. the machine in question uses an iptables firewall, but prior to the upgrade the system worked fine letting connections to port22 through. Regards Marty -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
There is an exploit for all versions lower than 3.7.1. Allowing root access. It seems to have hit the public domain yesterday. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/advisories/redhat_advisory-3628.html (this one seems to say 3.1 is ok, but When I first started hunting another site I came across (which I now can't find gr) was suggesting that 3.7.1 should be the version to install, which I did. Regards Marty - Original Message - From: Sean Estabrooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:45:23 +0100 Martin Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded my ssh using the 3.7.1 source tarball (I couldn't find an rpm for it). Now when I try to login I get a connection refused. As I am unable to get a connection to the machine, I am not able to provide much debugging information. Can anybody give me any pointers as to what to look for to sort out the problem? I do have a go between who has access to the console. the machine in question uses an iptables firewall, but prior to the upgrade the system worked fine letting connections to port22 through. Martin, I'd suggest reinstalling the 3.1 version from rpm, at least until you can sort problem out in a computer that is closer to you. Trying to debug through a remote third party with help from the list is going to be difficult. What problem were you trying to solve by upgrading to 3.7 in the first place? Perhaps, upgrading to the current rawhide rpm package (3.6) would be easier and still provide what you need. Good Luck, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
aha here's the link http://www.openssh.com/txt/buffer.adv Marty - Original Message - From: Sean Estabrooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:05 PM Subject: Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:45:23 +0100 Martin Moss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just upgraded my ssh using the 3.7.1 source tarball (I couldn't find an rpm for it). Now when I try to login I get a connection refused. As I am unable to get a connection to the machine, I am not able to provide much debugging information. Can anybody give me any pointers as to what to look for to sort out the problem? I do have a go between who has access to the console. the machine in question uses an iptables firewall, but prior to the upgrade the system worked fine letting connections to port22 through. Martin, I'd suggest reinstalling the 3.1 version from rpm, at least until you can sort problem out in a computer that is closer to you. Trying to debug through a remote third party with help from the list is going to be difficult. What problem were you trying to solve by upgrading to 3.7 in the first place? Perhaps, upgrading to the current rawhide rpm package (3.6) would be easier and still provide what you need. Good Luck, Sean -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
I can believe that:-) I just couldn't find the rpm. Any ideas where it would be? Marty - Original Message - From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 12:24 PM Subject: Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Martin Moss wrote: aha here's the link http://www.openssh.com/txt/buffer.adv RH often backports patches. Life is simpler if you stay with their packages. -- Hal Burgiss -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: KVM Switch recommendation
I have exactly the same keyboard/mouse problems with Belkin switches! - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:57 PM Subject: Re: KVM Switch recommendation I would recommend AGAINST using any Belkin KVMs. We've had nothing but problems with them. If you have a Windoze box and a Linux box with the GUI running on the same KVM, when you switch from the Windoze box to the Linux box it messes your mouse up. The mouse will start randomly moving all over the screen and clicking everywhere opening windows. When this happens, you have to Ctrl+Alt+Backspace to kill the GUI and then restart it. On the rack mounted server KVMs we have, if you don't start certain Compaq ProLiant servers with the focus on that machine in the KVM, it won't detect the keyboard and mouse when it boots. This is with both Linux and Windows. I would go with APC KVMs if its for a server rack, although they are a little expensive. We're still looking for a good desktop KVM. Chris Purcell, RHCE I can recommend the Belkin Omni Cube. I have been using that for a couple of years with not problems. I am also using a wireless optical mouse with no issues. On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 01:00, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: At 09:03 9/11/2003 +1000, you wrote: Does anyone has recommendation for KVM switch? I plan to use it to run Linux (Redhat 7.3) and Win2K with PS2 keyboard mouse. The cheaper the better, but trying to find the one with very minimal / no video degradation at 1400x1050, as my linux runs on that resolution on 19 inc monitor. I've been using cybex (now avocent: http://www.avocent.com) for many years without a single problem. I can also recommend these. When I was researching mine, this was what most people recommended as being a good value and high quality, and my 4-port KVM has been fantastic with no problems. I did, however, get my KVM cables from Newegg to save some dough and those have worked well too. I have not used above 1280x1024, but in theory you should have no problems at all. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
openssh 3.7.1 - reinstall
All, As previously posted, I've got a bit of a mess on my hands for the openssh on my redhat system. I had 2.9 rpm on there, then I installed the 3.7.1 source. This didn't seem to work as it gives me connection refused. To upgrade successfully, I need to use the 3.7.1 rpm. I cannot login to updates.redhat.com to get the patches/rpms that were mentioned on previous posts. I presume that I need to get an account from somewhere? Is this an up2date account? What steps must I take to remove the old code, remove the source installation and then install the new rpm? Marty -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
Guess I'll wait before I bother upgrading, currently nobody can get onto my machine anyway :-/ Marty - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused Now here is the kicker: http://www.openpkg.org/security/OpenPKG-SA-2003.040-openssh.html If you read through it, they mention this: The discovery of additional similar errors by Solar Designer show that version 3.7.1 is affected, too. Those errors may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by causing an incorrect amount of memory to be cleared and corrupting the heap on fatal cleanups. So, look like a long week of patches. :-( --Keith On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, MKlinke wrote: Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:01:23 -0500 From: MKlinke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused On Wednesday 17 September 2003 10:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks, But the one that I was referring to, what the openssh that was released this morrning, http://www.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-announce/2003-September /64.html Wed Sep 17 01:13:10 EST 2003 This new version came out after they released a patch. It may not be as critical as the previous bug fix, but still needs to be installed. The one that was released yesterday was openssh-3.7p1.tar.gz, the one released this morrning was openssh-3.7.1p1.tar.gz. Just waiting on an rpm to patch more servers. Thanks, --Keith Ah, thanks for the link, I hadn't caught up on my Bugtraq reading this morning. I guess we can expect a new Red Hat release soon Regards, Mike Klinke -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: upgraded ssh from 3.1 to 3.7.1 - now getting connection refused
You might have to delete the SSH client key and let it generate a new one. Where would I find this, and do you mean the client key on the sourcing ssh or the destination ssh server which is refusing the connection? Marty On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 08:06, Hal Burgiss wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:35:48PM +0100, Martin Moss wrote: I can believe that:-) I just couldn't find the rpm. Any ideas where it would be? RHN or ftp://updates.redhat.com/7.2/en/os//i386/openssh-3.1p1-10* That's obviously 7.2 updates (out yesterday or day before). -- Hal Burgiss -- Hart's PGP Key: 0x7BFF655E - http://TQMcube.com/hart_pgp.txt Total Quality Management - A Commitment to Excellence Email acceptance policy: http://www.TQMcube.com/email_policy.html --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Should we stay with M$
Security MS = bad, linux=good, Access is not a Database Server, unlike SQL Server, mysql is. All software you could want to use on linux is free, as is Linux, unless you wish to purchase a set of CD's. MS is not. Apache Vs IIS, no competition. Marty - Original Message - From: Jason Tesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Redhat List (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 1:05 PM Subject: Should we stay with M$ I know this is only kind of related to this list but I think some of you guys would be able to help me here. I work at a College which prior to me coming here 1.5 years ago had only one programmer. He has been here 7 years and is in my opinion not much other than a M$ Office guru. I am not the best either as most of my applications and programs I write are web based. I'm pretty good with php, mysql, other web languages and now I am really trying to get involved with Python, which I love :-) I also would like to convert myself to Linux. Currently I still have a few programs that I cannot get for Linux or even something comparable. Anyways, my question is could someone send me info links or anything like that that could aid me in explaining why Access programming, if that is what you call it, and staying dependant to M$ for that matter, would not be a good thing to persue for our future. We are having a tech meeting soon where we will be discusing our future direction and I want to go into that meeting with information and examples. Thank you for any help, links, or information you could feed me. Jason Tesser Web/Multimedia Programmer Northland Baptist Bible College (715)324-6900 ext. 3055 -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Should we stay with M$
Easy Tiger:-) I know you're not trying to be patronising, its cool, however I do have some counter points though:- Stop. Your response is nothing but pure fanboyism. This type of advocacy is ignorant and does nothing to advance OSS in the industry. Allow me to retort: Security MS = bad, linux=good I couldn't agree more, it IS pure fanboyism born of experience having to compare and contrast the two. And generally watch everything fall over on Windows, and not on Linux. You can rave on all you want about how Windows is secure if you set it up properly, but from the description Jason said of his team, it sounded like they didn't possess the expertise to spend hours turning off all the 'insecure' settings windows turns on as default. And that alone makes linux far better in My humble opinion, because you build it watertight to begin with and then gradually open up the services you want. I decided not to go into that much depth because I don't have time to do Jason's work for him, and I guess that whoever he is meeting with will probably not understand half the concepts we're talking about anyway. Any OS is only as secure as its Systems Administrator. I'm not going to start my typical rant here, I already ran through this with Didier weeks ago. Yes, MS has a terrible history track. So do other OS's. There are a number of points to consider: Exploit creators generally focus on Microsoft because it's the most prevalent (and worst administered) OS; Red Hat generally has just as many patches released as Windows (if not more), BUT... ; Red Hat also distributes much more software (3rd party) with their system than Windows... it would be impossible for them to audit all of it; etc, etc. MS has a poor track record, has done since People started 'targetting' microsoft years ago. We're not interested in 'other' OS's we're interested in linux. And I'm not aware of it having had a poor track record for a long time. Perhaps you should be reminded that hacking is no fun if you can't do anything, so the reason MS is 'exploited' more frequently is not because people hate MS so much it's because MS is so easy to exploit, it's far more fun. (However this is MY Opinion, as I'm far too busy to actually try hacking anything myself!) Perhaps a fair comparison is a Poor SA on MS against a poor SA on linux. I'd bet my bottom dollar that the poor SA on linux would still end up with a secure enough system. What trend does this reveal? Bugs will continue to exist, exploits will continue to happen. The one advantage Linux/OSS has over the proprietary market is a *proven* track record of fast patching. *This* is where Linux/OSS excels. Nevertheless, you're not helping anyone out by painting with broad strokes. Perhaps I'm not using broad strokes but Stereotypes. And Stereotypes start from somewhere. Need I remind you of the latest wave of Viruses, that have just struck MS systems. You find me a virus that can get past SSH as easily as MS. Access is not a Database Server, unlike SQL Server, mysql is. I'm not sure whether you're trying to say Access and SQL Server both suck, MySQL is good, or Access sucks, both SQL Server and MySQL are good. If the latter, you're ok. If the former, you're actually quite wrong. While I would *never* suggest that a client run SQL Server, it actually competes nicely with a number of other popular commercial RDBMS's. It *is* an enterprise database, like it or not. And yes, it too has a terrible security record. I did indeed mean to show that SQL Server and mysql are database Servers and Access is not. I was trying to show that there is an option on Windows to use SQL Server rather than mysql, although, mysql is in my experience solid as a rock, and I have yet to find an MS product that doesn't crash regularly. (another sweeping generalisation, but the truth from my own experience). G Bloomin Age of Empires always crashes when it's been an hour since you last saved your game!!!:-) All software you could want to use on linux is free, as is Linux, unless you wish to purchase a set of CD's. MS is not. Free as in speech, not as in beer. http://www.redhat.com/download/howto_download.html (where's the price of beer here? It is free to download - or do you mean the cost of the phone bill to download it:-) Apache Vs IIS, no competition. I won't argue this point except to say, it matters on the OP's circumstances. Apache does not have support for full-blown ASP programming. If that's what their department insists on using (doesn't sound like it), they're stuck with IIS. Personally, I love Apache... even on Windows. I've taken full-blown Perl web applications written in CGI::Application (with HTML::Template inheritance) and ported it trivially from Linux/Perl/Apache/MySQL to Windows2000/ActiveState Perl/Apache/MySQL. Col. Mod perl rocks, and my one experience of IIS left me feeling cold. I am a perl programmer at heart, so I
Recommend vpn for Linux
All, can anybody recommend any VPN software for Linux. I wish to VPN'ify' two home networks, each network has a linux router to connect to their ISP and they each have a domain name that provides a constant interface into their dynamic IP addresses. Ideally I would like to have it look like the computers are all on the same network , so a Windows machine on one network could see a windows machine on the other network. Is this a plausible thing to attempt? Regards Marty -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Sweet Success
Are you commission mate:-) ? lol Marty - Original Message - From: Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:49 AM Subject: Sweet Success I just want to relate the happiness I have over the successful installation of yet another RedHat server for a small business customer of mine; They were in need of a low-cost, dependable server machine to be used as a file server and a printer server - a machine on which they could load a high-end architectural/accounting package; originally they were faced with spending upwards of $6000 (for a MS type box, of course); my total drop in cost for the box ended up being $2200 - loaded with RH9 + updates, Samba, MySQL, using SENDMAIL/FETCHMAIL/PROCMAIL + SpamAssassin, F-Prot and ClamAV - as well as being the gateway for an 802.11b 2.4ghz network in our area. Actual software load and configuration was one evening here at home - about 2 hours total; drop in on site with client machine configurations was one day. Done deal. No dramas, no sweat, no problems. Even had time to show the admin how to use VNC to access the server desktop; script was setup to backup to CDRW once per week. EZ as pie. Had this have been a Windows box I would have spent three days with it - for one thing or another - I'm used to that crap, and the monstrous size of the patches/updates/fixes. So, for anyone with any doubts, it's really easy - it's really simple. Plus, the customer was more than happy to know that they have IMAP/POP functionality, a proxy (privoxy) and a firewall - without license fees and BS associated. They even have a nice big round RH sticker on the front door now...(couldn't say No to the admin - was her idea). -- Wed Aug 20 16:35:01 EST 2003 16:35:01 up 2 days, 19:01, 1 user, load average: 0.29, 0.16, 0.05 - |____ | illawarra computer services| | /-oo /| |'-. | http://kma.0catch.com | | .\__/ || | | || | _ / `._ \|_|_.-' | stephen kuhn | | | / \__.`=._) (_ | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - linux user #:267497 linux machine #:194239 * MDK 9.1+ RH 9 Mandrake Linux Kernel 2.4.21-11mdk Cooker for i586 - * This message was composed on a 100% Microsoft free computer * The Martian landed his saucer in Manhattan, and immediately upon emerging was approached by a panhandler. Mister, said the man, can I have a quarter? The Martian asked, What's a quarter? The panhandler thought a minute, brightened, then said, You're right! Can I have a dollar? -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: AOL Now Bouncing DHCP Addresses, Residential Addresses[May Be OT] [Most definitely OT] :-)
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:02:08AM -0500, Ronald W. Heiby wrote: Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 2:10:04 AM, T. wrote: Huh? No, the question is: Why the fsck where those guys able to get on board with the BOX CUTTERS?!?! Because no one had thought of box cutters as a threat. That's exactly what I don't understand. I've been stopped at European airports for carrying bicycle tools or even a bicycle lock (!) as they were regarded to be too dangerous - and that was way before 11/09. I wouldn't even have dreamt of trying to carry a pocket knive with me, at least not, if I actually wanted to catch that plane... :-} Cheerio, Thomas -- Having travelled to and From the US internally and Internationally over the years, I can honestly state that I was apalled by the lack of security compared to European flights - before 9/11. I guess that because Europe has lived with terrorism for hundreds of years its way ahead of the US on that score, I wonder if the US will continue to reinvent the wheel on Terrorism as they have done so far. I'm sure occupying Northern Ireland seemed like a good idea a hundred years ago too -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: off topic- spam arrest verification request
I agree, smacks of 'Lets jump on the band wagon' approach! Marty - Original Message - From: alan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: redhat list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 2:19 PM Subject: Re: off topic- spam arrest verification request On 11 Jun 2003, Randy Perkins wrote: if you subscribe to spamarrest, just go ahead and blacklist my email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] i am not interested in supporting a process which requires me to validate my email address for every spamarrest customer that recieves my posts on this group. SpamArrest may seem good for the person using it, but it is a royal pain for everyone else. I moderate a number of announce lists and I get a bunch of these things every time I post an announcement. Think of the headaches if everyone used it. It is a solution that does not scale well, if at all. At this point, I will be adding SpamArrest messages to my spam filters. If someone is too clueless to set up a mail filter that does not require human intervention for every sender, then they just won't get my messages. Besides... I expect the fake spammer address collection bot version any day now. (Who still trusts click here links in unsolicited e-mail these days?) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Re: Anyone try Webmin?
I agree, More people should look at how webmin 'the tool' is built and understand that it is component based. A very good idea for creating framework products. So not just a great tool, but a well thought out tool. I'm currently involved in coding different sql procedures through mod_perl and apache, and yes I agree learning your command line stuff reaps rewards, but also using webmin shaves off great chunks of my time when looking at different database tables and db user permissions especially. So I hardly touch most of the rest of webmin, but just one single component really saves me time. Can't praise the thing enough - well I guess I probably have:-) Marty - Original Message - From: Nick White [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 4:02 PM Subject: RE: Anyone try Webmin? Webmin is da bomb. We too have been using it in linuxconf's stead. It cuts a lot of time out of learning every service's configuration file syntax and options. -Original Message- From: David Cary Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Anyone try Webmin? http://www.webmin.com I have been experimenting with this for remote administration but it works great locally as well. This should be a real plus for someone new to Linux. The Postfix module is excellent as well. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
bugbear
Is bugbear doing the rounds again? I'm getting several messages from people on this list with bugbear attached? Marty -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
auto mounting samba drive
All, I'm having a mare. My query fits into 2 parts. 1) I can't get a samba drive with the following /etc/fstab line to mount at boot //windows/share /home/mountpoint/ smbfs uid=xx,gid=gg,dmask=0555,fmask=0555,username=,password=x xxx,ro 0 0 Once the system has booted I can issue a mount -a and everything mounts fine... 2) I can't find debugging information in any logfiles, what should I setup in /etc/syslog.conf I have a *.debug -/var/log/messages in my syslog.conf Regards Marty -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
